Devin FoleyandPaperclip 6681c71b40 fix(ci): stabilize chat startup and close the initial live-update gap (#13895)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Browser tests check chat state across navigation, reload, and agent
runs.
> - Runtime tests check that a service is ready before Paperclip
publishes its address.
> - CI for #13891 failed in these paths, then passed attempt 3 with the
same code.
> - The browser traces stopped during development asset startup. A
separate sidebar assertion used an unstable focus path through the rich
editor.
> - This PR gives browser tests fresh built assets and a direct keyboard
path to the star button. It adds service-worker reload coverage under
CPU throttling.
> - A later browser failure exposed a real reload race: comments can
change between the first query and the first live subscription. The UI
now refreshes active queries when that subscription opens.
> - Runtime fixtures now have separate registry state and better failure
evidence. The readiness deadline remains unchanged.
> - A later CI run exposed a wall-clock backoff assertion and three
authorization cases sharing one test lifecycle. The PR anchors the
assertion to transport time and separates the cases.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13891. Related runtime ownership and cleanup work: #11791, #11389,
#11278.

Evidence: [original CI run, attempt
3](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35910335089/attempts/3).
Attempt 3 passed both affected shards without code changes. This PR is
separate from the wake-payload change, which has since merged.

| Failure | Diagnosis and classification |
| --- | --- |
| Sidebar blank page and retry text missing after reload in CI | Both
traces show a blank document before React startup. Vite connects, but
the failing page makes no application API requests. The service worker
forwards the unbundled development module graph. The retry response is
already stored and its process-adapter run succeeded before reload. This
places the failure in browser bootstrap, not wake payload or reply
persistence. The exact reason the development module graph stopped is
not established by the retained trace. The harness now serves built
assets, and the new test covers startup and controlled reload at 4x CPU
throttling. |
| Star opacity remains zero on macOS | Reproduced on unchanged master
`f55759942b`. The old test clicked the rich editor, focused the star,
then used Tab and Shift+Tab. An instrumented baseline run captured the
sequence: Tab moved from the star to the next sidebar link, then the
editor bundle called `focus()` on its contenteditable before Shift+Tab.
That key reached the composer, where it is a work-mode shortcut. This
confirms a pending editor selection update stole focus; it was not the
browser skipping sidebar buttons. The assertion did not prove the star
retained focus. The test now moves the pointer away, focuses the
preceding sidebar link, presses Tab once, and asserts both actual focus
and opacity. This is test synchronization and keyboard traversal, not a
demonstrated CSS defect. |
| Runtime readiness exceeds 10 seconds | The old error only says `fetch
failed`. There is no child startup output in that failure, so it cannot
distinguish slow process startup from a refused or stalled probe. It
passed unchanged locally and took 3.416 seconds in attempt 3. Resource
contention is plausible but unproved. This PR does not claim a proven
historical runtime root cause: it isolates fixture registry/log files,
checks ports before spawn and after stop, checks live backends at
publication, and preserves transport errors, probe count, elapsed time,
and fixture startup timestamps for the next occurrence. |
| Later CI: recovery reply disappears after reload | Product
synchronization bug, distinct from the blank-page bootstrap failure.
Reproduced locally with a trace: the comments request started at
`21:56:07.443`, the server saved the reply at `.520`, and the first live
subscription started at `.541`. The reload fetched a successful run and
its complete log, but missed the comment event. The provider refreshed
after reconnects only. It now refreshes active queries on the first
connection too. A deterministic regression test fails before the fix. No
browser assertion was changed. |
| Later CI: Slack backoff and authorization tests | The 30-second
backoff assertion required more than 25 seconds to remain when it read
the saved action. CI spent 10.311 seconds in the test, exceeding that
five-second allowance. A local six-second read delay reproduces the
failure; the new transport-anchored lower and upper bounds pass the same
fault injection. The neighbouring authorization test ran three
independent fixtures in one test and timed out at 15 seconds. Each case
now has its own fixture cleanup and the normal per-test deadline, so
earlier cases do not remain active during later global worker sweeps. No
specific production slow call was established. |
| Self-hosted runner loses communication or shuts down | The original
lost-communication failure has no assertion. On final-head [attempt
1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/attempts/1),
Build, Runner Vitest 1/2, and chat 2/3 ran on three separate fleet
instances. All received a runner shutdown signal at `22:04:55 UTC`,
within 35 milliseconds, then cancellation. Server shard 6/12 received
the same shutdown signal one minute later. All four were Spot
`m7i-flex.xlarge` instances in `us-east-1a`. No test assertion or build
error preceded those stops. This is infrastructure interruption; the
reason the fleet stopped the runners is not available in job logs. |

## What Changed

- Build the browser fixture UI into the static server's preferred
directory, `server/ui-dist`, and disable Vite middleware. Ignore these
generated assets. Start the source CLI directly from the repository
root, as required by the CLI invocation safety contract.
- Keep all existing chat assertions. Add first takeover and three
service-worker-controlled reloads under CPU throttling. Assert that the
page uses built module assets and that opening it creates no chat task.
- Use forward keyboard traversal from the Zeta link to its star. Check
focus before checking the reveal style.
- Give each runtime exposure test a temporary Paperclip home and restore
environment state after process cleanup.
- Check that reserved ports are free before spawn, serve the fixture
response before exposure, and become free after stop.
- Include the nested fetch error, probe count, and elapsed time in
readiness failures. Add a unit test for this diagnostic contract.
- Refresh active queries when the first live connection opens, covering
events missed during initial page loading. Keep reconnect toast
suppression unchanged.
- Measure Slack retry timing from the transport attempt and recovery
completion. This checks the full provider-requested delay without
spending a small wall-clock allowance on unrelated processing.
- Run each Slack authorization-revocation scenario as a separate test,
with cleanup between cases. All assertions remain.
- Document the browser fixture's build and serving mode. No configured
assertion deadline, readiness deadline, retry count, or skip was added.

## Verification

- Final-head [Linux CI, attempt
2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/attempts/2):
**green**. All 52 check runs passed; two conditional checks were
skipped. The legacy Snyk status also passed. No pending or failed checks
remain.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed.
- `pnpm build` passed again after the final UI fix.
- Focused runtime suites: 38 passed, 3 existing platform skips.
- CLI invocation safety suite: 39 passed.
- Slack timing negative control: inserting a six-second delay before
reading the saved action fails the old assertion. All four revised
authorization/backoff cases pass with that same delay. The diagnostic
delay is not committed.
- Live update suites: 92 passed, including the new regression. UI
typecheck and token gates passed.
- Recovery browser negative control: the unchanged tests reproduced the
missing reply (1 failed, 9 passed). After the first-connection fix, all
six recovery paths passed twice (12 passed). Browser assertions and
deadlines are unchanged.
- Server typecheck passed after the Slack test adjustment.
- `GITHUB_WORKFLOW=PR pnpm test:run:general -- --group general-chat
--shard-index 0 --shard-count 3`: 342 passed. The other 682 tests belong
to the remaining shards; collection verified exact coverage.
- Final direct-source CLI launch: all five chat session tests passed.
- `PAPERCLIP_E2E_PORT=32993 PAPERCLIP_PLAYWRIGHT_CHANNEL=chrome pnpm
exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts
tests/e2e/agent-chat-sessions.spec.ts --repeat-each=3`: 15 passed,
including nine controlled reloads at 4x CPU throttling.
- `GITHUB_WORKFLOW=PR pnpm test:run:general -- --group
general-server-without-chat --shard-index 10 --shard-count 12`: 55 files
passed, 867 tests passed, 21 existing skips. An earlier run could not
initialize PostgreSQL because this Mac exhausted its System V
shared-memory slots. After reclaiming the orphaned segment from this
task's stopped browser server, the full shard passed.
- On final commit `1f1fafc08d`, [browser
4/8](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/job/107400837947)
passed all 16 tests; [browser
8/8](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/job/107400838155)
passed all 23 tests; [server
11/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/job/107400838328)
passed 887 tests with one existing skip. The readiness lifecycle case
took 1.842 seconds. Chat 1/3 also passed. All four jobs interrupted by
runner shutdowns passed unchanged on their single rerun.
- Greptile reviewed `1f1fafc08d`: **5/5**, with no unresolved comments.
- Full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after confirming
failures outside this patch: a sibling `skills` directory shadows
bundled Slack/AgentMail skills; macOS rejects rename of read-only
skill-cache directories (`EACCES`, also reproduced in an isolated
filesystem probe); and the host exhausts PostgreSQL System V
shared-memory slots. Focused reruns confirmed these limits. The complete
Linux CI run is the repository-wide verification; the full local run is
not green.
- Baseline evidence: the original sidebar test failed on unchanged
master; a development-mode run at 4x CPU throttling passed six selected
cases, so CPU pressure alone did not reproduce the CI bootstrap stall.

## Risks

- Default browser tests now exercise the shipped static UI. They no
longer implicitly cover Vite middleware or HMR; use the development
server for those checks.
- The new browser startup test uses Chromium CDP, matching the only
configured browser project.
- Opening a live subscription now causes one active-query refresh to
close the initial event gap. This adds startup API reads but no
recurring poll.
- Runtime behavior and deadlines are unchanged except for error details.
The historical readiness stall remains unconfirmed; a green rerun alone
cannot establish its cause.
- Local verification runs on macOS. The runtime lifecycle checks also
passed on Linux CI.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The session identifies the model family as
GPT-6; an exact served model ID and context window size are not exposed.
Used reasoning, repository inspection, shell tools, code editing, and
test execution. No subagents were used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#123` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — targeted suites passed;
full local host limits are listed above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-23 15:22:21 -07:00
…

Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord · Twitter · Website

MIT License Stars Star History Rank Discord



Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Open-source orchestration for teams of AI agents.

If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.

Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track work and costs from one dashboard.

It looks like a task manager. Under the hood: org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.

Manage business goals, not pull requests.

Step Example
01 Define the goal "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR."
02 Hire the team CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider.
03 Approve and run Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard.

Works
with
OpenClaw
OpenClaw
Claude
Claude Code
Codex
Codex
Cursor
Cursor
Bash
Bash
HTTP
HTTP

If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.


Paperclip is right for you if

  • ✅ You want to build autonomous AI organizations
  • ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
  • ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
  • ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
  • ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
  • ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
  • ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone

The four pillars

Four things have to work for an organization of AI agents to actually produce: the tasks, the org, the training, and the infrastructure. Paperclip is built around exactly those four pillars.

The four pillars of Paperclip
Pillar Built for What it covers
Agentic Task Manager — Declare intent. Agents work. You verify the output. Everyone, daily Tasks, approvals & review gates · proactive agent coworkers · auditable routines & workflows · verify from diffs, screenshots & tests
Org Chart for Agents — Roles, permissions & boundaries for humans and agents. Managers Mixed human + agent org chart · responsibilities, delegation, specialization · governance: who can do what · scoped secrets & company boundaries
Agent Employee Training — Design, train & evaluate your AI employees. Enablers Skill Studio & shared org-wide skills · evals & saved test runs · active learning loops & quality metrics · performance reviews for agents
Agentic OS — The infrastructure that makes the work run. IT & platform Cross-provider runtime: any model, any agent · sandboxing, integrations & MCP servers · SSO, GRC, RBAC & cost controls · data privacy, internal trace collection, compounding data value

Features

🔌 Bring Your Own Agent

Any agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

🎯 Goal Alignment

Every task traces back to the organization mission. Agents know what to do and why.

💓 Heartbeats

Agents wake on a schedule, check work, and act. Delegation flows up and down the org chart.

💰 Cost Control

Monthly budgets per agent. When they hit the limit, they stop. No runaway costs.

🏢 Multi-Organization

One deployment, many organizations. Complete data isolation. One control plane for your portfolio.

🎫 Ticket System

Every conversation traced. Every decision explained. Full tool-call tracing and immutable audit log.

🛡️ Governance

Approve hires, override strategy, pause or terminate any agent — at any time.

📊 Org Chart

Hierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description.

📱 Mobile Ready

Monitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere.

Problems Paperclip solves

Without Paperclip With Paperclip
❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots.
❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why.
❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts.
❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. ✅ Cost tracking surfaces token budgets and throttles agents when they're out. Management prioritizes with budgets.
❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. ✅ Heartbeats handle regular work on a schedule. Management supervises.
❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work.

Why Paperclip is special

Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.

Atomic execution. Task checkout and budget enforcement are atomic, so no double-work and no runaway spend.
Persistent agent state. Agents resume the same task context across heartbeats instead of restarting from scratch.
Runtime skill injection. Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining.
Governance with rollback. Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely.
Goal-aware execution. Tasks carry full goal ancestry so agents consistently see the "why," not just a title.
Portable company templates. Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling.
True multi-organization isolation. Every entity is company-scoped, so one deployment can run many companies with separate data and audit trails.

What's Under the Hood

Paperclip is a full control plane, not a wrapper. Before you build any of this yourself, know that it already exists:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                       PAPERCLIP SERVER                       │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │Identity & │  │  Work &   │  │ Heartbeat │  │Governance │  │
│  │  Access   │  │   Tasks   │  │ Execution │  │& Approvals│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Org Chart │  │Workspaces │  │  Plugins  │  │  Budget   │  │
│  │ & Agents  │  │ & Runtime │  │           │  │ & Costs   │  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Routines  │  │ Secrets & │  │ Activity  │  │  Company  │  │
│  │& Schedules│  │  Storage  │  │ & Events  │  │Portability│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
         ▲              ▲              ▲              ▲
   ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐
   │  Claude   │  │   Codex   │  │   CLI     │  │ HTTP/web  │
   │   Code    │  │           │  │  agents   │  │   bots    │
   └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘

The Systems

Identity & Access — Two deployment modes (trusted local or authenticated), board users, agent API keys, short-lived run JWTs, company memberships, invite flows, and OpenClaw onboarding. Every mutating request is traced to an actor.

Org Chart & Agents — Agents have roles, titles, reporting lines, permissions, and budgets. Adapter examples match the diagram: Claude Code, Codex, CLI agents such as Cursor/Gemini/bash, HTTP/webhook bots such as OpenClaw, and external adapter plugins. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

Work & Task System — Issues carry company/project/goal/parent links, atomic checkout with execution locks, first-class blocker dependencies, comments, documents, attachments, work products, labels, and inbox state. No double-work, no lost context.

Heartbeat Execution — DB-backed wakeup queue with coalescing, budget checks, workspace resolution, secret injection, skill loading, and adapter invocation. Runs produce structured logs, cost events, session state, and audit trails. Recovery handles orphaned runs automatically.

Workspaces & Runtime — Project workspaces, isolated execution workspaces (git worktrees, operator branches), and runtime services (dev servers, preview URLs). Agents work in the right directory with the right context every time.

Governance & Approvals — Board approval workflows, execution policies with review/approval stages, decision tracking, budget hard-stops, agent pause/resume/terminate, and full audit logging. Nothing ships without your sign-off.

Budget & Cost Control — Token and cost tracking by company, agent, project, goal, issue, provider, and model. Scoped budget policies with warning thresholds and hard stops. Overspend pauses agents and cancels queued work automatically.

Routines & Schedules — Recurring tasks with cron, webhook, and API triggers. Concurrency and catch-up policies. Each routine execution creates a tracked issue and wakes the assigned agent — no manual kick-offs needed.

Plugins — Instance-wide plugin system with out-of-process workers, capability-gated host services, job scheduling, tool exposure, and UI contributions. Extend Paperclip without forking it.

Secrets & Storage — Instance and company secrets, encrypted local storage, provider-backed object storage, attachments, and work products. Sensitive values stay out of prompts unless a scoped run explicitly needs them.

Activity & Events — Mutating actions, heartbeat state changes, cost events, approvals, comments, and work products are recorded as durable activity so operators can audit what happened and why.

Company Portability — Export and import entire organizations — agents, skills, projects, routines, and issues — with secret scrubbing and collision handling. One deployment, many companies, complete data isolation.


What Paperclip is not

Not a chatbot. Agents have jobs, not chat windows.
Not an agent framework. We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them.
Not a workflow builder. No drag-and-drop pipelines. Paperclip models companies — with org charts, goals, budgets, and governance.
Not a prompt manager. Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in.
Not a single-agent tool. This is for teams. If you have one agent, you probably don't need Paperclip. If you have twenty — you definitely do.
Not a code review tool. Paperclip orchestrates work, not pull requests. Bring your own review process.

Quickstart

Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required.

curl -fsSLO https://paperclip.ing/install.sh
curl -fsSLO https://paperclip.ing/install.sh.sha256
if command -v sha256sum >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  sha256sum -c install.sh.sha256
else
  shasum -a 256 -c install.sh.sha256
fi
bash install.sh

The installer ensures Node.js 24.11 or newer is available, installs a managed Paperclip CLI under ~/.paperclip/cli, and starts interactive onboarding. It can also install Paperclip as a background service on supported Linux and macOS systems. The checksum detects transfer or publishing mistakes, but it is served from the same origin as the script; use a release-tag or commit-pinned GitHub copy when you need an independently hosted source.

For a non-interactive managed install:

curl -fsSL https://paperclip.ing/install.sh | bash -s -- --no-prompt --no-onboard
paperclipai onboard --yes

The piped form requires supported Node.js, npm, and npx to already be present. If Node.js bootstrap is required, download and review install.sh before running it so no privileged dependency-install command is accepted through a pipe.

To try Paperclip without installing anything permanently:

npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai onboard --yes

For an isolated manual test instance that is already initialized with a CEO agent, use test-drive. It stays in the foreground, never installs a service or creates a first task, and opens the browser only after setup succeeds:

ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive
OPENAI_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive --harness codex
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive \
  --harness opencode \
  --model openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Each run without --data-dir gets a unique, retained temporary directory; its absolute path is printed at startup. Pass --data-dir to reuse one, or --no-browser to leave the initialized instance unopened. When invoked from a linked Git worktree, test-drive also enables task execution in that worktree. See doc/CLI.md for credential and reuse behavior.

Troubleshooting: private npm registry .npmrc

If this fails with an E404 for paperclipai (or similar) and you use a private npm registry (for example GitHub Packages) via a global ~/.npmrc, npx may be resolving paperclipai against that private registry instead of the public npm registry.

Diagnostic:

npm config get registry

Workaround (cross-platform; force the public npm registry for this command):

npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai onboard --yes

That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:

paperclipai onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
paperclipai onboard --yes --bind tailnet

If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use paperclipai configure to edit settings.

See doc/INSTALLING.md for pinned versions, canary and git-ref installs, updates, rollback, service management, and uninstalling.

Or manually:

git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev

This starts the API server at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.

Requirements: Node.js 24.11+, pnpm 9.15+


FAQ

What does a typical setup look like? Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.

If you're a solo entrepreneur you can use Tailscale to access Paperclip on the go. Then later you can deploy to e.g. Vercel when you need it.

Can I run multiple companies? Yes. A single deployment can run an unlimited number of companies with complete data isolation.

How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code? Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.

Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello? Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.

(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)

Do agents run continuously? By default, agents run on scheduled heartbeats and event-based triggers (task assignment, @-mentions). You can also hook in continuous agents like OpenClaw. You bring your agent and Paperclip coordinates.


Development

pnpm dev              # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once         # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server       # Server only
pnpm dev:mobile       # Serve prebuilt UI on :3101 for phones/tablets (proxies /api → :3100)
pnpm dev:both         # Run `pnpm dev` and `pnpm dev:mobile` together
pnpm build            # Build all
pnpm typecheck        # Type checking
pnpm test             # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch       # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e         # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate      # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate       # Apply migrations

pnpm test does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.

See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.


Roadmap

  • ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
  • ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
  • ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
  • ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
  • ✅ Skills Manager, Skill Studio & Skills Store
  • ✅ Scheduled Routines
  • ✅ Better Budgeting
  • ✅ Agent Reviews and Approvals
  • ✅ Multiple Human Users
  • ✅ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e2b, Cloudflare, Daytona, Modal, Novita, self-hosted Kubernetes)
  • ✅ Artifacts & Work Products
  • ✅ Deep Planning (planning mode, revisioned plans, plan approvals)
  • ✅ Enforced Outcomes (watchdogs, recovery actions, review gates)
  • ✅ MCP Tool Gateway & Apps (governed tool access)
  • ✅ Secrets Manager with per-agent access
  • ✅ Activity log & action attribution
  • ✅ Self-healing runs & automatic recovery
  • ✅ Agent evals & feedback
  • ⚪ Memory / Knowledge
  • ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
  • ⚪ Work Queues
  • ⚪ Self-Organization
  • ⚪ Automatic Organizational Learning
  • ⚪ CEO Chat
  • 🟡 Cloud deployments (multi-tenant isolation & company Import/Export shipped)
  • ⚪ Desktop App
  • ⚪ Bring-your-own-ticket-system (Asana / Linear / Jira as on-ramps)
  • ⚪ Connected Apps (one-click integrations, e.g. Vercel)

This is the short roadmap preview. See the full roadmap in ROADMAP.md.


Community & Plugins

Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip

Observability

Paperclip ships with opt-in OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation for the server (traces only). It activates when OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set and supports grpc, http/protobuf, and http/json via the standard OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL env var. @opentelemetry/api is a normal server dependency; the SDK, auto-instrumentation, and exporter packages are optional peer dependencies — install them only if you want tracing. See doc/observability.md for install commands and the full env-var reference.

Paperclip also ships with opt-in Sentry error monitoring for the server and the browser. Set SENTRY_DSN_FRONTEND to activate it for the browser and SENTRY_DSN_BACKEND to activate it for the server — each variable is optional, and the legacy SENTRY_DSN variable still works as a fallback for either component. The supported server SDK version is @sentry/node@10.71.0; it is an optional peer dependency for the server, so install it only if you want error monitoring. The browser SDK, @sentry/browser, is pinned to the same exact version. See doc/observability.md for the install command, the privacy settings, and the full default capture set.

Telemetry

Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.

Contributors changing emitted telemetry events should follow the Telemetry Data Contract. For proposed first-party events that are not in the generated contract yet, follow Telemetry Workflow.

Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:

Method How
Environment variable PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1
Standard convention DO_NOT_TRACK=1
CI environments Automatically disabled when CI=true
Config file Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config

Contributing

We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.


Community


License

MIT © 2026 Paperclip Labs, Inc

Star History

Star History Chart

Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to get work done, not babysit agents.

S
Description
GitHub Trending: paperclipai/paperclip
Readme MIT
3.9 GiB
Languages
TypeScript 93.2%
Rust 3.1%
JavaScript 2.6%
Shell 0.5%
CSS 0.4%