Ray d1a4477c29 chat(protocol="chat_completions") and the compat note on chat_completions() (#493)
* chat(protocol="chat_completions") and the compat note on chat_completions()

chat() gains the third protocol value: the answer lane's own engine
with its Chat Completions envelope kept (chunk dicts when streaming,
instructions as a leading system row). It is the one protocol the
managed cloud chat serves, so that lane opens without a chat model;
the own-model knobs still refuse there.

chat_completions() stays, unchanged in signature, with a docstring
that marks it as kept for existing code and points new code at
chat(). Error strings that steered callers to it now name the protocol
lane; the cookbook's two cells use chat().

The managed endpoint takes extra_body as its own request fields
(temperature, enable_citations), merged last under the skeleton
refusal, so new code reaches them without the old door.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015b7YGZ8LvYp2Q3oGNN8Lfc

* Review fixes: type and document the chat_completions protocol value

The protocol overloads name "chat_completions" so the literal narrows
to the envelope dict and the chunk-dict iterator; the protocol arg doc
lists it and notes the managed chat serves it; the show_process texts
no longer promise a transcript the Chat Completions lane has none of.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015b7YGZ8LvYp2Q3oGNN8Lfc

* Review fixes: name the lanes in error text, finish the chat() steer sweep

- _split_chat_messages rejected tool rows and structured content with
  "use chat(protocol=...)", which is the lane the caller just used now
  that chat_completions is a protocol value; name responses / messages.
- submit_query / get_retrieval still steered to chat_completions(), the
  door this branch demotes to compat; steer to chat() like the rest.
- Three docstring claims narrowed to where they hold: the compat note's
  "everything is chat(protocol=...)" excepts the text-only stream (that
  is chat(stream=True, show_process=False)); system rows join the
  managed prompt only with your own chat model, the managed endpoint
  forwards them verbatim; extra_body is verbatim on Responses, Messages
  and the managed endpoint, while own-model chat_completions splits it
  like the answer lane.
- Tests: drop the warnings guard around a deprecation that does not
  exist and the comments restating assertions; the managed-lane
  skeleton test now calls the lane it is named for.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014bdfnYbWsejWhuphPt1aSv

* Fix managed chat stream overrides in extra_body

* Clarify chat completions protocol parameter documentation

* chat(): keyword-only after messages, type the protocol value

chat(messages, doc_id, stream, ...) and chat_completions(messages, stream,
doc_id, ...) disagree on positions 2 and 3, and the compat note now tells
existing callers the two are interchangeable. A positional rewrite bound
doc_id=True and stream="pi-1": an unscoped answer, billed, no error. From
messages on, chat() takes keyword arguments only, so that rewrite is a
TypeError. Nothing in the repo passed chat() a positional after messages.

BREAKING: chat(messages, doc_id) and chat(messages, doc_id, stream) by
position no longer bind; spell doc_id= and stream=.

Also: the implementation and catch-all overload now carry the same
Literal as the protocol overloads, so a misspelt protocol fails
type-checking instead of only at runtime; _refuse_skeleton names the
managed lane's door (a system row), since instructions= is refused there;
_require_own_chat's comment no longer claims to be the gate for every
protocol.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DCBitejpuoNpD8cmQ9HR7j

* fix: prevent managed chat extras from overriding document scope

* extra_body: one gate for every lane, before any I/O

The managed endpoint's refusals of stream and doc_id sat in
cloud_api.chat_completions, one call site of four. The other lanes
took the same keys and broke worse: an own-model OpenAI backend sent
stream:false under an SSE parser and returned an empty answer, and
LiteLLM raised a bare KeyError. The merge had no Mapping check
either, so a list splatted into the payload as fabricated fields.

_refuse_skeleton now owns all of it: a non-dict is refused, and
stream / doc_id join the refused keys beside the skeleton. chat()
and chat_completions() call it first, so the own-model half no
longer runs doc targeting and the MCP initialize fetch before
refusing. cloud_api is a plain transport again.

The skeleton remedy no longer splits by client type. A system row
works on every chat-shaped lane and instructions= becomes one, so
the two labels were inverted for chat_completions() callers.
Managed chat(instructions=) opens when #497 lands.

Tests: non-dicts and the argument keys at the gate, both public
doors refusing before any lane is entered, a foreign managed key
pinned as forwarded. The keyword-only test builds its client outside
pytest.raises and matches the positional message.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RTqXsk6Y3iGn9iXZHrzpv6
2026-09-10 19:37:29 +08:00
2026-03-27 03:30:13 +08:00
2026-08-31 02:41:09 +01:00
2026-09-02 11:07:06 +01:00
2025-04-01 18:54:08 +08:00
2026-09-10 11:30:22 +01:00

pi_github_banner_low

VectifyAI%2FPageIndex | Trendshift

PageIndex: Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG

Reasoning-based RAG  ◦  No Vector DB, No Chunking  ◦  Context-Aware Retrieval  ◦  Reads Like a Human

🌐 Website  •   ☁️ Cloud  •   📖 Docs  •   📝 Blog  •   ✉️ Contact 

Updates

  • [Aug '26] 🔥 PageIndex SDK: pip install -U pageindex now ships local mode: index, retrieve, and chat entirely on your machine with your own LLM key, or point the same client at PageIndex Cloud with an API key.
  • [Aug '26] ⚡ PageIndex Flash: fast tree index generation for text-based PDFs, now the default indexing method in PageIndex SDK local mode.
  • Scale PageIndex to Millions of Documents: PageIndex File System is a file-level tree indexing layer that lets PageIndex reason over an entire corpus, not just a single document.
  • PageIndex App: a human-like document analysis agent for long professional documents.

What is PageIndex?

Are you frustrated with vector database retrieval accuracy for long and complex documents? Vector-based RAG retrieves by semantic similarity. But similarity ≠ relevance — what retrieval actually needs is relevance, and relevance requires reasoning. On professional documents that demand contextual understanding, domain expertise, and multi-step reasoning, similarity search misses what is relevant but not similar, and returns what is similar but not relevant.

Inspired by AlphaGo, PageIndex replaces the vector index with a hierarchical tree index and lets an LLM reason its way through it, the way a human expert turns to and reads the right section of a long report. Retrieval happens in two steps:

  1. Index: generate a tree-structure index for each document
  2. Retrieve: agentically search that tree with LLM reasoning

TL;DR

PageIndex is a vectorless, reasoning-based RAG engine that mirrors how humans read, delivering traceable, explainable, and context-aware retrieval, with no vector DBs or chunking.

Compare with Vector RAG

Vector RAG PageIndex
Index vector index tree index
Retrieval semantic similarity search LLM reasoning over the tree
Result opaque, “vibe retrieval” traceable to explicit references
Context query embedding only full context: conversation history, domain knowledge, etc.

It is ideal for financial reports, legal documents, regulatory filings, technical manuals, medical literature, academic textbooks, and any other long, complex professional document.

Quickstart

pip install -U pageindex
import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient

os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"

client = PageIndexClient(
    index="gpt-5.6-luna",               # model to build the tree index
    chat="gpt-5.6-sol",                 # model to search the tree
)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf")["doc_id"]

answer = client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin?", doc_id=doc_id)
print(answer)

Model Recommendations

  • index=: a basic model is sufficient. The tree structure itself is extracted from the document layout without an LLM; the index model only summarizes and refines it, which a basic model does well.
  • chat=: use the best model you can afford. The chat model searches the tree to retrieve information. See Query cost and accuracy.

Use PageIndex through the SDK client →

Configure other models, streaming, multi-document search, citations, and more.

Integrate PageIndex with your own agent →

Drop PageIndex tools into the OpenAI Agents SDK, the Claude Agent SDK, or any other framework.

Benchmarks

Local indexing cost and time

Building a tree locally runs about $0.001 per page with gpt-5.6-luna as the index model, so a 1,000-page textbook costs a little over a dollar and a few minutes, once, and every later question reuses it. PageIndex is designed not to rely heavily on the model used at index time, so in our experiments a basic model does not hurt quality.

Indexing cost against document length, log-log, for nine PDFs from 9 to 1,098 pages. Points track a $0.0011-per-page reference line; the spread around it is text density, not length.

Indexing time also scales predictably with document length. In the same local setup, the benchmark documents (9 to 1,098 pages) finished in roughly 13 seconds to 4.5 minutes.

Indexing time against document length, log-log, for nine PDFs from 9 to 1,098 pages. The measured indexing times range from about 13 seconds to 4.5 minutes and increase predictably with document length.

Query cost and accuracy

PageIndex-OSS-Benchmark measures exactly the setup in the quickstart above (PageIndexClient() in local mode, flash indexing, no OCR) on 62 lookup questions over 34 PDFs (1,945 pages) drawn from MMLongBench-Doc-V2. Every question's answer is a fact stated in running text, so a wrong answer is a retrieval or reading failure, not a reasoning one.

Accuracy against average cost per question. Each model forms a near-vertical reasoning-effort ladder; moving between models costs an order of magnitude a step.

Full results, data, and the runner are in the benchmark repo.

Cost per query vs. native PDF input

The alternative to retrieval is handing the model the whole PDF on every question. That cost grows with the document; PageIndex's does not, because it reads only the nodes its reasoning reaches. On documents where both routes return the same answer, native PDF input costs 2.1× more at 52 pages and 16.6× more at 420 (gpt-5.6-sol, prompt caching excluded) — and at 805 pages the document no longer fits in the context window at all.

Cost per query relative to PageIndex retrieval, for five PDFs from 52 to 805 pages. Passing the PDF natively costs 2.1x, 3.4x, 7.8x, and 16.6x more at 52, 85, 198, and 420 pages; at 805 pages it exceeds the model's context window.

Leading accuracy on FinanceBench

PageIndex reached a state-of-the-art 98.7% accuracy on FinanceBench (financial document QA benchmark), vastly outperforming vector-based RAG.

Explore the full FinanceBench evaluation results and the blog post.

PageIndex Cloud

The open-source version is ideal for text-heavy PDFs and local workflows. With PageIndex Cloud, document indexing and storage run in the cloud: PageIndex handles parsing, OCR, image understanding, tree-index construction, and managed storage for you. The chat and retrieval layer remains compatible with your model, so you can search the cloud-hosted index using the model provider your application already uses.

Moving indexing and storage from Local to Cloud only requires a PageIndex API key:

import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient

os.environ["PAGEINDEX_API_KEY"] = "your-pageindex-key"
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"

client = PageIndexClient(
    index="cloud",                       # build and store the index in PageIndex Cloud
    chat="gpt-5.6-sol",                  # use your preferred compatible model for chat
)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf", wait=True)["doc_id"]
print(client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin?", doc_id=doc_id))
Capability Local (this repo) Cloud (get an API key)
Best for text-heavy PDFs and local workflows scanned, image-heavy, and large document collections
Indexing runs locally runs in PageIndex Cloud, with production OCR and image understanding
Storage local managed in PageIndex Cloud
Chat model your model your model, or the managed chat included with your key
Citations page-level line-level
Image understanding — ✅
Multi-document scale manual PageIndex File System
MCP server — ✅

More About PageIndex Cloud

Ready to Try It?

For dedicated deployment (VPC or on-premises), contact us or book a demo.


⭐ Support Us

Leave us a star 🌟 if you like our project. Thank you!

Please cite this work as:

Mingtian Zhang, Yu Tang and PageIndex Team,
"PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG",
PageIndex Blog, Sep 2025.
Or use the BibTeX citation.
@article{zhang2025pageindex,
  author = {Mingtian Zhang and Yu Tang and PageIndex Team},
  title = {PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG},
  journal = {PageIndex Blog},
  year = {2025},
  month = {September},
  note = {https://pageindex.ai/blog/pageindex-intro},
}

© 2026 PageIndex AI

pageindex-wordmark-animated-288-warm
Languages
Python 99.5%
JavaScript 0.4%
Shell 0.1%