Ray 5189cf2892 chat(protocol=): the protocol doors move behind the front door (#460)
* feat: chat(protocol=) — the protocol doors move behind the front door

responses() and messages() become _responses()/_messages(): the same
engines, reachable as chat(protocol="responses"|"messages") with the
protocol's own input and output shapes (transcript items / content
blocks in, the envelope or native stream out). The old names are the
vendor SDKs' own, and an agent-written client.messages(...) now fails
fast with the way in — a runtime-only __getattr__, invisible to the
type checker so attribute typos on the client still get flagged.

chat() gains the knobs that lost their public home: instructions
(appended after the managed prompt — a string on every lane, Messages
system blocks with protocol="messages"), max_turns, backend,
extra_headers, extra_body. reasoning_effort lands natively on each
lane: LiteLLM's kwarg, Responses reasoning.effort, Anthropic
output_config.effort. show_process stays the answer lane's view.

Six overloads keep the return types narrow for py.typed consumers; the
answer lane's contract is unchanged. The managed cloud chat rejects the
own-model knobs as before.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017uvMD9eatgdaupLGFUjuKM

* fix: chat(protocol=) honors extra_body thinking; honest envelope and remedies

- Messages lane: through the public door the thinking budget rides
  extra_body, so the default max_tokens lift reads it there (extra_body
  wins on the wire, so it wins in the lift); the documented
  extra_body={"thinking": ...} no longer 400s on max_tokens < budget.
- Responses lane: temperature/top_p/reasoning/max_output_tokens reach the
  wire via extra_body only; the envelope now reports what was sent instead
  of the never-set locals.
- One _require_own_chat refusal for chat(protocol=...), the doors behind
  it, and instructions. The doors' own copies had already drifted from
  chat()'s text, and every copy pointed a local client with chat_model
  blank at the managed chat it does not have; a door reached directly on
  such a client fell through to a raw AttributeError. The check is the
  one chat_completions already makes.
- Messages lane treats model="" as unset, like every other model check.
- The protocol refusal for show_process runs before the stream=True hint,
  so the first remedy offered is the right one.
- instructions="" configures nothing (no empty system row, cache key
  unchanged), matching the protocol lanes.
- Responses validation names messages, the public parameter, not input.
- Stale docstring pointer to messages() fixed.
- A protocol=None, stream: bool overload restores str | ChatStream for a
  runtime-variable stream; the catch-all had widened it to a 4-way union.
- Tests: door X refuses like chat(protocol=X) on managed and blank-local
  clients; the protocol gate and the non-stream show_process order are
  asserted by distinct messages; chat(stream=True) joins the max_turns
  matrix; each fix carries a red-verified assertion.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M9GdjnuDHHwDKqMzvPWCcj
2026-09-02 06:59:55 +08:00
2026-08-31 02:41:09 +01:00
…

pi_github_banner_low

VectifyAI%2FPageIndex | Trendshift

PageIndex: Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG

Reasoning-based RAG  ◦  No Vector DB, No Chunking  ◦  Context-Aware Retrieval  ◦  Reads Like a Human

🌐 Website  •   🖥️ Platform  •   📖 Docs  •   📝 Blog  •   ✉️ Contact 

Updates

  • [Aug '26] 🔥 PageIndex SDK: pip install -U pageindex now ships local mode: index, retrieve, and chat entirely on your machine with your own LLM key, or point the same client at PageIndex Cloud with an API key.
  • [Aug '26] ⚡ PageIndex Flash: tree structure generation from PDFs in seconds, with structure extracted heuristically from the document's own layout info instead of built by an LLM.
  • Scale PageIndex to Millions of Documents: PageIndex File System is a file-level tree indexing layer that lets PageIndex reason over an entire corpus, not just a single document.
  • PageIndex App: a human-like document analysis agent for long professional documents.

What is PageIndex?

Are you frustrated with vector database retrieval accuracy for long and complex documents? Vector-based RAG retrieves by semantic similarity. But similarity ≠ relevance — what retrieval actually needs is relevance, and relevance requires reasoning. On professional documents that demand contextual understanding, domain expertise, and multi-step reasoning, similarity search misses what is relevant but not similar, and returns what is similar but not relevant.

Inspired by AlphaGo, PageIndex replaces the vector index with a hierarchical tree index and lets an LLM reason its way through it, the way a human expert turns to and reads the right section of a long report. Retrieval happens in two steps:

  1. Index: generate a tree-structure index for each document
  2. Retrieve: agentically search that tree with LLM reasoning

TL;DR

PageIndex is a vectorless, reasoning-based RAG engine that mirrors how humans read, delivering traceable, explainable, and context-aware retrieval, with no vector DBs or chunking.

Compare with Vector RAG

Vector RAG PageIndex
Index vector index tree index
Unit fixed-size chunks natural sections
Retrieval semantic similarity search LLM reasoning over the tree
Result opaque, “vibe retrieval” traceable to explicit references
Context query embedding only full context: conversation history, domain knowledge, etc.

It is ideal for financial reports, legal documents, regulatory filings, technical manuals, medical literature, academic textbooks, and any other long, complex professional document.

Quickstart

pip install -U pageindex
import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient

os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"

client = PageIndexClient(
    index="gpt-5.6-luna",               # model to build the tree index
    chat="gpt-5.6-sol",                 # model to search the tree
)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf")["doc_id"]

answer = client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin?", doc_id=doc_id)
print(answer)

Model Recommendations

  • index=: a basic model is sufficient. The tree structure itself is extracted from the document layout without an LLM; the index model only summarizes and refines it, which a basic model does well.
  • chat=: use the best model you can afford. The chat model searches the tree to retrieve information. See Query cost and accuracy.

Use PageIndex through the SDK client →

Configure other models, streaming, multi-document search, citations, and more.

Integrate PageIndex with your own agent →

Drop PageIndex tools into the OpenAI Agents SDK, the Claude Agent SDK, or any other framework.

Benchmarks

Local indexing cost and time

Building a tree locally runs about $0.001 per page with gpt-5.6-luna as the index model, so a 1,000-page textbook costs a little over a dollar and a few minutes, once, and every later question reuses it. PageIndex is designed not to rely heavily on the model used at index time, so in our experiments a basic model does not hurt quality.

Indexing cost against document length, log-log, for nine PDFs from 9 to 1,098 pages. Points track a $0.0011-per-page reference line; the spread around it is text density, not length.

Indexing time also scales predictably with document length. In the same local setup, the benchmark documents (9 to 1,098 pages) finished in roughly 13 seconds to 4.5 minutes.

Indexing time against document length, log-log, for nine PDFs from 9 to 1,098 pages. The measured indexing times range from about 13 seconds to 4.5 minutes and increase predictably with document length.

Query cost and accuracy

PageIndex-OSS-Benchmark measures exactly the setup in the quickstart above (PageIndexClient() in local mode, flash indexing, no OCR) on 62 lookup questions over 34 PDFs (1,945 pages) drawn from MMLongBench-Doc-V2. Every question's answer is a fact stated in running text, so a wrong answer is a retrieval or reading failure, not a reasoning one.

Accuracy against average cost per question. Each model forms a near-vertical reasoning-effort ladder; moving between models costs an order of magnitude a step.

Full results, data, and the runner are in the benchmark repo.

Cost per query vs. native PDF input

The alternative to retrieval is handing the model the whole PDF on every question. That cost grows with the document; PageIndex's does not, because it reads only the nodes its reasoning reaches. On documents where both routes return the same answer, native PDF input costs 2.1× more at 52 pages and 16.6× more at 420 (gpt-5.6-sol, prompt caching excluded) — and at 805 pages the document no longer fits in the context window at all.

Cost per query relative to PageIndex retrieval, for five PDFs from 52 to 805 pages. Passing the PDF natively costs 2.1x, 3.4x, 7.8x, and 16.6x more at 52, 85, 198, and 420 pages; at 805 pages it exceeds the model's context window.

Leading accuracy on FinanceBench

PageIndex reached a state-of-the-art 98.7% accuracy on FinanceBench (financial document QA benchmark), vastly outperforming vector-based RAG.

Explore the full FinanceBench evaluation results and the blog post.

PageIndex Cloud

The open-source version is ideal for text-heavy PDFs and local workflows. With PageIndex Cloud, document indexing and storage run in the cloud: PageIndex handles parsing, OCR, image understanding, tree-index construction, and managed storage for you. The chat and retrieval layer remains compatible with your model, so you can search the cloud-hosted index using the model provider your application already uses.

Moving indexing and storage from Local to Cloud only requires a PageIndex API key:

import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient

os.environ["PAGEINDEX_API_KEY"] = "your-pageindex-key"
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"

client = PageIndexClient(
    index="cloud",                       # build and store the index in PageIndex Cloud
    chat="gpt-5.6-sol",                  # use your preferred compatible model for chat
)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf", wait=True)["doc_id"]
print(client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin?", doc_id=doc_id))
Capability Local (this repo) Cloud (get an API key)
Best for text-heavy PDFs and local workflows scanned, image-heavy, and large document collections
Indexing runs locally runs in PageIndex Cloud, with production OCR and image understanding
Storage local managed in PageIndex Cloud
Chat model your model your model, or the managed chat included with your key
Citations page-level line-level
Image understanding — ✅
Multi-document scale manual PageIndex File System
MCP server — ✅

More About PageIndex Cloud

Ready to Try It?

For dedicated deployment (VPC or on-premises), contact us or book a demo.


⭐ Support Us

Leave us a star 🌟 if you like our project. Thank you!

Please cite this work as:

Mingtian Zhang, Yu Tang and PageIndex Team,
"PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG",
PageIndex Blog, Sep 2025.
Or use the BibTeX citation.
@article{zhang2025pageindex,
  author = {Mingtian Zhang and Yu Tang and PageIndex Team},
  title = {PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG},
  journal = {PageIndex Blog},
  year = {2025},
  month = {September},
  note = {https://pageindex.ai/blog/pageindex-intro},
}

Connect with Us

Website  Twitter  LinkedIn  Discord  Book a Demo  Contact Us


© 2026 PageIndex AI

Languages
Python 99.5%
JavaScript 0.4%
Shell 0.1%