* feat: chat(protocol=) — the protocol doors move behind the front door responses() and messages() become _responses()/_messages(): the same engines, reachable as chat(protocol="responses"|"messages") with the protocol's own input and output shapes (transcript items / content blocks in, the envelope or native stream out). The old names are the vendor SDKs' own, and an agent-written client.messages(...) now fails fast with the way in — a runtime-only __getattr__, invisible to the type checker so attribute typos on the client still get flagged. chat() gains the knobs that lost their public home: instructions (appended after the managed prompt — a string on every lane, Messages system blocks with protocol="messages"), max_turns, backend, extra_headers, extra_body. reasoning_effort lands natively on each lane: LiteLLM's kwarg, Responses reasoning.effort, Anthropic output_config.effort. show_process stays the answer lane's view. Six overloads keep the return types narrow for py.typed consumers; the answer lane's contract is unchanged. The managed cloud chat rejects the own-model knobs as before. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017uvMD9eatgdaupLGFUjuKM * fix: chat(protocol=) honors extra_body thinking; honest envelope and remedies - Messages lane: through the public door the thinking budget rides extra_body, so the default max_tokens lift reads it there (extra_body wins on the wire, so it wins in the lift); the documented extra_body={"thinking": ...} no longer 400s on max_tokens < budget. - Responses lane: temperature/top_p/reasoning/max_output_tokens reach the wire via extra_body only; the envelope now reports what was sent instead of the never-set locals. - One _require_own_chat refusal for chat(protocol=...), the doors behind it, and instructions. The doors' own copies had already drifted from chat()'s text, and every copy pointed a local client with chat_model blank at the managed chat it does not have; a door reached directly on such a client fell through to a raw AttributeError. The check is the one chat_completions already makes. - Messages lane treats model="" as unset, like every other model check. - The protocol refusal for show_process runs before the stream=True hint, so the first remedy offered is the right one. - instructions="" configures nothing (no empty system row, cache key unchanged), matching the protocol lanes. - Responses validation names messages, the public parameter, not input. - Stale docstring pointer to messages() fixed. - A protocol=None, stream: bool overload restores str | ChatStream for a runtime-variable stream; the catch-all had widened it to a 4-way union. - Tests: door X refuses like chat(protocol=X) on managed and blank-local clients; the protocol gate and the non-stream show_process order are asserted by distinct messages; chat(stream=True) joins the max_turns matrix; each fix carries a red-verified assertion. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M9GdjnuDHHwDKqMzvPWCcj
PageIndex: Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG
Reasoning-based RAG ◦ No Vector DB, No Chunking ◦ Context-Aware Retrieval ◦ Reads Like a Human
🌐 Website • 🖥️ Platform • 📖 Docs • 📝 Blog • ✉️ Contact
Updates
- [Aug '26] 🔥 PageIndex SDK:
pip install -U pageindexnow ships local mode: index, retrieve, and chat entirely on your machine with your own LLM key, or point the same client at PageIndex Cloud with an API key. - [Aug '26] ⚡ PageIndex Flash: tree structure generation from PDFs in seconds, with structure extracted heuristically from the document's own layout info instead of built by an LLM.
- Scale PageIndex to Millions of Documents: PageIndex File System is a file-level tree indexing layer that lets PageIndex reason over an entire corpus, not just a single document.
- PageIndex App: a human-like document analysis agent for long professional documents.
What is PageIndex?
Are you frustrated with vector database retrieval accuracy for long and complex documents? Vector-based RAG retrieves by semantic similarity. But similarity ≠ relevance — what retrieval actually needs is relevance, and relevance requires reasoning. On professional documents that demand contextual understanding, domain expertise, and multi-step reasoning, similarity search misses what is relevant but not similar, and returns what is similar but not relevant.
Inspired by AlphaGo, PageIndex replaces the vector index with a hierarchical tree index and lets an LLM reason its way through it, the way a human expert turns to and reads the right section of a long report. Retrieval happens in two steps:
- Index: generate a tree-structure index for each document
- Retrieve: agentically search that tree with LLM reasoning
TL;DR
PageIndex is a vectorless, reasoning-based RAG engine that mirrors how humans read, delivering traceable, explainable, and context-aware retrieval, with no vector DBs or chunking.
Compare with Vector RAG
| Vector RAG | PageIndex | |
|---|---|---|
| Index | vector index | tree index |
| Unit | fixed-size chunks | natural sections |
| Retrieval | semantic similarity search | LLM reasoning over the tree |
| Result | opaque, “vibe retrieval” | traceable to explicit references |
| Context | query embedding only | full context: conversation history, domain knowledge, etc. |
It is ideal for financial reports, legal documents, regulatory filings, technical manuals, medical literature, academic textbooks, and any other long, complex professional document.
Quickstart
pip install -U pageindex
import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"
client = PageIndexClient(
index="gpt-5.6-luna", # model to build the tree index
chat="gpt-5.6-sol", # model to search the tree
)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf")["doc_id"]
answer = client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin?", doc_id=doc_id)
print(answer)
Model Recommendations
index=: a basic model is sufficient. The tree structure itself is extracted from the document layout without an LLM; the index model only summarizes and refines it, which a basic model does well.chat=: use the best model you can afford. The chat model searches the tree to retrieve information. See Query cost and accuracy.
Use PageIndex through the SDK client →
Configure other models, streaming, multi-document search, citations, and more.
Integrate PageIndex with your own agent →
Drop PageIndex tools into the OpenAI Agents SDK, the Claude Agent SDK, or any other framework.
Benchmarks
Local indexing cost and time
Building a tree locally runs about $0.001 per page with gpt-5.6-luna as the index model, so a 1,000-page textbook costs a little over a dollar and a few minutes, once, and every later question reuses it. PageIndex is designed not to rely heavily on the model used at index time, so in our experiments a basic model does not hurt quality.
Indexing time also scales predictably with document length. In the same local setup, the benchmark documents (9 to 1,098 pages) finished in roughly 13 seconds to 4.5 minutes.
Query cost and accuracy
PageIndex-OSS-Benchmark measures exactly the setup in the quickstart above (PageIndexClient() in local mode, flash indexing, no OCR) on 62 lookup questions over 34 PDFs (1,945 pages) drawn from MMLongBench-Doc-V2. Every question's answer is a fact stated in running text, so a wrong answer is a retrieval or reading failure, not a reasoning one.
Full results, data, and the runner are in the benchmark repo.
Cost per query vs. native PDF input
The alternative to retrieval is handing the model the whole PDF on every question. That cost grows with the document; PageIndex's does not, because it reads only the nodes its reasoning reaches. On documents where both routes return the same answer, native PDF input costs 2.1× more at 52 pages and 16.6× more at 420 (gpt-5.6-sol, prompt caching excluded) — and at 805 pages the document no longer fits in the context window at all.
Leading accuracy on FinanceBench
PageIndex reached a state-of-the-art 98.7% accuracy on FinanceBench (financial document QA benchmark), vastly outperforming vector-based RAG.
Explore the full FinanceBench evaluation results and the blog post.
PageIndex Cloud
The open-source version is ideal for text-heavy PDFs and local workflows. With PageIndex Cloud, document indexing and storage run in the cloud: PageIndex handles parsing, OCR, image understanding, tree-index construction, and managed storage for you. The chat and retrieval layer remains compatible with your model, so you can search the cloud-hosted index using the model provider your application already uses.
Moving indexing and storage from Local to Cloud only requires a PageIndex API key:
import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient
os.environ["PAGEINDEX_API_KEY"] = "your-pageindex-key"
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"
client = PageIndexClient(
index="cloud", # build and store the index in PageIndex Cloud
chat="gpt-5.6-sol", # use your preferred compatible model for chat
)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf", wait=True)["doc_id"]
print(client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin?", doc_id=doc_id))
| Capability | Local (this repo) | Cloud (get an API key) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | text-heavy PDFs and local workflows | scanned, image-heavy, and large document collections |
| Indexing | runs locally | runs in PageIndex Cloud, with production OCR and image understanding |
| Storage | local | managed in PageIndex Cloud |
| Chat model | your model | your model, or the managed chat included with your key |
| Citations | page-level | line-level |
| Image understanding | — | ✅ |
| Multi-document scale | manual | PageIndex File System |
| MCP server | — | ✅ |
More About PageIndex Cloud
- Scale PageIndex to Millions of Documents: PageIndex File System is a Cloud-only, file-level tree indexing layer that lets PageIndex reason over an entire corpus, not just a single document.
Ready to Try It?
- Get a PageIndex API key
- Read the PageIndex Cloud documentation
For dedicated deployment (VPC or on-premises), contact us or book a demo.
⭐ Support Us
Leave us a star 🌟 if you like our project. Thank you!
Please cite this work as:
Mingtian Zhang, Yu Tang and PageIndex Team,
"PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG",
PageIndex Blog, Sep 2025.
Or use the BibTeX citation.
@article{zhang2025pageindex,
author = {Mingtian Zhang and Yu Tang and PageIndex Team},
title = {PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG},
journal = {PageIndex Blog},
year = {2025},
month = {September},
note = {https://pageindex.ai/blog/pageindex-intro},
}
Connect with Us
© 2026 PageIndex AI



