* fix(status): name the command that resumes a change `openspec status` printed the artifact checklist and stopped. The command that moves the change forward was computed already and shipped in the JSON `nextSteps` sentence, but the text surface never rendered it, so anyone resuming a change had to know the next command by heart. Extract `resolveNextStep` so the command and the published sentence come from one place, and print it as a `Next:` line — matching the idiom `openspec new change` already uses to hand off to `openspec status`. The completion case matters most: "All planning artifacts complete!" reads as "you are done" even while implementation tasks remain, and it is now followed by the `openspec instructions apply` command that resumes the work. Closes #906 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * style(status): keep the loadStatus comment on loadStatus The store-flag note landed between the "single definition" comment and the declaration it describes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(status): cover the next-step line, and record it in the spec The behavior change shipped without the OpenSpec change this repo requires of user-facing work, and without coverage for the paths a reviewer would reasonably ask about. Adds `add-status-next-step`, whose delta modifies `Next Artifact Discovery` in `cli-artifact-workflow` - the requirement that already says status is how you learn what comes next. It now also says status names the command. Coverage added: - Unit tests for `resolveNextStep`, pinning the published `nextSteps` sentences verbatim. Confirmed byte-identical to main's output, so the split into command + sentence provably did not reword the contract. - Custom-schema case: the line is built from the resolved artifact id, so a project with neither proposal/specs/design/tasks still gets a usable command. - Skipped artifacts are never named - they satisfy dependents but must not be created. - `--json` stays parseable and carries no `Next:` line. - `--all` gives every change its own line, and a failed entry none. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(status): assert the next-step line closes the output The spec delta says the text output ends with the `Next:` line, but the assertions used toContain, which a later line would still satisfy. Compare the last non-empty line instead, across all four ready/complete cases and the skipped one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(status): read the closing line CRLF-safely Split on /\r?\n/ so a CRLF stream cannot leave a carriage return attached to the line under comparison, and route the parity check through the same helper instead of its own scan. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: move the status Next: line to the canonical CLI page docs-lab/README.md makes docs-lab/ canonical and the old docs/ tree legacy, so the entry now lives under 'openspec status' in docs-lab/reference/cli.md and docs/cli.md is back to its state on main. Both documented outputs were captured from real runs rather than written by hand: the blocked case in a change with proposal and specs, and the complete case with all four artifacts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(status): drop em dashes from the changeset and proposal Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
→ fluid not rigid
→ iterative not waterfall
→ easy not complex
→ built for brownfield not just greenfield
→ scalable from personal projects to enterprises
Tip
New workflow now available! We've rebuilt OpenSpec with a new artifact-guided workflow.
Run
/opsx:propose "your idea"to get started. → Learn more here
Follow @0xTab on X for updates · Join the OpenSpec Discord for help and questions.
See it in action
You: /opsx:explore
AI: What would you like to explore?
You: I want dark mode but I'm not sure how to do it cleanly.
AI: Let me look at your styling setup...
Cleanest path here: CSS variables + a small theme context,
with system-preference detection. No new dependencies. Scope it?
You: Yes, let's do it.
You: /opsx:propose add-dark-mode
AI: Created openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/
✓ proposal.md — why we're doing this, what's changing
✓ specs/ — requirements and scenarios
✓ design.md — technical approach
✓ tasks.md — implementation checklist
Ready for implementation!
You: /opsx:apply
AI: Implementing tasks...
✓ 1.1 Add theme context provider
✓ 1.2 Create toggle component
✓ 2.1 Add CSS variables
✓ 2.2 Wire up localStorage
All tasks complete!
You: /opsx:archive
AI: Archived to openspec/changes/archive/2025-01-23-add-dark-mode/
Specs updated. Ready for the next feature.
What do the specs actually look like?
Plain Markdown — requirements with concrete scenarios, no special syntax to learn. Here's what goes in the specs/ folder created above:
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Theme selection
The app SHALL let users switch between light and dark themes,
defaulting to the system preference.
#### Scenario: User toggles dark mode
- **WHEN** the user clicks the theme toggle
- **THEN** the app switches to dark mode and persists the choice
Your AI writes these; you review the plan before any code is written.
OpenSpec is built with OpenSpec — browse this repo's live specs and in-flight changes for real examples at scale.
Why teams adopt OpenSpec
Solo, OpenSpec keeps you and your AI honest on a single repo. On a team, the hard part moves: a feature spans the API server, the web app, and a shared library; requirements are owned by one team and consumed by others; planning starts before any code exists.
Stores are the answer — planning in a repo of its own. The same openspec/ shape you already know (specs and changes), shared by git push like anything else. One source of truth your whole team and every coding agent can read, across every repo.
- Cross-repo features — one change, one plan, even when the code lands in three repos.
- Shared requirements — a platform team owns the specs; product teams reference them read-only, right where their coding agent can read them. No drifting wiki.
- Plan before code — capture the plan in the store now; the code repos catch up later.
Stores are in beta. Start with the Stores User Guide.
Quick Start
Requires Node.js 20.19.0 or higher.
Install OpenSpec globally:
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
Then navigate to your project directory and initialize:
cd your-project
openspec init
Want your AI to do it? Paste the setup prompt into your coding assistant — it installs the CLI, runs
openspec init, and verifies the result.
Now talk to your AI:
- Not sure what to build yet? Start with
/opsx:explore, a no-stakes thinking partner that reads your code, weighs options, and shapes a plan before any code gets written. (Explore guide) - Already know what you want? Go straight to
/opsx:propose <what-you-want-to-build>.
Both are in the default profile. If you want the expanded workflow (/opsx:new, /opsx:continue, /opsx:ff, /opsx:verify, /opsx:bulk-archive, /opsx:onboard), select it with openspec config profile and apply with openspec update.
/opsx:propose is the canonical name; your tool may spell it /opsx-propose (Cursor, GitHub Copilot), @opsx-propose (Amazon Q) or $openspec-propose (Codex). openspec init prints the right form for the tools you picked — see How To Invoke.
Note
Not sure if your tool is supported? View the full list – we support 30+ tools and growing.
Also works with pnpm, yarn, bun, and nix. See installation options.
Docs
Start here: the Documentation Home maps everything. New to OpenSpec? Read Getting Started, then How Commands Work (where you actually type /opsx:propose).
→ Getting Started: first steps
→ Explore First: think it through with /opsx:explore before you commit
→ How Commands Work: where slash commands run vs the CLI
→ Core Concepts at a Glance: the whole mental model, one page
→ Examples & Recipes: real changes, start to finish
→ Workflows: combos and patterns
→ Existing Projects: adopt OpenSpec on a brownfield codebase
→ Editing a Change: update artifacts, go back, reconcile manual edits
→ Commands: slash commands & skills
→ CLI: terminal reference
→ Stores: plan in a separate repo, shared across your team (beta)
→ Supported Tools: tool integrations & install paths
→ Concepts: how it all fits
→ Multi-Language: multi-language support
→ Customization: make it yours
→ Community Showcase: projects and resources built with and for OpenSpec
→ FAQ · Troubleshooting · Glossary: quick help
Community schemas
Third-party schema bundles distributed via standalone repositories — these provide opinionated workflows that integrate OpenSpec with other tools, similar to how github/spec-kit's community extension catalog handles tool integrations.
→ Browse the catalog in the customization docs.
Why OpenSpec?
AI coding assistants are powerful but unpredictable when requirements live only in chat history. OpenSpec adds a lightweight spec layer so you agree on what to build before any code is written.
- Agree before you build — human and AI align on specs before code gets written
- Stay organized — each change gets its own folder with proposal, specs, design, and tasks
- Work fluidly — update any artifact anytime, no rigid phase gates
- Use your tools — works with 30+ AI assistants via slash commands
How we compare
vs. Spec Kit (GitHub) — Thorough but heavyweight. Rigid phase gates, lots of Markdown, Python setup. OpenSpec is lighter and lets you iterate freely.
vs. Kiro (AWS) — Powerful but you're locked into their IDE and limited to Claude models. OpenSpec works with the tools you already use.
vs. nothing — AI coding without specs means vague prompts and unpredictable results. OpenSpec brings predictability without the ceremony.
Updating OpenSpec
Upgrade the package
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
Refresh agent instructions
Run this inside each project to regenerate AI guidance and ensure the latest slash commands are active:
openspec update
Usage Notes
Model selection: OpenSpec works best with high-reasoning models. We recommend Codex 5.5 and Opus 4.7 for both planning and implementation.
Context hygiene: OpenSpec benefits from a clean context window. Clear your context before starting implementation and maintain good context hygiene throughout your session.
Contributing
Open a discussion (for core design changes) or an issue before you open a PR, and link the issue or discussion from the PR. New features, significant refactors, and architectural changes need an OpenSpec change proposal first.
→ CONTRIBUTING.md: the full process, from first issue to merged PR
Other
Telemetry
OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats.
We collect only command names and version to understand usage patterns. No arguments, paths, content, or PII. Automatically disabled in CI.
Opt-out (any one is enough):
openspec config set telemetry.enabled false(global config; unset means on)export OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0orexport DO_NOT_TRACK=1(env overrides config)
Maintainers & Advisors
See MAINTAINERS.md for the list of core maintainers and advisors who help guide the project.
License
MIT
