* feat(skills): match natural "openspec <verb>" phrasing to its workflow Users and agents say "openspec propose" / "openspec apply", but no workflow skill description contained that phrasing, so an agent hearing it had nothing to match and routinely hand-built the artifacts with the CLI instead of running the workflow. Each workflow skill's description now names the phrasings that should route to it. `openspec update` is deliberately left unclaimed: it is a real CLI command that refreshes generated files, unrelated to the update-change workflow, so that skill claims "openspec update change" instead. Descriptions are emitted as unquoted YAML plain scalars, so the new tests also pin that the generated frontmatter still parses and the description round-trips. Closes #1221 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(skills): derive the CLI-collision guard instead of hardcoding it Review found the guard codified the one exception rather than the rule, so it could never catch the next collision. It now reads every command name the CLI registers and fails on any claimed phrase that shadows one, unless the phrase is listed in DELIBERATE_CLI_PHRASE_CLAIMS with a reason. Two routing fixes fall out of stating the rule: - bulk-archive also claims "openspec archive all", so an exact-phrase match on "openspec archive" no longer pulls a multi-change request to the single-change skill. - update-change now disclaims the openspec update CLI command in prose, not only by avoiding the string. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(skills): drop the trailing clause and close the plural-archive hole Review found the "- follow this skill rather than doing the work by hand" trailer was decoration that contradicted two of the skills it was appended to: sync-specs opens "This is an agent-driven operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs", and explore says "This is a stance, not a workflow. There are no fixed steps." A description is read at selection time, so the clause could not reach the hand-building it targeted anyway; the bodies already carry that guidance. Removing it from all 12 also drops ~800 chars of identical boilerplate that made update-change's CLI redirect read as filler. Routing fixes: - bulk-archive claims the plural phrasings that do not contain "all", so "openspec archive these three changes" no longer loses to the single-change skill on the bare literal. - update-change redirects to the CLI command positively instead of negating ("run that command instead"), which routers honor far better than "not for". - apply also claims "openspec implement", the natural English verb for it, which shadows no CLI command. Corrects the recorded reason for claiming "openspec archive": the CLI command does merge delta specs (docs/cli.md:631, src/core/archive.ts:1402). The real reason is that the workflow confirms and verifies the merge before anything moves, where the bare command does it in one shot. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(quickstart): name the verb phrasing that now routes to a workflow Also rewrites the changeset to house style: links the issue, names the commands-only scope limit, and tells a reader they need `openspec update` to pick it up. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(skills): walk the real command tree instead of scanning the entrypoint Mutation testing found the collision guard was a strict subset of reality, not the superset its comment claimed. It scanned src/cli/index.ts for `.command('…')`, but seven groups — spec, config, schema, store, doctor, context, workset — are registered from their own modules, so 23 real command names were invisible. A description claiming "openspec doctor" or "openspec spec" passed 18/18 green. It now walks the commander tree from the exported `program` (importing it does not parse argv; runCli does that), and a sanity test pins the seven delegated groups so the blind spot cannot come back. Three more holes the same pass found, all confirmed by re-running the mutations that previously slipped through: - phrase extraction was case-sensitive and double-quote-only, so "Openspec update" and `openspec update` in backticks both evaded every guard. Matching is now case-insensitive and accepts either delimiter. Unquoted prose stays excluded on purpose: the update-change redirect names the CLI command in prose, and prose is not a routing trigger. - prefix shadowing was unguarded, which is the exact shape of the archive/bulk-archive tension. A shorter phrase contained in another skill's longer phrase must now be declared in DELIBERATE_PHRASE_SHADOWING. - both allowlists accepted an empty reason and never flagged stale entries. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(skills): let the CLI-collision guard ignore hidden workflow-verb hints PR #1776 registers the workflow verbs (explore, propose, apply, ...) as hidden CLI commands that only point the user at the workflow. Walking the commander tree then saw "openspec explore" as a real command and failed the collision guard for every skill trigger. Skip a subcommand only when it is hidden AND named after a workflow. Visible commands and hidden non-workflow commands are still guarded, pinned by a synthetic commander tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(changeset): drop em dashes from the release note Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(skills): drop the generic by-hand clause from the explore description The other eleven descriptions dropped it; explore is a stance, not a workflow, so telling the agent to follow it instead of doing the work contradicts it. Adds a regression over every workflow description. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
→ fluid not rigid
→ iterative not waterfall
→ easy not complex
→ built for brownfield not just greenfield
→ scalable from personal projects to enterprises
Tip
New workflow now available! We've rebuilt OpenSpec with a new artifact-guided workflow.
Run
/opsx:propose "your idea"to get started. → Learn more here
Follow @0xTab on X for updates · Join the OpenSpec Discord for help and questions.
See it in action
You: /opsx:explore
AI: What would you like to explore?
You: I want dark mode but I'm not sure how to do it cleanly.
AI: Let me look at your styling setup...
Cleanest path here: CSS variables + a small theme context,
with system-preference detection. No new dependencies. Scope it?
You: Yes, let's do it.
You: /opsx:propose add-dark-mode
AI: Created openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/
✓ proposal.md — why we're doing this, what's changing
✓ specs/ — requirements and scenarios
✓ design.md — technical approach
✓ tasks.md — implementation checklist
Ready for implementation!
You: /opsx:apply
AI: Implementing tasks...
✓ 1.1 Add theme context provider
✓ 1.2 Create toggle component
✓ 2.1 Add CSS variables
✓ 2.2 Wire up localStorage
All tasks complete!
You: /opsx:archive
AI: Archived to openspec/changes/archive/2025-01-23-add-dark-mode/
Specs updated. Ready for the next feature.
What do the specs actually look like?
Plain Markdown — requirements with concrete scenarios, no special syntax to learn. Here's what goes in the specs/ folder created above:
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Theme selection
The app SHALL let users switch between light and dark themes,
defaulting to the system preference.
#### Scenario: User toggles dark mode
- **WHEN** the user clicks the theme toggle
- **THEN** the app switches to dark mode and persists the choice
Your AI writes these; you review the plan before any code is written.
OpenSpec is built with OpenSpec — browse this repo's live specs and in-flight changes for real examples at scale.
Why teams adopt OpenSpec
Solo, OpenSpec keeps you and your AI honest on a single repo. On a team, the hard part moves: a feature spans the API server, the web app, and a shared library; requirements are owned by one team and consumed by others; planning starts before any code exists.
Stores are the answer — planning in a repo of its own. The same openspec/ shape you already know (specs and changes), shared by git push like anything else. One source of truth your whole team and every coding agent can read, across every repo.
- Cross-repo features — one change, one plan, even when the code lands in three repos.
- Shared requirements — a platform team owns the specs; product teams reference them read-only, right where their coding agent can read them. No drifting wiki.
- Plan before code — capture the plan in the store now; the code repos catch up later.
Stores are in beta. Start with the Stores User Guide.
Quick Start
Requires Node.js 20.19.0 or higher.
Install OpenSpec globally:
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
Then navigate to your project directory and initialize:
cd your-project
openspec init
Want your AI to do it? Paste the setup prompt into your coding assistant — it installs the CLI, runs
openspec init, and verifies the result.
Now talk to your AI:
- Not sure what to build yet? Start with
/opsx:explore, a no-stakes thinking partner that reads your code, weighs options, and shapes a plan before any code gets written. (Explore guide) - Already know what you want? Go straight to
/opsx:propose <what-you-want-to-build>.
Both are in the default profile. If you want the expanded workflow (/opsx:new, /opsx:continue, /opsx:ff, /opsx:verify, /opsx:bulk-archive, /opsx:onboard), select it with openspec config profile and apply with openspec update.
/opsx:propose is the canonical name; your tool may spell it /opsx-propose (Cursor, GitHub Copilot), @opsx-propose (Amazon Q) or $openspec-propose (Codex). openspec init prints the right form for the tools you picked — see How To Invoke.
Note
Not sure if your tool is supported? View the full list – we support 30+ tools and growing.
Also works with pnpm, yarn, bun, and nix. See installation options.
Docs
Start here: the Documentation Home maps everything. New to OpenSpec? Read Getting Started, then How Commands Work (where you actually type /opsx:propose).
→ Getting Started: first steps
→ Explore First: think it through with /opsx:explore before you commit
→ How Commands Work: where slash commands run vs the CLI
→ Core Concepts at a Glance: the whole mental model, one page
→ Examples & Recipes: real changes, start to finish
→ Workflows: combos and patterns
→ Existing Projects: adopt OpenSpec on a brownfield codebase
→ Editing a Change: update artifacts, go back, reconcile manual edits
→ Commands: slash commands & skills
→ CLI: terminal reference
→ Stores: plan in a separate repo, shared across your team (beta)
→ Supported Tools: tool integrations & install paths
→ Concepts: how it all fits
→ Multi-Language: multi-language support
→ Customization: make it yours
→ Community Showcase: projects and resources built with and for OpenSpec
→ FAQ · Troubleshooting · Glossary: quick help
Community schemas
Third-party schema bundles distributed via standalone repositories — these provide opinionated workflows that integrate OpenSpec with other tools, similar to how github/spec-kit's community extension catalog handles tool integrations.
→ Browse the catalog in the customization docs.
Why OpenSpec?
AI coding assistants are powerful but unpredictable when requirements live only in chat history. OpenSpec adds a lightweight spec layer so you agree on what to build before any code is written.
- Agree before you build — human and AI align on specs before code gets written
- Stay organized — each change gets its own folder with proposal, specs, design, and tasks
- Work fluidly — update any artifact anytime, no rigid phase gates
- Use your tools — works with 30+ AI assistants via slash commands
How we compare
vs. Spec Kit (GitHub) — Thorough but heavyweight. Rigid phase gates, lots of Markdown, Python setup. OpenSpec is lighter and lets you iterate freely.
vs. Kiro (AWS) — Powerful but you're locked into their IDE and limited to Claude models. OpenSpec works with the tools you already use.
vs. nothing — AI coding without specs means vague prompts and unpredictable results. OpenSpec brings predictability without the ceremony.
Updating OpenSpec
Upgrade the package
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
Refresh agent instructions
Run this inside each project to regenerate AI guidance and ensure the latest slash commands are active:
openspec update
Usage Notes
Model selection: OpenSpec works best with high-reasoning models. We recommend Codex 5.5 and Opus 4.7 for both planning and implementation.
Context hygiene: OpenSpec benefits from a clean context window. Clear your context before starting implementation and maintain good context hygiene throughout your session.
Contributing
Open a discussion (for core design changes) or an issue before you open a PR, and link the issue or discussion from the PR. New features, significant refactors, and architectural changes need an OpenSpec change proposal first.
→ CONTRIBUTING.md: the full process, from first issue to merged PR
Other
Telemetry
OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats.
We collect only command names and version to understand usage patterns. No arguments, paths, content, or PII. Automatically disabled in CI.
Opt-out (any one is enough):
openspec config set telemetry.enabled false(global config; unset means on)export OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0orexport DO_NOT_TRACK=1(env overrides config)
Maintainers & Advisors
See MAINTAINERS.md for the list of core maintainers and advisors who help guide the project.
License
MIT
