mirror of
https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec.git
synced 2026-10-04 06:18:24 +08:00
Compare commits
281
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
f6b415cb9b | ||
|
|
e91568deb9 | ||
|
|
fc0d798f93 | ||
|
|
d155126235 | ||
|
|
943e0d4102 | ||
|
|
12a7224dc6 | ||
|
|
c773ef6feb | ||
|
|
0bfe1d4426 | ||
|
|
0e6f42c81c | ||
|
|
0cc9d9025a | ||
|
|
3261ccf6dc | ||
|
|
26ed336a16 | ||
|
|
847aa81c0f | ||
|
|
39bebefcc4 | ||
|
|
cf8b6212c8 | ||
|
|
c157483685 | ||
|
|
f90c7c3354 | ||
|
|
9381bd3b24 | ||
|
|
ae83b4e16d | ||
|
|
d48528134b | ||
|
|
54bd3f1ccd | ||
|
|
675e870bf1 | ||
|
|
07eaf7b691 | ||
|
|
153721d14a | ||
|
|
70c2e17525 | ||
|
|
e2c333e493 | ||
|
|
e137dd3981 | ||
|
|
2beb8e77e8 | ||
|
|
3b16b13613 | ||
|
|
c4cfdc7c49 | ||
|
|
e0736807b4 | ||
|
|
fdb05a723e | ||
|
|
8332a09811 | ||
|
|
d61a49f6d5 | ||
|
|
7d1237f00d | ||
|
|
33466b1e2a | ||
|
|
6c8c778043 | ||
|
|
43b01ad374 | ||
|
|
3cdcdfca8e | ||
|
|
32fc19a60d | ||
|
|
84f372517f | ||
|
|
adda63e17a | ||
|
|
90d05b7115 | ||
|
|
20714c1c28 | ||
|
|
2e51ae26d3 | ||
|
|
dbd4ed7bfb | ||
|
|
473093f885 | ||
|
|
b5a884748b | ||
|
|
690c75225c | ||
|
|
dd53fb7736 | ||
|
|
2a441c472d | ||
|
|
ed4d965208 | ||
|
|
c86985d6ec | ||
|
|
bf4bc2426f | ||
|
|
c57e421cc2 | ||
|
|
ed2e832066 | ||
|
|
9db74aa5ac | ||
|
|
b5b7248610 | ||
|
|
322bfd455a | ||
|
|
08c349369a | ||
|
|
40afee643e | ||
|
|
05023dab43 | ||
|
|
d7a928b4e9 | ||
|
|
07dd634986 | ||
|
|
36078b1947 | ||
|
|
d0e1b076c2 | ||
|
|
2fbda520de | ||
|
|
5633556b6d | ||
|
|
2bb0ed36c5 | ||
|
|
06097f9cb7 | ||
|
|
8f5a526396 | ||
|
|
eb152eb2ca | ||
|
|
e987a5a327 | ||
|
|
4971cda812 | ||
|
|
4715138927 | ||
|
|
940898c1c5 | ||
|
|
d49a88c3bb | ||
|
|
bb9f6ce0ea | ||
|
|
ae85a7229d | ||
|
|
504c93bdf1 | ||
|
|
c4a54a8d54 | ||
|
|
38d2356836 | ||
|
|
3f67debf65 | ||
|
|
533cb0fa87 | ||
|
|
8dfd824477 | ||
|
|
3ed1270316 | ||
|
|
eb15cdb983 | ||
|
|
cd172a4427 | ||
|
|
b7f5a429de | ||
|
|
a5c10ed5e7 | ||
|
|
1bc849554c | ||
|
|
d73705736f | ||
|
|
ed924ffcff | ||
|
|
1786684af6 | ||
|
|
51fb10db5e | ||
|
|
cac54042ce | ||
|
|
c47cdaafe2 | ||
|
|
ea5aa0e562 | ||
|
|
48b5ed9657 | ||
|
|
fb7ff527a6 | ||
|
|
11e195575f | ||
|
|
ab47cc6b00 | ||
|
|
8dcd1707ee | ||
|
|
4f4af5708d | ||
|
|
9822576770 | ||
|
|
af273b8e0b | ||
|
|
3ceef2db72 | ||
|
|
2c2599b1f0 | ||
|
|
c08a53cb21 | ||
|
|
455c65f3c4 | ||
|
|
9ac6330430 | ||
|
|
fb264bcbcd | ||
|
|
a2757e7856 | ||
|
|
6d84924c18 | ||
|
|
6de04f3b2b | ||
|
|
c2a1a4c807 | ||
|
|
2e71835d23 | ||
|
|
971f8ca4a3 | ||
|
|
68e0a7e68e | ||
|
|
f39cc5c1fb | ||
|
|
5129a8cf96 | ||
|
|
4ff893048d | ||
|
|
cefb4719aa | ||
|
|
5e1cef3b3b | ||
|
|
1adf3cea88 | ||
|
|
6d3cfe0443 | ||
|
|
17d1e5db3f | ||
|
|
3f5a66d3e4 | ||
|
|
c08fbc1ba0 | ||
|
|
938d03be9a | ||
|
|
19ccaabfc7 | ||
|
|
2e382b9898 | ||
|
|
b5a7d096f0 | ||
|
|
c54079a0cd | ||
|
|
1050e57ae4 | ||
|
|
17d7e59343 | ||
|
|
4758c5c68d | ||
|
|
c4b0826da7 | ||
|
|
537e6078b7 | ||
|
|
5439ab0833 | ||
|
|
9b6a763eb8 | ||
|
|
d32e50fe36 | ||
|
|
8386b91a71 | ||
|
|
8f9c3c7d0b | ||
|
|
9cdb0743f2 | ||
|
|
4e93d7a881 | ||
|
|
c4b6be41c1 | ||
|
|
a66580735c | ||
|
|
fb1d37e56e | ||
|
|
cf0de5e569 | ||
|
|
92b45462c6 | ||
|
|
5ab438f5fd | ||
|
|
5855fa2353 | ||
|
|
668a125d4d | ||
|
|
fef961f6e3 | ||
|
|
3677e0175f | ||
|
|
3ddf2586b4 | ||
|
|
ece61a6d68 | ||
|
|
ecddffc22e | ||
|
|
822464ec44 | ||
|
|
67ab683105 | ||
|
|
f82e243551 | ||
|
|
88b260d51f | ||
|
|
ce7422209f | ||
|
|
63b8a3e9f9 | ||
|
|
4cf7bf863d | ||
|
|
b30882b579 | ||
|
|
082abb4795 | ||
|
|
b81fa1e6cc | ||
|
|
4a863285b0 | ||
|
|
fe83be5d61 | ||
|
|
345f9dbb45 | ||
|
|
cc9d5402ff | ||
|
|
108bcd66d8 | ||
|
|
a50105e03c | ||
|
|
312e1d6d7c | ||
|
|
56d57da119 | ||
|
|
f56189a8f7 | ||
|
|
d7e0ce85e5 | ||
|
|
eb0d50c094 | ||
|
|
c482f1b47a | ||
|
|
2ae0484ac7 | ||
|
|
8c65b47abe | ||
|
|
9c9e57daa1 | ||
|
|
c7ca76cb4f | ||
|
|
06bd3999bf | ||
|
|
821097079a | ||
|
|
42e3118b0c | ||
|
|
a785c2a99a | ||
|
|
af513191eb | ||
|
|
efbbf3b9f1 | ||
|
|
6105211163 | ||
|
|
b3d31d224d | ||
|
|
9ae6141eb1 | ||
|
|
d84069a3ae | ||
|
|
8c974f8a80 | ||
|
|
25289b510d | ||
|
|
d070d08aa8 | ||
|
|
6539ceb54a | ||
|
|
c29b06da42 | ||
|
|
4a2b23942c | ||
|
|
807b9d32a6 | ||
|
|
b3d05d2f78 | ||
|
|
9848242587 | ||
|
|
5e0d21d1ed | ||
|
|
31d85d0e8b | ||
|
|
bc3666d702 | ||
|
|
970b9f6e2d | ||
|
|
5cb84a775e | ||
|
|
adc63069a9 | ||
|
|
f8eca37796 | ||
|
|
a908dc5a05 | ||
|
|
b46f99b9bc | ||
|
|
6f7cc2abd2 | ||
|
|
4867bfade5 | ||
|
|
7359b4846a | ||
|
|
88526e6b93 | ||
|
|
367aa12892 | ||
|
|
dcfb6afe0c | ||
|
|
86925b2b2d | ||
|
|
604ecb8bd1 | ||
|
|
5a4837c37d | ||
|
|
9d9539aaa2 | ||
|
|
c3fecf0619 | ||
|
|
6469593495 | ||
|
|
157936cf68 | ||
|
|
fef33df753 | ||
|
|
78b61e8466 | ||
|
|
5fa0fa68a7 | ||
|
|
fe9eb44ec2 | ||
|
|
ee78f21b08 | ||
|
|
e3ae2ceaf0 | ||
|
|
20b2fee749 | ||
|
|
e7fff31df2 | ||
|
|
fdf9a30f0b | ||
|
|
161aa41cb3 | ||
|
|
9e092a185b | ||
|
|
38454bb2a6 | ||
|
|
b04f1cc923 | ||
|
|
ae86e9be9e | ||
|
|
f955e87fd9 | ||
|
|
55efd19953 | ||
|
|
dab5d93b85 | ||
|
|
7b0f494754 | ||
|
|
dd7ba71fe5 | ||
|
|
66ad5658f9 | ||
|
|
21a0e74b74 | ||
|
|
485ef07ec7 | ||
|
|
ce5ceadbe7 | ||
|
|
9a173b917c | ||
|
|
79baabbed1 | ||
|
|
818a5922ce | ||
|
|
d8d2930182 | ||
|
|
6af6e0ccb6 | ||
|
|
50e6660018 | ||
|
|
4bbb52dda4 | ||
|
|
4a0ae49b6e | ||
|
|
5b2049aedf | ||
|
|
332020ac6b | ||
|
|
646c516b0d | ||
|
|
8c1b580f03 | ||
|
|
17e6f7166b | ||
|
|
931d10477e | ||
|
|
e4548bcc58 | ||
|
|
68fc049955 | ||
|
|
4874a16495 | ||
|
|
3caabf86cf | ||
|
|
d4593e4a54 | ||
|
|
0144ec2b1b | ||
|
|
98d90cc00d | ||
|
|
ccaa5ad0b0 | ||
|
|
8eb7ebd7cd | ||
|
|
be395d9d74 | ||
|
|
a09b87e391 | ||
|
|
9d7b44b722 | ||
|
|
44c06cc40e | ||
|
|
3cef6f0925 | ||
|
|
82ba1f504e | ||
|
|
d54fcc97f2 | ||
|
|
ebff738860 | ||
|
|
1bdaeef4da |
+93
-4
@@ -1,6 +1,95 @@
|
||||
This directory is managed by Changesets.
|
||||
# Changesets
|
||||
|
||||
- Add a changeset locally with `pnpm changeset`.
|
||||
- The CI "Release (prepare)" workflow opens/updates a Version Packages PR.
|
||||
- Publishing happens from a GitHub Release via the "Publish to npm" workflow.
|
||||
This directory is managed by [Changesets](https://github.com/changesets/changesets).
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Start
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pnpm changeset
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the prompts to select version bump type and describe your changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Add a changeset** — Run `pnpm changeset` locally before or after your PR
|
||||
2. **Version PR** — CI opens/updates a "Version Packages" PR when changesets merge to main
|
||||
3. **Release** — Merging the Version PR triggers npm publish and GitHub Release
|
||||
|
||||
> **Note:** Contributors only need to run `pnpm changeset`. Versioning (`changeset version`) and publishing happen automatically in CI.
|
||||
|
||||
## Template
|
||||
|
||||
Use this structure for your changeset content:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
"@fission-ai/openspec": patch
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### New Features
|
||||
|
||||
- **Feature name** — What users can now do
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- Fixed issue where X happened when Y
|
||||
|
||||
### Breaking Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- `oldMethod()` has been removed, use `newMethod()` instead
|
||||
|
||||
### Deprecations
|
||||
|
||||
- `legacyOption` is deprecated and will be removed in v2.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Other
|
||||
|
||||
- Internal refactoring of X for better performance
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Include only the sections relevant to your change.
|
||||
|
||||
## Version Bump Guide
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | When to use | Example |
|
||||
|------|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| `patch` | Bug fixes, small improvements | Fixed crash when config missing |
|
||||
| `minor` | New features, non-breaking additions | Added `--verbose` flag |
|
||||
| `major` | Breaking changes, removed features | Renamed `init` to `setup` |
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Create a Changeset
|
||||
|
||||
**Create one for:**
|
||||
- New features or commands
|
||||
- Bug fixes that affect users
|
||||
- Breaking changes or deprecations
|
||||
- Performance improvements users would notice
|
||||
|
||||
**Skip for:**
|
||||
- Documentation-only changes
|
||||
- Test additions/fixes
|
||||
- Internal refactoring with no user impact
|
||||
- CI/tooling changes
|
||||
|
||||
## Writing Good Descriptions
|
||||
|
||||
**Do:** Write for users, not developers
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
- **Shell completions** — Tab completion now available for Bash, Fish, and PowerShell
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't:** Write implementation details
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
- Added ShellCompletionGenerator class with Bash/Fish/PowerShell subclasses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Do:** Explain the impact
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
- Fixed config loading to respect `XDG_CONFIG_HOME` on Linux
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't:** Just reference the fix
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
- Fixed #123
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://unpkg.com/@changesets/config/schema.json",
|
||||
"changelog": "@changesets/cli/changelog",
|
||||
"changelog": [
|
||||
"@changesets/changelog-github",
|
||||
{ "repo": "Fission-AI/OpenSpec" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"commit": false,
|
||||
"fixed": [],
|
||||
"linked": [],
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
|
||||
# Minimal configuration for getting started
|
||||
language: "en-US"
|
||||
reviews:
|
||||
profile: "chill"
|
||||
high_level_summary: true
|
||||
auto_review:
|
||||
enabled: true
|
||||
drafts: false
|
||||
base_branches:
|
||||
- ".*"
|
||||
@@ -1,302 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: OpenSpec conventions and workflow for Cursor agents working in this repo
|
||||
alwaysApply: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
# OpenSpec Rules for Cursor Agents
|
||||
|
||||
Instructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development.
|
||||
|
||||
## Three-Stage Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 1: Creating Changes
|
||||
Create proposal when you need to:
|
||||
- Add features or functionality
|
||||
- Make breaking changes (API, schema)
|
||||
- Change architecture or patterns
|
||||
- Optimize performance (changes behavior)
|
||||
- Update security patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Skip proposal for:
|
||||
- Bug fixes (restore intended behavior)
|
||||
- Typos, formatting, comments
|
||||
- Dependency updates (non-breaking)
|
||||
- Configuration changes
|
||||
- Tests for existing behavior
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 2: Implementing Changes
|
||||
1. **Read proposal.md** - Understand what's being built
|
||||
2. **Read design.md** (if exists) - Review technical decisions
|
||||
3. **Read tasks.md** - Get implementation checklist
|
||||
4. **Implement tasks sequentially** - Complete in order
|
||||
5. **Mark complete immediately** - Update `- [x]` after each task
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 3: Archiving Changes
|
||||
After deployment, create separate PR to:
|
||||
- Move `changes/[name]/` → `changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/`
|
||||
- Update `specs/` if capabilities changed
|
||||
- Use `openspec archive [change] --skip-specs` for tooling-only changes
|
||||
|
||||
## Before Any Task
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Checklist:**
|
||||
- [ ] Read relevant specs in `specs/[capability]/spec.md`
|
||||
- [ ] Check pending changes in `changes/` for conflicts
|
||||
- [ ] Read `openspec/project.md` for conventions
|
||||
- [ ] Run `openspec list` to see active changes
|
||||
- [ ] Run `openspec list --specs` to see existing capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
**Before Creating Specs:**
|
||||
- Always check if capability already exists
|
||||
- Prefer modifying existing specs over creating duplicates
|
||||
- Use `openspec show [spec]` to review current state
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Start
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Essential commands
|
||||
openspec list # List active changes
|
||||
openspec list --specs # List specifications
|
||||
openspec show [item] # Display change or spec
|
||||
openspec diff [change] # Show spec differences
|
||||
openspec validate [item] # Validate changes or specs
|
||||
openspec archive [change] # Archive after deployment
|
||||
|
||||
# Project management
|
||||
openspec init [path] # Initialize OpenSpec
|
||||
openspec update [path] # Update instruction files
|
||||
|
||||
# Interactive mode
|
||||
openspec show # Prompts for selection
|
||||
openspec validate # Bulk validation mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Debugging
|
||||
openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only
|
||||
openspec validate [change] --strict
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Flags
|
||||
|
||||
- `--json` - Machine-readable output
|
||||
- `--type change|spec` - Disambiguate items
|
||||
- `--strict` - Comprehensive validation
|
||||
- `--no-interactive` - Disable prompts
|
||||
- `--skip-specs` - Archive without spec updates
|
||||
|
||||
## Directory Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── project.md # Project conventions
|
||||
├── specs/ # Current truth - what IS built
|
||||
│ └── [capability]/ # Single focused capability
|
||||
│ ├── spec.md # Requirements and scenarios
|
||||
│ └── design.md # Technical patterns
|
||||
├── changes/ # Proposals - what SHOULD change
|
||||
│ ├── [change-name]/
|
||||
│ │ ├── proposal.md # Why, what, impact
|
||||
│ │ ├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist
|
||||
│ │ ├── design.md # Technical decisions (optional)
|
||||
│ │ └── specs/ # Delta changes
|
||||
│ │ └── [capability]/
|
||||
│ │ └── spec.md # ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED
|
||||
│ └── archive/ # Completed changes
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Creating Change Proposals
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
New request?
|
||||
├─ Bug fix restoring spec behavior? → Fix directly
|
||||
├─ Typo/format/comment? → Fix directly
|
||||
├─ New feature/capability? → Create proposal
|
||||
├─ Breaking change? → Create proposal
|
||||
├─ Architecture change? → Create proposal
|
||||
└─ Unclear? → Create proposal (safer)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Proposal Structure
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Create directory:** `changes/[descriptive-name]/`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Write proposal.md:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
[1-2 sentences on problem/opportunity]
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
- [Bullet list of changes]
|
||||
- [Mark breaking changes with **BREAKING**]
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
- Affected specs: [list capabilities]
|
||||
- Affected code: [key files/systems]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Create spec deltas:** `specs/[capability]/spec.md`
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: New Feature
|
||||
The system SHALL provide...
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Success case
|
||||
- **WHEN** user performs action
|
||||
- **THEN** expected result
|
||||
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Existing Feature
|
||||
[Complete modified requirement]
|
||||
|
||||
## REMOVED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Old Feature
|
||||
**Reason**: [Why removing]
|
||||
**Migration**: [How to handle]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Create tasks.md:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 1. Implementation
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Create database schema
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Implement API endpoint
|
||||
- [ ] 1.3 Add frontend component
|
||||
- [ ] 1.4 Write tests
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Spec File Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical: Scenario Formatting
|
||||
|
||||
**CORRECT** (use #### headers):
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
#### Scenario: User login success
|
||||
- **WHEN** valid credentials provided
|
||||
- **THEN** return JWT token
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**WRONG** (don't use bullets or bold):
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
- **Scenario: User login** ❌
|
||||
**Scenario**: User login ❌
|
||||
### Scenario: User login ❌
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Every requirement MUST have at least one scenario.
|
||||
|
||||
### Delta Operations
|
||||
|
||||
- `## ADDED Requirements` - New capabilities
|
||||
- `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changed behavior
|
||||
- `## REMOVED Requirements` - Deprecated features
|
||||
- `## RENAMED Requirements` - Name changes
|
||||
|
||||
Headers matched with `trim(header)` - whitespace ignored.
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### Common Errors
|
||||
|
||||
**"Change must have at least one delta"**
|
||||
- Check `changes/[name]/specs/` exists with .md files
|
||||
- Verify files have operation prefixes (## ADDED Requirements)
|
||||
|
||||
**"Requirement must have at least one scenario"**
|
||||
- Check scenarios use `#### Scenario:` format (4 hashtags)
|
||||
- Don't use bullet points or bold for scenario headers
|
||||
|
||||
**Silent scenario parsing failures**
|
||||
- Exact format required: `#### Scenario: Name`
|
||||
- Debug with: `openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only`
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Tips
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Always use strict mode for comprehensive checks
|
||||
openspec validate [change] --strict
|
||||
|
||||
# Debug delta parsing
|
||||
openspec show [change] --json | jq '.deltas'
|
||||
|
||||
# Check specific requirement
|
||||
openspec show [spec] --json -r 1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Simplicity First
|
||||
- Default to <100 lines of new code
|
||||
- Single-file implementations until proven insufficient
|
||||
- Avoid frameworks without clear justification
|
||||
- Choose boring, proven patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Complexity Triggers
|
||||
Only add complexity with:
|
||||
- Performance data showing current solution too slow
|
||||
- Concrete scale requirements (>1000 users, >100MB data)
|
||||
- Multiple proven use cases requiring abstraction
|
||||
|
||||
### Clear References
|
||||
- Use `file.ts:42` format for code locations
|
||||
- Reference specs as `specs/auth/spec.md`
|
||||
- Link related changes and PRs
|
||||
|
||||
### Capability Naming
|
||||
- Use verb-noun: `user-auth`, `payment-capture`
|
||||
- Single purpose per capability
|
||||
- 10-minute understandability rule
|
||||
- Split if description needs "AND"
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Selection Guide
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Tool | Why |
|
||||
|------|------|-----|
|
||||
| Find files by pattern | Glob | Fast pattern matching |
|
||||
| Search code content | Grep | Optimized regex search |
|
||||
| Read specific files | Read | Direct file access |
|
||||
| Explore unknown scope | Task | Multi-step investigation |
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Recovery
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Conflicts
|
||||
1. Run `openspec list` to see active changes
|
||||
2. Check for overlapping specs
|
||||
3. Coordinate with change owners
|
||||
4. Consider combining proposals
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Failures
|
||||
1. Run with `--strict` flag
|
||||
2. Check JSON output for details
|
||||
3. Verify spec file format
|
||||
4. Ensure scenarios properly formatted
|
||||
|
||||
### Missing Context
|
||||
1. Read project.md first
|
||||
2. Check related specs
|
||||
3. Review recent archives
|
||||
4. Ask for clarification
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage Indicators
|
||||
- `changes/` - Proposed, not yet built
|
||||
- `specs/` - Built and deployed
|
||||
- `archive/` - Completed changes
|
||||
|
||||
### File Purposes
|
||||
- `proposal.md` - Why and what
|
||||
- `tasks.md` - Implementation steps
|
||||
- `design.md` - Technical decisions
|
||||
- `spec.md` - Requirements and behavior
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Essentials
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec list # What's in progress?
|
||||
openspec show [item] # View details
|
||||
openspec diff [change] # What's changing?
|
||||
openspec validate --strict # Is it correct?
|
||||
openspec archive [change] # Mark complete
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Specs are truth. Changes are proposals. Keep them in sync.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
|
||||
# Dev Container Setup
|
||||
|
||||
This directory contains the VS Code dev container configuration for OpenSpec development.
|
||||
|
||||
## What's Included
|
||||
|
||||
- **Node.js 20 LTS** (>=20.19.0) - TypeScript/JavaScript runtime
|
||||
- **pnpm** - Fast, disk space efficient package manager
|
||||
- **Git + GitHub CLI** - Version control tools
|
||||
- **VS Code Extensions**:
|
||||
- ESLint & Prettier for code quality
|
||||
- Vitest Explorer for running tests
|
||||
- GitLens for enhanced git integration
|
||||
- Error Lens for inline error highlighting
|
||||
- Code Spell Checker
|
||||
- Path IntelliSense
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Use
|
||||
|
||||
### First Time Setup
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Install Prerequisites** (on your local machine):
|
||||
- [VS Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/)
|
||||
- [Docker Desktop](https://www.docker.com/products/docker-desktop)
|
||||
- [Dev Containers extension](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-vscode-remote.remote-containers)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Open in Container**:
|
||||
- Open this project in VS Code
|
||||
- You'll see a notification: "Folder contains a Dev Container configuration file"
|
||||
- Click "Reopen in Container"
|
||||
|
||||
OR
|
||||
|
||||
- Open Command Palette (`Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+P`)
|
||||
- Type "Dev Containers: Reopen in Container"
|
||||
- Press Enter
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Wait for Setup**:
|
||||
- The container will build (first time takes a few minutes)
|
||||
- `pnpm install` runs automatically via `postCreateCommand`
|
||||
- All extensions install automatically
|
||||
|
||||
### Daily Development
|
||||
|
||||
Once set up, the container preserves your development environment:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run development build
|
||||
pnpm run dev
|
||||
|
||||
# Run CLI in development
|
||||
pnpm run dev:cli
|
||||
|
||||
# Run tests
|
||||
pnpm test
|
||||
|
||||
# Run tests in watch mode
|
||||
pnpm test:watch
|
||||
|
||||
# Build the project
|
||||
pnpm run build
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### SSH Keys
|
||||
|
||||
Your SSH keys are mounted read-only from `~/.ssh`, so git operations work seamlessly with GitHub/GitLab.
|
||||
|
||||
### Rebuilding the Container
|
||||
|
||||
If you modify `.devcontainer/devcontainer.json`:
|
||||
- Command Palette → "Dev Containers: Rebuild Container"
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
- No need to install Node.js or pnpm on your local machine
|
||||
- Consistent development environment across team members
|
||||
- Isolated from other Node.js projects on your machine
|
||||
- All dependencies and tools containerized
|
||||
- Easy onboarding for new developers
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
**Container won't build:**
|
||||
- Ensure Docker Desktop is running
|
||||
- Check Docker has enough memory allocated (recommend 4GB+)
|
||||
|
||||
**Extensions not appearing:**
|
||||
- Rebuild the container: "Dev Containers: Rebuild Container"
|
||||
|
||||
**Permission issues:**
|
||||
- The container runs as the `node` user (non-root)
|
||||
- Files created in the container are owned by this user
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "OpenSpec Development",
|
||||
"image": "mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/typescript-node:1-20-bookworm",
|
||||
|
||||
// Additional tools and features
|
||||
"features": {
|
||||
"ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/git:1": {
|
||||
"version": "latest",
|
||||
"ppa": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/github-cli:1": {
|
||||
"version": "latest"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
// Configure tool-specific properties
|
||||
"customizations": {
|
||||
"vscode": {
|
||||
// Set default container specific settings
|
||||
"settings": {
|
||||
"typescript.tsdk": "node_modules/typescript/lib",
|
||||
"typescript.enablePromptUseWorkspaceTsdk": true,
|
||||
"editor.formatOnSave": true,
|
||||
"editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode",
|
||||
"editor.codeActionsOnSave": {
|
||||
"source.fixAll": "explicit"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"files.eol": "\n",
|
||||
"terminal.integrated.defaultProfile.linux": "bash"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
// Add extensions you want installed when the container is created
|
||||
"extensions": [
|
||||
// TypeScript/JavaScript essentials
|
||||
"dbaeumer.vscode-eslint",
|
||||
"esbenp.prettier-vscode",
|
||||
|
||||
// Testing
|
||||
"vitest.explorer",
|
||||
|
||||
// Git
|
||||
"eamodio.gitlens",
|
||||
|
||||
// Utilities
|
||||
"streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker",
|
||||
"usernamehw.errorlens",
|
||||
"christian-kohler.path-intellisense"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
// Use 'forwardPorts' to make a list of ports inside the container available locally
|
||||
// "forwardPorts": [],
|
||||
|
||||
// Use 'postCreateCommand' to run commands after the container is created
|
||||
"postCreateCommand": "corepack enable && corepack prepare pnpm@latest --activate && pnpm install",
|
||||
|
||||
// Configure mounts to preserve SSH keys for git operations
|
||||
"mounts": [
|
||||
"source=${localEnv:HOME}${localEnv:USERPROFILE}/.ssh,target=/home/node/.ssh,readonly,type=bind,consistency=cached"
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// Set the default user to 'node' (non-root user)
|
||||
"remoteUser": "node",
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure git is properly configured
|
||||
"initializeCommand": "echo 'Initializing dev container...'"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
|
||||
# Default code ownership
|
||||
* @TabishB
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
# Github Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing CI Locally
|
||||
|
||||
Test GitHub Actions workflows locally using [act](https://nektosact.com/):
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Test all PR checks
|
||||
act pull_request
|
||||
|
||||
# Test specific job
|
||||
act pull_request -j nix-flake-validate
|
||||
|
||||
# Dry run to see what would execute
|
||||
act pull_request --dryrun
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The `.actrc` file configures act to use the appropriate Docker image.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+191
-8
@@ -15,10 +15,35 @@ concurrency:
|
||||
cancel-in-progress: true
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
test:
|
||||
# Detect which files changed to enable path-based filtering
|
||||
changes:
|
||||
name: Detect changes
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
nix: ${{ steps.filter.outputs.nix }}
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Checkout code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Check for Nix-related changes
|
||||
uses: dorny/paths-filter@v3
|
||||
id: filter
|
||||
with:
|
||||
filters: |
|
||||
nix:
|
||||
- 'flake.nix'
|
||||
- 'flake.lock'
|
||||
- 'package.json'
|
||||
- 'pnpm-lock.yaml'
|
||||
- 'scripts/update-flake.sh'
|
||||
- '.github/workflows/ci.yml'
|
||||
|
||||
test_pr:
|
||||
name: Test
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
|
||||
timeout-minutes: 10
|
||||
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Checkout code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
@@ -48,7 +73,68 @@ jobs:
|
||||
- name: Upload test coverage
|
||||
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
name: coverage-report
|
||||
name: coverage-report-pr
|
||||
path: coverage/
|
||||
retention-days: 7
|
||||
|
||||
test_matrix:
|
||||
name: Test (${{ matrix.label }})
|
||||
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
|
||||
timeout-minutes: 15
|
||||
if: github.event_name != 'pull_request'
|
||||
strategy:
|
||||
fail-fast: false
|
||||
matrix:
|
||||
include:
|
||||
- os: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
label: linux-bash
|
||||
- os: macos-latest
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
label: macos-bash
|
||||
- os: windows-latest
|
||||
shell: pwsh
|
||||
label: windows-pwsh
|
||||
|
||||
defaults:
|
||||
run:
|
||||
shell: ${{ matrix.shell }}
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Checkout code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
fetch-depth: 0
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Setup pnpm
|
||||
uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
version: 9
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Setup Node.js
|
||||
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
node-version: '20'
|
||||
cache: 'pnpm'
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Print environment diagnostics
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
node -p "JSON.stringify({ platform: process.platform, arch: process.arch, shell: process.env.SHELL || process.env.ComSpec || '' })"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Install dependencies
|
||||
run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Build project
|
||||
run: pnpm run build
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Run tests
|
||||
run: pnpm test
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Upload test coverage
|
||||
if: matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest'
|
||||
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
name: coverage-report-main
|
||||
path: coverage/
|
||||
retention-days: 7
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -79,6 +165,9 @@ jobs:
|
||||
- name: Type check
|
||||
run: pnpm exec tsc --noEmit
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Lint
|
||||
run: pnpm lint
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Check for build artifacts
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
if [ ! -d "dist" ]; then
|
||||
@@ -90,6 +179,66 @@ jobs:
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
nix-flake-validate:
|
||||
name: Nix Flake Validation
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
timeout-minutes: 10
|
||||
needs: changes
|
||||
if: needs.changes.outputs.nix == 'true'
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Checkout code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Install Nix
|
||||
uses: DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action@v13
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Setup Nix cache
|
||||
uses: DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action@v8
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Build with Nix
|
||||
run: nix build
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Verify build output
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
if [ ! -e "result" ]; then
|
||||
echo "Error: Nix build output 'result' symlink not found"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [ ! -f "result/bin/openspec" ]; then
|
||||
echo "Error: openspec binary not found in build output"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "✅ Build output verified"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Test binary execution
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
VERSION=$(nix run . -- --version)
|
||||
echo "OpenSpec version: $VERSION"
|
||||
if [ -z "$VERSION" ]; then
|
||||
echo "Error: Version command returned empty output"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "✅ Binary execution successful"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Validate update script
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
echo "Testing update-flake.sh script..."
|
||||
bash scripts/update-flake.sh
|
||||
echo "✅ Update script executed successfully"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Check flake.nix modifications
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
if git diff --quiet flake.nix; then
|
||||
echo "⚠️ Warning: flake.nix was not modified by update script"
|
||||
else
|
||||
echo "✅ flake.nix was updated by script"
|
||||
git diff flake.nix
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Restore flake.nix
|
||||
if: always()
|
||||
run: git checkout -- flake.nix || true
|
||||
|
||||
validate-changesets:
|
||||
name: Validate Changesets
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
@@ -122,15 +271,15 @@ jobs:
|
||||
echo "Changesets not configured, skipping validation"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
required-checks:
|
||||
required-checks-pr:
|
||||
name: All checks passed
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
needs: [test, lint]
|
||||
if: always()
|
||||
needs: [test_pr, lint, nix-flake-validate]
|
||||
if: always() && github.event_name == 'pull_request'
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Verify all checks passed
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.test.result }}" != "success" ]]; then
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.test_pr.result }}" != "success" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Test job failed"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
@@ -138,4 +287,38 @@ jobs:
|
||||
echo "Lint job failed"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "All required checks passed!"
|
||||
# Nix validation may be skipped if no Nix-related files changed
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.nix-flake-validate.result }}" != "success" && "${{ needs.nix-flake-validate.result }}" != "skipped" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Nix flake validation job failed"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.nix-flake-validate.result }}" == "skipped" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Nix flake validation skipped (no Nix-related changes)"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "All required checks passed!"
|
||||
|
||||
required-checks-main:
|
||||
name: All checks passed
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
needs: [test_matrix, lint, nix-flake-validate]
|
||||
if: always() && github.event_name != 'pull_request'
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Verify all checks passed
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.test_matrix.result }}" != "success" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Matrix test job failed"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.lint.result }}" != "success" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Lint job failed"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
# Nix validation may be skipped if no Nix-related files changed
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.nix-flake-validate.result }}" != "success" && "${{ needs.nix-flake-validate.result }}" != "skipped" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Nix flake validation job failed"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ "${{ needs.nix-flake-validate.result }}" == "skipped" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Nix flake validation skipped (no Nix-related changes)"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "All required checks passed!"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,14 +7,31 @@ on:
|
||||
permissions:
|
||||
contents: write
|
||||
pull-requests: write
|
||||
id-token: write # Required for npm OIDC trusted publishing
|
||||
|
||||
concurrency:
|
||||
group: release-${{ github.ref }}
|
||||
cancel-in-progress: false
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
prepare:
|
||||
if: github.repository == 'Fission-AI/OpenSpec'
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
# Generate GitHub App token first - used for checkout and changesets
|
||||
# This allows git operations to trigger CI workflows on the version PR
|
||||
# (GITHUB_TOKEN cannot trigger workflows by design)
|
||||
- name: Generate GitHub App Token
|
||||
id: app-token
|
||||
uses: actions/create-github-app-token@v2
|
||||
with:
|
||||
app-id: ${{ vars.APP_ID }}
|
||||
private-key: ${{ secrets.APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
fetch-depth: 0
|
||||
token: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
@@ -22,16 +39,22 @@ jobs:
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
node-version: '20'
|
||||
node-version: '24' # Node 24 includes npm 11.5.1+ required for OIDC
|
||||
cache: 'pnpm'
|
||||
registry-url: 'https://registry.npmjs.org'
|
||||
|
||||
- run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
|
||||
|
||||
# Opens/updates the Version Packages PR; no publishing here
|
||||
# Opens/updates the Version Packages PR; publishes when the Version PR merges
|
||||
- name: Create/Update Version PR
|
||||
id: changesets
|
||||
uses: changesets/action@v1
|
||||
with:
|
||||
title: 'chore(release): version packages'
|
||||
createGithubReleases: true
|
||||
# Use CI-specific release script: relies on version PR having been merged
|
||||
# so package.json already contains the bumped version.
|
||||
publish: pnpm run release:ci
|
||||
env:
|
||||
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
||||
|
||||
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}
|
||||
# npm authentication handled via OIDC trusted publishing (no token needed)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
|
||||
name: Publish to npm
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
release:
|
||||
types: [published]
|
||||
workflow_dispatch: {}
|
||||
|
||||
permissions:
|
||||
contents: read
|
||||
id-token: write
|
||||
|
||||
concurrency:
|
||||
group: publish-${{ github.ref }}
|
||||
cancel-in-progress: false
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
publish:
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
env:
|
||||
NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
fetch-depth: 0
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
version: 9
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
node-version: '20'
|
||||
cache: 'pnpm'
|
||||
registry-url: 'https://registry.npmjs.org'
|
||||
scope: '@fission-ai'
|
||||
always-auth: true
|
||||
|
||||
- run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Build project
|
||||
run: pnpm run build
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Ensure running from a tag
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
if [[ "$GITHUB_REF" != refs/tags/* ]]; then
|
||||
echo "This workflow must run from a tag (got: $GITHUB_REF)";
|
||||
exit 1;
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Verify release tag matches package.json
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
TAG="${GITHUB_REF_NAME#v}"
|
||||
PKG_VERSION=$(node -p "require('./package.json').version")
|
||||
if [ "$TAG" != "$PKG_VERSION" ]; then
|
||||
echo "Tag v$TAG does not match package.json $PKG_VERSION"; exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Debug npm auth and context
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
test -n "$NODE_AUTH_TOKEN" || (echo "NODE_AUTH_TOKEN is missing" && exit 1)
|
||||
echo "NODE_AUTH_TOKEN present"
|
||||
npm --version
|
||||
pnpm --version
|
||||
node --version
|
||||
npm config get registry
|
||||
npm whoami
|
||||
npm ping
|
||||
|
||||
- run: pnpm test
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Publish
|
||||
run: pnpm publish --access public --provenance --no-git-checks --tag next
|
||||
+6
-3
@@ -140,9 +140,12 @@ dist/
|
||||
vite.config.js.timestamp-*
|
||||
vite.config.ts.timestamp-*
|
||||
|
||||
# Internal Docs
|
||||
docs/
|
||||
|
||||
# Claude
|
||||
.claude/
|
||||
CLAUDE.md
|
||||
CLAUDE.md
|
||||
.DS_Store
|
||||
|
||||
# Pnpm
|
||||
.pnpm-store/
|
||||
result
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 24b4866: Initial release
|
||||
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
|
||||
# OpenSpec Project
|
||||
|
||||
This document provides instructions for AI coding assistants on how to use OpenSpec conventions for spec-driven development. Follow these rules precisely when working on OpenSpec-enabled projects.
|
||||
|
||||
This project uses OpenSpec for spec-driven development. Specifications are the source of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
See @openspec/AGENTS.md for detailed conventions and guidelines.
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity Management
|
||||
|
||||
**Default to minimal solutions:**
|
||||
- Propose <100 lines of new code for features
|
||||
- Prefer single-file implementations until proven insufficient
|
||||
- Avoid frameworks, abstractions, and optimizations without clear justification
|
||||
- Choose boring, well-understood patterns over novel approaches
|
||||
|
||||
**Question requests for complexity:**
|
||||
- Caching? → Ask for performance data and targets
|
||||
- New framework? → Suggest plain code first
|
||||
- Extra layers? → Start with the thinnest viable design
|
||||
|
||||
**Justify complexity with data:**
|
||||
- Performance metrics showing current solution is too slow
|
||||
- Concrete scale requirements (e.g., >1000 users, >100MB data)
|
||||
- Multiple proven use cases requiring an abstraction
|
||||
|
||||
## Package Manager
|
||||
Always use pnpm (NOT npm or yarn) for all Node.js package management:
|
||||
- Install dependencies: `pnpm install`
|
||||
- Add packages: `pnpm add [package]`
|
||||
- Run scripts: `pnpm run [script]`
|
||||
|
||||
## Git Commits
|
||||
Use conventional commits with these rules:
|
||||
- Format: `type(scope): subject` (e.g., `fix: resolve auth error`, `feat(api): add user endpoint`)
|
||||
- Keep commit messages to ONE line only - no body or footer
|
||||
- Common types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore
|
||||
- Never add co-authorship lines or attribution
|
||||
+460
@@ -1,5 +1,465 @@
|
||||
# @fission-ai/openspec
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.0.2
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- [#596](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/pull/596) [`e91568d`](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/commit/e91568deb948073f3e9d9bb2d2ab5bf8080d6cf4) Thanks [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB)! - ### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- Clarified spec naming convention — Specs should be named after capabilities (`specs/<capability>/spec.md`), not changes
|
||||
- Fixed task checkbox format guidance — Tasks now clearly require `- [ ]` checkbox format for apply phase tracking
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.0.1
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- [#587](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/pull/587) [`943e0d4`](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/commit/943e0d41026d034de66b9442d1276c01b293eb2b) Thanks [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB)! - ### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- Fixed incorrect archive path in onboarding documentation — the template now shows the correct path `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/` instead of the incorrect `openspec/archive/YYYY-MM-DD--<name>/`
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.0.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Major Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- [#578](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/pull/578) [`0cc9d90`](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/commit/0cc9d9025af367faa1688a7b2606a2549053cd3f) Thanks [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB)! - ## OpenSpec 1.0 — The OPSX Release
|
||||
|
||||
The workflow has been rebuilt from the ground up. OPSX replaces the old phase-locked `/openspec:*` commands with an action-based system where AI understands what artifacts exist, what's ready to create, and what each action unlocks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Breaking Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Old commands removed** — `/openspec:proposal`, `/openspec:apply`, and `/openspec:archive` no longer exist
|
||||
- **Config files removed** — Tool-specific instruction files (`CLAUDE.md`, `.cursorrules`, `AGENTS.md`, `project.md`) are no longer generated
|
||||
- **Migration** — Run `openspec init` to upgrade. Legacy artifacts are detected and cleaned up with confirmation.
|
||||
|
||||
### From Static Prompts to Dynamic Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
**Before:** AI received the same static instructions every time, regardless of project state.
|
||||
|
||||
**Now:** Instructions are dynamically assembled from three layers:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Context** — Project background from `config.yaml` (tech stack, conventions)
|
||||
2. **Rules** — Artifact-specific constraints (e.g., "propose spike tasks for unknowns")
|
||||
3. **Template** — The actual structure for the output file
|
||||
|
||||
AI queries the CLI for real-time state: which artifacts exist, what's ready to create, what dependencies are satisfied, and what each action unlocks.
|
||||
|
||||
### From Phase-Locked to Action-Based
|
||||
|
||||
**Before:** Linear workflow — proposal → apply → archive. Couldn't easily go back or iterate.
|
||||
|
||||
**Now:** Flexible actions on a change. Edit any artifact anytime. The artifact graph tracks state automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | What it does |
|
||||
| -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `/opsx:explore` | Think through ideas before committing to a change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:new` | Start a new change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:continue` | Create one artifact at a time (step-through) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:ff` | Create all planning artifacts at once (fast-forward) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks |
|
||||
| `/opsx:verify` | Validate implementation matches artifacts |
|
||||
| `/opsx:sync` | Sync delta specs to main specs |
|
||||
| `/opsx:archive` | Archive completed change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:bulk-archive` | Archive multiple changes with conflict detection |
|
||||
| `/opsx:onboard` | Guided 15-minute walkthrough of complete workflow |
|
||||
|
||||
### From Text Merging to Semantic Spec Syncing
|
||||
|
||||
**Before:** Spec updates required manual merging or wholesale file replacement.
|
||||
|
||||
**Now:** Delta specs use semantic markers that AI understands:
|
||||
|
||||
- `## ADDED Requirements` — New requirements to add
|
||||
- `## MODIFIED Requirements` — Partial updates (add scenario without copying existing ones)
|
||||
- `## REMOVED Requirements` — Delete with reason and migration notes
|
||||
- `## RENAMED Requirements` — Rename preserving content
|
||||
|
||||
Archive parses these at the requirement level, not brittle header matching.
|
||||
|
||||
### From Scattered Files to Agent Skills
|
||||
|
||||
**Before:** 8+ config files at project root + slash commands scattered across 21 tool-specific locations with different formats.
|
||||
|
||||
**Now:** Single `.claude/skills/` directory with YAML-fronted markdown files. Auto-detected by Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf. Cross-editor compatible.
|
||||
|
||||
### New Features
|
||||
|
||||
- **Onboarding skill** — `/opsx:onboard` walks new users through their first complete change with codebase-aware task suggestions and step-by-step narration (11 phases, ~15 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
- **21 AI tools supported** — Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Continue, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, Amazon Q, Cline, RooCode, Kilo Code, Auggie, CodeBuddy, Qoder, Qwen, CoStrict, Crush, Factory, OpenCode, Antigravity, iFlow, and Codex
|
||||
|
||||
- **Interactive setup** — `openspec init` shows animated welcome screen and searchable multi-select for choosing tools. Pre-selects already-configured tools for easy refresh.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Customizable schemas** — Define custom artifact workflows in `openspec/schemas/` without touching package code. Teams can share workflows via version control.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- Fixed Claude Code YAML parsing failure when command names contained colons
|
||||
- Fixed task file parsing to handle trailing whitespace on checkbox lines
|
||||
- Fixed JSON instruction output to separate context/rules from template — AI was copying constraint blocks into artifact files
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- New getting-started guide, CLI reference, concepts documentation
|
||||
- Removed misleading "edit mid-flight and continue" claims that weren't implemented
|
||||
- Added migration guide for upgrading from pre-OPSX versions
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.23.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- [#540](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/pull/540) [`c4cfdc7`](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/commit/c4cfdc7c499daef30d8a218f5f59b8d9e5adb754) Thanks [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB)! - ### New Features
|
||||
|
||||
- **Bulk archive skill** — Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation with `/opsx:bulk-archive`. Includes batch validation, spec conflict detection, and consolidated confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
### Other
|
||||
|
||||
- **Simplified setup** — Config creation now uses sensible defaults with helpful comments instead of interactive prompts
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.22.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- [#530](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/pull/530) [`33466b1`](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/commit/33466b1e2a6798bdd6d0e19149173585b0612e6f) Thanks [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB)! - Add project-level configuration, project-local schemas, and schema management commands
|
||||
|
||||
**New Features**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Project-level configuration** — Configure OpenSpec behavior per-project via `openspec/config.yaml`, including custom rules injection, context files, and schema resolution settings
|
||||
- **Project-local schemas** — Define custom artifact schemas within your project's `openspec/schemas/` directory for project-specific workflows
|
||||
- **Schema management commands** — New `openspec schema` commands (`list`, `show`, `export`, `validate`) for inspecting and managing artifact schemas (experimental)
|
||||
|
||||
**Bug Fixes**
|
||||
|
||||
- Fixed config loading to handle null `rules` field in project configuration
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.21.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- [#516](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/pull/516) [`b5a8847`](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/commit/b5a884748be6156a7bb140b4941cfec4f20a9fc8) Thanks [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB)! - Add feedback command and Nix flake support
|
||||
|
||||
**New Features**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Feedback command** — Submit feedback directly from the CLI with `openspec feedback`, which creates GitHub Issues with automatic metadata inclusion and graceful fallback for manual submission
|
||||
- **Nix flake support** — Install and develop openspec using Nix with the new `flake.nix`, including automated flake maintenance and CI validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Bug Fixes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Explore mode guardrails** — Explore mode now explicitly prevents implementation, keeping the focus on thinking and discovery while still allowing artifact creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Other**
|
||||
|
||||
- Improved change inference in `opsx apply` — automatically detects the target change from conversation context or prompts when ambiguous
|
||||
- Streamlined archive sync assessment with clearer delta spec location guidance
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.20.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- [#502](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/pull/502) [`9db74aa`](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/commit/9db74aa5ac6547efadaed795217cfa17444f2004) Thanks [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB)! - Add `/opsx:verify` command and fix vitest process storms
|
||||
|
||||
**New Features**
|
||||
|
||||
- **`/opsx:verify` command** — Validate that change implementations match their specifications
|
||||
|
||||
**Bug Fixes**
|
||||
|
||||
- Fixed vitest process storms by capping worker parallelism
|
||||
- Fixed agent workflows to use non-interactive mode for validation commands
|
||||
- Fixed PowerShell completions generator to remove trailing commas
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.19.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- eb152eb: Add Continue IDE support, shell completions, and `/opsx:explore` command
|
||||
|
||||
**New Features**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Continue IDE support** – OpenSpec now generates slash commands for [Continue](https://continue.dev/), expanding editor integration options alongside Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, and others
|
||||
- **Shell completions for Bash, Fish, and PowerShell** – Run `openspec completion install` to set up tab completion in your preferred shell
|
||||
- **`/opsx:explore` command** – A new thinking partner mode for exploring ideas and investigating problems before committing to changes
|
||||
- **Codebuddy slash command improvements** – Updated frontmatter format for better compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Bug Fixes**
|
||||
|
||||
- Shell completions now correctly offer parent-level flags (like `--help`) when a command has subcommands
|
||||
- Fixed Windows compatibility issues in tests
|
||||
|
||||
**Other**
|
||||
|
||||
- Added optional anonymous usage statistics to help understand how OpenSpec is used. This is **opt-out** by default – set `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` to disable. Only command names and version are collected; no arguments, file paths, or content. Automatically disabled in CI environments.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.18.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 8dfd824: Add OPSX experimental workflow commands and enhanced artifact system
|
||||
|
||||
**New Commands:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `/opsx:ff` - Fast-forward through artifact creation, generating all needed artifacts in one go
|
||||
- `/opsx:sync` - Sync delta specs from a change to main specs
|
||||
- `/opsx:archive` - Archive completed changes with smart sync check
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifact Workflow Enhancements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Schema-aware apply instructions with inline guidance and XML output
|
||||
- Agent schema selection for experimental artifact workflow
|
||||
- Per-change schema metadata via `.openspec.yaml` files
|
||||
- Agent Skills for experimental artifact workflow
|
||||
- Instruction loader for template loading and change context
|
||||
- Restructured schemas as directories with templates
|
||||
|
||||
**Improvements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Enhanced list command with last modified timestamps and sorting
|
||||
- Change creation utilities for better workflow support
|
||||
|
||||
**Fixes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Normalize paths for cross-platform glob compatibility
|
||||
- Allow REMOVED requirements when creating new spec files
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.17.2
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 455c65f: Fix `--no-interactive` flag in validate command to properly disable spinner, preventing hangs in pre-commit hooks and CI environments
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.17.1
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- a2757e7: Fix pre-commit hook hang issue in config command by using dynamic import for @inquirer/prompts
|
||||
|
||||
The config command was causing pre-commit hooks to hang indefinitely due to stdin event listeners being registered at module load time. This fix converts the static import to a dynamic import that only loads inquirer when the `config reset` command is actually used interactively.
|
||||
|
||||
Also adds ESLint with a rule to prevent static @inquirer imports, avoiding future regressions.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.17.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 2e71835: Add `openspec config` command and Oh-my-zsh completions
|
||||
|
||||
**New Features**
|
||||
|
||||
- Add `openspec config` command for managing global configuration settings
|
||||
- Implement global config directory with XDG Base Directory specification support
|
||||
- Add Oh-my-zsh shell completions support for enhanced CLI experience
|
||||
|
||||
**Bug Fixes**
|
||||
|
||||
- Fix hang in pre-commit hooks by using dynamic imports
|
||||
- Respect XDG_CONFIG_HOME environment variable on all platforms
|
||||
- Resolve Windows compatibility issues in zsh-installer tests
|
||||
- Align cli-completion spec with implementation
|
||||
- Remove hardcoded agent field from slash commands
|
||||
|
||||
**Documentation**
|
||||
|
||||
- Alphabetize AI tools list in README and make it collapsible
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.16.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- c08fbc1: Add new AI tool integrations and enhancements:
|
||||
|
||||
- **feat(iflow-cli)**: Add iFlow-cli integration with slash command support and documentation
|
||||
- **feat(init)**: Add IDE restart instruction after init to inform users about slash command availability
|
||||
**feat(antigravity)**: Add Antigravity slash command support
|
||||
- **fix**: Generate TOML commands for Qwen Code (fixes #293)
|
||||
- Clarify scaffold proposal documentation and enhance proposal guidelines
|
||||
- Update proposal guidelines to emphasize design-first approach before implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Unreleased
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add Continue slash command support so `openspec init` can generate `.continue/prompts/openspec-*.prompt` files with MARKDOWN frontmatter and `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder, and refresh them on `openspec update`.
|
||||
|
||||
- Add Antigravity slash command support so `openspec init` can generate `.agent/workflows/openspec-*.md` files with description-only frontmatter and `openspec update` refreshes existing workflows alongside Windsurf.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.15.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 4758c5c: Add support for new AI tools with native slash command integration
|
||||
|
||||
- **Gemini CLI**: Add native TOML-based slash command support for Gemini CLI with `.gemini/commands/openspec/` integration
|
||||
- **RooCode**: Add RooCode integration with configurator, slash commands, and templates
|
||||
- **Cline**: Fix Cline to use workflows instead of rules for slash commands (`.clinerules/workflows/` paths)
|
||||
- **Documentation**: Update documentation to reflect new integrations and workflow changes
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.14.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 8386b91: Add support for new AI assistants and configuration improvements
|
||||
|
||||
- feat: add Qwen Code support with slash command integration
|
||||
- feat: add $ARGUMENTS support to apply slash command for dynamic variable passing
|
||||
- feat: add Qoder CLI support to configuration and documentation
|
||||
- feat: add CoStrict AI assistant support
|
||||
- fix: recreate missing openspec template files in extend mode
|
||||
- fix: prevent false 'already configured' detection for tools
|
||||
- fix: use change-id as fallback title instead of "Untitled Change"
|
||||
- docs: add guidance for populating project-level context
|
||||
- docs: add Crush to supported AI tools in README
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.13.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 668a125: Add support for multiple AI assistants and improve validation
|
||||
|
||||
This release adds support for several new AI coding assistants:
|
||||
|
||||
- CodeBuddy Code - AI-powered coding assistant
|
||||
- CodeRabbit - AI code review assistant
|
||||
- Cline - Claude-powered CLI assistant
|
||||
- Crush AI - AI assistant platform
|
||||
- Auggie (Augment CLI) - Code augmentation tool
|
||||
|
||||
New features:
|
||||
|
||||
- Archive slash command now supports arguments for more flexible workflows
|
||||
|
||||
Bug fixes:
|
||||
|
||||
- Delta spec validation now handles case-insensitive headers and properly detects empty sections
|
||||
- Archive validation now correctly honors --no-validate flag and ignores metadata
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation improvements:
|
||||
|
||||
- Added VS Code dev container configuration for easier development setup
|
||||
- Updated AGENTS.md with explicit change-id notation
|
||||
- Enhanced slash commands documentation with restart notes
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.12.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 082abb4: Add factory function support for slash commands and non-interactive init options
|
||||
|
||||
This release includes two new features:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Factory function support for slash commands**: Slash commands can now be defined as functions that return command objects, enabling dynamic command configuration
|
||||
- **Non-interactive init options**: Added `--tools`, `--all-tools`, and `--skip-tools` CLI flags to `openspec init` for automated initialization in CI/CD pipelines while maintaining backward compatibility with interactive mode
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.11.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 312e1d6: Add Amazon Q Developer CLI integration. OpenSpec now supports Amazon Q Developer with automatic prompt generation in `.amazonq/prompts/` directory, allowing you to use OpenSpec slash commands with Amazon Q's @-syntax.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.10.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- d7e0ce8: Improve init wizard Enter key behavior to allow proceeding through prompts more naturally
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.9.2
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 2ae0484: Fix cross-platform path handling issues. This release includes fixes for joinPath behavior and slash command path resolution to ensure OpenSpec works correctly across all platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.9.1
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- 8210970: Fix OpenSpec not working on Windows when Codex integration is selected. This release includes fixes for cross-platform path handling and normalization to ensure OpenSpec works correctly on Windows systems.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.9.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- efbbf3b: Add support for Codex and GitHub Copilot slash commands with YAML frontmatter and $ARGUMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
## Unreleased
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add GitHub Copilot slash command support. OpenSpec now writes prompts to `.github/prompts/openspec-{proposal,apply,archive}.prompt.md` with YAML frontmatter and `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder, and refreshes them on `openspec update`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.8.1
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- d070d08: Fix CLI version mismatch and add a release guard that validates the packed tarball prints the same version as package.json via `openspec --version`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.8.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- c29b06d: Add Windsurf support.
|
||||
- Add Codex slash command support. OpenSpec now writes prompts directly to Codex's global directory (`~/.codex/prompts` or `$CODEX_HOME/prompts`) and refreshes them on `openspec update`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.7.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add native Kilo Code workflow integration so `openspec init` and `openspec update` manage `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-*.md` files.
|
||||
- Always scaffold the managed root `AGENTS.md` hand-off stub and regroup the AI tool prompts during init/update to keep instructions consistent.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.6.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Slim the generated root agent instructions down to a managed hand-off stub and update the init/update flows to refresh it safely.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.5.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- feat: implement Phase 1 E2E testing with cross-platform CI matrix
|
||||
|
||||
- Add shared runCLI helper in test/helpers/run-cli.ts for spawn testing
|
||||
- Create test/cli-e2e/basic.test.ts covering help, version, validate flows
|
||||
- Migrate existing CLI exec tests to use runCLI helper
|
||||
- Extend CI matrix to bash (Linux/macOS) and pwsh (Windows)
|
||||
- Split PR and main workflows for optimized feedback
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Make apply instructions more specific
|
||||
|
||||
Improve agent templates and slash command templates with more specific and actionable apply instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
- docs: improve documentation and cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
- Document non-interactive flag for archive command
|
||||
- Replace discord badge in README
|
||||
- Archive completed changes for better organization
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.4.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add OpenSpec change proposals for CLI improvements and enhanced user experience
|
||||
- Add Opencode slash commands support for AI-driven development workflows
|
||||
|
||||
### Patch Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add documentation improvements including --yes flag for archive command template and Discord badge
|
||||
- Fix normalize line endings in markdown parser to handle CRLF files properly
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.3.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Enhance `openspec init` with extend mode, multi-tool selection, and an interactive `AGENTS.md` configurator.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.2.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- ce5cead: - Add an `openspec view` dashboard that rolls up spec counts and change progress at a glance
|
||||
- Generate and update AI slash commands alongside the renamed `openspec/AGENTS.md` instructions file
|
||||
- Remove the deprecated `openspec diff` command and direct users to `openspec show`
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.1.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Minor Changes
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# Maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
People who maintain and guide OpenSpec.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
| Name | GitHub | Role |
|
||||
|------|--------|------|
|
||||
| Tabish Bidiwale | [@TabishB](https://github.com/TabishB) | Lead maintainer |
|
||||
|
||||
## Advisors
|
||||
|
||||
Advisors help shape technical direction and provide guidance to the project.
|
||||
|
||||
| Name | GitHub | Focus |
|
||||
|------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| Hari Krishnan | [@harikrishnan83](https://github.com/harikrishnan83) | Technical direction |
|
||||
@@ -1,274 +1,204 @@
|
||||
# OpenSpec
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
<a href="https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec">
|
||||
<picture>
|
||||
<source srcset="assets/openspec_bg.png">
|
||||
<img src="assets/openspec_bg.png" alt="OpenSpec logo">
|
||||
</picture>
|
||||
</a>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
[](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
|
||||
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@fission-ai/openspec)
|
||||
[](https://nodejs.org/)
|
||||
[](./LICENSE)
|
||||
[](https://conventionalcommits.org)
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
<a href="https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/actions/workflows/ci.yml"><img alt="CI" src="https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/@fission-ai/openspec"><img alt="npm version" src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@fission-ai/openspec?style=flat-square" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="./LICENSE"><img alt="License: MIT" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-blue.svg?style=flat-square" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC"><img alt="Discord" src="https://img.shields.io/discord/1411657095639601154?style=flat-square&logo=discord&logoColor=white&label=Discord&suffix=%20online" /></a>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
**Supported AI Tools:** ✅ Claude Code | 🔜 Cursor (coming soon) | 🔜 AGENTS.md support (coming soon)
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>The most loved spec framework.</strong></summary>
|
||||
|
||||
Create **alignment** between humans and AI coding assistants through spec-driven development. **No API keys required.**
|
||||
[](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/stargazers)
|
||||
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@fission-ai/openspec)
|
||||
[](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/graphs/contributors)
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
<p></p>
|
||||
Our philosophy:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
→ fluid not rigid
|
||||
→ iterative not waterfall
|
||||
→ easy not complex
|
||||
→ built for brownfield not just greenfield
|
||||
→ scalable from personal projects to enterprises
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
> [!TIP]
|
||||
> **New workflow now available!** We've rebuilt OpenSpec with a new artifact-guided workflow.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Run `/opsx:onboard` to get started. → [Learn more here](docs/opsx.md)
|
||||
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
Follow <a href="https://x.com/0xTab">@0xTab on X</a> for updates · Join the <a href="https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC">OpenSpec Discord</a> for help and questions.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
### Teams
|
||||
|
||||
Using OpenSpec in a team? [Email here](mailto:teams@openspec.dev) for access to our Slack channel.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- TODO: Add GIF demo of /opsx:new → /opsx:archive workflow -->
|
||||
|
||||
## See it in action
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:new add-dark-mode
|
||||
AI: Created openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/
|
||||
Ready to create: proposal
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:ff # "fast-forward" - generate all planning docs
|
||||
AI: ✓ proposal.md — why we're doing this, what's changing
|
||||
✓ specs/ — requirements and scenarios
|
||||
✓ design.md — technical approach
|
||||
✓ tasks.md — implementation checklist
|
||||
Ready for implementation!
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:apply
|
||||
AI: Implementing tasks...
|
||||
✓ 1.1 Add theme context provider
|
||||
✓ 1.2 Create toggle component
|
||||
✓ 2.1 Add CSS variables
|
||||
✓ 2.2 Wire up localStorage
|
||||
All tasks complete!
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:archive
|
||||
AI: Archived to openspec/changes/archive/2025-01-23-add-dark-mode/
|
||||
Specs updated. Ready for the next feature.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>OpenSpec Dashboard</strong></summary>
|
||||
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
<img src="assets/openspec_dashboard.png" alt="OpenSpec dashboard preview" width="90%">
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Start
|
||||
|
||||
**Requires Node.js 20.19.0 or higher.**
|
||||
|
||||
Install OpenSpec globally:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then navigate to your project directory and initialize:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd your-project
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Now tell your AI: `/opsx:new <what-you-want-to-build>`
|
||||
|
||||
> [!NOTE]
|
||||
> Not sure if your tool is supported? [View the full list](docs/supported-tools.md) – we support 20+ tools and growing.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Also works with pnpm, yarn, bun, and nix. [See installation options](docs/installation.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Docs
|
||||
|
||||
→ **[Getting Started](docs/getting-started.md)**: first steps<br>
|
||||
→ **[Workflows](docs/workflows.md)**: combos and patterns<br>
|
||||
→ **[Commands](docs/commands.md)**: slash commands & skills<br>
|
||||
→ **[CLI](docs/cli.md)**: terminal reference<br>
|
||||
→ **[Supported Tools](docs/supported-tools.md)**: tool integrations & install paths<br>
|
||||
→ **[Concepts](docs/concepts.md)**: how it all fits<br>
|
||||
→ **[Multi-Language](docs/multi-language.md)**: multi-language support<br>
|
||||
→ **[Customization](docs/customization.md)**: make it yours
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec ensures you and your AI assistant agree on what to build before any code is written. By discussing and refining specifications first, you bring determinism to AI code generation—getting exactly what you want, not what the AI thinks you might want.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why OpenSpec?
|
||||
|
||||
**The Problem:** AI coding assistants are powerful but unpredictable. Without clear specifications, they generate code based on assumptions, often missing requirements or adding unwanted features. Teams waste time in review cycles because humans and AI aren't aligned on what to build.
|
||||
AI coding assistants are powerful but unpredictable when requirements live only in chat history. OpenSpec adds a lightweight spec layer so you agree on what to build before any code is written.
|
||||
|
||||
**The Solution:** OpenSpec creates alignment BEFORE code is written:
|
||||
- **Human-AI Alignment** - You and your AI agree on specifications before implementation
|
||||
- **Deterministic Output** - Clear specs lead to predictable code generation
|
||||
- **Team Alignment** - Everyone reviews specs, not code surprises
|
||||
- **Focus on What, Not How** - Define requirements while AI handles implementation
|
||||
- **Living Documentation** - Specs evolve with your code as a natural byproduct
|
||||
- **Agree before you build** — human and AI align on specs before code gets written
|
||||
- **Stay organized** — each change gets its own folder with proposal, specs, design, and tasks
|
||||
- **Work fluidly** — update any artifact anytime, no rigid phase gates
|
||||
- **Use your tools** — works with 20+ AI assistants via slash commands
|
||||
|
||||
## What You Get
|
||||
### How we compare
|
||||
|
||||
- **Alignment First** - Ensure humans and AI agree on what to build before writing code
|
||||
- **Predictable AI Output** - Turn non-deterministic AI into a reliable development partner
|
||||
- **Universal Tool Support** - Works with any AI assistant - Claude Code, Cursor, or future tools
|
||||
- **No API Keys Required** - Integrates through context rules, not external services
|
||||
- **Spec-Level Reviews** - Teams review intentions, not implementation details
|
||||
- **Clear Feature Scope** - Know exactly what you're building and what you're not
|
||||
- **Progress Tracking** - See what's proposed, in progress, or completed at a glance
|
||||
**vs. [Spec Kit](https://github.com/github/spec-kit)** (GitHub) — Thorough but heavyweight. Rigid phase gates, lots of Markdown, Python setup. OpenSpec is lighter and lets you iterate freely.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
**vs. [Kiro](https://kiro.dev)** (AWS) — Powerful but you're locked into their IDE and limited to Claude models. OpenSpec works with the tools you already use.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
|
||||
│ SPECS │ │ CHANGES │ │ ARCHIVE │
|
||||
│ (Truth) │◀──────│ (Proposals) │──────▶│ (Completed) │
|
||||
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘
|
||||
▲ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────┐ │
|
||||
└───────────────│ CODE │◀──────────────┘
|
||||
└─────────────┘
|
||||
**vs. nothing** — AI coding without specs means vague prompts and unpredictable results. OpenSpec brings predictability without the ceremony.
|
||||
|
||||
1. SPECS define current capabilities (what IS built)
|
||||
2. CHANGES propose modifications using deltas (what SHOULD change)
|
||||
3. CODE implements the changes following tasks
|
||||
4. ARCHIVE preserves completed changes after deployment
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Updating OpenSpec
|
||||
|
||||
## Installation
|
||||
|
||||
### Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- Node.js >= 20.19.0
|
||||
|
||||
### Install OpenSpec
|
||||
|
||||
Install globally:
|
||||
**Upgrade the package**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec
|
||||
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Getting Started
|
||||
**Refresh agent instructions**
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Initialize OpenSpec in Your Project
|
||||
Run this inside each project to regenerate AI guidance and ensure the latest slash commands are active:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Navigate to your project
|
||||
cd my-project
|
||||
|
||||
# Initialize OpenSpec
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
|
||||
# Select your AI tool (more coming soon!):
|
||||
# "Which AI tool do you use?"
|
||||
# > Claude Code
|
||||
# Cursor (coming soon)
|
||||
|
||||
# This creates:
|
||||
# openspec/
|
||||
# ├── specs/ # Current specifications (truth)
|
||||
# ├── changes/ # Proposed changes
|
||||
# └── README.md # AI instructions for your tool
|
||||
openspec update
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Create Your First Change
|
||||
## Usage Notes
|
||||
|
||||
Jump straight into creating a change proposal with your AI assistant (works with Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI tool):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
// Quick win - Add a simple new feature:
|
||||
You: "I want to add a user profile API endpoint.
|
||||
Please create an OpenSpec change proposal for this."
|
||||
|
||||
AI: "I'll create an OpenSpec change proposal for the user profile API..."
|
||||
*Creates openspec/changes/add-user-profile-api/ with:*
|
||||
- proposal.md (why this feature is needed)
|
||||
- tasks.md (implementation checklist)
|
||||
- design.md (API design decisions)
|
||||
- specs/user-profile/spec.md (new requirements)
|
||||
|
||||
You: "The proposal looks good. Let's implement it."
|
||||
|
||||
AI: "Following the tasks in openspec/changes/add-user-profile-api/tasks.md:
|
||||
Task 1.1: Create user profile model..."
|
||||
*Implements each task systematically*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Track Your Work
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# View active changes (what's being worked on)
|
||||
openspec list
|
||||
|
||||
# See the difference between proposed and current specs
|
||||
openspec diff add-2fa
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate your changes are properly formatted
|
||||
openspec validate add-2fa --strict
|
||||
|
||||
# After deployment, archive the completed change
|
||||
openspec archive add-2fa
|
||||
# This moves the change to archive/ and updates specs/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Most used:
|
||||
openspec list # See what changes you're working on
|
||||
openspec archive <change> # Mark a change as complete after deployment
|
||||
|
||||
# Also useful:
|
||||
openspec diff <change> # See what specs will change
|
||||
openspec validate <change> # Check formatting before committing
|
||||
openspec show <change> # View change details
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Example: How AI Creates OpenSpec Files
|
||||
|
||||
When you ask your AI assistant to "add two-factor authentication", it creates:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── specs/
|
||||
│ └── auth/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # Current auth spec (if exists)
|
||||
└── changes/
|
||||
└── add-2fa/ # AI creates this entire structure
|
||||
├── proposal.md # Why and what changes
|
||||
├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist
|
||||
├── design.md # Technical decisions (optional)
|
||||
└── specs/
|
||||
└── auth/
|
||||
└── spec.md # Delta showing additions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AI-Generated Spec (created in `openspec/specs/auth/spec.md`):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Auth Specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Authentication and session management.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: User Authentication
|
||||
The system SHALL issue a JWT on successful login.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Valid credentials
|
||||
- WHEN a user submits valid credentials
|
||||
- THEN a JWT is returned
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AI-Generated Change Delta (created in `openspec/changes/add-2fa/specs/auth/spec.md`):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Delta for Auth
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
|
||||
The system MUST require a second factor during login.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: OTP required
|
||||
- WHEN a user submits valid credentials
|
||||
- THEN an OTP challenge is required
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AI-Generated Tasks (created in `openspec/changes/add-2fa/tasks.md`):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 1. Database Setup
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Add OTP secret column to users table
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Create OTP verification logs table
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Backend Implementation
|
||||
- [ ] 2.1 Add OTP generation endpoint
|
||||
- [ ] 2.2 Modify login flow to require OTP
|
||||
- [ ] 2.3 Add OTP verification endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Frontend Updates
|
||||
- [ ] 3.1 Create OTP input component
|
||||
- [ ] 3.2 Update login flow UI
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Important:** You don't create these files manually. Your AI assistant generates them based on your requirements and the existing codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
## Understanding OpenSpec Files
|
||||
|
||||
### Delta Format
|
||||
|
||||
Deltas are "patches" that show how specs change:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`## ADDED Requirements`** - New capabilities
|
||||
- **`## MODIFIED Requirements`** - Changed behavior (include complete updated text)
|
||||
- **`## REMOVED Requirements`** - Deprecated features
|
||||
|
||||
**Format requirements:**
|
||||
- Use `### Requirement: <name>` for headers
|
||||
- Every requirement needs at least one `#### Scenario:` block
|
||||
- Use SHALL/MUST in requirement text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Why OpenSpec Works
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec creates **alignment** between you and your AI coding assistant:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **You describe** what you want to build
|
||||
2. **AI creates specs** before writing any code
|
||||
3. **You review and adjust** the specifications
|
||||
4. **AI implements** exactly what was specified
|
||||
5. **Everyone understands** what's being built through clear specs
|
||||
|
||||
**True Interoperability:** OpenSpec is designed to be universal. No API keys, no vendor lock-in. It works by adding context rules to ANY AI coding tool - whether you use Claude Code today, switch to Cursor tomorrow, or adopt the next breakthrough AI assistant. Your specs remain portable and your workflow stays consistent.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## How OpenSpec Compares
|
||||
|
||||
### vs. Kiro.dev
|
||||
OpenSpec groups all changes for a feature in one place (`openspec/changes/feature-name/`), making it easy to track what needs to be done. Kiro spreads changes across multiple spec folders, making feature tracking harder.
|
||||
|
||||
### vs. No Specs
|
||||
Without specs, AI coding assistants generate code based on vague prompts, often missing requirements or adding unwanted features. OpenSpec ensures alignment before any code is written.
|
||||
|
||||
## Team Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
### Getting Started with Your Team
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Initialize OpenSpec** - Run `openspec init` in your project
|
||||
2. **Start with new features** - Use OpenSpec for your next change proposal
|
||||
3. **Build incrementally** - Each new feature adds to your spec library
|
||||
4. **Future capability** - We're working on tools to generate specs from existing code
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Freedom:** Your team can use different AI assistants. One developer might use Claude Code while another uses Cursor - OpenSpec keeps everyone aligned through shared specifications. Run `openspec update` to configure for any supported tool without affecting others.
|
||||
**Model selection**: OpenSpec works best with high-reasoning models. We recommend Opus 4.5 and GPT 5.2 for both planning and implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Context hygiene**: OpenSpec benefits from a clean context window. Clear your context before starting implementation and maintain good context hygiene throughout your session.
|
||||
|
||||
## Contributing
|
||||
|
||||
- Install dependencies: `npm install`
|
||||
- Build: `npm run build`
|
||||
- Test: `npm test`
|
||||
- Develop CLI locally: `npm run dev` or `npm run dev:cli`
|
||||
**Small fixes** — Bug fixes, typo corrections, and minor improvements can be submitted directly as PRs.
|
||||
|
||||
**Larger changes** — For new features, significant refactors, or architectural changes, please submit an OpenSpec change proposal first so we can align on intent and goals before implementation begins.
|
||||
|
||||
When writing proposals, keep the OpenSpec philosophy in mind: we serve a wide variety of users across different coding agents, models, and use cases. Changes should work well for everyone.
|
||||
|
||||
**AI-generated code is welcome** — as long as it's been tested and verified. PRs containing AI-generated code should mention the coding agent and model used (e.g., "Generated with Claude Code using claude-opus-4-5-20251101").
|
||||
|
||||
### Development
|
||||
|
||||
- Install dependencies: `pnpm install`
|
||||
- Build: `pnpm run build`
|
||||
- Test: `pnpm test`
|
||||
- Develop CLI locally: `pnpm run dev` or `pnpm run dev:cli`
|
||||
- Conventional commits (one-line): `type(scope): subject`
|
||||
|
||||
## Other
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>Telemetry</strong></summary>
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats.
|
||||
|
||||
We collect only command names and version to understand usage patterns. No arguments, paths, content, or PII. Automatically disabled in CI.
|
||||
|
||||
**Opt-out:** `export OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` or `export DO_NOT_TRACK=1`
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>Maintainers & Advisors</strong></summary>
|
||||
|
||||
See [MAINTAINERS.md](MAINTAINERS.md) for the list of core maintainers and advisors who help guide the project.
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
MIT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+475
@@ -0,0 +1,475 @@
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
<a href="https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec">
|
||||
<picture>
|
||||
<source srcset="assets/openspec_pixel_dark.svg" media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)">
|
||||
<source srcset="assets/openspec_pixel_light.svg" media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)">
|
||||
<img src="assets/openspec_pixel_light.svg" alt="OpenSpec logo" height="64">
|
||||
</picture>
|
||||
</a>
|
||||
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p align="center">Spec-driven development for AI coding assistants.</p>
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
<a href="https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/actions/workflows/ci.yml"><img alt="CI" src="https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/@fission-ai/openspec"><img alt="npm version" src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@fission-ai/openspec?style=flat-square" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="https://nodejs.org/"><img alt="node version" src="https://img.shields.io/node/v/@fission-ai/openspec?style=flat-square" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="./LICENSE"><img alt="License: MIT" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-blue.svg?style=flat-square" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="https://conventionalcommits.org"><img alt="Conventional Commits" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Conventional%20Commits-1.0.0-yellow.svg?style=flat-square" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC"><img alt="Discord" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Discord-Join%20the%20community-5865F2?logo=discord&logoColor=white&style=flat-square" /></a>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
<img src="assets/openspec_dashboard.png" alt="OpenSpec dashboard preview" width="90%">
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
Follow <a href="https://x.com/0xTab">@0xTab on X</a> for updates · Join the <a href="https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC">OpenSpec Discord</a> for help and questions.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p align="center">
|
||||
<sub>🧪 <strong>New:</strong> <a href="docs/opsx.md">OPSX Workflow</a> — schema-driven, hackable, fluid. Iterate on workflows without code changes.</sub>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
# OpenSpec
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec aligns humans and AI coding assistants with spec-driven development so you agree on what to build before any code is written. **No API keys required.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Why OpenSpec?
|
||||
|
||||
AI coding assistants are powerful but unpredictable when requirements live in chat history. OpenSpec adds a lightweight specification workflow that locks intent before implementation, giving you deterministic, reviewable outputs.
|
||||
|
||||
Key outcomes:
|
||||
- Human and AI stakeholders agree on specs before work begins.
|
||||
- Structured change folders (proposals, tasks, and spec updates) keep scope explicit and auditable.
|
||||
- Shared visibility into what's proposed, active, or archived.
|
||||
- Works with the AI tools you already use: custom slash commands where supported, context rules everywhere else.
|
||||
|
||||
## How OpenSpec compares (at a glance)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Lightweight**: simple workflow, no API keys, minimal setup.
|
||||
- **Brownfield-first**: works great beyond 0→1. OpenSpec separates the source of truth from proposals: `openspec/specs/` (current truth) and `openspec/changes/` (proposed updates). This keeps diffs explicit and manageable across features.
|
||||
- **Change tracking**: proposals, tasks, and spec deltas live together; archiving merges the approved updates back into specs.
|
||||
- **Compared to spec-kit & Kiro**: those shine for brand-new features (0→1). OpenSpec also excels when modifying existing behavior (1→n), especially when updates span multiple specs.
|
||||
|
||||
See the full comparison in [How OpenSpec Compares](#how-openspec-compares).
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Draft Change │
|
||||
│ Proposal │
|
||||
└────────┬───────────┘
|
||||
│ share intent with your AI
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Review & Align │
|
||||
│ (edit specs/tasks) │◀──── feedback loop ──────┐
|
||||
└────────┬───────────┘ │
|
||||
│ approved plan │
|
||||
▼ │
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ Implement Tasks │──────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│ (AI writes code) │
|
||||
└────────┬───────────┘
|
||||
│ ship the change
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Archive & Update │
|
||||
│ Specs (source) │
|
||||
└────────────────────┘
|
||||
|
||||
1. Draft a change proposal that captures the spec updates you want.
|
||||
2. Review the proposal with your AI assistant until everyone agrees.
|
||||
3. Implement tasks that reference the agreed specs.
|
||||
4. Archive the change to merge the approved updates back into the source-of-truth specs.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Getting Started
|
||||
|
||||
### Supported AI Tools
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>Native Slash Commands</strong> (click to expand)</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
These tools have built-in OpenSpec commands. Select the OpenSpec integration when prompted.
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Commands |
|
||||
|------|----------|
|
||||
| **Amazon Q Developer** | `@openspec-proposal`, `@openspec-apply`, `@openspec-archive` (`.amazonq/prompts/`) |
|
||||
| **Antigravity** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.agent/workflows/`) |
|
||||
| **Auggie (Augment CLI)** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.augment/commands/`) |
|
||||
| **Claude Code** | `/openspec:proposal`, `/openspec:apply`, `/openspec:archive` |
|
||||
| **Cline** | Workflows in `.clinerules/workflows/` directory (`.clinerules/workflows/openspec-*.md`) |
|
||||
| **CodeBuddy Code (CLI)** | `/openspec:proposal`, `/openspec:apply`, `/openspec:archive` (`.codebuddy/commands/`) — see [docs](https://www.codebuddy.ai/cli) |
|
||||
| **Codex** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (global: `~/.codex/prompts`, auto-installed) |
|
||||
| **Continue** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.continue/prompts/`) |
|
||||
| **CoStrict** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.cospec/openspec/commands/`) — see [docs](https://costrict.ai)|
|
||||
| **Crush** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.crush/commands/openspec/`) |
|
||||
| **Cursor** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` |
|
||||
| **Factory Droid** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.factory/commands/`) |
|
||||
| **Gemini CLI** | `/openspec:proposal`, `/openspec:apply`, `/openspec:archive` (`.gemini/commands/openspec/`) |
|
||||
| **GitHub Copilot** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.github/prompts/`) |
|
||||
| **iFlow (iflow-cli)** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.iflow/commands/`) |
|
||||
| **Kilo Code** | `/openspec-proposal.md`, `/openspec-apply.md`, `/openspec-archive.md` (`.kilocode/workflows/`) |
|
||||
| **OpenCode** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` |
|
||||
| **Qoder** | `/openspec:proposal`, `/openspec:apply`, `/openspec:archive` (`.qoder/commands/openspec/`) — see [docs](https://qoder.com) |
|
||||
| **Qwen Code** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.qwen/commands/`) |
|
||||
| **RooCode** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.roo/commands/`) |
|
||||
| **Windsurf** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.windsurf/workflows/`) |
|
||||
|
||||
Kilo Code discovers team workflows automatically. Save the generated files under `.kilocode/workflows/` and trigger them from the command palette with `/openspec-proposal.md`, `/openspec-apply.md`, or `/openspec-archive.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>AGENTS.md Compatible</strong> (click to expand)</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
These tools automatically read workflow instructions from `openspec/AGENTS.md`. Ask them to follow the OpenSpec workflow if they need a reminder. Learn more about the [AGENTS.md convention](https://agents.md/).
|
||||
|
||||
| Tools |
|
||||
|-------|
|
||||
| Amp • Jules • Others |
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
### Install & Initialize
|
||||
|
||||
#### Prerequisites
|
||||
- **Node.js >= 20.19.0** - Check your version with `node --version`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 1: Install the CLI globally
|
||||
|
||||
**Option A: Using npm**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Verify installation:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec --version
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Option B: Using Nix (NixOS and Nix package manager)**
|
||||
|
||||
Run OpenSpec directly without installation:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
nix run github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec -- init
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or install to your profile:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
nix profile install github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or add to your development environment in `flake.nix`:
|
||||
```nix
|
||||
{
|
||||
inputs = {
|
||||
nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-unstable";
|
||||
openspec.url = "github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
outputs = { nixpkgs, openspec, ... }: {
|
||||
devShells.x86_64-linux.default = nixpkgs.legacyPackages.x86_64-linux.mkShell {
|
||||
buildInputs = [ openspec.packages.x86_64-linux.default ];
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Verify installation:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec --version
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 2: Initialize OpenSpec in your project
|
||||
|
||||
Navigate to your project directory:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd my-project
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Run the initialization:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What happens during initialization:**
|
||||
- You'll be prompted to pick any natively supported AI tools (Claude Code, CodeBuddy, Cursor, OpenCode, Qoder,etc.); other assistants always rely on the shared `AGENTS.md` stub
|
||||
- OpenSpec automatically configures slash commands for the tools you choose and always writes a managed `AGENTS.md` hand-off at the project root
|
||||
- A new `openspec/` directory structure is created in your project
|
||||
|
||||
**After setup:**
|
||||
- Primary AI tools can trigger `/openspec` workflows without additional configuration
|
||||
- Run `openspec list` to verify the setup and view any active changes
|
||||
- If your coding assistant doesn't surface the new slash commands right away, restart it. Slash commands are loaded at startup,
|
||||
so a fresh launch ensures they appear
|
||||
|
||||
### Optional: Populate Project Context
|
||||
|
||||
After `openspec init` completes, you'll receive a suggested prompt to help populate your project context:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Populate your project context:
|
||||
"Please read openspec/project.md and help me fill it out with details about my project, tech stack, and conventions"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Use `openspec/project.md` to define project-level conventions, standards, architectural patterns, and other guidelines that should be followed across all changes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Create Your First Change
|
||||
|
||||
Here's a real example showing the complete OpenSpec workflow. This works with any AI tool. Those with native slash commands will recognize the shortcuts automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Draft the Proposal
|
||||
Start by asking your AI to create a change proposal:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: Create an OpenSpec change proposal for adding profile search filters by role and team
|
||||
(Shortcut for tools with slash commands: /openspec:proposal Add profile search filters)
|
||||
|
||||
AI: I'll create an OpenSpec change proposal for profile filters.
|
||||
*Scaffolds openspec/changes/add-profile-filters/ with proposal.md, tasks.md, spec deltas.*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Verify & Review
|
||||
Check that the change was created correctly and review the proposal:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
$ openspec list # Confirm the change folder exists
|
||||
$ openspec validate add-profile-filters # Validate spec formatting
|
||||
$ openspec show add-profile-filters # Review proposal, tasks, and spec delta
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Refine the Specs
|
||||
Iterate on the specifications until they match your needs:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: Can you add acceptance criteria for the role and team filters?
|
||||
|
||||
AI: I'll update the spec delta with scenarios for role and team filters.
|
||||
*Edits openspec/changes/add-profile-filters/specs/profile/spec.md and tasks.md.*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. Implement the Change
|
||||
Once specs look good, start implementation:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: The specs look good. Let's implement this change.
|
||||
(Shortcut for tools with slash commands: /openspec:apply add-profile-filters)
|
||||
|
||||
AI: I'll work through the tasks in the add-profile-filters change.
|
||||
*Implements tasks from openspec/changes/add-profile-filters/tasks.md*
|
||||
*Marks tasks complete: Task 1.1 ✓, Task 1.2 ✓, Task 2.1 ✓...*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5. Archive the Completed Change
|
||||
After implementation is complete, archive the change:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
AI: All tasks are complete. The implementation is ready.
|
||||
|
||||
You: Please archive the change
|
||||
(Shortcut for tools with slash commands: /openspec:archive add-profile-filters)
|
||||
|
||||
AI: I'll archive the add-profile-filters change.
|
||||
*Runs: openspec archive add-profile-filters --yes*
|
||||
✓ Change archived successfully. Specs updated. Ready for the next feature!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or run the command yourself in terminal:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
$ openspec archive add-profile-filters --yes # Archive the completed change without prompts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** Tools with native slash commands (Claude Code, CodeBuddy, Cursor, Codex, Qoder, RooCode) can use the shortcuts shown. All other tools work with natural language requests to "create an OpenSpec proposal", "apply the OpenSpec change", or "archive the change".
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Reference
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec list # View active change folders
|
||||
openspec view # Interactive dashboard of specs and changes
|
||||
openspec show <change> # Display change details (proposal, tasks, spec updates)
|
||||
openspec validate <change> # Check spec formatting and structure
|
||||
openspec archive <change> [--yes|-y] # Move a completed change into archive/ (non-interactive with --yes)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Example: How AI Creates OpenSpec Files
|
||||
|
||||
When you ask your AI assistant to "add two-factor authentication", it creates:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── specs/
|
||||
│ └── auth/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # Current auth spec (if exists)
|
||||
└── changes/
|
||||
└── add-2fa/ # AI creates this entire structure
|
||||
├── proposal.md # Why and what changes
|
||||
├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist
|
||||
├── design.md # Technical decisions (optional)
|
||||
└── specs/
|
||||
└── auth/
|
||||
└── spec.md # Delta showing additions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AI-Generated Spec (created in `openspec/specs/auth/spec.md`):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Auth Specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Authentication and session management.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: User Authentication
|
||||
The system SHALL issue a JWT on successful login.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Valid credentials
|
||||
- WHEN a user submits valid credentials
|
||||
- THEN a JWT is returned
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AI-Generated Change Delta (created in `openspec/changes/add-2fa/specs/auth/spec.md`):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Delta for Auth
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
|
||||
The system MUST require a second factor during login.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: OTP required
|
||||
- WHEN a user submits valid credentials
|
||||
- THEN an OTP challenge is required
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AI-Generated Tasks (created in `openspec/changes/add-2fa/tasks.md`):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 1. Database Setup
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Add OTP secret column to users table
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Create OTP verification logs table
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Backend Implementation
|
||||
- [ ] 2.1 Add OTP generation endpoint
|
||||
- [ ] 2.2 Modify login flow to require OTP
|
||||
- [ ] 2.3 Add OTP verification endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Frontend Updates
|
||||
- [ ] 3.1 Create OTP input component
|
||||
- [ ] 3.2 Update login flow UI
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Important:** You don't create these files manually. Your AI assistant generates them based on your requirements and the existing codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
## Understanding OpenSpec Files
|
||||
|
||||
### Delta Format
|
||||
|
||||
Deltas are "patches" that show how specs change:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`## ADDED Requirements`** - New capabilities
|
||||
- **`## MODIFIED Requirements`** - Changed behavior (include complete updated text)
|
||||
- **`## REMOVED Requirements`** - Deprecated features
|
||||
|
||||
**Format requirements:**
|
||||
- Use `### Requirement: <name>` for headers
|
||||
- Every requirement needs at least one `#### Scenario:` block
|
||||
- Use SHALL/MUST in requirement text
|
||||
|
||||
## How OpenSpec Compares
|
||||
|
||||
### vs. spec-kit
|
||||
OpenSpec’s two-folder model (`openspec/specs/` for the current truth, `openspec/changes/` for proposed updates) keeps state and diffs separate. This scales when you modify existing features or touch multiple specs. spec-kit is strong for greenfield/0→1 but provides less structure for cross-spec updates and evolving features.
|
||||
|
||||
### vs. Kiro.dev
|
||||
OpenSpec groups every change for a feature in one folder (`openspec/changes/feature-name/`), making it easy to track related specs, tasks, and designs together. Kiro spreads updates across multiple spec folders, which can make feature tracking harder.
|
||||
|
||||
### vs. No Specs
|
||||
Without specs, AI coding assistants generate code from vague prompts, often missing requirements or adding unwanted features. OpenSpec brings predictability by agreeing on the desired behavior before any code is written.
|
||||
|
||||
## Team Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Initialize OpenSpec** – Run `openspec init` in your repo.
|
||||
2. **Start with new features** – Ask your AI to capture upcoming work as change proposals.
|
||||
3. **Grow incrementally** – Each change archives into living specs that document your system.
|
||||
4. **Stay flexible** – Different teammates can use Claude Code, CodeBuddy, Cursor, or any AGENTS.md-compatible tool while sharing the same specs.
|
||||
|
||||
Run `openspec update` whenever someone switches tools so your agents pick up the latest instructions and slash-command bindings.
|
||||
|
||||
## Updating OpenSpec
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Upgrade the package**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
2. **Refresh agent instructions**
|
||||
- Run `openspec update` inside each project to regenerate AI guidance and ensure the latest slash commands are active.
|
||||
|
||||
## Experimental Features
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>🧪 OPSX: Fluid, Iterative Workflow</strong> (Claude Code only)</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this exists:**
|
||||
- Standard workflow is locked down — you can't tweak instructions or customize
|
||||
- When AI output is bad, you can't improve the prompts yourself
|
||||
- Same workflow for everyone, no way to match how your team works
|
||||
|
||||
**What's different:**
|
||||
- **Hackable** — edit templates and schemas yourself, test immediately, no rebuild
|
||||
- **Granular** — each artifact has its own instructions, test and tweak individually
|
||||
- **Customizable** — define your own workflows, artifacts, and dependencies
|
||||
- **Fluid** — no phase gates, update any artifact anytime
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
You can always go back:
|
||||
|
||||
proposal ──→ specs ──→ design ──→ tasks ──→ implement
|
||||
▲ ▲ ▲ │
|
||||
└───────────┴──────────┴────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | What it does |
|
||||
|---------|--------------|
|
||||
| `/opsx:new` | Start a new change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:continue` | Create the next artifact (based on what's ready) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:ff` | Fast-forward (all planning artifacts at once) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks, updating artifacts as needed |
|
||||
| `/opsx:archive` | Archive when done |
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup:** `openspec experimental`
|
||||
|
||||
[Full documentation →](docs/opsx.md)
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>Telemetry</strong> – OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats (opt-out: <code>OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0</code>)</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
We collect only command names and version to understand usage patterns. No arguments, paths, content, or PII. Automatically disabled in CI.
|
||||
|
||||
**Opt-out:** `export OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` or `export DO_NOT_TRACK=1`
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
## Contributing
|
||||
|
||||
- Install dependencies: `pnpm install`
|
||||
- Build: `pnpm run build`
|
||||
- Test: `pnpm test`
|
||||
- Develop CLI locally: `pnpm run dev` or `pnpm run dev:cli`
|
||||
- Conventional commits (one-line): `type(scope): subject`
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>Maintainers & Advisors</strong></summary>
|
||||
|
||||
See [MAINTAINERS.md](MAINTAINERS.md) for the list of core maintainers and advisors who help guide the project.
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
MIT
|
||||
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 34 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 450 KiB |
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
||||
<svg width="640" height="80" viewBox="0 0 640 80" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
|
||||
<path d="M32 0H16V16H32V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M48 0H32V16H48V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M16 16H0V32H16V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M64 16H48V32H64V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M16 32H0V48H16V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M64 32H48V48H64V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M16 48H0V64H16V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M64 48H48V64H64V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M32 64H16V80H32V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M48 64H32V80H48V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M96 0H80V16H96V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M112 0H96V16H112V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M128 0H112V16H128V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M96 16H80V32H96V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M144 16H128V32H144V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M96 32H80V48H96V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M112 32H96V48H112V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M128 32H112V48H128V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M144 32H128V48H144V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M96 48H80V64H96V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M96 64H80V80H96V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M176 0H160V16H176V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M192 0H176V16H192V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M208 0H192V16H208V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M224 0H208V16H224V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M176 16H160V32H176V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M176 32H160V48H176V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M192 32H176V48H192V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M208 32H192V48H208V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M176 48H160V64H176V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M176 64H160V80H176V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M192 64H176V80H192V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M208 64H192V80H208V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M224 64H208V80H224V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M256 0H240V16H256V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M304 0H288V16H304V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M256 16H240V32H256V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M272 16H256V32H272V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M304 16H288V32H304V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M256 32H240V48H256V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M288 32H272V48H288V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M304 32H288V48H304V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M256 48H240V64H256V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M304 48H288V64H304V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M256 64H240V80H256V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M304 64H288V80H304V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M352 0H336V16H352V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M368 0H352V16H368V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M384 0H368V16H384V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M336 16H320V32H336V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M352 32H336V48H352V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M368 32H352V48H368V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M384 48H368V64H384V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M336 64H320V80H336V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M352 64H336V80H352V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M368 64H352V80H368V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M416 0H400V16H416V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M432 0H416V16H432V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M448 0H432V16H448V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M416 16H400V32H416V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M464 16H448V32H464V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M416 32H400V48H416V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M432 32H416V48H432V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M448 32H432V48H448V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M464 32H448V48H464V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M416 48H400V64H416V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M416 64H400V80H416V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M496 0H480V16H496V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M512 0H496V16H512V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M528 0H512V16H528V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M544 0H528V16H544V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M496 16H480V32H496V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M496 32H480V48H496V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M512 32H496V48H512V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M528 32H512V48H528V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M496 48H480V64H496V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M496 64H480V80H496V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M512 64H496V80H512V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M528 64H512V80H528V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M544 64H528V80H544V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M592 0H576V16H592V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M608 0H592V16H608V0Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M576 16H560V32H576V16Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M576 32H560V48H576V32Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M576 48H560V64H576V48Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M592 64H576V80H592V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
<path d="M608 64H592V80H608V64Z" fill="white"/>
|
||||
</svg>
|
||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 4.1 KiB |
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
||||
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="640" height="80" viewBox="0 0 640 80">
|
||||
<rect x="16" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="32" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="0" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="48" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="0" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="48" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="0" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="48" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="16" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="32" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="80" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="96" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="112" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="80" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="128" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="80" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="96" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="112" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="128" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="80" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="80" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="160" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="176" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="192" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="208" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="160" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="160" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="176" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="192" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="160" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="160" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="176" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="192" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="208" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="240" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="288" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="240" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="256" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="288" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="240" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="272" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="288" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="240" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="288" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="240" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="288" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="336" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="352" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="368" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="320" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="336" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="352" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="368" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="320" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="336" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="352" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="400" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="416" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="432" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="400" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="448" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="400" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="416" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="432" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="448" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="400" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="400" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="480" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="496" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="512" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="528" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="480" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="480" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="496" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="512" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="480" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="480" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="496" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="512" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="528" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="576" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="592" y="0" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="560" y="16" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="560" y="32" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="560" y="48" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="576" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
<rect x="592" y="64" width="16" height="16" fill="black" />
|
||||
</svg>
|
||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 5.1 KiB |
@@ -1,7 +1,15 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env node
|
||||
|
||||
import { execSync } from 'child_process';
|
||||
import { execFileSync } from 'child_process';
|
||||
import { existsSync, rmSync } from 'fs';
|
||||
import { createRequire } from 'module';
|
||||
|
||||
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
|
||||
|
||||
const runTsc = (args = []) => {
|
||||
const tscPath = require.resolve('typescript/bin/tsc');
|
||||
execFileSync(process.execPath, [tscPath, ...args], { stdio: 'inherit' });
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
console.log('🔨 Building OpenSpec...\n');
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,10 +22,10 @@ if (existsSync('dist')) {
|
||||
// Run TypeScript compiler (use local version explicitly)
|
||||
console.log('Compiling TypeScript...');
|
||||
try {
|
||||
execSync('./node_modules/.bin/tsc -v', { stdio: 'inherit' });
|
||||
execSync('./node_modules/.bin/tsc', { stdio: 'inherit' });
|
||||
runTsc(['--version']);
|
||||
runTsc();
|
||||
console.log('\n✅ Build completed successfully!');
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
console.error('\n❌ Build failed!');
|
||||
process.exit(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+894
@@ -0,0 +1,894 @@
|
||||
# CLI Reference
|
||||
|
||||
The OpenSpec CLI (`openspec`) provides terminal commands for project setup, validation, status inspection, and management. These commands complement the AI slash commands (like `/opsx:new`) documented in [Commands](commands.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Commands | Purpose |
|
||||
|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
| **Setup** | `init`, `update` | Initialize and update OpenSpec in your project |
|
||||
| **Browsing** | `list`, `view`, `show` | Explore changes and specs |
|
||||
| **Validation** | `validate` | Check changes and specs for issues |
|
||||
| **Lifecycle** | `archive` | Finalize completed changes |
|
||||
| **Workflow** | `status`, `instructions`, `templates`, `schemas` | Artifact-driven workflow support |
|
||||
| **Schemas** | `schema init`, `schema fork`, `schema validate`, `schema which` | Create and manage custom workflows |
|
||||
| **Config** | `config` | View and modify settings |
|
||||
| **Utility** | `feedback`, `completion` | Feedback and shell integration |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Human vs Agent Commands
|
||||
|
||||
Most CLI commands are designed for **human use** in a terminal. Some commands also support **agent/script use** via JSON output.
|
||||
|
||||
### Human-Only Commands
|
||||
|
||||
These commands are interactive and designed for terminal use:
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose |
|
||||
|---------|---------|
|
||||
| `openspec init` | Initialize project (interactive prompts) |
|
||||
| `openspec view` | Interactive dashboard |
|
||||
| `openspec config edit` | Open config in editor |
|
||||
| `openspec feedback` | Submit feedback via GitHub |
|
||||
| `openspec completion install` | Install shell completions |
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent-Compatible Commands
|
||||
|
||||
These commands support `--json` output for programmatic use by AI agents and scripts:
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Human Use | Agent Use |
|
||||
|---------|-----------|-----------|
|
||||
| `openspec list` | Browse changes/specs | `--json` for structured data |
|
||||
| `openspec show <item>` | Read content | `--json` for parsing |
|
||||
| `openspec validate` | Check for issues | `--all --json` for bulk validation |
|
||||
| `openspec status` | See artifact progress | `--json` for structured status |
|
||||
| `openspec instructions` | Get next steps | `--json` for agent instructions |
|
||||
| `openspec templates` | Find template paths | `--json` for path resolution |
|
||||
| `openspec schemas` | List available schemas | `--json` for schema discovery |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Global Options
|
||||
|
||||
These options work with all commands:
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--version`, `-V` | Show version number |
|
||||
| `--no-color` | Disable color output |
|
||||
| `--help`, `-h` | Display help for command |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Setup Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec init`
|
||||
|
||||
Initialize OpenSpec in your project. Creates the folder structure and configures AI tool integrations.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec init [path] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `path` | No | Target directory (default: current directory) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--tools <list>` | Configure AI tools non-interactively. Use `all`, `none`, or comma-separated list |
|
||||
| `--force` | Auto-cleanup legacy files without prompting |
|
||||
|
||||
**Supported tools:** `amazon-q`, `antigravity`, `auggie`, `claude`, `cline`, `codex`, `codebuddy`, `continue`, `costrict`, `crush`, `cursor`, `factory`, `gemini`, `github-copilot`, `iflow`, `kilocode`, `opencode`, `qoder`, `qwen`, `roocode`, `windsurf`
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive initialization
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
|
||||
# Initialize in a specific directory
|
||||
openspec init ./my-project
|
||||
|
||||
# Non-interactive: configure for Claude and Cursor
|
||||
openspec init --tools claude,cursor
|
||||
|
||||
# Configure for all supported tools
|
||||
openspec init --tools all
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip prompts and auto-cleanup legacy files
|
||||
openspec init --force
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What it creates:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── specs/ # Your specifications (source of truth)
|
||||
├── changes/ # Proposed changes
|
||||
└── config.yaml # Project configuration
|
||||
|
||||
.claude/skills/ # Claude Code skill files (if claude selected)
|
||||
.cursor/rules/ # Cursor rules (if cursor selected)
|
||||
... (other tool configs)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec update`
|
||||
|
||||
Update OpenSpec instruction files after upgrading the CLI. Re-generates AI tool configuration files.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec update [path] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `path` | No | Target directory (default: current directory) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--force` | Force update even when files are up to date |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Update instruction files after npm upgrade
|
||||
npm update @fission-ai/openspec
|
||||
openspec update
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Browsing Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec list`
|
||||
|
||||
List changes or specs in your project.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec list [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--specs` | List specs instead of changes |
|
||||
| `--changes` | List changes (default) |
|
||||
| `--sort <order>` | Sort by `recent` (default) or `name` |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# List all active changes
|
||||
openspec list
|
||||
|
||||
# List all specs
|
||||
openspec list --specs
|
||||
|
||||
# JSON output for scripts
|
||||
openspec list --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output (text):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Active changes:
|
||||
add-dark-mode UI theme switching support
|
||||
fix-login-bug Session timeout handling
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec view`
|
||||
|
||||
Display an interactive dashboard for exploring specs and changes.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec view
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Opens a terminal-based interface for navigating your project's specifications and changes.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec show`
|
||||
|
||||
Display details of a change or spec.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec show [item-name] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `item-name` | No | Name of change or spec (prompts if omitted) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--type <type>` | Specify type: `change` or `spec` (auto-detected if unambiguous) |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
| `--no-interactive` | Disable prompts |
|
||||
|
||||
**Change-specific options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--deltas-only` | Show only delta specs (JSON mode) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Spec-specific options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--requirements` | Show only requirements, exclude scenarios (JSON mode) |
|
||||
| `--no-scenarios` | Exclude scenario content (JSON mode) |
|
||||
| `-r, --requirement <id>` | Show specific requirement by 1-based index (JSON mode) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive selection
|
||||
openspec show
|
||||
|
||||
# Show a specific change
|
||||
openspec show add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Show a specific spec
|
||||
openspec show auth --type spec
|
||||
|
||||
# JSON output for parsing
|
||||
openspec show add-dark-mode --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec validate`
|
||||
|
||||
Validate changes and specs for structural issues.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec validate [item-name] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `item-name` | No | Specific item to validate (prompts if omitted) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--all` | Validate all changes and specs |
|
||||
| `--changes` | Validate all changes |
|
||||
| `--specs` | Validate all specs |
|
||||
| `--type <type>` | Specify type when name is ambiguous: `change` or `spec` |
|
||||
| `--strict` | Enable strict validation mode |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
| `--concurrency <n>` | Max parallel validations (default: 6, or `OPENSPEC_CONCURRENCY` env) |
|
||||
| `--no-interactive` | Disable prompts |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive validation
|
||||
openspec validate
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate a specific change
|
||||
openspec validate add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate all changes
|
||||
openspec validate --changes
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate everything with JSON output (for CI/scripts)
|
||||
openspec validate --all --json
|
||||
|
||||
# Strict validation with increased parallelism
|
||||
openspec validate --all --strict --concurrency 12
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output (text):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Validating add-dark-mode...
|
||||
✓ proposal.md valid
|
||||
✓ specs/ui/spec.md valid
|
||||
⚠ design.md: missing "Technical Approach" section
|
||||
|
||||
1 warning found
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output (JSON):**
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"results": {
|
||||
"changes": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "add-dark-mode",
|
||||
"valid": true,
|
||||
"warnings": ["design.md: missing 'Technical Approach' section"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"valid": 1,
|
||||
"invalid": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Lifecycle Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec archive`
|
||||
|
||||
Archive a completed change and merge delta specs into main specs.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec archive [change-name] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Change to archive (prompts if omitted) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `-y, --yes` | Skip confirmation prompts |
|
||||
| `--skip-specs` | Skip spec updates (for infrastructure/tooling/doc-only changes) |
|
||||
| `--no-validate` | Skip validation (requires confirmation) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive archive
|
||||
openspec archive
|
||||
|
||||
# Archive specific change
|
||||
openspec archive add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Archive without prompts (CI/scripts)
|
||||
openspec archive add-dark-mode --yes
|
||||
|
||||
# Archive a tooling change that doesn't affect specs
|
||||
openspec archive update-ci-config --skip-specs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Validates the change (unless `--no-validate`)
|
||||
2. Prompts for confirmation (unless `--yes`)
|
||||
3. Merges delta specs into `openspec/specs/`
|
||||
4. Moves change folder to `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Commands
|
||||
|
||||
These commands support the artifact-driven OPSX workflow. They're useful for both humans checking progress and agents determining next steps.
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec status`
|
||||
|
||||
Display artifact completion status for a change.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec status [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--change <id>` | Change name (prompts if omitted) |
|
||||
| `--schema <name>` | Schema override (auto-detected from change's config) |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive status check
|
||||
openspec status
|
||||
|
||||
# Status for specific change
|
||||
openspec status --change add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# JSON for agent use
|
||||
openspec status --change add-dark-mode --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output (text):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Change: add-dark-mode
|
||||
Schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
Artifacts:
|
||||
✓ proposal proposal.md exists
|
||||
✓ specs specs/ exists
|
||||
◆ design ready (requires: specs)
|
||||
○ tasks blocked (requires: design)
|
||||
|
||||
Next: Create design using /opsx:continue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output (JSON):**
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"change": "add-dark-mode",
|
||||
"schema": "spec-driven",
|
||||
"artifacts": [
|
||||
{"id": "proposal", "status": "complete", "path": "proposal.md"},
|
||||
{"id": "specs", "status": "complete", "path": "specs/"},
|
||||
{"id": "design", "status": "ready", "requires": ["specs"]},
|
||||
{"id": "tasks", "status": "blocked", "requires": ["design"]}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"next": "design"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec instructions`
|
||||
|
||||
Get enriched instructions for creating an artifact or applying tasks. Used by AI agents to understand what to create next.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec instructions [artifact] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `artifact` | No | Artifact ID: `proposal`, `specs`, `design`, `tasks`, or `apply` |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--change <id>` | Change name (required in non-interactive mode) |
|
||||
| `--schema <name>` | Schema override |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Special case:** Use `apply` as the artifact to get task implementation instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Get instructions for next artifact
|
||||
openspec instructions --change add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Get specific artifact instructions
|
||||
openspec instructions design --change add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Get apply/implementation instructions
|
||||
openspec instructions apply --change add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# JSON for agent consumption
|
||||
openspec instructions design --change add-dark-mode --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output includes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Template content for the artifact
|
||||
- Project context from config
|
||||
- Content from dependency artifacts
|
||||
- Per-artifact rules from config
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec templates`
|
||||
|
||||
Show resolved template paths for all artifacts in a schema.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec templates [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--schema <name>` | Schema to inspect (default: `spec-driven`) |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show template paths for default schema
|
||||
openspec templates
|
||||
|
||||
# Show templates for custom schema
|
||||
openspec templates --schema my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# JSON for programmatic use
|
||||
openspec templates --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output (text):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
Templates:
|
||||
proposal → ~/.openspec/schemas/spec-driven/templates/proposal.md
|
||||
specs → ~/.openspec/schemas/spec-driven/templates/specs.md
|
||||
design → ~/.openspec/schemas/spec-driven/templates/design.md
|
||||
tasks → ~/.openspec/schemas/spec-driven/templates/tasks.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec schemas`
|
||||
|
||||
List available workflow schemas with their descriptions and artifact flows.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec schemas [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec schemas
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Available schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
spec-driven (package)
|
||||
The default spec-driven development workflow
|
||||
Flow: proposal → specs → design → tasks
|
||||
|
||||
my-custom (project)
|
||||
Custom workflow for this project
|
||||
Flow: research → proposal → tasks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Schema Commands
|
||||
|
||||
Commands for creating and managing custom workflow schemas.
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec schema init`
|
||||
|
||||
Create a new project-local schema.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec schema init <name> [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `name` | Yes | Schema name (kebab-case) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--description <text>` | Schema description |
|
||||
| `--artifacts <list>` | Comma-separated artifact IDs (default: `proposal,specs,design,tasks`) |
|
||||
| `--default` | Set as project default schema |
|
||||
| `--no-default` | Don't prompt to set as default |
|
||||
| `--force` | Overwrite existing schema |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive schema creation
|
||||
openspec schema init research-first
|
||||
|
||||
# Non-interactive with specific artifacts
|
||||
openspec schema init rapid \
|
||||
--description "Rapid iteration workflow" \
|
||||
--artifacts "proposal,tasks" \
|
||||
--default
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What it creates:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/schemas/<name>/
|
||||
├── schema.yaml # Schema definition
|
||||
└── templates/
|
||||
├── proposal.md # Template for each artifact
|
||||
├── specs.md
|
||||
├── design.md
|
||||
└── tasks.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec schema fork`
|
||||
|
||||
Copy an existing schema to your project for customization.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec schema fork <source> [name] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `source` | Yes | Schema to copy |
|
||||
| `name` | No | New schema name (default: `<source>-custom`) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--force` | Overwrite existing destination |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Fork the built-in spec-driven schema
|
||||
openspec schema fork spec-driven my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec schema validate`
|
||||
|
||||
Validate a schema's structure and templates.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec schema validate [name] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `name` | No | Schema to validate (validates all if omitted) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--verbose` | Show detailed validation steps |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Validate a specific schema
|
||||
openspec schema validate my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate all schemas
|
||||
openspec schema validate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec schema which`
|
||||
|
||||
Show where a schema resolves from (useful for debugging precedence).
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec schema which [name] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `name` | No | Schema name |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--all` | List all schemas with their sources |
|
||||
| `--json` | Output as JSON |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check where a schema comes from
|
||||
openspec schema which spec-driven
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
spec-driven resolves from: package
|
||||
Source: /usr/local/lib/node_modules/@fission-ai/openspec/schemas/spec-driven
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Schema precedence:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Project: `openspec/schemas/<name>/`
|
||||
2. User: `~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/<name>/`
|
||||
3. Package: Built-in schemas
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec config`
|
||||
|
||||
View and modify global OpenSpec configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec config <subcommand> [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Subcommands:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Subcommand | Description |
|
||||
|------------|-------------|
|
||||
| `path` | Show config file location |
|
||||
| `list` | Show all current settings |
|
||||
| `get <key>` | Get a specific value |
|
||||
| `set <key> <value>` | Set a value |
|
||||
| `unset <key>` | Remove a key |
|
||||
| `reset` | Reset to defaults |
|
||||
| `edit` | Open in `$EDITOR` |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show config file path
|
||||
openspec config path
|
||||
|
||||
# List all settings
|
||||
openspec config list
|
||||
|
||||
# Get a specific value
|
||||
openspec config get telemetry.enabled
|
||||
|
||||
# Set a value
|
||||
openspec config set telemetry.enabled false
|
||||
|
||||
# Set a string value explicitly
|
||||
openspec config set user.name "My Name" --string
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove a custom setting
|
||||
openspec config unset user.name
|
||||
|
||||
# Reset all configuration
|
||||
openspec config reset --all --yes
|
||||
|
||||
# Edit config in your editor
|
||||
openspec config edit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Utility Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec feedback`
|
||||
|
||||
Submit feedback about OpenSpec. Creates a GitHub issue.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec feedback <message> [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `message` | Yes | Feedback message |
|
||||
|
||||
**Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--body <text>` | Detailed description |
|
||||
|
||||
**Requirements:** GitHub CLI (`gh`) must be installed and authenticated.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec feedback "Add support for custom artifact types" \
|
||||
--body "I'd like to define my own artifact types beyond the built-in ones."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `openspec completion`
|
||||
|
||||
Manage shell completions for the OpenSpec CLI.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec completion <subcommand> [shell]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Subcommands:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Subcommand | Description |
|
||||
|------------|-------------|
|
||||
| `generate [shell]` | Output completion script to stdout |
|
||||
| `install [shell]` | Install completion for your shell |
|
||||
| `uninstall [shell]` | Remove installed completions |
|
||||
|
||||
**Supported shells:** `bash`, `zsh`, `fish`, `powershell`
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Install completions (auto-detects shell)
|
||||
openspec completion install
|
||||
|
||||
# Install for specific shell
|
||||
openspec completion install zsh
|
||||
|
||||
# Generate script for manual installation
|
||||
openspec completion generate bash > ~/.bash_completion.d/openspec
|
||||
|
||||
# Uninstall
|
||||
openspec completion uninstall
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Exit Codes
|
||||
|
||||
| Code | Meaning |
|
||||
|------|---------|
|
||||
| `0` | Success |
|
||||
| `1` | Error (validation failure, missing files, etc.) |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Environment Variables
|
||||
|
||||
| Variable | Description |
|
||||
|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `OPENSPEC_CONCURRENCY` | Default concurrency for bulk validation (default: 6) |
|
||||
| `EDITOR` or `VISUAL` | Editor for `openspec config edit` |
|
||||
| `NO_COLOR` | Disable color output when set |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- [Commands](commands.md) - AI slash commands (`/opsx:new`, `/opsx:apply`, etc.)
|
||||
- [Workflows](workflows.md) - Common patterns and when to use each command
|
||||
- [Customization](customization.md) - Create custom schemas and templates
|
||||
- [Getting Started](getting-started.md) - First-time setup guide
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
|
||||
# Commands
|
||||
|
||||
This is the reference for OpenSpec's slash commands. These commands are invoked in your AI coding assistant's chat interface (e.g., Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf).
|
||||
|
||||
For workflow patterns and when to use each command, see [Workflows](workflows.md). For CLI commands, see [CLI](cli.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose |
|
||||
|---------|---------|
|
||||
| `/opsx:explore` | Think through ideas before committing to a change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:new` | Start a new change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:continue` | Create the next artifact based on dependencies |
|
||||
| `/opsx:ff` | Fast-forward: create all planning artifacts at once |
|
||||
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks from the change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:verify` | Validate implementation matches artifacts |
|
||||
| `/opsx:sync` | Merge delta specs into main specs |
|
||||
| `/opsx:archive` | Archive a completed change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:bulk-archive` | Archive multiple changes at once |
|
||||
| `/opsx:onboard` | Guided tutorial through the complete workflow |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:explore`
|
||||
|
||||
Think through ideas, investigate problems, and clarify requirements before committing to a change.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:explore [topic]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `topic` | No | What you want to explore or investigate |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Opens an exploratory conversation with no structure required
|
||||
- Investigates the codebase to answer questions
|
||||
- Compares options and approaches
|
||||
- Creates visual diagrams to clarify thinking
|
||||
- Can transition to `/opsx:new` when insights crystallize
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:explore
|
||||
|
||||
AI: What would you like to explore?
|
||||
|
||||
You: How should we handle authentication for the mobile app?
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Let me investigate your current auth setup...
|
||||
[Analyzes codebase]
|
||||
|
||||
I see you're using session-based auth for the web app.
|
||||
For mobile, we have three main options:
|
||||
|
||||
1. JWT tokens (stateless, works offline)
|
||||
2. OAuth2 (if you need third-party login)
|
||||
3. Extend current sessions (simpler, but requires connectivity)
|
||||
|
||||
Your API already has CORS configured. Which direction interests you?
|
||||
|
||||
You: Let's go with JWT. Can we start a change for that?
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Ready when you are. Run /opsx:new add-jwt-auth to begin.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Use when requirements are unclear or you need to investigate
|
||||
- No artifacts are created during exploration
|
||||
- Good for comparing multiple approaches before deciding
|
||||
- Can read files and search the codebase
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:new`
|
||||
|
||||
Start a new change. Creates the change folder structure and scaffolds it with the selected schema.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:new [change-name] [--schema <schema-name>]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Name for the change folder (prompted if not provided) |
|
||||
| `--schema` | No | Workflow schema to use (default: from config or `spec-driven`) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Creates `openspec/changes/<change-name>/` directory
|
||||
- Creates `.openspec.yaml` metadata file in the change folder
|
||||
- Shows the first artifact template ready for creation
|
||||
- Prompts for change name and schema if not provided
|
||||
|
||||
**What it creates:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/changes/<change-name>/
|
||||
└── .openspec.yaml # Change metadata (schema, created date)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:new add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Created openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/
|
||||
Schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
Ready to create: proposal
|
||||
Use /opsx:continue to create it, or /opsx:ff to create all artifacts.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Use descriptive names: `add-feature`, `fix-bug`, `refactor-module`
|
||||
- Avoid generic names like `update`, `changes`, `wip`
|
||||
- Schema can also be set in project config (`openspec/config.yaml`)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:continue`
|
||||
|
||||
Create the next artifact in the dependency chain. Creates one artifact at a time for incremental progress.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:continue [change-name]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Which change to continue (inferred from context if not provided) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Queries the artifact dependency graph
|
||||
- Shows which artifacts are ready vs blocked
|
||||
- Creates the first ready artifact
|
||||
- Reads dependency files for context
|
||||
- Shows what becomes available after creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:continue
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Change: add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
Artifact status:
|
||||
✓ proposal (done)
|
||||
◆ specs (ready)
|
||||
◆ design (ready)
|
||||
○ tasks (blocked - needs: specs)
|
||||
|
||||
Creating specs...
|
||||
|
||||
[Reads proposal.md, creates specs based on requirements]
|
||||
|
||||
✓ Created openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/specs/ui/spec.md
|
||||
|
||||
Now available: tasks
|
||||
Run /opsx:continue to create the next artifact.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Use when you want to review each artifact before proceeding
|
||||
- Good for complex changes where you want control
|
||||
- Multiple artifacts may become ready simultaneously
|
||||
- You can edit created artifacts before continuing
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:ff`
|
||||
|
||||
Fast-forward through artifact creation. Creates all planning artifacts at once.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:ff [change-name]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Which change to fast-forward (inferred from context if not provided) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Creates all artifacts in dependency order
|
||||
- Tracks progress via todo list
|
||||
- Stops when all `apply-required` artifacts are complete
|
||||
- Reads each dependency before creating the next artifact
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:ff add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Fast-forwarding add-dark-mode...
|
||||
|
||||
✓ Creating proposal.md
|
||||
✓ Creating specs/ui/spec.md
|
||||
✓ Creating design.md
|
||||
✓ Creating tasks.md
|
||||
|
||||
All planning artifacts complete!
|
||||
Ready for implementation. Run /opsx:apply to begin.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Use when you have a clear picture of what you're building
|
||||
- Faster than `/opsx:continue` for straightforward changes
|
||||
- You can still edit artifacts afterward
|
||||
- Good for small to medium features
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:apply`
|
||||
|
||||
Implement tasks from the change. Works through the task list, writing code and checking off items.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:apply [change-name]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Which change to implement (inferred from context if not provided) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Reads `tasks.md` and identifies incomplete tasks
|
||||
- Works through tasks one by one
|
||||
- Writes code, creates files, runs tests as needed
|
||||
- Marks tasks complete with checkboxes `[x]`
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:apply
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Implementing add-dark-mode...
|
||||
|
||||
Reading tasks.md:
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Create ThemeContext
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Add CSS custom properties
|
||||
- [ ] 1.3 Implement localStorage persistence
|
||||
|
||||
Working on 1.1: Create ThemeContext...
|
||||
[Creates src/context/ThemeContext.tsx]
|
||||
|
||||
✓ 1.1 Complete
|
||||
|
||||
Working on 1.2: Add CSS custom properties...
|
||||
[Updates src/styles/globals.css]
|
||||
|
||||
✓ 1.2 Complete
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Can resume where you left off if interrupted
|
||||
- Use for parallel changes by specifying the change name
|
||||
- Completion state is tracked in `tasks.md` checkboxes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:verify`
|
||||
|
||||
Validate that implementation matches your change artifacts. Checks completeness, correctness, and coherence.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:verify [change-name]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Which change to verify (inferred from context if not provided) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Checks three dimensions of implementation quality
|
||||
- Searches codebase for implementation evidence
|
||||
- Reports issues categorized as CRITICAL, WARNING, or SUGGESTION
|
||||
- Does not block archive, but surfaces issues
|
||||
|
||||
**Verification dimensions:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Dimension | What it validates |
|
||||
|-----------|-------------------|
|
||||
| **Completeness** | All tasks done, all requirements implemented, scenarios covered |
|
||||
| **Correctness** | Implementation matches spec intent, edge cases handled |
|
||||
| **Coherence** | Design decisions reflected in code, patterns consistent |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:verify
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Verifying add-dark-mode...
|
||||
|
||||
COMPLETENESS
|
||||
✓ All 8 tasks in tasks.md are checked
|
||||
✓ All requirements in specs have corresponding code
|
||||
⚠ Scenario "System preference detection" has no test coverage
|
||||
|
||||
CORRECTNESS
|
||||
✓ Implementation matches spec intent
|
||||
✓ Edge cases from scenarios are handled
|
||||
✓ Error states match spec definitions
|
||||
|
||||
COHERENCE
|
||||
✓ Design decisions reflected in code structure
|
||||
✓ Naming conventions consistent with design.md
|
||||
⚠ Design mentions "CSS variables" but implementation uses Tailwind classes
|
||||
|
||||
SUMMARY
|
||||
─────────────────────────────
|
||||
Critical issues: 0
|
||||
Warnings: 2
|
||||
Ready to archive: Yes (with warnings)
|
||||
|
||||
Recommendations:
|
||||
1. Add test for system preference detection
|
||||
2. Update design.md to reflect Tailwind usage, or refactor to use CSS variables
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Run before archiving to catch mismatches early
|
||||
- Warnings don't block archive but indicate potential issues
|
||||
- Good for reviewing AI's work before committing
|
||||
- Can reveal drift between artifacts and implementation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:sync`
|
||||
|
||||
**Optional command.** Merge delta specs from a change into main specs. Archive will prompt to sync if needed, so you typically don't need to run this manually.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:sync [change-name]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Which change to sync (inferred from context if not provided) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Reads delta specs from change folder
|
||||
- Parses ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED sections
|
||||
- Merges changes into main `openspec/specs/` directory
|
||||
- Preserves existing content not mentioned in delta
|
||||
- Does not archive the change (remains active)
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:sync
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Syncing add-dark-mode delta specs...
|
||||
|
||||
Reading: openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/specs/ui/spec.md
|
||||
Target: openspec/specs/ui/spec.md
|
||||
|
||||
Changes to apply:
|
||||
✓ ADDED: Theme Selection requirement (2 scenarios)
|
||||
✓ ADDED: Accessibility requirement (1 scenario)
|
||||
|
||||
Merging...
|
||||
✓ openspec/specs/ui/spec.md updated
|
||||
|
||||
Change remains active. Run /opsx:archive when ready to complete.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**When to use manually:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Use sync? |
|
||||
|----------|-----------|
|
||||
| Long-running change, want specs in main before archiving | Yes |
|
||||
| Multiple parallel changes need the updated base specs | Yes |
|
||||
| Want to preview/review the merge separately | Yes |
|
||||
| Quick change, going straight to archive | No (archive handles it) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Sync is intelligent, not copy-paste
|
||||
- Can add scenarios to existing requirements without duplicating
|
||||
- Change stays active after sync (not archived)
|
||||
- Most users will never need to call this directly—archive prompts if needed
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:archive`
|
||||
|
||||
Archive a completed change. Finalizes the change and moves it to the archive folder.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:archive [change-name]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-name` | No | Which change to archive (inferred from context if not provided) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Checks artifact completion status
|
||||
- Checks task completion (warns if incomplete)
|
||||
- Offers to sync delta specs if not already synced
|
||||
- Moves change folder to `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`
|
||||
- Preserves all artifacts for audit trail
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:archive
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Archiving add-dark-mode...
|
||||
|
||||
Artifact status:
|
||||
✓ proposal.md exists
|
||||
✓ specs/ exists
|
||||
✓ design.md exists
|
||||
✓ tasks.md exists (8/8 tasks complete)
|
||||
|
||||
Delta specs: Not yet synced
|
||||
→ Sync now? (recommended)
|
||||
|
||||
You: Yes
|
||||
|
||||
AI: ✓ Synced specs to openspec/specs/ui/spec.md
|
||||
✓ Moved to openspec/changes/archive/2025-01-24-add-dark-mode/
|
||||
|
||||
Change archived successfully.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Archive won't block on incomplete tasks, but will warn
|
||||
- Delta specs can be synced during archive or beforehand
|
||||
- Archived changes are preserved for history
|
||||
- Use `/opsx:verify` first to catch issues
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:bulk-archive`
|
||||
|
||||
Archive multiple completed changes at once. Handles spec conflicts between changes.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:bulk-archive [change-names...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Arguments:**
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `change-names` | No | Specific changes to archive (prompts to select if not provided) |
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Lists all completed changes
|
||||
- Validates each change before archiving
|
||||
- Detects spec conflicts across changes
|
||||
- Resolves conflicts by checking what's actually implemented
|
||||
- Archives in chronological order
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:bulk-archive
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Found 3 completed changes:
|
||||
- add-dark-mode (8/8 tasks complete)
|
||||
- fix-login-bug (3/3 tasks complete)
|
||||
- update-footer (2/2 tasks complete)
|
||||
|
||||
Checking for spec conflicts...
|
||||
⚠ add-dark-mode and update-footer both touch specs/ui/
|
||||
|
||||
Inspecting codebase to resolve...
|
||||
Both changes are implemented. Will merge in chronological order:
|
||||
1. add-dark-mode (created Jan 20)
|
||||
2. update-footer (created Jan 22)
|
||||
|
||||
Archive all 3 changes?
|
||||
|
||||
You: Yes
|
||||
|
||||
AI: ✓ Archived add-dark-mode
|
||||
✓ Archived fix-login-bug
|
||||
✓ Archived update-footer
|
||||
Specs merged: add-dark-mode → update-footer
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Good for parallel work streams
|
||||
- Conflict resolution is agentic (checks codebase)
|
||||
- Changes are archived in order of creation
|
||||
- Prompts before overwriting spec content
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:onboard`
|
||||
|
||||
Guided onboarding through the complete OpenSpec workflow. An interactive tutorial using your actual codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
**Syntax:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:onboard
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What it does:**
|
||||
- Walks through a complete workflow cycle with narration
|
||||
- Scans your codebase for real improvement opportunities
|
||||
- Creates an actual change with real artifacts
|
||||
- Implements actual work (small, safe changes)
|
||||
- Archives the completed change
|
||||
- Explains each step as it happens
|
||||
|
||||
**Phases:**
|
||||
1. Welcome and codebase analysis
|
||||
2. Finding an improvement opportunity
|
||||
3. Creating a change (`/opsx:new`)
|
||||
4. Writing the proposal
|
||||
5. Creating specs
|
||||
6. Writing the design
|
||||
7. Creating tasks
|
||||
8. Implementing tasks (`/opsx:apply`)
|
||||
9. Verifying implementation
|
||||
10. Archiving the change
|
||||
11. Summary and next steps
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:onboard
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Welcome to OpenSpec!
|
||||
|
||||
I'll walk you through the complete workflow using your actual codebase.
|
||||
We'll find something small to improve, create a proper change for it,
|
||||
implement it, and archive it.
|
||||
|
||||
Let me scan your codebase for opportunities...
|
||||
|
||||
[Analyzes codebase]
|
||||
|
||||
I found a few things we could work on:
|
||||
1. Add input validation to the contact form
|
||||
2. Improve error messages in the auth flow
|
||||
3. Add loading states to async buttons
|
||||
|
||||
Which interests you? (or suggest something else)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tips:**
|
||||
- Best for new users learning the workflow
|
||||
- Uses real code, not toy examples
|
||||
- Creates a real change you can keep or discard
|
||||
- Takes 15-30 minutes to complete
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Syntax by AI Tool
|
||||
|
||||
Different AI tools use slightly different command syntax. Use the format that matches your tool:
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Syntax Example |
|
||||
|------|----------------|
|
||||
| Claude Code | `/opsx:new`, `/opsx:apply` |
|
||||
| Cursor | `/opsx-new`, `/opsx-apply` |
|
||||
| Windsurf | `/opsx-new`, `/opsx-apply` |
|
||||
| Copilot | `/opsx-new`, `/opsx-apply` |
|
||||
|
||||
The functionality is identical regardless of syntax.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Legacy Commands
|
||||
|
||||
These commands use the older "all-at-once" workflow. They still work but OPSX commands are recommended.
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | What it does |
|
||||
|---------|--------------|
|
||||
| `/openspec:proposal` | Create all artifacts at once (proposal, specs, design, tasks) |
|
||||
| `/openspec:apply` | Implement the change |
|
||||
| `/openspec:archive` | Archive the change |
|
||||
|
||||
**When to use legacy commands:**
|
||||
- Existing projects using the old workflow
|
||||
- Simple changes where you don't need incremental artifact creation
|
||||
- Preference for the all-or-nothing approach
|
||||
|
||||
**Migrating to OPSX:**
|
||||
Legacy changes can be continued with OPSX commands. The artifact structure is compatible.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### "Change not found"
|
||||
|
||||
The command couldn't identify which change to work on.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solutions:**
|
||||
- Specify the change name explicitly: `/opsx:apply add-dark-mode`
|
||||
- Check that the change folder exists: `openspec list`
|
||||
- Verify you're in the right project directory
|
||||
|
||||
### "No artifacts ready"
|
||||
|
||||
All artifacts are either complete or blocked by missing dependencies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solutions:**
|
||||
- Run `openspec status --change <name>` to see what's blocking
|
||||
- Check if required artifacts exist
|
||||
- Create missing dependency artifacts first
|
||||
|
||||
### "Schema not found"
|
||||
|
||||
The specified schema doesn't exist.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solutions:**
|
||||
- List available schemas: `openspec schemas`
|
||||
- Check spelling of schema name
|
||||
- Create the schema if it's custom: `openspec schema init <name>`
|
||||
|
||||
### Commands not recognized
|
||||
|
||||
The AI tool doesn't recognize OpenSpec commands.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solutions:**
|
||||
- Ensure OpenSpec is initialized: `openspec init`
|
||||
- Regenerate skills: `openspec update`
|
||||
- Check that `.claude/skills/` directory exists (for Claude Code)
|
||||
- Restart your AI tool to pick up new skills
|
||||
|
||||
### Artifacts not generating properly
|
||||
|
||||
The AI creates incomplete or incorrect artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solutions:**
|
||||
- Add project context in `openspec/config.yaml`
|
||||
- Add per-artifact rules for specific guidance
|
||||
- Provide more detail in your change description
|
||||
- Use `/opsx:continue` instead of `/opsx:ff` for more control
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- [Workflows](workflows.md) - Common patterns and when to use each command
|
||||
- [CLI](cli.md) - Terminal commands for management and validation
|
||||
- [Customization](customization.md) - Create custom schemas and workflows
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,582 @@
|
||||
# Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
This guide explains the core ideas behind OpenSpec and how they fit together. For practical usage, see [Getting Started](getting-started.md) and [Workflows](workflows.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec is built around four principles:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
fluid not rigid — no phase gates, work on what makes sense
|
||||
iterative not waterfall — learn as you build, refine as you go
|
||||
easy not complex — lightweight setup, minimal ceremony
|
||||
brownfield-first — works with existing codebases, not just greenfield
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Why These Principles Matter
|
||||
|
||||
**Fluid not rigid.** Traditional spec systems lock you into phases: first you plan, then you implement, then you're done. OpenSpec is more flexible — you can create artifacts in any order that makes sense for your work.
|
||||
|
||||
**Iterative not waterfall.** Requirements change. Understanding deepens. What seemed like a good approach at the start might not hold up after you see the codebase. OpenSpec embraces this reality.
|
||||
|
||||
**Easy not complex.** Some spec frameworks require extensive setup, rigid formats, or heavyweight processes. OpenSpec stays out of your way. Initialize in seconds, start working immediately, customize only if you need to.
|
||||
|
||||
**Brownfield-first.** Most software work isn't building from scratch — it's modifying existing systems. OpenSpec's delta-based approach makes it easy to specify changes to existing behavior, not just describe new systems.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Big Picture
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec organizes your work into two main areas:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ openspec/ │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ specs/ │ │ changes/ │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ Source of truth │◄─────│ Proposed modifications │ │
|
||||
│ │ How your system │ merge│ Each change = one folder │ │
|
||||
│ │ currently works │ │ Contains artifacts + deltas │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
│ └─────────────────────┘ └──────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Specs** are the source of truth — they describe how your system currently behaves.
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes** are proposed modifications — they live in separate folders until you're ready to merge them.
|
||||
|
||||
This separation is key. You can work on multiple changes in parallel without conflicts. You can review a change before it affects the main specs. And when you archive a change, its deltas merge cleanly into the source of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
## Specs
|
||||
|
||||
Specs describe your system's behavior using structured requirements and scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
### Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/specs/
|
||||
├── auth/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # Authentication behavior
|
||||
├── payments/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # Payment processing
|
||||
├── notifications/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # Notification system
|
||||
└── ui/
|
||||
└── spec.md # UI behavior and themes
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Organize specs by domain — logical groupings that make sense for your system. Common patterns:
|
||||
|
||||
- **By feature area**: `auth/`, `payments/`, `search/`
|
||||
- **By component**: `api/`, `frontend/`, `workers/`
|
||||
- **By bounded context**: `ordering/`, `fulfillment/`, `inventory/`
|
||||
|
||||
### Spec Format
|
||||
|
||||
A spec contains requirements, and each requirement has scenarios:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Auth Specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Authentication and session management for the application.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: User Authentication
|
||||
The system SHALL issue a JWT token upon successful login.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Valid credentials
|
||||
- GIVEN a user with valid credentials
|
||||
- WHEN the user submits login form
|
||||
- THEN a JWT token is returned
|
||||
- AND the user is redirected to dashboard
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Invalid credentials
|
||||
- GIVEN invalid credentials
|
||||
- WHEN the user submits login form
|
||||
- THEN an error message is displayed
|
||||
- AND no token is issued
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Session Expiration
|
||||
The system MUST expire sessions after 30 minutes of inactivity.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Idle timeout
|
||||
- GIVEN an authenticated session
|
||||
- WHEN 30 minutes pass without activity
|
||||
- THEN the session is invalidated
|
||||
- AND the user must re-authenticate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key elements:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Element | Purpose |
|
||||
|---------|---------|
|
||||
| `## Purpose` | High-level description of this spec's domain |
|
||||
| `### Requirement:` | A specific behavior the system must have |
|
||||
| `#### Scenario:` | A concrete example of the requirement in action |
|
||||
| SHALL/MUST/SHOULD | RFC 2119 keywords indicating requirement strength |
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Structure Specs This Way
|
||||
|
||||
**Requirements are the "what"** — they state what the system should do without specifying implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Scenarios are the "when"** — they provide concrete examples that can be verified. Good scenarios:
|
||||
- Are testable (you could write an automated test for them)
|
||||
- Cover both happy path and edge cases
|
||||
- Use Given/When/Then or similar structured format
|
||||
|
||||
**RFC 2119 keywords** (SHALL, MUST, SHOULD, MAY) communicate intent:
|
||||
- **MUST/SHALL** — absolute requirement
|
||||
- **SHOULD** — recommended, but exceptions exist
|
||||
- **MAY** — optional
|
||||
|
||||
## Changes
|
||||
|
||||
A change is a proposed modification to your system, packaged as a folder with everything needed to understand and implement it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/
|
||||
├── proposal.md # Why and what
|
||||
├── design.md # How (technical approach)
|
||||
├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist
|
||||
├── .openspec.yaml # Change metadata (optional)
|
||||
└── specs/ # Delta specs
|
||||
└── ui/
|
||||
└── spec.md # What's changing in ui/spec.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Each change is self-contained. It has:
|
||||
- **Artifacts** — documents that capture intent, design, and tasks
|
||||
- **Delta specs** — specifications for what's being added, modified, or removed
|
||||
- **Metadata** — optional configuration for this specific change
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Changes Are Folders
|
||||
|
||||
Packaging a change as a folder has several benefits:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Everything together.** Proposal, design, tasks, and specs live in one place. No hunting through different locations.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Parallel work.** Multiple changes can exist simultaneously without conflicting. Work on `add-dark-mode` while `fix-auth-bug` is also in progress.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Clean history.** When archived, changes move to `changes/archive/` with their full context preserved. You can look back and understand not just what changed, but why.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Review-friendly.** A change folder is easy to review — open it, read the proposal, check the design, see the spec deltas.
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
Artifacts are the documents within a change that guide the work.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Artifact Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
proposal ──────► specs ──────► design ──────► tasks ──────► implement
|
||||
│ │ │ │
|
||||
why what how steps
|
||||
+ scope changes approach to take
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Artifacts build on each other. Each artifact provides context for the next.
|
||||
|
||||
### Artifact Types
|
||||
|
||||
#### Proposal (`proposal.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
The proposal captures **intent**, **scope**, and **approach** at a high level.
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Proposal: Add Dark Mode
|
||||
|
||||
## Intent
|
||||
Users have requested a dark mode option to reduce eye strain
|
||||
during nighttime usage and match system preferences.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
In scope:
|
||||
- Theme toggle in settings
|
||||
- System preference detection
|
||||
- Persist preference in localStorage
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
- Custom color themes (future work)
|
||||
- Per-page theme overrides
|
||||
|
||||
## Approach
|
||||
Use CSS custom properties for theming with a React context
|
||||
for state management. Detect system preference on first load,
|
||||
allow manual override.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**When to update the proposal:**
|
||||
- Scope changes (narrowing or expanding)
|
||||
- Intent clarifies (better understanding of the problem)
|
||||
- Approach fundamentally shifts
|
||||
|
||||
#### Specs (delta specs in `specs/`)
|
||||
|
||||
Delta specs describe **what's changing** relative to the current specs. See [Delta Specs](#delta-specs) below.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Design (`design.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
The design captures **technical approach** and **architecture decisions**.
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Design: Add Dark Mode
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Approach
|
||||
Theme state managed via React Context to avoid prop drilling.
|
||||
CSS custom properties enable runtime switching without class toggling.
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision: Context over Redux
|
||||
Using React Context for theme state because:
|
||||
- Simple binary state (light/dark)
|
||||
- No complex state transitions
|
||||
- Avoids adding Redux dependency
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision: CSS Custom Properties
|
||||
Using CSS variables instead of CSS-in-JS because:
|
||||
- Works with existing stylesheet
|
||||
- No runtime overhead
|
||||
- Browser-native solution
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Flow
|
||||
```
|
||||
ThemeProvider (context)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
ThemeToggle ◄──► localStorage
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
CSS Variables (applied to :root)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## File Changes
|
||||
- `src/contexts/ThemeContext.tsx` (new)
|
||||
- `src/components/ThemeToggle.tsx` (new)
|
||||
- `src/styles/globals.css` (modified)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**When to update the design:**
|
||||
- Implementation reveals the approach won't work
|
||||
- Better solution discovered
|
||||
- Dependencies or constraints change
|
||||
|
||||
#### Tasks (`tasks.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
Tasks are the **implementation checklist** — concrete steps with checkboxes.
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Theme Infrastructure
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Create ThemeContext with light/dark state
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Add CSS custom properties for colors
|
||||
- [ ] 1.3 Implement localStorage persistence
|
||||
- [ ] 1.4 Add system preference detection
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. UI Components
|
||||
- [ ] 2.1 Create ThemeToggle component
|
||||
- [ ] 2.2 Add toggle to settings page
|
||||
- [ ] 2.3 Update Header to include quick toggle
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Styling
|
||||
- [ ] 3.1 Define dark theme color palette
|
||||
- [ ] 3.2 Update components to use CSS variables
|
||||
- [ ] 3.3 Test contrast ratios for accessibility
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task best practices:**
|
||||
- Group related tasks under headings
|
||||
- Use hierarchical numbering (1.1, 1.2, etc.)
|
||||
- Keep tasks small enough to complete in one session
|
||||
- Check tasks off as you complete them
|
||||
|
||||
## Delta Specs
|
||||
|
||||
Delta specs are the key concept that makes OpenSpec work for brownfield development. They describe **what's changing** rather than restating the entire spec.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Delta for Auth
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
|
||||
The system MUST support TOTP-based two-factor authentication.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: 2FA enrollment
|
||||
- GIVEN a user without 2FA enabled
|
||||
- WHEN the user enables 2FA in settings
|
||||
- THEN a QR code is displayed for authenticator app setup
|
||||
- AND the user must verify with a code before activation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: 2FA login
|
||||
- GIVEN a user with 2FA enabled
|
||||
- WHEN the user submits valid credentials
|
||||
- THEN an OTP challenge is presented
|
||||
- AND login completes only after valid OTP
|
||||
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Session Expiration
|
||||
The system MUST expire sessions after 15 minutes of inactivity.
|
||||
(Previously: 30 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Idle timeout
|
||||
- GIVEN an authenticated session
|
||||
- WHEN 15 minutes pass without activity
|
||||
- THEN the session is invalidated
|
||||
|
||||
## REMOVED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Remember Me
|
||||
(Deprecated in favor of 2FA. Users should re-authenticate each session.)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Delta Sections
|
||||
|
||||
| Section | Meaning | What Happens on Archive |
|
||||
|---------|---------|------------------------|
|
||||
| `## ADDED Requirements` | New behavior | Appended to main spec |
|
||||
| `## MODIFIED Requirements` | Changed behavior | Replaces existing requirement |
|
||||
| `## REMOVED Requirements` | Deprecated behavior | Deleted from main spec |
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Deltas Instead of Full Specs
|
||||
|
||||
**Clarity.** A delta shows exactly what's changing. Reading a full spec, you'd have to diff it mentally against the current version.
|
||||
|
||||
**Conflict avoidance.** Two changes can touch the same spec file without conflicting, as long as they modify different requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
**Review efficiency.** Reviewers see the change, not the unchanged context. Focus on what matters.
|
||||
|
||||
**Brownfield fit.** Most work modifies existing behavior. Deltas make modifications first-class, not an afterthought.
|
||||
|
||||
## Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
Schemas define the artifact types and their dependencies for a workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
### How Schemas Work
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# openspec/schemas/spec-driven/schema.yaml
|
||||
name: spec-driven
|
||||
artifacts:
|
||||
- id: proposal
|
||||
generates: proposal.md
|
||||
requires: [] # No dependencies, can create first
|
||||
|
||||
- id: specs
|
||||
generates: specs/**/*.md
|
||||
requires: [proposal] # Needs proposal before creating
|
||||
|
||||
- id: design
|
||||
generates: design.md
|
||||
requires: [proposal] # Can create in parallel with specs
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks
|
||||
generates: tasks.md
|
||||
requires: [specs, design] # Needs both specs and design first
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts form a dependency graph:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
proposal
|
||||
(root node)
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
▼ ▼
|
||||
specs design
|
||||
(requires: (requires:
|
||||
proposal) proposal)
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
tasks
|
||||
(requires:
|
||||
specs, design)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies are enablers, not gates.** They show what's possible to create, not what you must create next. You can skip design if you don't need it. You can create specs before or after design — both depend only on proposal.
|
||||
|
||||
### Built-in Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
**spec-driven** (default)
|
||||
|
||||
The standard workflow for spec-driven development:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
proposal → specs → design → tasks → implement
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Best for: Most feature work where you want to agree on specs before implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
### Custom Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
Create custom schemas for your team's workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Create from scratch
|
||||
openspec schema init research-first
|
||||
|
||||
# Or fork an existing one
|
||||
openspec schema fork spec-driven research-first
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example custom schema:**
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# openspec/schemas/research-first/schema.yaml
|
||||
name: research-first
|
||||
artifacts:
|
||||
- id: research
|
||||
generates: research.md
|
||||
requires: [] # Do research first
|
||||
|
||||
- id: proposal
|
||||
generates: proposal.md
|
||||
requires: [research] # Proposal informed by research
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks
|
||||
generates: tasks.md
|
||||
requires: [proposal] # Skip specs/design, go straight to tasks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
See [Customization](customization.md) for full details on creating and using custom schemas.
|
||||
|
||||
## Archive
|
||||
|
||||
Archiving completes a change by merging its delta specs into the main specs and preserving the change for history.
|
||||
|
||||
### What Happens When You Archive
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Before archive:
|
||||
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── specs/
|
||||
│ └── auth/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md ◄────────────────┐
|
||||
└── changes/ │
|
||||
└── add-2fa/ │
|
||||
├── proposal.md │
|
||||
├── design.md │ merge
|
||||
├── tasks.md │
|
||||
└── specs/ │
|
||||
└── auth/ │
|
||||
└── spec.md ─────────┘
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
After archive:
|
||||
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── specs/
|
||||
│ └── auth/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # Now includes 2FA requirements
|
||||
└── changes/
|
||||
└── archive/
|
||||
└── 2025-01-24-add-2fa/ # Preserved for history
|
||||
├── proposal.md
|
||||
├── design.md
|
||||
├── tasks.md
|
||||
└── specs/
|
||||
└── auth/
|
||||
└── spec.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### The Archive Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Merge deltas.** Each delta spec section (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED) is applied to the corresponding main spec.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Move to archive.** The change folder moves to `changes/archive/` with a date prefix for chronological ordering.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Preserve context.** All artifacts remain intact in the archive. You can always look back to understand why a change was made.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Archive Matters
|
||||
|
||||
**Clean state.** Active changes (`changes/`) shows only work in progress. Completed work moves out of the way.
|
||||
|
||||
**Audit trail.** The archive preserves the full context of every change — not just what changed, but the proposal explaining why, the design explaining how, and the tasks showing the work done.
|
||||
|
||||
**Spec evolution.** Specs grow organically as changes are archived. Each archive merges its deltas, building up a comprehensive specification over time.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It All Fits Together
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ OPENSPEC FLOW │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 1. START │ /opsx:new creates a change folder │
|
||||
│ │ CHANGE │ │
|
||||
│ └───────┬────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 2. CREATE │ /opsx:ff or /opsx:continue │
|
||||
│ │ ARTIFACTS │ Creates proposal → specs → design → tasks │
|
||||
│ │ │ (based on schema dependencies) │
|
||||
│ └───────┬────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 3. IMPLEMENT │ /opsx:apply │
|
||||
│ │ TASKS │ Work through tasks, checking them off │
|
||||
│ │ │◄──── Update artifacts as you learn │
|
||||
│ └───────┬────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 4. VERIFY │ /opsx:verify (optional) │
|
||||
│ │ WORK │ Check implementation matches specs │
|
||||
│ └───────┬────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 5. ARCHIVE │────►│ Delta specs merge into main specs │ │
|
||||
│ │ CHANGE │ │ Change folder moves to archive/ │ │
|
||||
│ └────────────────┘ │ Specs are now the updated source of truth │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**The virtuous cycle:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Specs describe current behavior
|
||||
2. Changes propose modifications (as deltas)
|
||||
3. Implementation makes the changes real
|
||||
4. Archive merges deltas into specs
|
||||
5. Specs now describe the new behavior
|
||||
6. Next change builds on updated specs
|
||||
|
||||
## Glossary
|
||||
|
||||
| Term | Definition |
|
||||
|------|------------|
|
||||
| **Artifact** | A document within a change (proposal, design, tasks, or delta specs) |
|
||||
| **Archive** | The process of completing a change and merging its deltas into main specs |
|
||||
| **Change** | A proposed modification to the system, packaged as a folder with artifacts |
|
||||
| **Delta spec** | A spec that describes changes (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED) relative to current specs |
|
||||
| **Domain** | A logical grouping for specs (e.g., `auth/`, `payments/`) |
|
||||
| **Requirement** | A specific behavior the system must have |
|
||||
| **Scenario** | A concrete example of a requirement, typically in Given/When/Then format |
|
||||
| **Schema** | A definition of artifact types and their dependencies |
|
||||
| **Spec** | A specification describing system behavior, containing requirements and scenarios |
|
||||
| **Source of truth** | The `openspec/specs/` directory, containing the current agreed-upon behavior |
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- [Getting Started](getting-started.md) - Practical first steps
|
||||
- [Workflows](workflows.md) - Common patterns and when to use each
|
||||
- [Commands](commands.md) - Full command reference
|
||||
- [Customization](customization.md) - Create custom schemas and configure your project
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
|
||||
# Customization
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec provides three levels of customization:
|
||||
|
||||
| Level | What it does | Best for |
|
||||
|-------|--------------|----------|
|
||||
| **Project Config** | Set defaults, inject context/rules | Most teams |
|
||||
| **Custom Schemas** | Define your own workflow artifacts | Teams with unique processes |
|
||||
| **Global Overrides** | Share schemas across all projects | Power users |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
The `openspec/config.yaml` file is the easiest way to customize OpenSpec for your team. It lets you:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Set a default schema** - Skip `--schema` on every command
|
||||
- **Inject project context** - AI sees your tech stack, conventions, etc.
|
||||
- **Add per-artifact rules** - Custom rules for specific artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick Setup
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This walks you through creating a config interactively. Or create one manually:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# openspec/config.yaml
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Tech stack: TypeScript, React, Node.js, PostgreSQL
|
||||
API style: RESTful, documented in docs/api.md
|
||||
Testing: Jest + React Testing Library
|
||||
We value backwards compatibility for all public APIs
|
||||
|
||||
rules:
|
||||
proposal:
|
||||
- Include rollback plan
|
||||
- Identify affected teams
|
||||
specs:
|
||||
- Use Given/When/Then format
|
||||
- Reference existing patterns before inventing new ones
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
**Default schema:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Without config
|
||||
openspec new change my-feature --schema spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
# With config - schema is automatic
|
||||
openspec new change my-feature
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Context and rules injection:**
|
||||
|
||||
When generating any artifact, your context and rules are injected into the AI prompt:
|
||||
|
||||
```xml
|
||||
<context>
|
||||
Tech stack: TypeScript, React, Node.js, PostgreSQL
|
||||
...
|
||||
</context>
|
||||
|
||||
<rules>
|
||||
- Include rollback plan
|
||||
- Identify affected teams
|
||||
</rules>
|
||||
|
||||
<template>
|
||||
[Schema's built-in template]
|
||||
</template>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- **Context** appears in ALL artifacts
|
||||
- **Rules** ONLY appear for the matching artifact
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Resolution Order
|
||||
|
||||
When OpenSpec needs a schema, it checks in this order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. CLI flag: `--schema <name>`
|
||||
2. Change metadata (`.openspec.yaml` in the change folder)
|
||||
3. Project config (`openspec/config.yaml`)
|
||||
4. Default (`spec-driven`)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Custom Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
When project config isn't enough, create your own schema with a completely custom workflow. Custom schemas live in your project's `openspec/schemas/` directory and are version-controlled with your code.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
your-project/
|
||||
├── openspec/
|
||||
│ ├── config.yaml # Project config
|
||||
│ ├── schemas/ # Custom schemas live here
|
||||
│ │ └── my-workflow/
|
||||
│ │ ├── schema.yaml
|
||||
│ │ └── templates/
|
||||
│ └── changes/ # Your changes
|
||||
└── src/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Fork an Existing Schema
|
||||
|
||||
The fastest way to customize is to fork a built-in schema:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec schema fork spec-driven my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This copies the entire `spec-driven` schema to `openspec/schemas/my-workflow/` where you can edit it freely.
|
||||
|
||||
**What you get:**
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
openspec/schemas/my-workflow/
|
||||
├── schema.yaml # Workflow definition
|
||||
└── templates/
|
||||
├── proposal.md # Template for proposal artifact
|
||||
├── spec.md # Template for specs
|
||||
├── design.md # Template for design
|
||||
└── tasks.md # Template for tasks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Now edit `schema.yaml` to change the workflow, or edit templates to change what AI generates.
|
||||
|
||||
### Create a Schema from Scratch
|
||||
|
||||
For a completely fresh workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive
|
||||
openspec schema init research-first
|
||||
|
||||
# Non-interactive
|
||||
openspec schema init rapid \
|
||||
--description "Rapid iteration workflow" \
|
||||
--artifacts "proposal,tasks" \
|
||||
--default
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Structure
|
||||
|
||||
A schema defines the artifacts in your workflow and how they depend on each other:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# openspec/schemas/my-workflow/schema.yaml
|
||||
name: my-workflow
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
description: My team's custom workflow
|
||||
|
||||
artifacts:
|
||||
- id: proposal
|
||||
generates: proposal.md
|
||||
description: Initial proposal document
|
||||
template: proposal.md
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a proposal that explains WHY this change is needed.
|
||||
Focus on the problem, not the solution.
|
||||
requires: []
|
||||
|
||||
- id: design
|
||||
generates: design.md
|
||||
description: Technical design
|
||||
template: design.md
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a design document explaining HOW to implement.
|
||||
requires:
|
||||
- proposal # Can't create design until proposal exists
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks
|
||||
generates: tasks.md
|
||||
description: Implementation checklist
|
||||
template: tasks.md
|
||||
requires:
|
||||
- design
|
||||
|
||||
apply:
|
||||
requires: [tasks]
|
||||
tracks: tasks.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key fields:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Purpose |
|
||||
|-------|---------|
|
||||
| `id` | Unique identifier, used in commands and rules |
|
||||
| `generates` | Output filename (supports globs like `specs/**/*.md`) |
|
||||
| `template` | Template file in `templates/` directory |
|
||||
| `instruction` | AI instructions for creating this artifact |
|
||||
| `requires` | Dependencies - which artifacts must exist first |
|
||||
|
||||
### Templates
|
||||
|
||||
Templates are markdown files that guide the AI. They're injected into the prompt when creating that artifact.
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
<!-- templates/proposal.md -->
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Explain the motivation for this change. What problem does this solve? -->
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Describe what will change. Be specific about new capabilities or modifications. -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Affected code, APIs, dependencies, systems -->
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Templates can include:
|
||||
- Section headers the AI should fill in
|
||||
- HTML comments with guidance for the AI
|
||||
- Example formats showing expected structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Validate Your Schema
|
||||
|
||||
Before using a custom schema, validate it:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec schema validate my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This checks:
|
||||
- `schema.yaml` syntax is correct
|
||||
- All referenced templates exist
|
||||
- No circular dependencies
|
||||
- Artifact IDs are valid
|
||||
|
||||
### Use Your Custom Schema
|
||||
|
||||
Once created, use your schema with:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Specify on command
|
||||
openspec new change feature --schema my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# Or set as default in config.yaml
|
||||
schema: my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Debug Schema Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure which schema is being used? Check with:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# See where a specific schema resolves from
|
||||
openspec schema which my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# List all available schemas
|
||||
openspec schema which --all
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Output shows whether it's from your project, user directory, or the package:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Schema: my-workflow
|
||||
Source: project
|
||||
Path: /path/to/project/openspec/schemas/my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **Note:** OpenSpec also supports user-level schemas at `~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/` for sharing across projects, but project-level schemas in `openspec/schemas/` are recommended since they're version-controlled with your code.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Rapid Iteration Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
A minimal workflow for quick iterations:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# openspec/schemas/rapid/schema.yaml
|
||||
name: rapid
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
description: Fast iteration with minimal overhead
|
||||
|
||||
artifacts:
|
||||
- id: proposal
|
||||
generates: proposal.md
|
||||
description: Quick proposal
|
||||
template: proposal.md
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief proposal for this change.
|
||||
Focus on what and why, skip detailed specs.
|
||||
requires: []
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks
|
||||
generates: tasks.md
|
||||
description: Implementation checklist
|
||||
template: tasks.md
|
||||
requires: [proposal]
|
||||
|
||||
apply:
|
||||
requires: [tasks]
|
||||
tracks: tasks.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Adding a Review Artifact
|
||||
|
||||
Fork the default and add a review step:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec schema fork spec-driven with-review
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then edit `schema.yaml` to add:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
- id: review
|
||||
generates: review.md
|
||||
description: Pre-implementation review checklist
|
||||
template: review.md
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a review checklist based on the design.
|
||||
Include security, performance, and testing considerations.
|
||||
requires:
|
||||
- design
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks
|
||||
# ... existing tasks config ...
|
||||
requires:
|
||||
- specs
|
||||
- design
|
||||
- review # Now tasks require review too
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- [CLI Reference: Schema Commands](cli.md#schema-commands) - Full command documentation
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
|
||||
# Getting Started
|
||||
|
||||
This guide explains how OpenSpec works after you've installed and initialized it. For installation instructions, see the [main README](../README.md#quick-start).
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec helps you and your AI coding assistant agree on what to build before any code is written. The workflow follows a simple pattern:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Start a Change │ /opsx:new
|
||||
└────────┬───────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Create Artifacts │ /opsx:ff or /opsx:continue
|
||||
│ (proposal, specs, │
|
||||
│ design, tasks) │
|
||||
└────────┬───────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Implement Tasks │ /opsx:apply
|
||||
│ (AI writes code) │
|
||||
└────────┬───────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Archive & Merge │ /opsx:archive
|
||||
│ Specs │
|
||||
└────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What OpenSpec Creates
|
||||
|
||||
After running `openspec init`, your project has this structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── specs/ # Source of truth (your system's behavior)
|
||||
│ └── <domain>/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md
|
||||
├── changes/ # Proposed updates (one folder per change)
|
||||
│ └── <change-name>/
|
||||
│ ├── proposal.md
|
||||
│ ├── design.md
|
||||
│ ├── tasks.md
|
||||
│ └── specs/ # Delta specs (what's changing)
|
||||
│ └── <domain>/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md
|
||||
└── config.yaml # Project configuration (optional)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Two key directories:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **`specs/`** - The source of truth. These specs describe how your system currently behaves. Organized by domain (e.g., `specs/auth/`, `specs/payments/`).
|
||||
|
||||
- **`changes/`** - Proposed modifications. Each change gets its own folder with all related artifacts. When a change is complete, its specs merge into the main `specs/` directory.
|
||||
|
||||
## Understanding Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
Each change folder contains artifacts that guide the work:
|
||||
|
||||
| Artifact | Purpose |
|
||||
|----------|---------|
|
||||
| `proposal.md` | The "why" and "what" - captures intent, scope, and approach |
|
||||
| `specs/` | Delta specs showing ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED requirements |
|
||||
| `design.md` | The "how" - technical approach and architecture decisions |
|
||||
| `tasks.md` | Implementation checklist with checkboxes |
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts build on each other:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
proposal ──► specs ──► design ──► tasks ──► implement
|
||||
▲ ▲ ▲ │
|
||||
└───────────┴──────────┴────────────────────┘
|
||||
update as you learn
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
You can always go back and refine earlier artifacts as you learn more during implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
## How Delta Specs Work
|
||||
|
||||
Delta specs are the key concept in OpenSpec. They show what's changing relative to your current specs.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Format
|
||||
|
||||
Delta specs use sections to indicate the type of change:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Delta for Auth
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
|
||||
The system MUST require a second factor during login.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: OTP required
|
||||
- GIVEN a user with 2FA enabled
|
||||
- WHEN the user submits valid credentials
|
||||
- THEN an OTP challenge is presented
|
||||
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Session Timeout
|
||||
The system SHALL expire sessions after 30 minutes of inactivity.
|
||||
(Previously: 60 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Idle timeout
|
||||
- GIVEN an authenticated session
|
||||
- WHEN 30 minutes pass without activity
|
||||
- THEN the session is invalidated
|
||||
|
||||
## REMOVED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Remember Me
|
||||
(Deprecated in favor of 2FA)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### What Happens on Archive
|
||||
|
||||
When you archive a change:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **ADDED** requirements are appended to the main spec
|
||||
2. **MODIFIED** requirements replace the existing version
|
||||
3. **REMOVED** requirements are deleted from the main spec
|
||||
|
||||
The change folder moves to `openspec/changes/archive/` for audit history.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example: Your First Change
|
||||
|
||||
Let's walk through adding dark mode to an application.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Start the Change
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:new add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Created openspec/changes/add-dark-mode/
|
||||
Ready to create: proposal
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Create Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
Use `/opsx:ff` (fast-forward) to create all planning artifacts at once:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:ff
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Creating artifacts for add-dark-mode...
|
||||
✓ proposal.md — why we're doing this, what's changing
|
||||
✓ specs/ — requirements and scenarios
|
||||
✓ design.md — technical approach
|
||||
✓ tasks.md — implementation checklist
|
||||
Ready for implementation!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. What Gets Created
|
||||
|
||||
**proposal.md** - Captures the intent:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Proposal: Add Dark Mode
|
||||
|
||||
## Intent
|
||||
Users have requested a dark mode option to reduce eye strain
|
||||
during nighttime usage.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
- Add theme toggle in settings
|
||||
- Support system preference detection
|
||||
- Persist preference in localStorage
|
||||
|
||||
## Approach
|
||||
Use CSS custom properties for theming with a React context
|
||||
for state management.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**specs/ui/spec.md** - Delta showing new requirements:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Delta for UI
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Theme Selection
|
||||
The system SHALL allow users to choose between light and dark themes.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Manual toggle
|
||||
- GIVEN a user on any page
|
||||
- WHEN the user clicks the theme toggle
|
||||
- THEN the theme switches immediately
|
||||
- AND the preference persists across sessions
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: System preference
|
||||
- GIVEN a user with no saved preference
|
||||
- WHEN the application loads
|
||||
- THEN the system's preferred color scheme is used
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**tasks.md** - Implementation checklist:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Theme Infrastructure
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Create ThemeContext with light/dark state
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Add CSS custom properties for colors
|
||||
- [ ] 1.3 Implement localStorage persistence
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. UI Components
|
||||
- [ ] 2.1 Create ThemeToggle component
|
||||
- [ ] 2.2 Add toggle to settings page
|
||||
- [ ] 2.3 Update Header to include quick toggle
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Styling
|
||||
- [ ] 3.1 Define dark theme color palette
|
||||
- [ ] 3.2 Update components to use CSS variables
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Implement
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:apply
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Working through tasks...
|
||||
✓ 1.1 Created ThemeContext with light/dark state
|
||||
✓ 1.2 Added CSS custom properties to globals.css
|
||||
✓ 1.3 Implemented localStorage persistence
|
||||
✓ 2.1 Created ThemeToggle component
|
||||
...
|
||||
All tasks complete!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
During implementation, if you discover the design needs adjustment, just update the artifact and continue.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Archive
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:archive
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Archiving add-dark-mode...
|
||||
✓ Merged specs into openspec/specs/ui/spec.md
|
||||
✓ Moved to openspec/changes/archive/2025-01-24-add-dark-mode/
|
||||
Done! Ready for the next feature.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Your delta specs are now part of the main specs, documenting how your system works.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verifying and Reviewing
|
||||
|
||||
Use the CLI to check on your changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# List active changes
|
||||
openspec list
|
||||
|
||||
# View change details
|
||||
openspec show add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate spec formatting
|
||||
openspec validate add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Interactive dashboard
|
||||
openspec view
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- [Workflows](workflows.md) - Common patterns and when to use each command
|
||||
- [Commands](commands.md) - Full reference for all slash commands
|
||||
- [Concepts](concepts.md) - Deeper understanding of specs, changes, and schemas
|
||||
- [Customization](customization.md) - Make OpenSpec work your way
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
||||
# Installation
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- **Node.js 20.19.0 or higher** — Check your version: `node --version`
|
||||
|
||||
## Package Managers
|
||||
|
||||
### npm
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### pnpm
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pnpm add -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### yarn
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
yarn global add @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### bun
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bun add -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Nix
|
||||
|
||||
Run OpenSpec directly without installation:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
nix run github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec -- init
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or install to your profile:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
nix profile install github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or add to your development environment in `flake.nix`:
|
||||
|
||||
```nix
|
||||
{
|
||||
inputs = {
|
||||
nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-unstable";
|
||||
openspec.url = "github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
outputs = { nixpkgs, openspec, ... }: {
|
||||
devShells.x86_64-linux.default = nixpkgs.legacyPackages.x86_64-linux.mkShell {
|
||||
buildInputs = [ openspec.packages.x86_64-linux.default ];
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Verify Installation
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec --version
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
After installing, initialize OpenSpec in your project:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd your-project
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
See [Getting Started](getting-started.md) for a full walkthrough.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,575 @@
|
||||
# Migrating to OPSX
|
||||
|
||||
This guide helps you transition from the legacy OpenSpec workflow to OPSX. The migration is designed to be smooth—your existing work is preserved, and the new system offers more flexibility.
|
||||
|
||||
## What's Changing?
|
||||
|
||||
OPSX replaces the old phase-locked workflow with a fluid, action-based approach. Here's the key shift:
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | Legacy | OPSX |
|
||||
|--------|--------|------|
|
||||
| **Commands** | `/openspec:proposal`, `/openspec:apply`, `/openspec:archive` | `/opsx:new`, `/opsx:continue`, `/opsx:apply`, and more |
|
||||
| **Workflow** | Create all artifacts at once | Create incrementally or all at once—your choice |
|
||||
| **Going back** | Awkward phase gates | Natural—update any artifact anytime |
|
||||
| **Customization** | Fixed structure | Schema-driven, fully hackable |
|
||||
| **Configuration** | `CLAUDE.md` with markers + `project.md` | Clean config in `openspec/config.yaml` |
|
||||
|
||||
**The philosophy change:** Work isn't linear. OPSX stops pretending it is.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Before You Begin
|
||||
|
||||
### Your Existing Work Is Safe
|
||||
|
||||
The migration process is designed with preservation in mind:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Active changes in `openspec/changes/`** — Completely preserved. You can continue them with OPSX commands.
|
||||
- **Archived changes** — Untouched. Your history remains intact.
|
||||
- **Main specs in `openspec/specs/`** — Untouched. These are your source of truth.
|
||||
- **Your content in CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.** — Preserved. Only the OpenSpec marker blocks are removed; everything you wrote stays.
|
||||
|
||||
### What Gets Removed
|
||||
|
||||
Only OpenSpec-managed files that are being replaced:
|
||||
|
||||
| What | Why |
|
||||
|------|-----|
|
||||
| Legacy slash command directories/files | Replaced by the new skills system |
|
||||
| `openspec/AGENTS.md` | Obsolete workflow trigger |
|
||||
| OpenSpec markers in `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, etc. | No longer needed |
|
||||
|
||||
**Legacy command locations by tool** (examples—your tool may vary):
|
||||
|
||||
- Claude Code: `.claude/commands/openspec/`
|
||||
- Cursor: `.cursor/commands/openspec-*.md`
|
||||
- Windsurf: `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-*.md`
|
||||
- Cline: `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-*.md`
|
||||
- Roo: `.roo/commands/openspec-*.md`
|
||||
- GitHub Copilot: `.github/prompts/openspec-*.prompt.md`
|
||||
- And others (Augment, Continue, Amazon Q, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
The migration detects whichever tools you have configured and cleans up their legacy files.
|
||||
|
||||
The removal list may seem long, but these are all files that OpenSpec originally created. Your own content is never deleted.
|
||||
|
||||
### What Needs Your Attention
|
||||
|
||||
One file requires manual migration:
|
||||
|
||||
**`openspec/project.md`** — This file isn't deleted automatically because it may contain project context you've written. You'll need to:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review its contents
|
||||
2. Move useful context to `openspec/config.yaml` (see guidance below)
|
||||
3. Delete the file when ready
|
||||
|
||||
**Why we made this change:**
|
||||
|
||||
The old `project.md` was passive—agents might read it, might not, might forget what they read. We found reliability was inconsistent.
|
||||
|
||||
The new `config.yaml` context is **actively injected into every OpenSpec planning request**. This means your project conventions, tech stack, and rules are always present when the AI is creating artifacts. Higher reliability.
|
||||
|
||||
**The tradeoff:**
|
||||
|
||||
Because context is injected into every request, you'll want to be concise. Focus on what really matters:
|
||||
- Tech stack and key conventions
|
||||
- Non-obvious constraints the AI needs to know
|
||||
- Rules that frequently got ignored before
|
||||
|
||||
Don't worry about getting it perfect. We're still learning what works best here, and we'll be improving how context injection works as we experiment.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Running the Migration
|
||||
|
||||
Both `openspec init` and `openspec update` detect legacy files and guide you through the same cleanup process. Use whichever fits your situation:
|
||||
|
||||
### Using `openspec init`
|
||||
|
||||
Run this if you want to add new tools or reconfigure which tools are set up:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The init command detects legacy files and guides you through cleanup:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Upgrading to the new OpenSpec
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec now uses agent skills, the emerging standard across coding
|
||||
agents. This simplifies your setup while keeping everything working
|
||||
as before.
|
||||
|
||||
Files to remove
|
||||
No user content to preserve:
|
||||
• .claude/commands/openspec/
|
||||
• openspec/AGENTS.md
|
||||
|
||||
Files to update
|
||||
OpenSpec markers will be removed, your content preserved:
|
||||
• CLAUDE.md
|
||||
• AGENTS.md
|
||||
|
||||
Needs your attention
|
||||
• openspec/project.md
|
||||
We won't delete this file. It may contain useful project context.
|
||||
|
||||
The new openspec/config.yaml has a "context:" section for planning
|
||||
context. This is included in every OpenSpec request and works more
|
||||
reliably than the old project.md approach.
|
||||
|
||||
Review project.md, move any useful content to config.yaml's context
|
||||
section, then delete the file when ready.
|
||||
|
||||
? Upgrade and clean up legacy files? (Y/n)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What happens when you say yes:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Legacy slash command directories are removed
|
||||
2. OpenSpec markers are stripped from `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, etc. (your content stays)
|
||||
3. `openspec/AGENTS.md` is deleted
|
||||
4. New skills are installed in `.claude/skills/`
|
||||
5. `openspec/config.yaml` is created with a default schema
|
||||
|
||||
### Using `openspec update`
|
||||
|
||||
Run this if you just want to migrate and refresh your existing tools to the latest version:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec update
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The update command also detects and cleans up legacy artifacts, then refreshes your skills to the latest version.
|
||||
|
||||
### Non-Interactive / CI Environments
|
||||
|
||||
For scripted migrations:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec init --force --tools claude
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The `--force` flag skips prompts and auto-accepts cleanup.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Migrating project.md to config.yaml
|
||||
|
||||
The old `openspec/project.md` was a freeform markdown file for project context. The new `openspec/config.yaml` is structured and—critically—**injected into every planning request** so your conventions are always present when the AI works.
|
||||
|
||||
### Before (project.md)
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Project Context
|
||||
|
||||
This is a TypeScript monorepo using React and Node.js.
|
||||
We use Jest for testing and follow strict ESLint rules.
|
||||
Our API is RESTful and documented in docs/api.md.
|
||||
|
||||
## Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
- All public APIs must maintain backwards compatibility
|
||||
- New features should include tests
|
||||
- Use Given/When/Then format for specifications
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### After (config.yaml)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Tech stack: TypeScript, React, Node.js
|
||||
Testing: Jest with React Testing Library
|
||||
API: RESTful, documented in docs/api.md
|
||||
We maintain backwards compatibility for all public APIs
|
||||
|
||||
rules:
|
||||
proposal:
|
||||
- Include rollback plan for risky changes
|
||||
specs:
|
||||
- Use Given/When/Then format for scenarios
|
||||
- Reference existing patterns before inventing new ones
|
||||
design:
|
||||
- Include sequence diagrams for complex flows
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Differences
|
||||
|
||||
| project.md | config.yaml |
|
||||
|------------|-------------|
|
||||
| Freeform markdown | Structured YAML |
|
||||
| One blob of text | Separate context and per-artifact rules |
|
||||
| Unclear when it's used | Context appears in ALL artifacts; rules appear in matching artifacts only |
|
||||
| No schema selection | Explicit `schema:` field sets default workflow |
|
||||
|
||||
### What to Keep, What to Drop
|
||||
|
||||
When migrating, be selective. Ask yourself: "Does the AI need this for *every* planning request?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Good candidates for `context:`**
|
||||
- Tech stack (languages, frameworks, databases)
|
||||
- Key architectural patterns (monorepo, microservices, etc.)
|
||||
- Non-obvious constraints ("we can't use library X because...")
|
||||
- Critical conventions that often get ignored
|
||||
|
||||
**Move to `rules:` instead**
|
||||
- Artifact-specific formatting ("use Given/When/Then in specs")
|
||||
- Review criteria ("proposals must include rollback plans")
|
||||
- These only appear for the matching artifact, keeping other requests lighter
|
||||
|
||||
**Leave out entirely**
|
||||
- General best practices the AI already knows
|
||||
- Verbose explanations that could be summarized
|
||||
- Historical context that doesn't affect current work
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Create config.yaml** (if not already created by init):
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Add your context** (be concise—this goes into every request):
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Your project background goes here.
|
||||
Focus on what the AI genuinely needs to know.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Add per-artifact rules** (optional):
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
rules:
|
||||
proposal:
|
||||
- Your proposal-specific guidance
|
||||
specs:
|
||||
- Your spec-writing rules
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Delete project.md** once you've moved everything useful.
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't overthink it.** Start with the essentials and iterate. If you notice the AI missing something important, add it. If context feels bloated, trim it. This is a living document.
|
||||
|
||||
### Need Help? Use This Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
If you're unsure how to distill your project.md, ask your AI assistant:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
I'm migrating from OpenSpec's old project.md to the new config.yaml format.
|
||||
|
||||
Here's my current project.md:
|
||||
[paste your project.md content]
|
||||
|
||||
Please help me create a config.yaml with:
|
||||
1. A concise `context:` section (this gets injected into every planning request, so keep it tight—focus on tech stack, key constraints, and conventions that often get ignored)
|
||||
2. `rules:` for specific artifacts if any content is artifact-specific (e.g., "use Given/When/Then" belongs in specs rules, not global context)
|
||||
|
||||
Leave out anything generic that AI models already know. Be ruthless about brevity.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The AI will help you identify what's essential vs. what can be trimmed.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The New Commands
|
||||
|
||||
After migration, you have 9 OPSX commands instead of 3:
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose |
|
||||
|---------|---------|
|
||||
| `/opsx:explore` | Think through ideas with no structure |
|
||||
| `/opsx:new` | Start a new change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:continue` | Create the next artifact (one at a time) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:ff` | Fast-forward—create all planning artifacts at once |
|
||||
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks from tasks.md |
|
||||
| `/opsx:verify` | Validate implementation matches specs |
|
||||
| `/opsx:sync` | Preview spec merge (optional—archive prompts if needed) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:archive` | Finalize and archive the change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:bulk-archive` | Archive multiple changes at once |
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Mapping from Legacy
|
||||
|
||||
| Legacy | OPSX Equivalent |
|
||||
|--------|-----------------|
|
||||
| `/openspec:proposal` | `/opsx:new` then `/opsx:ff` |
|
||||
| `/openspec:apply` | `/opsx:apply` |
|
||||
| `/openspec:archive` | `/opsx:archive` |
|
||||
|
||||
### New Capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
**Granular artifact creation:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:continue
|
||||
```
|
||||
Creates one artifact at a time based on dependencies. Use this when you want to review each step.
|
||||
|
||||
**Exploration mode:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:explore
|
||||
```
|
||||
Think through ideas with a partner before committing to a change.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Understanding the New Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### From Phase-Locked to Fluid
|
||||
|
||||
The legacy workflow forced linear progression:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
|
||||
│ PLANNING │ ───► │ IMPLEMENTING │ ───► │ ARCHIVING │
|
||||
│ PHASE │ │ PHASE │ │ PHASE │
|
||||
└──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
|
||||
|
||||
If you're in implementation and realize the design is wrong?
|
||||
Too bad. Phase gates don't let you go back easily.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
OPSX uses actions, not phases:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ ACTIONS (not phases) │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ new ◄──► continue ◄──► apply ◄──► archive │
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────┴───────────┴───────────┘ │
|
||||
│ any order │
|
||||
└────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependency Graph
|
||||
|
||||
Artifacts form a directed graph. Dependencies are enablers, not gates:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
proposal
|
||||
(root node)
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
▼ ▼
|
||||
specs design
|
||||
(requires: (requires:
|
||||
proposal) proposal)
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
tasks
|
||||
(requires:
|
||||
specs, design)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
When you run `/opsx:continue`, it checks what's ready and offers the next artifact. You can also create multiple ready artifacts in any order.
|
||||
|
||||
### Skills vs Commands
|
||||
|
||||
The legacy system used tool-specific command files:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.claude/commands/openspec/
|
||||
├── proposal.md
|
||||
├── apply.md
|
||||
└── archive.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
OPSX uses the emerging **skills** standard:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.claude/skills/
|
||||
├── openspec-explore/SKILL.md
|
||||
├── openspec-new-change/SKILL.md
|
||||
├── openspec-continue-change/SKILL.md
|
||||
├── openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
|
||||
└── ...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Skills are recognized across multiple AI coding tools and provide richer metadata.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuing Existing Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Your in-progress changes work seamlessly with OPSX commands.
|
||||
|
||||
**Have an active change from the legacy workflow?**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:apply add-my-feature
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
OPSX reads the existing artifacts and continues from where you left off.
|
||||
|
||||
**Want to add more artifacts to an existing change?**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:continue add-my-feature
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Shows what's ready to create based on what already exists.
|
||||
|
||||
**Need to see status?**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec status --change add-my-feature
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The New Config System
|
||||
|
||||
### config.yaml Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# Required: Default schema for new changes
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
# Optional: Project context (max 50KB)
|
||||
# Injected into ALL artifact instructions
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Your project background, tech stack,
|
||||
conventions, and constraints.
|
||||
|
||||
# Optional: Per-artifact rules
|
||||
# Only injected into matching artifacts
|
||||
rules:
|
||||
proposal:
|
||||
- Include rollback plan
|
||||
specs:
|
||||
- Use Given/When/Then format
|
||||
design:
|
||||
- Document fallback strategies
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- Break into 2-hour maximum chunks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
When determining which schema to use, OPSX checks in order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **CLI flag**: `--schema <name>` (highest priority)
|
||||
2. **Change metadata**: `.openspec.yaml` in the change directory
|
||||
3. **Project config**: `openspec/config.yaml`
|
||||
4. **Default**: `spec-driven`
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
| Schema | Artifacts | Best For |
|
||||
|--------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| `spec-driven` | proposal → specs → design → tasks | Most projects |
|
||||
|
||||
List all available schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec workflow schemas
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Custom Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
Create your own workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec schema init my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or fork an existing one:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec schema fork spec-driven my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
See [Customization](customization.md) for details.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### "Legacy files detected in non-interactive mode"
|
||||
|
||||
You're running in a CI or non-interactive environment. Use:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec init --force
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Commands not appearing after migration
|
||||
|
||||
Restart your IDE. Skills are detected at startup.
|
||||
|
||||
### "Unknown artifact ID in rules"
|
||||
|
||||
Check that your `rules:` keys match your schema's artifact IDs:
|
||||
|
||||
- **spec-driven**: `proposal`, `specs`, `design`, `tasks`
|
||||
|
||||
Run this to see valid artifact IDs:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec workflow schemas --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Config not being applied
|
||||
|
||||
1. Ensure the file is at `openspec/config.yaml` (not `.yml`)
|
||||
2. Validate YAML syntax
|
||||
3. Config changes take effect immediately—no restart needed
|
||||
|
||||
### project.md not migrated
|
||||
|
||||
The system intentionally preserves `project.md` because it may contain your custom content. Review it manually, move useful parts to `config.yaml`, then delete it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Want to see what would be cleaned up?
|
||||
|
||||
Run init and decline the cleanup prompt—you'll see the full detection summary without any changes being made.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Files After Migration
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
project/
|
||||
├── openspec/
|
||||
│ ├── specs/ # Unchanged
|
||||
│ ├── changes/ # Unchanged
|
||||
│ │ └── archive/ # Unchanged
|
||||
│ └── config.yaml # NEW: Project configuration
|
||||
├── .claude/
|
||||
│ └── skills/ # NEW: OPSX skills
|
||||
│ ├── openspec-explore/
|
||||
│ ├── openspec-new-change/
|
||||
│ └── ...
|
||||
├── CLAUDE.md # OpenSpec markers removed, your content preserved
|
||||
└── AGENTS.md # OpenSpec markers removed, your content preserved
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### What's Gone
|
||||
|
||||
- `.claude/commands/openspec/` — replaced by `.claude/skills/`
|
||||
- `openspec/AGENTS.md` — obsolete
|
||||
- `openspec/project.md` — migrate to `config.yaml`, then delete
|
||||
- OpenSpec marker blocks in `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Cheatsheet
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:new Start a change
|
||||
/opsx:continue Create next artifact
|
||||
/opsx:ff Create all planning artifacts
|
||||
/opsx:apply Implement tasks
|
||||
/opsx:archive Finish and archive
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Getting Help
|
||||
|
||||
- **Discord**: [discord.gg/YctCnvvshC](https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC)
|
||||
- **GitHub Issues**: [github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/issues](https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/issues)
|
||||
- **Documentation**: [docs/opsx.md](opsx.md) for the full OPSX reference
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
||||
# Multi-Language Guide
|
||||
|
||||
Configure OpenSpec to generate artifacts in languages other than English.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Setup
|
||||
|
||||
Add a language instruction to your `openspec/config.yaml`:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Language: Portuguese (pt-BR)
|
||||
All artifacts must be written in Brazilian Portuguese.
|
||||
|
||||
# Your other project context below...
|
||||
Tech stack: TypeScript, React, Node.js
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
That's it. All generated artifacts will now be in Portuguese.
|
||||
|
||||
## Language Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Portuguese (Brazil)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Language: Portuguese (pt-BR)
|
||||
All artifacts must be written in Brazilian Portuguese.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Spanish
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Idioma: Español
|
||||
Todos los artefactos deben escribirse en español.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Chinese (Simplified)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
语言:中文(简体)
|
||||
所有产出物必须用简体中文撰写。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Japanese
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
言語:日本語
|
||||
すべての成果物は日本語で作成してください。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### French
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Langue : Français
|
||||
Tous les artefacts doivent être rédigés en français.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### German
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Sprache: Deutsch
|
||||
Alle Artefakte müssen auf Deutsch verfasst werden.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Tips
|
||||
|
||||
### Handle Technical Terms
|
||||
|
||||
Decide how to handle technical terminology:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Language: Japanese
|
||||
Write in Japanese, but:
|
||||
- Keep technical terms like "API", "REST", "GraphQL" in English
|
||||
- Code examples and file paths remain in English
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Combine with Other Context
|
||||
|
||||
Language settings work alongside your other project context:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Language: Portuguese (pt-BR)
|
||||
All artifacts must be written in Brazilian Portuguese.
|
||||
|
||||
Tech stack: TypeScript, React 18, Node.js 20
|
||||
Database: PostgreSQL with Prisma ORM
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
To verify your language config is working:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check the instructions - should show your language context
|
||||
openspec instructions proposal --change my-change
|
||||
|
||||
# Output will include your language context
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- [Customization Guide](./customization.md) - Project configuration options
|
||||
- [Workflows Guide](./workflows.md) - Full workflow documentation
|
||||
+645
@@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
|
||||
# OPSX Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
> **Compatibility:** Claude Code only (for now). Feedback welcome on [Discord](https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC).
|
||||
|
||||
## What Is It?
|
||||
|
||||
OPSX is a **fluid, iterative workflow** for OpenSpec changes. No more rigid phases — just actions you can take anytime.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Exists
|
||||
|
||||
The standard OpenSpec workflow works, but it's **locked down**:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Instructions are hardcoded** — buried in TypeScript, you can't change them
|
||||
- **All-or-nothing** — one big command creates everything, can't test individual pieces
|
||||
- **Fixed structure** — same workflow for everyone, no customization
|
||||
- **Black box** — when AI output is bad, you can't tweak the prompts
|
||||
|
||||
**OPSX opens it up.** Now anyone can:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Experiment with instructions** — edit a template, see if the AI does better
|
||||
2. **Test granularly** — validate each artifact's instructions independently
|
||||
3. **Customize workflows** — define your own artifacts and dependencies
|
||||
4. **Iterate quickly** — change a template, test immediately, no rebuild
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Standard workflow: OPSX:
|
||||
┌────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Hardcoded in package │ │ schema.yaml │◄── You edit this
|
||||
│ (can't change) │ │ templates/*.md │◄── Or this
|
||||
│ ↓ │ │ ↓ │
|
||||
│ Wait for new release │ │ Instant effect │
|
||||
│ ↓ │ │ ↓ │
|
||||
│ Hope it's better │ │ Test it yourself │
|
||||
└────────────────────────┘ └────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**This is for everyone:**
|
||||
- **Teams** — create workflows that match how you actually work
|
||||
- **Power users** — tweak prompts to get better AI outputs for your codebase
|
||||
- **OpenSpec contributors** — experiment with new approaches without releases
|
||||
|
||||
We're all still learning what works best. OPSX lets us learn together.
|
||||
|
||||
## The User Experience
|
||||
|
||||
**The problem with linear workflows:**
|
||||
You're "in planning phase", then "in implementation phase", then "done". But real work doesn't work that way. You implement something, realize your design was wrong, need to update specs, continue implementing. Linear phases fight against how work actually happens.
|
||||
|
||||
**OPSX approach:**
|
||||
- **Actions, not phases** — create, implement, update, archive — do any of them anytime
|
||||
- **Dependencies are enablers** — they show what's possible, not what's required next
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
proposal ──→ specs ──→ design ──→ tasks ──→ implement
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Setup
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 1. Make sure you have openspec installed and initialized
|
||||
openspec init
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. Generate the experimental skills
|
||||
openspec experimental
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This creates skills in `.claude/skills/` that Claude Code auto-detects.
|
||||
|
||||
During setup, you'll be prompted to create a **project config** (`openspec/config.yaml`). This is optional but recommended.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Project config lets you set defaults and inject project-specific context into all artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
### Creating Config
|
||||
|
||||
Config is created during `experimental`, or manually:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# openspec/config.yaml
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
|
||||
context: |
|
||||
Tech stack: TypeScript, React, Node.js
|
||||
API conventions: RESTful, JSON responses
|
||||
Testing: Vitest for unit tests, Playwright for e2e
|
||||
Style: ESLint with Prettier, strict TypeScript
|
||||
|
||||
rules:
|
||||
proposal:
|
||||
- Include rollback plan
|
||||
- Identify affected teams
|
||||
specs:
|
||||
- Use Given/When/Then format for scenarios
|
||||
design:
|
||||
- Include sequence diagrams for complex flows
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Config Fields
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Type | Description |
|
||||
|-------|------|-------------|
|
||||
| `schema` | string | Default schema for new changes (e.g., `spec-driven`) |
|
||||
| `context` | string | Project context injected into all artifact instructions |
|
||||
| `rules` | object | Per-artifact rules, keyed by artifact ID |
|
||||
|
||||
### How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
**Schema precedence** (highest to lowest):
|
||||
1. CLI flag (`--schema <name>`)
|
||||
2. Change metadata (`.openspec.yaml` in change directory)
|
||||
3. Project config (`openspec/config.yaml`)
|
||||
4. Default (`spec-driven`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Context injection:**
|
||||
- Context is prepended to every artifact's instructions
|
||||
- Wrapped in `<context>...</context>` tags
|
||||
- Helps AI understand your project's conventions
|
||||
|
||||
**Rules injection:**
|
||||
- Rules are only injected for matching artifacts
|
||||
- Wrapped in `<rules>...</rules>` tags
|
||||
- Appear after context, before the template
|
||||
|
||||
### Artifact IDs by Schema
|
||||
|
||||
**spec-driven** (default):
|
||||
- `proposal` — Change proposal
|
||||
- `specs` — Specifications
|
||||
- `design` — Technical design
|
||||
- `tasks` — Implementation tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### Config Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- Unknown artifact IDs in `rules` generate warnings
|
||||
- Schema names are validated against available schemas
|
||||
- Context has a 50KB size limit
|
||||
- Invalid YAML is reported with line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
### Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
**"Unknown artifact ID in rules: X"**
|
||||
- Check artifact IDs match your schema (see list above)
|
||||
- Run `openspec schemas --json` to see artifact IDs for each schema
|
||||
|
||||
**Config not being applied:**
|
||||
- Ensure file is at `openspec/config.yaml` (not `.yml`)
|
||||
- Check YAML syntax with a validator
|
||||
- Config changes take effect immediately (no restart needed)
|
||||
|
||||
**Context too large:**
|
||||
- Context is limited to 50KB
|
||||
- Summarize or link to external docs instead
|
||||
|
||||
## Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | What it does |
|
||||
|---------|--------------|
|
||||
| `/opsx:explore` | Think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements |
|
||||
| `/opsx:new` | Start a new change |
|
||||
| `/opsx:continue` | Create the next artifact (based on what's ready) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:ff` | Fast-forward — create all planning artifacts at once |
|
||||
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks, updating artifacts as needed |
|
||||
| `/opsx:sync` | Sync delta specs to main (optional—archive prompts if needed) |
|
||||
| `/opsx:archive` | Archive when done |
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
### Explore an idea
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:explore
|
||||
```
|
||||
Think through ideas, investigate problems, compare options. No structure required - just a thinking partner. When insights crystallize, transition to `/opsx:new` or `/opsx:ff`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Start a new change
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:new
|
||||
```
|
||||
You'll be asked what you want to build and which workflow schema to use.
|
||||
|
||||
### Create artifacts
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:continue
|
||||
```
|
||||
Shows what's ready to create based on dependencies, then creates one artifact. Use repeatedly to build up your change incrementally.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:ff add-dark-mode
|
||||
```
|
||||
Creates all planning artifacts at once. Use when you have a clear picture of what you're building.
|
||||
|
||||
### Implement (the fluid part)
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:apply
|
||||
```
|
||||
Works through tasks, checking them off as you go. If you're juggling multiple changes, you can run `/opsx:apply <name>`; otherwise it should infer from the conversation and prompt you to choose if it can't tell.
|
||||
|
||||
### Finish up
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:archive # Move to archive when done (prompts to sync specs if needed)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Update vs. Start Fresh
|
||||
|
||||
You can always edit your proposal or specs before implementation. But when does refining become "this is different work"?
|
||||
|
||||
### What a Proposal Captures
|
||||
|
||||
A proposal defines three things:
|
||||
1. **Intent** — What problem are you solving?
|
||||
2. **Scope** — What's in/out of bounds?
|
||||
3. **Approach** — How will you solve it?
|
||||
|
||||
The question is: which changed, and by how much?
|
||||
|
||||
### Update the Existing Change When:
|
||||
|
||||
**Same intent, refined execution**
|
||||
- You discover edge cases you didn't consider
|
||||
- The approach needs tweaking but the goal is unchanged
|
||||
- Implementation reveals the design was slightly off
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope narrows**
|
||||
- You realize full scope is too big, want to ship MVP first
|
||||
- "Add dark mode" → "Add dark mode toggle (system preference in v2)"
|
||||
|
||||
**Learning-driven corrections**
|
||||
- Codebase isn't structured how you thought
|
||||
- A dependency doesn't work as expected
|
||||
- "Use CSS variables" → "Use Tailwind's dark: prefix instead"
|
||||
|
||||
### Start a New Change When:
|
||||
|
||||
**Intent fundamentally changed**
|
||||
- The problem itself is different now
|
||||
- "Add dark mode" → "Add comprehensive theme system with custom colors, fonts, spacing"
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope exploded**
|
||||
- Change grew so much it's essentially different work
|
||||
- Original proposal would be unrecognizable after updates
|
||||
- "Fix login bug" → "Rewrite auth system"
|
||||
|
||||
**Original is completable**
|
||||
- The original change can be marked "done"
|
||||
- New work stands alone, not a refinement
|
||||
- Complete "Add dark mode MVP" → Archive → New change "Enhance dark mode"
|
||||
|
||||
### The Heuristics
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Is this the same work? │
|
||||
└──────────────┬──────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
▼ ▼ ▼
|
||||
Same intent? >50% overlap? Can original
|
||||
Same problem? Same scope? be "done" without
|
||||
│ │ these changes?
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
┌────────┴────────┐ ┌──────┴──────┐ ┌───────┴───────┐
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
YES NO YES NO NO YES
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
|
||||
UPDATE NEW UPDATE NEW UPDATE NEW
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
| Test | Update | New Change |
|
||||
|------|--------|------------|
|
||||
| **Identity** | "Same thing, refined" | "Different work" |
|
||||
| **Scope overlap** | >50% overlaps | <50% overlaps |
|
||||
| **Completion** | Can't be "done" without changes | Can finish original, new work stands alone |
|
||||
| **Story** | Update chain tells coherent story | Patches would confuse more than clarify |
|
||||
|
||||
### The Principle
|
||||
|
||||
> **Update preserves context. New change provides clarity.**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Choose update when the history of your thinking is valuable.
|
||||
> Choose new when starting fresh would be clearer than patching.
|
||||
|
||||
Think of it like git branches:
|
||||
- Keep committing while working on the same feature
|
||||
- Start a new branch when it's genuinely new work
|
||||
- Sometimes merge a partial feature and start fresh for phase 2
|
||||
|
||||
## What's Different?
|
||||
|
||||
| | Standard (`/openspec:proposal`) | Experimental (`/opsx:*`) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Structure** | One big proposal document | Discrete artifacts with dependencies |
|
||||
| **Workflow** | Linear phases: plan → implement → archive | Fluid actions — do anything anytime |
|
||||
| **Iteration** | Awkward to go back | Update artifacts as you learn |
|
||||
| **Customization** | Fixed structure | Schema-driven (define your own artifacts) |
|
||||
|
||||
**The key insight:** work isn't linear. OPSX stops pretending it is.
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Deep Dive
|
||||
|
||||
This section explains how OPSX works under the hood and how it compares to the standard workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
### Philosophy: Phases vs Actions
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ STANDARD WORKFLOW │
|
||||
│ (Phase-Locked, All-or-Nothing) │
|
||||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ PLANNING │ ───► │ IMPLEMENTING │ ───► │ ARCHIVING │ │
|
||||
│ │ PHASE │ │ PHASE │ │ PHASE │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
|
||||
│ /openspec:proposal /openspec:apply /openspec:archive │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ • Creates ALL artifacts at once │
|
||||
│ • Can't go back to update specs during implementation │
|
||||
│ • Phase gates enforce linear progression │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ OPSX WORKFLOW │
|
||||
│ (Fluid Actions, Iterative) │
|
||||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ ACTIONS (not phases) │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ new ◄──► continue ◄──► apply ◄──► archive │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ └──────────┴───────────┴───────────┘ │ │
|
||||
│ │ any order │ │
|
||||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ • Create artifacts one at a time OR fast-forward │
|
||||
│ • Update specs/design/tasks during implementation │
|
||||
│ • Dependencies enable progress, phases don't exist │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
**Standard workflow** uses hardcoded templates in TypeScript:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ STANDARD WORKFLOW COMPONENTS │
|
||||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Hardcoded Templates (TypeScript strings) │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ Configurators (18+ classes, one per editor) │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ Generated Command Files (.claude/commands/openspec/*.md) │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ • Fixed structure, no artifact awareness │
|
||||
│ • Change requires code modification + rebuild │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**OPSX** uses external schemas and a dependency graph engine:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ OPSX COMPONENTS │
|
||||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Schema Definitions (YAML) │
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ name: spec-driven │ │
|
||||
│ │ artifacts: │ │
|
||||
│ │ - id: proposal │ │
|
||||
│ │ generates: proposal.md │ │
|
||||
│ │ requires: [] ◄── Dependencies │ │
|
||||
│ │ - id: specs │ │
|
||||
│ │ generates: specs/**/*.md ◄── Glob patterns │ │
|
||||
│ │ requires: [proposal] ◄── Enables after proposal │ │
|
||||
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ Artifact Graph Engine │
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ • Topological sort (dependency ordering) │ │
|
||||
│ │ • State detection (filesystem existence) │ │
|
||||
│ │ • Rich instruction generation (templates + context) │ │
|
||||
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ▼ │
|
||||
│ Skill Files (.claude/skills/openspec-*/SKILL.md) │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ • Cross-editor compatible (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf) │
|
||||
│ • Skills query CLI for structured data │
|
||||
│ • Fully customizable via schema files │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependency Graph Model
|
||||
|
||||
Artifacts form a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Dependencies are **enablers**, not gates:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
proposal
|
||||
(root node)
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
▼ ▼
|
||||
specs design
|
||||
(requires: (requires:
|
||||
proposal) proposal)
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
tasks
|
||||
(requires:
|
||||
specs, design)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌──────────────┐
|
||||
│ APPLY PHASE │
|
||||
│ (requires: │
|
||||
│ tasks) │
|
||||
└──────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**State transitions:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
BLOCKED ────────────────► READY ────────────────► DONE
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
Missing All deps File exists
|
||||
dependencies are DONE on filesystem
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Information Flow
|
||||
|
||||
**Standard workflow** — agent receives static instructions:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "/openspec:proposal"
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Static instructions: │
|
||||
│ • Create proposal.md │
|
||||
│ • Create tasks.md │
|
||||
│ • Create design.md │
|
||||
│ • Create specs/<capability>/spec.md │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ No awareness of what exists or │
|
||||
│ dependencies between artifacts │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
Agent creates ALL artifacts in one go
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**OPSX** — agent queries for rich context:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "/opsx:continue"
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Step 1: Query current state │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ $ openspec status --change "add-auth" --json │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ { │ │
|
||||
│ │ "artifacts": [ │ │
|
||||
│ │ {"id": "proposal", "status": "done"}, │ │
|
||||
│ │ {"id": "specs", "status": "ready"}, ◄── First ready │ │
|
||||
│ │ {"id": "design", "status": "ready"}, │ │
|
||||
│ │ {"id": "tasks", "status": "blocked", "missingDeps": ["specs"]}│ │
|
||||
│ │ ] │ │
|
||||
│ │ } │ │
|
||||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Step 2: Get rich instructions for ready artifact │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ $ openspec instructions specs --change "add-auth" --json │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ { │ │
|
||||
│ │ "template": "# Specification\n\n## ADDED Requirements...", │ │
|
||||
│ │ "dependencies": [{"id": "proposal", "path": "...", "done": true}│ │
|
||||
│ │ "unlocks": ["tasks"] │ │
|
||||
│ │ } │ │
|
||||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Step 3: Read dependencies → Create ONE artifact → Show what's unlocked │
|
||||
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Iteration Model
|
||||
|
||||
**Standard workflow** — awkward to iterate:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
|
||||
│/proposal│ ──► │ /apply │ ──► │/archive │
|
||||
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ ├── "Wait, the design is wrong"
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ ├── Options:
|
||||
│ │ • Edit files manually (breaks context)
|
||||
│ │ • Abandon and start over
|
||||
│ │ • Push through and fix later
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ └── No official "go back" mechanism
|
||||
│
|
||||
└── Creates ALL artifacts at once
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**OPSX** — natural iteration:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/opsx:new ───► /opsx:continue ───► /opsx:apply ───► /opsx:archive
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ │ ├── "The design is wrong"
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ │ ▼
|
||||
│ │ Just edit design.md
|
||||
│ │ and continue!
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ │ ▼
|
||||
│ │ /opsx:apply picks up
|
||||
│ │ where you left off
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ └── Creates ONE artifact, shows what's unlocked
|
||||
│
|
||||
└── Scaffolds change, waits for direction
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Custom Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
Create custom workflows using the schema management commands:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Create a new schema from scratch (interactive)
|
||||
openspec schema init my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# Or fork an existing schema as a starting point
|
||||
openspec schema fork spec-driven my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate your schema structure
|
||||
openspec schema validate my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# See where a schema resolves from (useful for debugging)
|
||||
openspec schema which my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Schemas are stored in `openspec/schemas/` (project-local, version controlled) or `~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/` (user global).
|
||||
|
||||
**Schema structure:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/schemas/research-first/
|
||||
├── schema.yaml
|
||||
└── templates/
|
||||
├── research.md
|
||||
├── proposal.md
|
||||
└── tasks.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example schema.yaml:**
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
name: research-first
|
||||
artifacts:
|
||||
- id: research # Added before proposal
|
||||
generates: research.md
|
||||
requires: []
|
||||
|
||||
- id: proposal
|
||||
generates: proposal.md
|
||||
requires: [research] # Now depends on research
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks
|
||||
generates: tasks.md
|
||||
requires: [proposal]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependency Graph:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
research ──► proposal ──► tasks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | Standard | OPSX |
|
||||
|--------|----------|------|
|
||||
| **Templates** | Hardcoded TypeScript | External YAML + Markdown |
|
||||
| **Dependencies** | None (all at once) | DAG with topological sort |
|
||||
| **State** | Phase-based mental model | Filesystem existence |
|
||||
| **Customization** | Edit source, rebuild | Create schema.yaml |
|
||||
| **Iteration** | Phase-locked | Fluid, edit anything |
|
||||
| **Editor Support** | 18+ configurator classes | Single skills directory |
|
||||
|
||||
## Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
Schemas define what artifacts exist and their dependencies. Currently available:
|
||||
|
||||
- **spec-driven** (default): proposal → specs → design → tasks
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# List available schemas
|
||||
openspec schemas
|
||||
|
||||
# See all schemas with their resolution sources
|
||||
openspec schema which --all
|
||||
|
||||
# Create a new schema interactively
|
||||
openspec schema init my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# Fork an existing schema for customization
|
||||
openspec schema fork spec-driven my-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate schema structure before use
|
||||
openspec schema validate my-workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Tips
|
||||
|
||||
- Use `/opsx:explore` to think through an idea before committing to a change
|
||||
- `/opsx:ff` when you know what you want, `/opsx:continue` when exploring
|
||||
- During `/opsx:apply`, if something's wrong — fix the artifact, then continue
|
||||
- Tasks track progress via checkboxes in `tasks.md`
|
||||
- Check status anytime: `openspec status --change "name"`
|
||||
|
||||
## Feedback
|
||||
|
||||
This is rough. That's intentional — we're learning what works.
|
||||
|
||||
Found a bug? Have ideas? Join us on [Discord](https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC) or open an issue on [GitHub](https://github.com/Fission-AI/openspec/issues).
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Supported Tools
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec works with 20+ AI coding assistants. When you run `openspec init`, you'll be prompted to select which tools you use, and OpenSpec will configure the appropriate integrations.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
For each tool you select, OpenSpec installs:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Skills** — Reusable instruction files that power the `/opsx:*` workflow commands
|
||||
2. **Commands** — Tool-specific slash command bindings
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Directory Reference
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Skills Location | Commands Location |
|
||||
|------|-----------------|-------------------|
|
||||
| Amazon Q Developer | `.amazonq/skills/` | `.amazonq/prompts/` |
|
||||
| Antigravity | `.agent/skills/` | `.agent/workflows/` |
|
||||
| Auggie (Augment CLI) | `.augment/skills/` | `.augment/commands/` |
|
||||
| Claude Code | `.claude/skills/` | `.claude/commands/opsx/` |
|
||||
| Cline | `.cline/skills/` | `.clinerules/workflows/` |
|
||||
| CodeBuddy | `.codebuddy/skills/` | `.codebuddy/commands/opsx/` |
|
||||
| Codex | `.codex/skills/` | `.codex/prompts/` |
|
||||
| Continue | `.continue/skills/` | `.continue/prompts/` |
|
||||
| CoStrict | `.cospec/skills/` | `.cospec/openspec/commands/` |
|
||||
| Crush | `.crush/skills/` | `.crush/commands/opsx/` |
|
||||
| Cursor | `.cursor/skills/` | `.cursor/commands/` |
|
||||
| Factory Droid | `.factory/skills/` | `.factory/commands/` |
|
||||
| Gemini CLI | `.gemini/skills/` | `.gemini/commands/opsx/` |
|
||||
| GitHub Copilot | `.github/skills/` | `.github/prompts/` |
|
||||
| iFlow | `.iflow/skills/` | `.iflow/commands/` |
|
||||
| Kilo Code | `.kilocode/skills/` | `.kilocode/workflows/` |
|
||||
| OpenCode | `.opencode/skills/` | `.opencode/command/` |
|
||||
| Qoder | `.qoder/skills/` | `.qoder/commands/opsx/` |
|
||||
| Qwen Code | `.qwen/skills/` | `.qwen/commands/` |
|
||||
| RooCode | `.roo/skills/` | `.roo/commands/` |
|
||||
| Windsurf | `.windsurf/skills/` | `.windsurf/commands/opsx/` |
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-Interactive Setup
|
||||
|
||||
For CI/CD or scripted setup, use the `--tools` flag:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Configure specific tools
|
||||
openspec init --tools claude,cursor
|
||||
|
||||
# Configure all supported tools
|
||||
openspec init --tools all
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip tool configuration
|
||||
openspec init --tools none
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Available tool IDs:** `amazon-q`, `antigravity`, `auggie`, `claude`, `cline`, `codebuddy`, `codex`, `continue`, `costrict`, `crush`, `cursor`, `factory`, `gemini`, `github-copilot`, `iflow`, `kilocode`, `opencode`, `qoder`, `qwen`, `roocode`, `windsurf`
|
||||
|
||||
## What Gets Installed
|
||||
|
||||
For each tool, OpenSpec generates 10 skill files that power the OPSX workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
| Skill | Purpose |
|
||||
|-------|---------|
|
||||
| `openspec-explore` | Thinking partner for exploring ideas |
|
||||
| `openspec-new-change` | Start a new change |
|
||||
| `openspec-continue-change` | Create the next artifact |
|
||||
| `openspec-ff-change` | Fast-forward through all planning artifacts |
|
||||
| `openspec-apply-change` | Implement tasks |
|
||||
| `openspec-verify-change` | Verify implementation completeness |
|
||||
| `openspec-sync-specs` | Sync delta specs to main (optional—archive prompts if needed) |
|
||||
| `openspec-archive-change` | Archive a completed change |
|
||||
| `openspec-bulk-archive-change` | Archive multiple changes at once |
|
||||
| `openspec-onboard` | Guided onboarding through a complete workflow cycle |
|
||||
|
||||
These skills are invoked via slash commands like `/opsx:new`, `/opsx:apply`, etc. See [Commands](commands.md) for the full list.
|
||||
|
||||
## Adding a New Tool
|
||||
|
||||
Want to add support for another AI coding assistant? Check out the [command adapter pattern](../CONTRIBUTING.md) or open an issue on GitHub.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- [CLI Reference](cli.md) — Terminal commands
|
||||
- [Commands](commands.md) — Slash commands and skills
|
||||
- [Getting Started](getting-started.md) — First-time setup
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,425 @@
|
||||
# Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
This guide covers common workflow patterns for OpenSpec and when to use each one. For basic setup, see [Getting Started](getting-started.md). For command reference, see [Commands](commands.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Philosophy: Actions, Not Phases
|
||||
|
||||
Traditional workflows force you through phases: planning, then implementation, then done. But real work doesn't fit neatly into boxes.
|
||||
|
||||
OPSX takes a different approach:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Traditional (phase-locked):
|
||||
|
||||
PLANNING ────────► IMPLEMENTING ────────► DONE
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ "Can't go back" │
|
||||
└────────────────────┘
|
||||
|
||||
OPSX (fluid actions):
|
||||
|
||||
proposal ──► specs ──► design ──► tasks ──► implement
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key principles:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Actions, not phases** - Commands are things you can do, not stages you're stuck in
|
||||
- **Dependencies are enablers** - They show what's possible, not what's required next
|
||||
|
||||
> **Customization:** OPSX workflows are driven by schemas that define artifact sequences. See [Customization](customization.md) for details on creating custom schemas.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick Feature
|
||||
|
||||
When you know what you want to build and just need to execute:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
/opsx:new ──► /opsx:ff ──► /opsx:apply ──► /opsx:verify ──► /opsx:archive
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example conversation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:new add-logout-button
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Created openspec/changes/add-logout-button/
|
||||
Ready to create: proposal
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:ff
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Creating all planning artifacts...
|
||||
✓ proposal.md
|
||||
✓ specs/
|
||||
✓ design.md
|
||||
✓ tasks.md
|
||||
Ready for implementation!
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:apply
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Working through tasks...
|
||||
✓ Added logout button to header
|
||||
✓ Implemented session clearing
|
||||
✓ Added confirmation dialog
|
||||
All tasks complete!
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:archive
|
||||
|
||||
AI: ✓ Merged specs
|
||||
✓ Archived change
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Best for:** Small to medium features, bug fixes, straightforward changes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Exploratory
|
||||
|
||||
When requirements are unclear or you need to investigate first:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
/opsx:explore ──► /opsx:new ──► /opsx:continue ──► ... ──► /opsx:apply
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example conversation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:explore
|
||||
|
||||
AI: What would you like to explore?
|
||||
|
||||
You: I want to improve page load performance but I'm not sure
|
||||
where the bottlenecks are.
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Let me help investigate...
|
||||
[Analyzes bundle sizes, identifies slow queries, reviews
|
||||
component render patterns]
|
||||
|
||||
I found three main bottlenecks:
|
||||
1. Large unoptimized images
|
||||
2. Synchronous data fetching in ProductList
|
||||
3. Re-renders from context changes
|
||||
|
||||
Which would you like to address first?
|
||||
|
||||
You: Let's tackle the data fetching issue.
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:new optimize-product-list-fetching
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Created change. Ready to create: proposal
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:continue
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Creating proposal based on our exploration...
|
||||
[Writes proposal incorporating investigation insights]
|
||||
|
||||
Ready to create: specs, design
|
||||
Which would you like next?
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:continue
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Creating specs...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Best for:** Performance optimization, debugging, architectural decisions, unclear requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
### Parallel Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Work on multiple changes at once:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Change A: /opsx:new ──► /opsx:ff ──► /opsx:apply (in progress)
|
||||
│
|
||||
context switch
|
||||
│
|
||||
Change B: /opsx:new ──► /opsx:ff ──────► /opsx:apply
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example conversation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: I'm working on add-dark-mode but got pulled into a bug fix
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:new fix-login-redirect
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Created openspec/changes/fix-login-redirect/
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:ff
|
||||
|
||||
AI: ✓ Created planning artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:apply
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Working on fix-login-redirect...
|
||||
[Implements the fix]
|
||||
All tasks complete!
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:archive
|
||||
|
||||
AI: ✓ Archived fix-login-redirect
|
||||
|
||||
You: Let's get back to dark mode
|
||||
|
||||
You: /opsx:apply add-dark-mode
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Resuming add-dark-mode...
|
||||
Picking up at task 2.3: Update Header...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Best for:** Parallel work streams, urgent interrupts, team collaboration.
|
||||
|
||||
When you have multiple completed changes, use `/opsx:bulk-archive`:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:bulk-archive
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Found 3 completed changes:
|
||||
- add-dark-mode (all tasks done)
|
||||
- fix-login-redirect (all tasks done)
|
||||
- update-footer (all tasks done)
|
||||
|
||||
Checking for spec conflicts...
|
||||
⚠ add-dark-mode and update-footer both touch specs/ui/
|
||||
|
||||
Inspecting codebase to resolve...
|
||||
Both changes are implemented. Will apply in chronological order.
|
||||
|
||||
Archive all 3 changes?
|
||||
|
||||
You: Yes
|
||||
|
||||
AI: ✓ Archived add-dark-mode
|
||||
✓ Archived fix-login-redirect
|
||||
✓ Archived update-footer
|
||||
Specs merged in order: add-dark-mode → update-footer
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Bulk archive detects when multiple changes touch the same specs and resolves conflicts by checking what's actually implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
### Completing a Change
|
||||
|
||||
The recommended completion flow:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
/opsx:apply ──► /opsx:verify ──► /opsx:archive
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
validates prompts to sync
|
||||
implementation if needed
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Verify: Check Your Work
|
||||
|
||||
`/opsx:verify` validates implementation against your artifacts across three dimensions:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:verify
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Verifying add-auth...
|
||||
|
||||
COMPLETENESS
|
||||
✓ All 12 tasks in tasks.md are checked
|
||||
✓ All requirements in specs have corresponding code
|
||||
⚠ Scenario "Session timeout after inactivity" not tested
|
||||
|
||||
CORRECTNESS
|
||||
✓ Implementation matches spec intent
|
||||
✓ Edge cases from scenarios are handled
|
||||
✓ Error states match spec definitions
|
||||
|
||||
COHERENCE
|
||||
✓ Design decisions reflected in code structure
|
||||
✓ Naming conventions consistent with design.md
|
||||
⚠ Design mentions "event-driven" but implementation uses polling
|
||||
|
||||
SUMMARY
|
||||
─────────────────────────────
|
||||
Critical issues: 0
|
||||
Warnings: 2
|
||||
Ready to archive: Yes (with warnings)
|
||||
|
||||
Recommendations:
|
||||
1. Add test for session timeout scenario
|
||||
2. Consider refactoring to event-driven as designed, or update design.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What verify checks:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Dimension | What it validates |
|
||||
|-----------|------------------|
|
||||
| Completeness | All tasks done, all requirements implemented, scenarios covered |
|
||||
| Correctness | Implementation matches spec intent, edge cases handled |
|
||||
| Coherence | Design decisions reflected in code, patterns consistent |
|
||||
|
||||
Verify won't block archive, but it surfaces issues you might want to address first.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Archive: Finalize the Change
|
||||
|
||||
`/opsx:archive` completes the change and moves it to the archive:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:archive
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Archiving add-auth...
|
||||
|
||||
Artifact status:
|
||||
✓ proposal.md exists
|
||||
✓ specs/ exists
|
||||
✓ design.md exists
|
||||
✓ tasks.md exists (12/12 tasks complete)
|
||||
|
||||
Delta specs: Not yet synced to main
|
||||
→ Would you like to sync now?
|
||||
|
||||
You: Yes
|
||||
|
||||
AI: ✓ Synced specs to openspec/specs/auth/spec.md
|
||||
✓ Moved to openspec/changes/archive/2025-01-24-add-auth/
|
||||
|
||||
Change archived successfully.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Archive will prompt if specs aren't synced. It won't block on incomplete tasks, but it will warn you.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use What
|
||||
|
||||
### `/opsx:ff` vs `/opsx:continue`
|
||||
|
||||
| Situation | Use |
|
||||
|-----------|-----|
|
||||
| Clear requirements, ready to build | `/opsx:ff` |
|
||||
| Exploring, want to review each step | `/opsx:continue` |
|
||||
| Want to iterate on proposal before specs | `/opsx:continue` |
|
||||
| Time pressure, need to move fast | `/opsx:ff` |
|
||||
| Complex change, want control | `/opsx:continue` |
|
||||
|
||||
**Rule of thumb:** If you can describe the full scope upfront, use `/opsx:ff`. If you're figuring it out as you go, use `/opsx:continue`.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to Update vs Start Fresh
|
||||
|
||||
A common question: when is updating an existing change okay, and when should you start a new one?
|
||||
|
||||
**Update the existing change when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Same intent, refined execution
|
||||
- Scope narrows (MVP first, rest later)
|
||||
- Learning-driven corrections (codebase isn't what you expected)
|
||||
- Design tweaks based on implementation discoveries
|
||||
|
||||
**Start a new change when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Intent fundamentally changed
|
||||
- Scope exploded to different work entirely
|
||||
- Original change can be marked "done" standalone
|
||||
- Patches would confuse more than clarify
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Is this the same work? │
|
||||
└──────────────┬──────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
▼ ▼ ▼
|
||||
Same intent? >50% overlap? Can original
|
||||
Same problem? Same scope? be "done" without
|
||||
│ │ these changes?
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
┌────────┴────────┐ ┌──────┴──────┐ ┌───────┴───────┐
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
YES NO YES NO NO YES
|
||||
│ │ │ │ │ │
|
||||
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
|
||||
UPDATE NEW UPDATE NEW UPDATE NEW
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example: "Add dark mode"**
|
||||
|
||||
- "Need to also support custom themes" → New change (scope exploded)
|
||||
- "System preference detection is harder than expected" → Update (same intent)
|
||||
- "Let's ship toggle first, add preferences later" → Update then archive, then new change
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Keep Changes Focused
|
||||
|
||||
One logical unit of work per change. If you're doing "add feature X and also refactor Y", consider two separate changes.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters:**
|
||||
- Easier to review and understand
|
||||
- Cleaner archive history
|
||||
- Can ship independently
|
||||
- Simpler rollback if needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Use `/opsx:explore` for Unclear Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Before committing to a change, explore the problem space:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:explore
|
||||
|
||||
AI: What would you like to explore?
|
||||
|
||||
You: How should we handle rate limiting for our API?
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Let me investigate your current setup and options...
|
||||
[Researches codebase, considers patterns]
|
||||
|
||||
I see three approaches we could take:
|
||||
1. Middleware-based (simple, per-endpoint)
|
||||
2. Redis-backed (scalable, shared state)
|
||||
3. Token bucket per user (fair, complex)
|
||||
|
||||
Your current stack suggests #1 or #2. What's your scale?
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Exploration clarifies thinking before you create artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
### Verify Before Archiving
|
||||
|
||||
Use `/opsx:verify` to check implementation matches artifacts:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You: /opsx:verify
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Verifying add-dark-mode...
|
||||
|
||||
✓ All tasks in tasks.md are checked
|
||||
✓ Requirements in specs have corresponding code
|
||||
✓ Design decisions are reflected in implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Ready to archive!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Catches mismatches before you close out the change.
|
||||
|
||||
### Name Changes Clearly
|
||||
|
||||
Good names make `openspec list` useful:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Good: Avoid:
|
||||
add-dark-mode feature-1
|
||||
fix-login-redirect update
|
||||
optimize-product-query changes
|
||||
implement-2fa wip
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
For full command details and options, see [Commands](commands.md).
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | When to Use |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| `/opsx:explore` | Think through ideas | Unclear requirements, investigation |
|
||||
| `/opsx:new` | Start a change | Beginning any new work |
|
||||
| `/opsx:continue` | Create next artifact | Step-by-step artifact creation |
|
||||
| `/opsx:ff` | Create all planning artifacts | Clear scope, ready to build |
|
||||
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks | Ready to write code |
|
||||
| `/opsx:verify` | Validate implementation | Before archiving, catch mismatches |
|
||||
| `/opsx:sync` | Merge delta specs | Optional—archive prompts if needed |
|
||||
| `/opsx:archive` | Complete the change | All work finished |
|
||||
| `/opsx:bulk-archive` | Archive multiple changes | Parallel work, batch completion |
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- [Commands](commands.md) - Full command reference with options
|
||||
- [Concepts](concepts.md) - Deep dive into specs, artifacts, and schemas
|
||||
- [Customization](customization.md) - Create custom workflows
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
import tseslint from 'typescript-eslint';
|
||||
|
||||
export default tseslint.config(
|
||||
{
|
||||
files: ['src/**/*.ts'],
|
||||
extends: [...tseslint.configs.recommended],
|
||||
rules: {
|
||||
// Prevent static imports of @inquirer modules to avoid pre-commit hook hangs.
|
||||
// These modules have side effects that can keep the Node.js event loop alive
|
||||
// when stdin is piped. Use dynamic import() instead.
|
||||
// See: https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/issues/367
|
||||
'no-restricted-imports': [
|
||||
'error',
|
||||
{
|
||||
patterns: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
group: ['@inquirer/*'],
|
||||
message:
|
||||
'Use dynamic import() for @inquirer modules to prevent pre-commit hook hangs. See #367.',
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// Disable rules that need broader cleanup - focus on critical issues only
|
||||
'@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any': 'off',
|
||||
'@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars': 'off',
|
||||
'no-empty': 'off',
|
||||
'prefer-const': 'off',
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
// init.ts is dynamically imported from cli/index.ts, so static @inquirer
|
||||
// imports there are safe - they won't be loaded at CLI startup
|
||||
files: ['src/core/init.ts'],
|
||||
rules: {
|
||||
'no-restricted-imports': 'off',
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ignores: ['dist/**', 'node_modules/**', '*.js', '*.mjs'],
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
Generated
+27
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"nodes": {
|
||||
"nixpkgs": {
|
||||
"locked": {
|
||||
"lastModified": 1767640445,
|
||||
"narHash": "sha256-UWYqmD7JFBEDBHWYcqE6s6c77pWdcU/i+bwD6XxMb8A=",
|
||||
"owner": "NixOS",
|
||||
"repo": "nixpkgs",
|
||||
"rev": "9f0c42f8bc7151b8e7e5840fb3bd454ad850d8c5",
|
||||
"type": "github"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"original": {
|
||||
"owner": "NixOS",
|
||||
"ref": "nixos-unstable",
|
||||
"repo": "nixpkgs",
|
||||
"type": "github"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"root": {
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"root": "root",
|
||||
"version": 7
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
description = "OpenSpec - AI-native system for spec-driven development";
|
||||
|
||||
inputs = {
|
||||
nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-unstable";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
outputs = { self, nixpkgs }:
|
||||
let
|
||||
supportedSystems = [ "x86_64-linux" "aarch64-linux" "x86_64-darwin" "aarch64-darwin" ];
|
||||
|
||||
forAllSystems = f: nixpkgs.lib.genAttrs supportedSystems (system: f system);
|
||||
in
|
||||
{
|
||||
packages = forAllSystems (system:
|
||||
let
|
||||
pkgs = nixpkgs.legacyPackages.${system};
|
||||
in
|
||||
{
|
||||
default = pkgs.stdenv.mkDerivation (finalAttrs: {
|
||||
pname = "openspec";
|
||||
version = "0.23.0";
|
||||
|
||||
src = ./.;
|
||||
|
||||
pnpmDeps = pkgs.fetchPnpmDeps {
|
||||
inherit (finalAttrs) pname version src;
|
||||
pnpm = pkgs.pnpm_9;
|
||||
fetcherVersion = 3;
|
||||
hash = "sha256-9s2kdvd7svK4hofnD66HkDc86WTQeayfF5y7L2dmjNg=";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
nativeBuildInputs = with pkgs; [
|
||||
nodejs_20
|
||||
npmHooks.npmInstallHook
|
||||
pnpmConfigHook
|
||||
pnpm_9
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
buildPhase = ''
|
||||
runHook preBuild
|
||||
|
||||
pnpm run build
|
||||
|
||||
runHook postBuild
|
||||
'';
|
||||
|
||||
dontNpmPrune = true;
|
||||
|
||||
meta = with pkgs.lib; {
|
||||
description = "AI-native system for spec-driven development";
|
||||
homepage = "https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec";
|
||||
license = licenses.mit;
|
||||
maintainers = [ ];
|
||||
mainProgram = "openspec";
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
apps = forAllSystems (system: {
|
||||
default = {
|
||||
type = "app";
|
||||
program = "${self.packages.${system}.default}/bin/openspec";
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
devShells = forAllSystems (system:
|
||||
let
|
||||
pkgs = nixpkgs.legacyPackages.${system};
|
||||
in
|
||||
{
|
||||
default = pkgs.mkShell {
|
||||
buildInputs = with pkgs; [
|
||||
nodejs_20
|
||||
pnpm_9
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
shellHook = ''
|
||||
echo "OpenSpec development environment"
|
||||
echo "Node version: $(node --version)"
|
||||
echo "pnpm version: $(pnpm --version)"
|
||||
echo "Run 'pnpm install' to install dependencies"
|
||||
'';
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
|
||||
# OpenSpec Parallel Delta Remediation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Summary
|
||||
- Active changes apply requirement-level replacements when archiving. When two changes touch the same requirement, the second archive overwrites the first and silently drops scenarios (e.g., Windsurf vs. Kilo Code slash command updates).
|
||||
- The archive workflow (`src/core/archive.ts:191` and `src/core/archive.ts:501`) rebuilds main specs by replacing entire requirement blocks with the content contained in the change delta. The delta format (`src/core/parsers/requirement-blocks.ts:113`) has no notion of base versions or scenario-level operations.
|
||||
- The tooling cannot detect divergence between the change author’s starting point and the live spec, so parallel development corrupts the source of truth without warning.
|
||||
|
||||
## Observed Failure Mode
|
||||
- Change A (`add-windsurf-workflows`) adds a Windsurf scenario under `Slash Command Configuration`.
|
||||
- Change B (`add-kilocode-workflows`) adds a Kilo Code scenario to the same requirement, starting from the pre-Windsurf spec.
|
||||
- After Change A archives, the main spec contains both scenarios.
|
||||
- When Change B archives, `buildUpdatedSpec` sees a `MODIFIED` block for `Slash Command Configuration` and replaces the requirement with the four-scenario variant shipped in that change. Because that file never learned about Windsurf, the Windsurf scenario disappears.
|
||||
- There is no warning, diff, or conflict indicator—the archive completes successfully, and the source-of-truth spec now omits a shipped scenario.
|
||||
|
||||
## Root Causes
|
||||
1. **Replace-only semantics.** `buildUpdatedSpec` performs hash-map substitution of requirement blocks and cannot merge or compare individual scenarios (`src/core/archive.ts:455`-`src/core/archive.ts:526`).
|
||||
2. **Missing base fingerprint.** Changes do not persist the requirement content they were authored against, so the archive step cannot tell if the live spec diverged.
|
||||
3. **Single-level granularity.** The delta language only understands requirements. Even if we introduced scenario-level parsing, we would still lose sibling edits without an accompanying merge strategy.
|
||||
4. **Lack of conflict UX.** The CLI never forces contributors to reconcile parallel updates. There is no equivalent of `git merge`, `git rebase`, or conflict markers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Objectives
|
||||
- Preserve every approved scenario regardless of archive order.
|
||||
- Detect and block speculative archives when the live spec diverges from the author’s base.
|
||||
- Provide a deterministic, reviewable conflict resolution flow that mirrors source-control best practices.
|
||||
- Keep the authoring experience ergonomic: deltas should remain human-editable markdown.
|
||||
- Support incremental adoption so existing repositories can roll forward without breaking active work.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Fix: Layered Remediation
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 0 – Stop the Bleeding (Detection & Guardrails)
|
||||
1. **Persist requirement fingerprints alongside each change.**
|
||||
- When scaffolding or validating a change, capture the current requirement body for every `MODIFIED`/`REMOVED`/`RENAMED` entry and write it to `changes/<id>/meta.json`.
|
||||
- Store a stable hash (e.g., SHA-256) of the base requirement content and the raw text itself for later merges.
|
||||
2. **Validate fingerprints during archive.**
|
||||
- Before `buildUpdatedSpec` mutates specs, recompute the requirement hash from the live spec.
|
||||
- If the hash differs from the stored base, abort and instruct the user to rebase. This makes the destructive path impossible.
|
||||
3. **Surface intent in CLI output.**
|
||||
- Show which requirements are stale, when they diverged, and which change last touched them.
|
||||
4. **Document interim manual mitigation.**
|
||||
- Update `openspec/AGENTS.md` and docs so contributors know to rerun `openspec change sync` (see Phase 1) whenever another change lands.
|
||||
|
||||
_Outcome:_ We prevent data loss immediately while we work on a richer merge story.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1 – Add a Rebase Workflow (Author-Side Merge)
|
||||
1. **Introduce `openspec change sync <id>` (or `rebase`).**
|
||||
- Reads the stored base snapshot, the current spec, and the author’s delta.
|
||||
- Performs a 3-way merge per requirement. A naive diff3 on markdown lines is acceptable initially because we already operate on requirement-sized chunks.
|
||||
- If the merge is clean, rewrite the `MODIFIED` block with the merged text and refresh the stored fingerprint.
|
||||
- On conflict, write conflict markers inside the change delta (similar to Git) and require the author to hand-edit before re-running validation.
|
||||
2. **Enrich validator messages.**
|
||||
- `openspec validate` should flag unresolved conflict markers or fingerprint mismatches so errors appear early in the workflow.
|
||||
3. **Optional:** Offer a `--rewrite-scenarios` helper that merges bullet lists of scenarios to reduce manual editing noise.
|
||||
|
||||
_Outcome:_ Contributors can safely reconcile their work with the latest spec before archiving, restoring true parallel development.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2 – Increase Delta Granularity
|
||||
1. **Extend the delta language with scenario-level directives.**
|
||||
- Allow `## MODIFIED Requirements` + `## ADDED Scenarios` / `## MODIFIED Scenarios` sections nested under the requirement header.
|
||||
- Backed by stable scenario identifiers (explicit IDs or generated hashes) stored in `meta.json`. This lets the system reason about individual scenarios.
|
||||
2. **Teach the parser to understand nested operations.**
|
||||
- Update `parseDeltaSpec` to emit scenario-level operations in addition to requirement blocks.
|
||||
- Update `buildUpdatedSpec` (or its replacement) to merge scenario lists, preserving order while inserting new entries in a deterministic fashion.
|
||||
3. **Automate migration.**
|
||||
- Provide a one-time command that inspects each existing spec, injects scenario IDs, and rewrites in-flight change deltas into the richer format.
|
||||
4. **Continue to rely on the Phase 1 rebase flow for conflicts when two changes edit the same scenario body or description.**
|
||||
|
||||
_Outcome:_ Most concurrent updates become commutative, drastically reducing the odds of human merges.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3 – Structured Spec Graph (Long-Term)
|
||||
1. **Define stable requirement IDs.**
|
||||
- Embed `Requirement ID: <uuid>` markers in specs so renames and moves are trackable.
|
||||
- This enables future features like cross-capability references and better diff visualizations.
|
||||
2. **Model spec edits as operations over an AST.**
|
||||
- Build an intermediate representation (IR) for requirements/scenarios/metadata.
|
||||
- Use operational transforms or CRDT-like techniques to guarantee merge associativity.
|
||||
3. **Integrate with Git directly.**
|
||||
- Offer optional `openspec branch` scaffolding that aligns spec changes with Git branches, letting teams leverage Git’s conflict editor for the markdown IR.
|
||||
|
||||
_Outcome:_ OpenSpec graduates from replace-based updates to a resilient, intent-preserving spec management platform.
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration & Product Impacts
|
||||
- **Backfill metadata:** add hashes for all active changes and the current main specs during the initial rollout.
|
||||
- **CLI UX:** new commands (`change sync`, enhanced `archive`) require documentation, help text, and release notes.
|
||||
- **Docs & AGENTS updates:** reinforce the rebase workflow and explain conflict resolution to AI assistants.
|
||||
- **Testing:** introduce fixtures covering divergent requirement fingerprints and merge resolution logic.
|
||||
- **Telemetry (optional):** log fingerprint mismatches so we can see how often teams hit conflicts after the rollout.
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Questions / Risks
|
||||
- How should we order scenarios when multiple changes insert at different points? (Consider optional `position` metadata or deterministic alphabetical fallbacks.)
|
||||
- What is the graceful failure mode if contributors delete the `meta.json` file? (CLI should recreate fingerprints on demand.)
|
||||
- Do we need to support offline authors who cannot easily re-run the sync command before archiving? (Potential `--accept-outdated` escape hatch for emergencies.)
|
||||
- How will archived historical changes be handled? We may need a migration script to embed fingerprints retroactively so re-validation succeeds.
|
||||
|
||||
## Immediate Next Steps
|
||||
1. Prototype fingerprint capture during `openspec change validate` and block archive on mismatches.
|
||||
2. Ship `openspec change sync` with line-based diff3 merging and conflict markers.
|
||||
3. Update contributor docs and AI instructions to mandate running `sync` before archiving.
|
||||
4. Plan the scenario-level delta extension and migration path as a follow-up RFC.
|
||||
@@ -1,434 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# OpenSpec Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
Instructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development.
|
||||
|
||||
## TL;DR Quick Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- Search existing work: `openspec spec list --long`, `openspec list` (use `rg` only for full-text search)
|
||||
- Decide scope: new capability vs modify existing capability
|
||||
- Pick a unique `change-id`: kebab-case, verb-led (`add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`)
|
||||
- Scaffold: `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, `design.md` (only if needed), and delta specs per affected capability
|
||||
- Write deltas: use `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements`; include at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement
|
||||
- Validate: `openspec validate [change-id] --strict` and fix issues
|
||||
- Request approval: Do not start implementation until proposal is approved
|
||||
|
||||
## Three-Stage Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 1: Creating Changes
|
||||
Create proposal when you need to:
|
||||
- Add features or functionality
|
||||
- Make breaking changes (API, schema)
|
||||
- Change architecture or patterns
|
||||
- Optimize performance (changes behavior)
|
||||
- Update security patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Triggers (examples):
|
||||
- "Help me create a change proposal"
|
||||
- "Help me plan a change"
|
||||
- "Help me create a proposal"
|
||||
- "I want to create a spec proposal"
|
||||
- "I want to create a spec"
|
||||
|
||||
Loose matching guidance:
|
||||
- Contains one of: `proposal`, `change`, `spec`
|
||||
- With one of: `create`, `plan`, `make`, `start`, `help`
|
||||
|
||||
Skip proposal for:
|
||||
- Bug fixes (restore intended behavior)
|
||||
- Typos, formatting, comments
|
||||
- Dependency updates (non-breaking)
|
||||
- Configuration changes
|
||||
- Tests for existing behavior
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 2: Implementing Changes
|
||||
1. **Read proposal.md** - Understand what's being built
|
||||
2. **Read design.md** (if exists) - Review technical decisions
|
||||
3. **Read tasks.md** - Get implementation checklist
|
||||
4. **Implement tasks sequentially** - Complete in order
|
||||
5. **Mark complete immediately** - Update `- [x]` after each task
|
||||
6. **Validate strictly** - Run `openspec validate [change] --strict` and address issues
|
||||
7. **Approval gate** - Do not start implementation until the proposal is reviewed and approved
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 3: Archiving Changes
|
||||
After deployment, create separate PR to:
|
||||
- Move `changes/[name]/` → `changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/`
|
||||
- Update `specs/` if capabilities changed
|
||||
- Use `openspec archive [change] --skip-specs` for tooling-only changes
|
||||
|
||||
## Before Any Task
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Checklist:**
|
||||
- [ ] Read relevant specs in `specs/[capability]/spec.md`
|
||||
- [ ] Check pending changes in `changes/` for conflicts
|
||||
- [ ] Read `openspec/project.md` for conventions
|
||||
- [ ] Run `openspec list` to see active changes
|
||||
- [ ] Run `openspec list --specs` to see existing capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
**Before Creating Specs:**
|
||||
- Always check if capability already exists
|
||||
- Prefer modifying existing specs over creating duplicates
|
||||
- Use `openspec show [spec]` to review current state
|
||||
- If request is ambiguous, ask 1–2 clarifying questions before scaffolding
|
||||
|
||||
### Search Guidance
|
||||
- Enumerate specs: `openspec spec list --long` (or `--json` for scripts)
|
||||
- Enumerate changes: `openspec list` (or `openspec change list --json` - deprecated but available)
|
||||
- Show details:
|
||||
- Spec: `openspec show <spec-id> --type spec` (use `--json` for filters)
|
||||
- Change: `openspec show <change-id> --json --deltas-only`
|
||||
- Full-text search (use ripgrep): `rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs`
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Start
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Essential commands
|
||||
openspec list # List active changes
|
||||
openspec list --specs # List specifications
|
||||
openspec show [item] # Display change or spec
|
||||
openspec diff [change] # Show spec differences
|
||||
openspec validate [item] # Validate changes or specs
|
||||
openspec archive [change] # Archive after deployment
|
||||
|
||||
# Project management
|
||||
openspec init [path] # Initialize OpenSpec
|
||||
openspec update [path] # Update instruction files
|
||||
|
||||
# Interactive mode
|
||||
openspec show # Prompts for selection
|
||||
openspec validate # Bulk validation mode
|
||||
|
||||
# Debugging
|
||||
openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only
|
||||
openspec validate [change] --strict
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Flags
|
||||
|
||||
- `--json` - Machine-readable output
|
||||
- `--type change|spec` - Disambiguate items
|
||||
- `--strict` - Comprehensive validation
|
||||
- `--no-interactive` - Disable prompts
|
||||
- `--skip-specs` - Archive without spec updates
|
||||
|
||||
## Directory Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── project.md # Project conventions
|
||||
├── specs/ # Current truth - what IS built
|
||||
│ └── [capability]/ # Single focused capability
|
||||
│ ├── spec.md # Requirements and scenarios
|
||||
│ └── design.md # Technical patterns
|
||||
├── changes/ # Proposals - what SHOULD change
|
||||
│ ├── [change-name]/
|
||||
│ │ ├── proposal.md # Why, what, impact
|
||||
│ │ ├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist
|
||||
│ │ ├── design.md # Technical decisions (optional; see criteria)
|
||||
│ │ └── specs/ # Delta changes
|
||||
│ │ └── [capability]/
|
||||
│ │ └── spec.md # ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED
|
||||
│ └── archive/ # Completed changes
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Creating Change Proposals
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
New request?
|
||||
├─ Bug fix restoring spec behavior? → Fix directly
|
||||
├─ Typo/format/comment? → Fix directly
|
||||
├─ New feature/capability? → Create proposal
|
||||
├─ Breaking change? → Create proposal
|
||||
├─ Architecture change? → Create proposal
|
||||
└─ Unclear? → Create proposal (safer)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Proposal Structure
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Create directory:** `changes/[change-id]/` (kebab-case, verb-led, unique)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Write proposal.md:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
[1-2 sentences on problem/opportunity]
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
- [Bullet list of changes]
|
||||
- [Mark breaking changes with **BREAKING**]
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
- Affected specs: [list capabilities]
|
||||
- Affected code: [key files/systems]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Create spec deltas:** `specs/[capability]/spec.md`
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: New Feature
|
||||
The system SHALL provide...
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Success case
|
||||
- **WHEN** user performs action
|
||||
- **THEN** expected result
|
||||
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Existing Feature
|
||||
[Complete modified requirement]
|
||||
|
||||
## REMOVED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Old Feature
|
||||
**Reason**: [Why removing]
|
||||
**Migration**: [How to handle]
|
||||
```
|
||||
If multiple capabilities are affected, create multiple delta files under `changes/[change-id]/specs/<capability>/spec.md`—one per capability.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Create tasks.md:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 1. Implementation
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Create database schema
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Implement API endpoint
|
||||
- [ ] 1.3 Add frontend component
|
||||
- [ ] 1.4 Write tests
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Create design.md when needed:**
|
||||
Create `design.md` if any of the following apply; otherwise omit it:
|
||||
- Cross-cutting change (multiple services/modules) or a new architectural pattern
|
||||
- New external dependency or significant data model changes
|
||||
- Security, performance, or migration complexity
|
||||
- Ambiguity that benefits from technical decisions before coding
|
||||
|
||||
Minimal `design.md` skeleton:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
[Background, constraints, stakeholders]
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals / Non-Goals
|
||||
- Goals: [...]
|
||||
- Non-Goals: [...]
|
||||
|
||||
## Decisions
|
||||
- Decision: [What and why]
|
||||
- Alternatives considered: [Options + rationale]
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks / Trade-offs
|
||||
- [Risk] → Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Plan
|
||||
[Steps, rollback]
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
- [...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Spec File Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical: Scenario Formatting
|
||||
|
||||
**CORRECT** (use #### headers):
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
#### Scenario: User login success
|
||||
- **WHEN** valid credentials provided
|
||||
- **THEN** return JWT token
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**WRONG** (don't use bullets or bold):
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
- **Scenario: User login** ❌
|
||||
**Scenario**: User login ❌
|
||||
### Scenario: User login ❌
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Every requirement MUST have at least one scenario.
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement Wording
|
||||
- Use SHALL/MUST for normative requirements (avoid should/may unless intentionally non-normative)
|
||||
|
||||
### Delta Operations
|
||||
|
||||
- `## ADDED Requirements` - New capabilities
|
||||
- `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changed behavior
|
||||
- `## REMOVED Requirements` - Deprecated features
|
||||
- `## RENAMED Requirements` - Name changes
|
||||
|
||||
Headers matched with `trim(header)` - whitespace ignored.
|
||||
|
||||
Example for RENAMED:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## RENAMED Requirements
|
||||
- FROM: `### Requirement: Login`
|
||||
- TO: `### Requirement: User Authentication`
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### Common Errors
|
||||
|
||||
**"Change must have at least one delta"**
|
||||
- Check `changes/[name]/specs/` exists with .md files
|
||||
- Verify files have operation prefixes (## ADDED Requirements)
|
||||
|
||||
**"Requirement must have at least one scenario"**
|
||||
- Check scenarios use `#### Scenario:` format (4 hashtags)
|
||||
- Don't use bullet points or bold for scenario headers
|
||||
|
||||
**Silent scenario parsing failures**
|
||||
- Exact format required: `#### Scenario: Name`
|
||||
- Debug with: `openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only`
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Tips
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Always use strict mode for comprehensive checks
|
||||
openspec validate [change] --strict
|
||||
|
||||
# Debug delta parsing
|
||||
openspec show [change] --json | jq '.deltas'
|
||||
|
||||
# Check specific requirement
|
||||
openspec show [spec] --json -r 1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Happy Path Script
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 1) Explore current state
|
||||
openspec spec list --long
|
||||
openspec list
|
||||
# Optional full-text search:
|
||||
# rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs
|
||||
# rg -n "^#|Requirement:" openspec/changes
|
||||
|
||||
# 2) Choose change id and scaffold
|
||||
CHANGE=add-two-factor-auth
|
||||
mkdir -p openspec/changes/$CHANGE/{specs/auth}
|
||||
printf "## Why\n...\n\n## What Changes\n- ...\n\n## Impact\n- ...\n" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/proposal.md
|
||||
printf "## 1. Implementation\n- [ ] 1.1 ...\n" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/tasks.md
|
||||
|
||||
# 3) Add deltas (example)
|
||||
cat > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/specs/auth/spec.md << 'EOF'
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
|
||||
Users MUST provide a second factor during login.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: OTP required
|
||||
- **WHEN** valid credentials are provided
|
||||
- **THEN** an OTP challenge is required
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
|
||||
# 4) Validate
|
||||
openspec validate $CHANGE --strict
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Multi-Capability Example
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/changes/add-2fa-notify/
|
||||
├── proposal.md
|
||||
├── tasks.md
|
||||
└── specs/
|
||||
├── auth/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # ADDED: Two-Factor Authentication
|
||||
└── notifications/
|
||||
└── spec.md # ADDED: OTP email notification
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
auth/spec.md
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
notifications/spec.md
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: OTP Email Notification
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Simplicity First
|
||||
- Default to <100 lines of new code
|
||||
- Single-file implementations until proven insufficient
|
||||
- Avoid frameworks without clear justification
|
||||
- Choose boring, proven patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Complexity Triggers
|
||||
Only add complexity with:
|
||||
- Performance data showing current solution too slow
|
||||
- Concrete scale requirements (>1000 users, >100MB data)
|
||||
- Multiple proven use cases requiring abstraction
|
||||
|
||||
### Clear References
|
||||
- Use `file.ts:42` format for code locations
|
||||
- Reference specs as `specs/auth/spec.md`
|
||||
- Link related changes and PRs
|
||||
|
||||
### Capability Naming
|
||||
- Use verb-noun: `user-auth`, `payment-capture`
|
||||
- Single purpose per capability
|
||||
- 10-minute understandability rule
|
||||
- Split if description needs "AND"
|
||||
|
||||
### Change ID Naming
|
||||
- Use kebab-case, short and descriptive: `add-two-factor-auth`
|
||||
- Prefer verb-led prefixes: `add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`
|
||||
- Ensure uniqueness; if taken, append `-2`, `-3`, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Selection Guide
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Tool | Why |
|
||||
|------|------|-----|
|
||||
| Find files by pattern | Glob | Fast pattern matching |
|
||||
| Search code content | Grep | Optimized regex search |
|
||||
| Read specific files | Read | Direct file access |
|
||||
| Explore unknown scope | Task | Multi-step investigation |
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Recovery
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Conflicts
|
||||
1. Run `openspec list` to see active changes
|
||||
2. Check for overlapping specs
|
||||
3. Coordinate with change owners
|
||||
4. Consider combining proposals
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Failures
|
||||
1. Run with `--strict` flag
|
||||
2. Check JSON output for details
|
||||
3. Verify spec file format
|
||||
4. Ensure scenarios properly formatted
|
||||
|
||||
### Missing Context
|
||||
1. Read project.md first
|
||||
2. Check related specs
|
||||
3. Review recent archives
|
||||
4. Ask for clarification
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage Indicators
|
||||
- `changes/` - Proposed, not yet built
|
||||
- `specs/` - Built and deployed
|
||||
- `archive/` - Completed changes
|
||||
|
||||
### File Purposes
|
||||
- `proposal.md` - Why and what
|
||||
- `tasks.md` - Implementation steps
|
||||
- `design.md` - Technical decisions
|
||||
- `spec.md` - Requirements and behavior
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Essentials
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
openspec list # What's in progress?
|
||||
openspec show [item] # View details
|
||||
openspec diff [change] # What's changing?
|
||||
openspec validate --strict # Is it correct?
|
||||
openspec archive [change] # Mark complete
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Specs are truth. Changes are proposals. Keep them in sync.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
||||
# Add Artifact Regeneration Support
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, there is **no way to regenerate artifacts** in the OPSX workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
- `/opsx:apply` just reads whatever's on disk
|
||||
- `/opsx:continue` only creates the NEXT artifact - won't touch existing ones
|
||||
|
||||
If you edit `design.md` after `tasks.md` exists, your only options are:
|
||||
1. Delete tasks.md manually, then run `/opsx:continue`
|
||||
2. Edit tasks.md manually
|
||||
|
||||
The documentation claims you can "update artifacts mid-flight and continue" but there's no mechanism that actually supports this.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Solution
|
||||
|
||||
Two parts:
|
||||
|
||||
### Part 1: Staleness Detection
|
||||
Add artifact staleness detection to `/opsx:apply`:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Track modification times**: When generating an artifact, record the mtime of its dependencies
|
||||
2. **Detect staleness**: When `/opsx:apply` runs, check if upstream artifacts (design.md, specs) have been modified since tasks.md was generated
|
||||
3. **Prompt user**: If stale, ask: "Design was modified after tasks were generated. Would you like to regenerate tasks with `/opsx:continue`?"
|
||||
|
||||
## User Experience
|
||||
|
||||
### Vision: Seamless Mid-Flight Correction
|
||||
|
||||
This is the workflow we want to enable (currently documented but not supported):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
You: /opsx:apply
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Working through tasks...
|
||||
✓ Task 1.1: Created caching layer
|
||||
✓ Task 1.2: Added cache invalidation
|
||||
|
||||
Working on 1.3: Implement TTL...
|
||||
I noticed the design assumes Redis, but your project uses
|
||||
in-memory caching. Should I update the design?
|
||||
|
||||
You: Yes, update it to use the existing cache module.
|
||||
|
||||
AI: Updated design.md to use CacheManager from src/cache/
|
||||
Updated tasks.md with revised implementation steps
|
||||
Continuing implementation...
|
||||
✓ Task 1.3: Implemented TTL using CacheManager
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**No restart needed.** Just update the artifact and continue.
|
||||
|
||||
### Staleness Warning UX
|
||||
|
||||
When user manually edits an upstream artifact:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
$ /opsx:apply
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Detected changes to upstream artifacts:
|
||||
- design.md modified 5 minutes ago (after tasks.md was generated)
|
||||
|
||||
Options:
|
||||
1. Regenerate tasks (recommended)
|
||||
2. Continue anyway with current tasks
|
||||
3. Cancel
|
||||
|
||||
>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Part 2: Regeneration Capability
|
||||
|
||||
Add a way to regenerate specific artifacts:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Option A: Flag on continue
|
||||
/opsx:continue --regenerate tasks
|
||||
|
||||
# Option B: Separate command
|
||||
/opsx:regenerate tasks
|
||||
|
||||
# Option C: Interactive prompt when staleness detected
|
||||
/opsx:apply
|
||||
# "Design changed. Regenerate tasks? [y/N]"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Approach
|
||||
|
||||
### Option A: Metadata File
|
||||
Store `.openspec-meta.json` in change directory:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"tasks.md": {
|
||||
"generated_at": "2025-01-24T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"dependencies": {
|
||||
"design.md": "2025-01-24T09:55:00Z",
|
||||
"specs/feature/spec.md": "2025-01-24T09:50:00Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Option B: Frontmatter
|
||||
Add YAML frontmatter to generated artifacts:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
generated_at: 2025-01-24T10:00:00Z
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- design.md@2025-01-24T09:55:00Z
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Tasks
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Option C: Git-based
|
||||
Use git to detect if upstream files changed since downstream was last modified. No extra metadata needed but requires git.
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-Goals
|
||||
|
||||
- Automatic regeneration (user should always choose)
|
||||
- Blocking apply entirely (just warn)
|
||||
- Tracking code file changes (only artifact dependencies)
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
- Should be implemented after `fix-midflight-update-docs` so docs are accurate first
|
||||
- Could be combined with that change if desired
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- User is warned when applying with stale artifacts
|
||||
- Clear path to regenerate if needed
|
||||
- No false positives (only warn when genuinely stale)
|
||||
- Documentation claims become actually true
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
|
||||
Users and agents need a simple way to submit feedback about OpenSpec directly from the CLI. Currently there's no mechanism to collect user feedback, feature requests, or bug reports in a way that enables follow-up conversation. Using GitHub Issues allows us to track feedback, prevent spam via GitHub auth, and enables outreach to users.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add `openspec feedback <message>` CLI command
|
||||
- Leverage `gh` CLI for GitHub authentication and issue creation
|
||||
- Add `/feedback` skill for agent-assisted feedback with context enrichment
|
||||
- Ensure cross-platform compatibility (macOS, Linux, Windows)
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
|
||||
- Affected specs: New `cli-feedback` capability
|
||||
- Affected code:
|
||||
- `src/cli/index.ts` - Register feedback command
|
||||
- `src/commands/feedback.ts` - Command implementation using `gh` CLI
|
||||
- `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts` - Feedback skill template
|
||||
- `src/core/completions/command-registry.ts` - Shell completions
|
||||
- External dependency: Requires `gh` CLI installed and authenticated
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Feedback command
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL provide an `openspec feedback` command that creates a GitHub Issue in the openspec repository using the `gh` CLI. The system SHALL use `execFileSync` with argument arrays to prevent shell injection vulnerabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Simple feedback submission
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec feedback "Great tool!"`
|
||||
- **THEN** the system executes `gh issue create` with title "Feedback: Great tool!"
|
||||
- **AND** the issue is created in the openspec repository
|
||||
- **AND** the issue has the `feedback` label
|
||||
- **AND** the system displays the created issue URL
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Safe command execution
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** submitting feedback via `gh` CLI
|
||||
- **THEN** the system uses `execFileSync` with separate arguments array
|
||||
- **AND** user input is NOT passed through a shell
|
||||
- **AND** shell metacharacters (quotes, backticks, $(), etc.) are treated as literal text
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Feedback with body
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec feedback "Title here" --body "Detailed description..."`
|
||||
- **THEN** the system creates a GitHub Issue with the specified title
|
||||
- **AND** the issue body contains the detailed description
|
||||
- **AND** the issue body includes metadata (OpenSpec version, platform, timestamp)
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: GitHub CLI dependency
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL use `gh` CLI for automatic feedback submission when available, and provide a manual submission fallback when `gh` is not installed or not authenticated. The system SHALL use platform-appropriate commands to detect `gh` CLI availability.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Missing gh CLI with fallback
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec feedback "message"`
|
||||
- **AND** `gh` CLI is not installed (not found in PATH)
|
||||
- **THEN** the system displays warning: "GitHub CLI not found. Manual submission required."
|
||||
- **AND** outputs structured feedback content with delimiters:
|
||||
- "--- FORMATTED FEEDBACK ---"
|
||||
- Title line
|
||||
- Labels line
|
||||
- Body content with metadata
|
||||
- "--- END FEEDBACK ---"
|
||||
- **AND** displays pre-filled GitHub issue URL for manual submission
|
||||
- **AND** exits with zero code (successful fallback)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Cross-platform gh CLI detection on Unix
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** system is running on macOS or Linux (platform is 'darwin' or 'linux')
|
||||
- **AND** checking if `gh` CLI is installed
|
||||
- **THEN** the system executes `which gh` command
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Cross-platform gh CLI detection on Windows
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** system is running on Windows (platform is 'win32')
|
||||
- **AND** checking if `gh` CLI is installed
|
||||
- **THEN** the system executes `where gh` command
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Unauthenticated gh CLI with fallback
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec feedback "message"`
|
||||
- **AND** `gh` CLI is installed but not authenticated
|
||||
- **THEN** the system displays warning: "GitHub authentication required. Manual submission required."
|
||||
- **AND** outputs structured feedback content (same format as missing gh CLI scenario)
|
||||
- **AND** displays pre-filled GitHub issue URL for manual submission
|
||||
- **AND** displays authentication instructions: "To auto-submit in the future: gh auth login"
|
||||
- **AND** exits with zero code (successful fallback)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Authenticated gh CLI
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec feedback "message"`
|
||||
- **AND** `gh auth status` returns success (authenticated)
|
||||
- **THEN** the system proceeds with feedback submission
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Issue metadata
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL include relevant metadata in the GitHub Issue body.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Standard metadata
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating a GitHub Issue for feedback
|
||||
- **THEN** the issue body includes:
|
||||
- OpenSpec CLI version
|
||||
- Platform (darwin, linux, win32)
|
||||
- Submission timestamp
|
||||
- Separator line: "---\nSubmitted via OpenSpec CLI"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Windows platform metadata
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating a GitHub Issue for feedback on Windows
|
||||
- **THEN** the issue body includes "Platform: win32"
|
||||
- **AND** all platform detection uses Node.js `os.platform()` API
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: No sensitive metadata
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating a GitHub Issue for feedback
|
||||
- **THEN** the issue body does NOT include:
|
||||
- File paths from user's system
|
||||
- Project names or directory names
|
||||
- Environment variables
|
||||
- IP addresses
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Feedback always works
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL allow feedback submission regardless of telemetry settings.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Feedback with telemetry disabled
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user has disabled telemetry via `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0`
|
||||
- **AND** user runs `openspec feedback "message"`
|
||||
- **THEN** the feedback is still submitted via `gh` CLI
|
||||
- **AND** telemetry events are not sent
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Feedback in CI environment
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** `CI=true` is set in the environment
|
||||
- **AND** user runs `openspec feedback "message"`
|
||||
- **THEN** the feedback submission proceeds normally (if `gh` is available and authenticated)
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Error handling
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL handle feedback submission errors gracefully.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: gh CLI execution failure
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** `gh issue create` command fails
|
||||
- **THEN** the system displays the error output from `gh` CLI
|
||||
- **AND** exits with the same exit code as `gh`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Network failure
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** `gh` CLI reports network connectivity issues
|
||||
- **THEN** the system displays the error message from `gh`
|
||||
- **AND** suggests checking network connectivity
|
||||
- **AND** exits with non-zero code
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Feedback skill for agents
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL provide a `/feedback` skill that guides agents through collecting and submitting user feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Agent-initiated feedback
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user invokes `/feedback` in an agent conversation
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent gathers context from the conversation
|
||||
- **AND** drafts a feedback issue with enriched content
|
||||
- **AND** anonymizes sensitive information
|
||||
- **AND** presents the draft to the user for approval
|
||||
- **AND** submits via `openspec feedback` command on user confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Context enrichment
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** agent drafts feedback
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent includes relevant context such as:
|
||||
- What task was being performed
|
||||
- What worked well or poorly
|
||||
- Specific friction points or praise
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Anonymization
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** agent drafts feedback
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent removes or replaces:
|
||||
- File paths with `<path>` or generic descriptions
|
||||
- API keys, tokens, secrets with `<redacted>`
|
||||
- Company/organization names with `<company>`
|
||||
- Personal names with `<user>`
|
||||
- Specific URLs with `<url>` unless public/relevant
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: User confirmation required
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** agent has drafted feedback
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent MUST show the complete draft to the user
|
||||
- **AND** ask for explicit approval before submitting
|
||||
- **AND** allow the user to request modifications
|
||||
- **AND** only submit after user confirms
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Shell completions
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL provide shell completions for the feedback command.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Command completion
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user types `openspec fee<TAB>`
|
||||
- **THEN** the shell completes to `openspec feedback`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Flag completion
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user types `openspec feedback "msg" --<TAB>`
|
||||
- **THEN** the shell suggests available flags (`--body`)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
## 1. Feedback Command
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Create `src/commands/feedback.ts` with command implementation
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Check `gh` CLI availability using platform-appropriate command (`which` on Unix/macOS, `where` on Windows)
|
||||
- [x] 1.3 Check GitHub auth status with `gh auth status`
|
||||
- [x] 1.4 Execute `gh issue create` with formatted title and body using `execFileSync` to prevent shell injection
|
||||
- [x] 1.5 Display issue URL returned by `gh` CLI
|
||||
- [x] 1.6 Register `feedback <message>` command in `src/cli/index.ts`
|
||||
- [x] 1.7 Ensure cross-platform compatibility (macOS, Linux, Windows)
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Shell Completions
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Add `feedback` command to command registry
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Regenerate completion scripts for all shells
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Feedback Skill
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Create feedback skill template in `skill-templates.ts`
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Document context gathering workflow
|
||||
- [x] 3.3 Document anonymization rules
|
||||
- [x] 3.4 Document user confirmation flow
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 4.1 Add unit tests for feedback command (mock `gh` subprocess calls)
|
||||
- [x] 4.2 Add integration test for full feedback flow with mocked `gh` CLI
|
||||
- [x] 4.3 Test error handling for missing `gh` CLI
|
||||
- [x] 4.4 Test error handling for unauthenticated `gh` session
|
||||
- [x] 4.5 Test cross-platform `gh` CLI detection (verify `which` on Unix, `where` on Windows)
|
||||
- [x] 4.6 Test platform metadata includes correct value for Windows (win32)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
|
||||
schema: spec-driven
|
||||
created: 2026-01-24
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSpec has a complete skill and slash command generation system. Skills are defined in `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts` as functions that return `SkillTemplate` objects (for Agent Skills) and `CommandTemplate` objects (for slash commands). These are registered in `src/core/shared/skill-generation.ts` and generated during `openspec init` and `openspec update`.
|
||||
|
||||
Existing skills follow a consistent pattern:
|
||||
- `getXxxSkillTemplate()` returns the skill with name, description, instructions
|
||||
- `getOpsxXxxCommandTemplate()` returns the slash command with name, description, category, tags, content
|
||||
- Both are registered in their respective arrays in `skill-generation.ts`
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals / Non-Goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals:**
|
||||
- Add `/opsx:onboard` skill that teaches the OpenSpec workflow through guided practice
|
||||
- Follow existing patterns for skill/command template generation
|
||||
- Provide comprehensive narration that explains each step
|
||||
- Include codebase analysis to suggest real, appropriately-scoped tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Goals:**
|
||||
- Creating a separate "demo mode" or simulated workflow (we do real work)
|
||||
- Adding new CLI commands (this is purely agent instructions)
|
||||
- Modifying the init/update flow (just adding to the template arrays)
|
||||
|
||||
## Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 1: Single Monolithic Skill
|
||||
|
||||
The onboard skill will be a single comprehensive instruction set rather than composing existing skills with flags.
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:**
|
||||
- Slash commands don't support flags (they're just prompts)
|
||||
- A monolithic skill gives complete control over narration and pacing
|
||||
- Easier to maintain a single cohesive experience
|
||||
- Users learn the real commands by seeing them mentioned in narration
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 2: Codebase Analysis Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
The skill instructions will direct the agent to look for specific patterns when suggesting starter tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
1. TODO/FIXME comments in code
|
||||
2. Missing error handling (`catch` blocks that swallow errors, no try-catch around risky operations)
|
||||
3. Functions without tests (cross-reference src/ with test files)
|
||||
4. Type: `any` in TypeScript files
|
||||
5. Console.log statements in non-debug code
|
||||
6. Missing input validation on user-facing inputs
|
||||
7. Recent git commits (for context on what user is working on)
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:** These are universally applicable, easy to detect, and produce well-scoped tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 3: Narration Integration Style
|
||||
|
||||
Each phase will follow a pattern:
|
||||
1. **EXPLAIN** what we're about to do and why (1-2 sentences)
|
||||
2. **DO** the action (run command, create artifact)
|
||||
3. **SHOW** what happened
|
||||
4. **PAUSE** at key transitions (not every step)
|
||||
|
||||
Pauses occur at:
|
||||
- After task selection (before creating change)
|
||||
- After drafting proposal (before saving)
|
||||
- After tasks are generated (before implementation)
|
||||
- After archive (final recap)
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:** Too many pauses becomes tedious. Too few loses the teaching opportunity. These are the natural "chapter breaks."
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 4: Scope Guardrail Approach
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects a task that's too large, the skill will:
|
||||
1. Acknowledge the task is valuable
|
||||
2. Explain why smaller is better for first time
|
||||
3. Suggest a smaller slice or alternative
|
||||
4. Let user override if they insist
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:** Soft guardrails teach without frustrating. Users learn scope calibration as part of the experience.
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 5: Template Structure
|
||||
|
||||
The skill template will be ~400-600 lines of instruction text, structured as:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
- Preflight checks (init status)
|
||||
- Phase 1: Welcome & Setup
|
||||
- Phase 2: Task Selection (with codebase analysis instructions)
|
||||
- Phase 3: Explore Demo (brief)
|
||||
- Phase 4: Change Creation
|
||||
- Phase 5: Proposal
|
||||
- Phase 6: Specs
|
||||
- Phase 7: Design
|
||||
- Phase 8: Tasks
|
||||
- Phase 9: Apply (Implementation)
|
||||
- Phase 10: Archive
|
||||
- Phase 11: Recap & Next Steps
|
||||
- Edge cases & graceful exits
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The command template will be identical to the skill template (same content, different wrapper).
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:** Following the established pattern where skill and command share the same core instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks / Trade-offs
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk: Instruction length**
|
||||
The skill will be significantly longer than existing skills (~500 lines vs ~100-200).
|
||||
→ Mitigation: This is acceptable since onboarding is inherently comprehensive. Token cost is one-time per session.
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk: Codebase analysis may find nothing**
|
||||
Some codebases (new projects, very clean code) may not have obvious improvement opportunities.
|
||||
→ Mitigation: Fall back to asking user what they want to build. Include "add a new feature" as an option.
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk: Task suggestions may be inappropriate**
|
||||
Agent might suggest tasks that touch sensitive code or have hidden complexity.
|
||||
→ Mitigation: User always chooses; agent just suggests. Scope estimates help set expectations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk: User abandons mid-way**
|
||||
Onboarding takes ~15 minutes; users may not complete it.
|
||||
→ Mitigation: Graceful exit handling - note the change is saved, explain how to continue later.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
|
||||
Users who run `openspec init` are left with files but no clear path to actually using the system. There's a gap between "I have OpenSpec set up" and "I understand the workflow." An onboarding skill would guide users through their first complete change cycle on a real task in their codebase, teaching the workflow by doing it.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add new `/opsx:onboard` skill that guides users through their first OpenSpec change
|
||||
- Add corresponding slash command template for editor integrations
|
||||
- The skill will:
|
||||
- Analyze the user's codebase to suggest appropriately-scoped starter tasks
|
||||
- Walk through the full workflow (explore → new → proposal → specs → design → tasks → apply → archive)
|
||||
- Provide narration explaining each step as it happens
|
||||
- Result in a real, implemented change in the user's codebase
|
||||
|
||||
## Capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
### New Capabilities
|
||||
- `opsx-onboard-skill`: The onboarding skill that guides users through their first complete OpenSpec workflow cycle with narration and codebase-aware task suggestions
|
||||
|
||||
### Modified Capabilities
|
||||
<!-- No existing specs are being modified - this is purely additive -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
|
||||
- `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts`: Add `getOnboardSkillTemplate()` and `getOpsxOnboardCommandTemplate()` functions
|
||||
- `src/core/shared/skill-generation.ts`: Register the new skill and command templates in `getSkillTemplates()` and `getCommandTemplates()`
|
||||
- Users running `openspec init` or `openspec update` will get the new skill/command files generated
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: OPSX Onboard Skill
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL provide an `/opsx:onboard` skill that guides users through their first complete OpenSpec workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Skill invocation
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user invokes `/opsx:onboard`
|
||||
- **THEN** agent checks if OpenSpec is initialized
|
||||
- **AND** if not initialized, prompts user to run `openspec init` first
|
||||
- **AND** if initialized, proceeds with onboarding flow
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Welcome and expectations
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** onboarding begins
|
||||
- **THEN** agent displays welcome message explaining what will happen
|
||||
- **AND** sets expectation of ~15 minute duration
|
||||
- **AND** explains the workflow phases: explore → new → artifacts → apply → archive
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Codebase Analysis for Task Suggestions
|
||||
|
||||
The skill SHALL analyze the user's codebase to suggest appropriately-scoped starter tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Codebase scanning
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** onboarding reaches task selection phase
|
||||
- **THEN** agent scans codebase for small improvement opportunities
|
||||
- **AND** looks for: TODO/FIXME comments, missing error handling, functions without tests, outdated dependencies, type: any in TypeScript, console.log in production code, missing input validation
|
||||
- **AND** checks recent git commits for context on current work
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Task suggestion presentation
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** agent has analyzed codebase
|
||||
- **THEN** agent presents 3-4 specific task suggestions with scope estimates
|
||||
- **AND** each suggestion includes: task description, estimated scope (files/lines), why it's a good starter
|
||||
- **AND** offers option for user to specify their own task
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Scope guardrail
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user selects or describes a task that is too large
|
||||
- **THEN** agent gently redirects toward smaller scope
|
||||
- **AND** suggests breaking down or deferring the large task
|
||||
- **AND** offers appropriately-sized alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Explore Phase Demo
|
||||
|
||||
The skill SHALL briefly demonstrate explore mode before creating a change.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Brief explore demonstration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** task is selected
|
||||
- **THEN** agent briefly demonstrates `/opsx:explore` by investigating relevant code
|
||||
- **AND** explains explore mode is for thinking before doing
|
||||
- **AND** keeps this phase short (not a full exploration session)
|
||||
- **AND** transitions to change creation
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Guided Artifact Creation
|
||||
|
||||
The skill SHALL guide users through each artifact with narration explaining the purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Change creation with narration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating the change directory
|
||||
- **THEN** agent runs `openspec new change "<name>"` with derived kebab-case name
|
||||
- **AND** explains what a "change" is (container for thinking and planning)
|
||||
- **AND** shows the folder structure that was created
|
||||
- **AND** pauses for user acknowledgment before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Proposal creation with narration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating proposal.md
|
||||
- **THEN** agent explains proposals capture WHY we're making this change
|
||||
- **AND** drafts proposal based on selected task
|
||||
- **AND** shows draft to user for approval before saving
|
||||
- **AND** explains the sections (Why, What Changes, Capabilities, Impact)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Specs creation with narration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating spec files
|
||||
- **THEN** agent explains specs define WHAT we're building in detail
|
||||
- **AND** explains the requirement/scenario format
|
||||
- **AND** creates spec file(s) based on proposal capabilities
|
||||
- **AND** notes that specs become documentation that stays in sync
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Design creation with narration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating design.md
|
||||
- **THEN** agent explains design captures HOW we'll build it
|
||||
- **AND** notes this is where technical decisions and tradeoffs live
|
||||
- **AND** for small changes, acknowledges design may be brief
|
||||
- **AND** creates design based on proposal and specs
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Tasks creation with narration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** creating tasks.md
|
||||
- **THEN** agent explains tasks break work into checkboxes
|
||||
- **AND** explains these drive the apply phase
|
||||
- **AND** generates task list from design and specs
|
||||
- **AND** shows tasks and asks if ready to implement
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Guided Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
The skill SHALL implement tasks with narration connecting back to artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Implementation with narration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** implementing tasks
|
||||
- **THEN** agent announces each task before working on it
|
||||
- **AND** implements the change in the codebase
|
||||
- **AND** occasionally references how specs/design informed decisions
|
||||
- **AND** marks each task complete as it finishes
|
||||
- **AND** keeps narration light (not over-explaining)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Implementation completion
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** all tasks are complete
|
||||
- **THEN** agent announces completion
|
||||
- **AND** summarizes what was done
|
||||
- **AND** transitions to archive phase
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Archive with Explanation
|
||||
|
||||
The skill SHALL archive the completed change and explain what happened.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Archive with narration
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** archiving the change
|
||||
- **THEN** agent explains archive moves change to dated folder
|
||||
- **AND** runs archive process
|
||||
- **AND** shows where archived change lives
|
||||
- **AND** explains the long-term value (finding decisions later)
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Recap and Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
The skill SHALL conclude with a recap and command reference.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Final recap
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** onboarding is complete
|
||||
- **THEN** agent summarizes the workflow phases completed
|
||||
- **AND** emphasizes this rhythm works for any size change
|
||||
- **AND** provides command reference table (/opsx:explore, /opsx:new, /opsx:ff, /opsx:continue, /opsx:apply, /opsx:verify, /opsx:archive)
|
||||
- **AND** suggests next actions (try /opsx:new or /opsx:ff on something)
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Graceful Exit Handling
|
||||
|
||||
The skill SHALL handle users who want to stop mid-way.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: User wants to stop
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user indicates they want to stop during onboarding
|
||||
- **THEN** agent acknowledges gracefully
|
||||
- **AND** notes that the in-progress change is saved
|
||||
- **AND** explains how to continue later with `/opsx:continue <name>`
|
||||
- **AND** exits without pressure
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: User wants quick reference only
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user says they just want to see the commands
|
||||
- **THEN** agent provides command cheat sheet
|
||||
- **AND** exits gracefully with encouragement to try `/opsx:new`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
## 1. Add Skill Template
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Add `getOnboardSkillTemplate()` function to `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts` with full onboarding instruction text covering all phases (preflight, welcome, task selection, explore demo, change creation, proposal, specs, design, tasks, apply, archive, recap)
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Include codebase analysis instructions for suggesting starter tasks (TODO/FIXME, missing error handling, missing tests, type:any, console.log, missing validation)
|
||||
- [x] 1.3 Include narration pattern instructions (EXPLAIN → DO → SHOW → PAUSE at key transitions)
|
||||
- [x] 1.4 Include scope guardrail instructions for redirecting users away from overly large tasks
|
||||
- [x] 1.5 Include graceful exit handling instructions (user stops mid-way, user just wants command reference)
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Add Command Template
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Add `getOpsxOnboardCommandTemplate()` function to `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts` returning CommandTemplate with same instruction content as skill
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Register Templates
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Add onboard skill to `getSkillTemplates()` array in `src/core/shared/skill-generation.ts` with dirName `openspec-onboard`
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Add onboard command to `getCommandTemplates()` array in `src/core/shared/skill-generation.ts` with id `onboard`
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Verify
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] 4.1 Run `pnpm run build` to ensure TypeScript compiles
|
||||
- [x] 4.2 Test skill generation by running `openspec init` in a test directory and verifying onboard skill/command files are created
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
||||
# Design: Add /opsx:verify Skill
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Decision: Dynamic Generation via Setup Command
|
||||
|
||||
### Context
|
||||
|
||||
All existing opsx experimental skills (explore, new, continue, apply, ff, sync, archive) are dynamically generated when users run `openspec artifact-experimental-setup`. They are not manually created files checked into the repository.
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Integrate verify into the existing artifact-experimental-setup system rather than creating static skill files.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Consistency**: All 7 existing opsx skills follow this pattern. Adding verify as the 8th skill should follow the same architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Maintainability**: Template functions in `skill-templates.ts` are the single source of truth. Changes to skill definitions automatically propagate to all users when they re-run setup.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Distribution**: Users get the verify skill automatically when running `openspec artifact-experimental-setup`, just like all other opsx skills. No special installation steps needed.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Versioning**: Skills are generated from the installed npm package version, ensuring consistency between CLI version and skill behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Approach
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Template Functions
|
||||
|
||||
Add two template functions to `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts`:
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
export function getVerifyChangeSkillTemplate(): SkillTemplate
|
||||
export function getOpsxVerifyCommandTemplate(): CommandTemplate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
These return the skill definition (for Agent Skills) and slash command definition (for explicit invocation).
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Setup Integration
|
||||
|
||||
Update `artifactExperimentalSetupCommand()` in `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts`:
|
||||
|
||||
- Import both template functions
|
||||
- Add verify to the `skills` array (position 8)
|
||||
- Add verify to the `commands` array (position 8)
|
||||
- Update help text to list `/opsx:verify`
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Generated Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
When users run `openspec artifact-experimental-setup`, the command creates:
|
||||
|
||||
- `.claude/skills/openspec-verify-change/SKILL.md` - Agent Skills format
|
||||
- `.claude/commands/opsx/verify.md` - Slash command format
|
||||
|
||||
Both are generated from the template functions, with YAML frontmatter automatically added.
|
||||
|
||||
### Alternatives Considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Alternative 1: Static skill files in repository**
|
||||
|
||||
Create `.claude/skills/openspec-verify-change/SKILL.md` as a static file in the OpenSpec repository.
|
||||
|
||||
**Rejected because:**
|
||||
- Inconsistent with all other opsx skills
|
||||
- Requires users to manually copy/update files
|
||||
- Versioning becomes complicated (repo version vs installed package version)
|
||||
- Breaks the established pattern
|
||||
|
||||
**Alternative 2: Separate verify setup command**
|
||||
|
||||
Add `openspec setup-verify` as a separate command.
|
||||
|
||||
**Rejected because:**
|
||||
- Fragments the setup experience
|
||||
- Users would need to run multiple commands
|
||||
- Doesn't scale if we add more skills in the future
|
||||
- Goes against the "setup once, get everything" philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
### Trade-offs
|
||||
|
||||
**Advantages:**
|
||||
- Consistent with existing architecture
|
||||
- Zero additional setup burden for users
|
||||
- Easy to update and maintain
|
||||
- Automatic version compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Disadvantages:**
|
||||
- Slightly more complex initial implementation (template functions + integration)
|
||||
- Requires understanding the setup system (but that's already documented)
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification
|
||||
|
||||
The implementation correctly follows this design if:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Both template functions exist in `skill-templates.ts`
|
||||
2. Verify appears in both skills and commands arrays in `artifact-workflow.ts`
|
||||
3. Help text mentions `/opsx:verify`
|
||||
4. Running `openspec artifact-experimental-setup` generates both skill and command files
|
||||
5. Build succeeds with no TypeScript errors
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
# Change: Add /opsx:verify Skill
|
||||
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
|
||||
Users need a way to validate that their implementation actually matches what was requested before archiving a change. Currently, there's no systematic way to check:
|
||||
- Whether all tasks are truly complete
|
||||
- Whether the implementation covers all spec requirements and scenarios
|
||||
- Whether the implementation follows the design decisions
|
||||
- Whether the code is coherent and makes sense
|
||||
|
||||
A user requested: "Can we get a :verify that will ensure that the implementation matches what was requested?"
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add `getVerifyChangeSkillTemplate()` function to `skill-templates.ts`
|
||||
- Add `getOpsxVerifyCommandTemplate()` function to `skill-templates.ts`
|
||||
- Integrate verify skill into `artifactExperimentalSetupCommand` in `artifact-workflow.ts`
|
||||
- Add verify to the skills and commands arrays in the setup command
|
||||
- Update help text to include `/opsx:verify` in the list of available commands
|
||||
- Create `opsx-verify-skill` capability spec
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification Dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
The skill verifies across three dimensions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Completeness** - Are all tasks done? Are all specs addressed?
|
||||
2. **Correctness** - Does the implementation match specs? Are scenarios covered?
|
||||
3. **Coherence** - Does the implementation make sense? Does it follow design.md?
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
Produces a prioritized report with:
|
||||
- Summary scorecard (tasks, specs, design adherence)
|
||||
- Critical issues first (must fix before archive)
|
||||
- Warnings second (should fix)
|
||||
- Suggestions third (nice to have)
|
||||
- Actionable fix recommendations for each issue
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
|
||||
- Affected specs: New `opsx-verify-skill` spec
|
||||
- Affected code:
|
||||
- `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts` - Added 2 new template functions
|
||||
- `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts` - Integrated verify into experimental setup
|
||||
- Generated artifacts: When users run `openspec artifact-experimental-setup`:
|
||||
- Creates `.claude/skills/openspec-verify-change/SKILL.md`
|
||||
- Creates `.claude/commands/opsx/verify.md`
|
||||
- Related skills: Works alongside `/opsx:apply` and before `/opsx:archive`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
|
||||
# opsx-verify-skill Specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Defines the agent skill for verifying that implementation matches change artifacts (specs, tasks, design).
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Verify Skill Invocation
|
||||
The system SHALL provide an `/opsx:verify` skill that validates implementation against change artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Verify with change name provided
|
||||
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:verify <change-name>`
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent verifies implementation for that specific change
|
||||
- **AND** produces a verification report
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Verify without change name
|
||||
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:verify` without a change name
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent prompts user to select from available changes
|
||||
- **AND** shows only changes that have implementation tasks
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Change has no tasks
|
||||
- **WHEN** selected change has no tasks.md or tasks are empty
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent reports "No tasks to verify"
|
||||
- **AND** suggests running `/opsx:continue` to create tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Completeness Verification
|
||||
The agent SHALL verify that all required work has been completed.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Task completion check
|
||||
- **WHEN** verifying completeness
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent reads tasks.md
|
||||
- **AND** counts tasks marked `- [x]` (complete) vs `- [ ]` (incomplete)
|
||||
- **AND** reports completion status with specific incomplete tasks listed
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Spec coverage check
|
||||
- **WHEN** verifying completeness
|
||||
- **AND** delta specs exist in `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/`
|
||||
- **THEN** the agent extracts all requirements from delta specs
|
||||
- **AND** searches codebase for implementation of each requirement
|
||||
- **AND** reports which requirements appear to have implementation vs which are missing
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: All tasks complete
|
||||
- **WHEN** all tasks are marked complete
|
||||
- **THEN** report "Tasks: N/N complete"
|
||||
- **AND** mark completeness dimension as passed
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Incomplete tasks found
|
||||
- **WHEN** some tasks are incomplete
|
||||
- **THEN** report "Tasks: X/N complete"
|
||||
- **AND** list each incomplete task
|
||||
- **AND** mark as CRITICAL issue
|
||||
- **AND** suggest: "Complete remaining tasks or mark as done if already implemented"
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Correctness Verification
|
||||
The agent SHALL verify that implementation matches the specifications.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Requirement implementation mapping
|
||||
- **WHEN** verifying correctness
|
||||
- **THEN** for each requirement in delta specs:
|
||||
- Search codebase for implementation
|
||||
- Identify relevant files and line numbers
|
||||
- Assess whether implementation satisfies the requirement
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Scenario coverage check
|
||||
- **WHEN** verifying correctness
|
||||
- **THEN** for each scenario in delta specs:
|
||||
- Check if the scenario's conditions are handled in code
|
||||
- Check if tests exist that cover the scenario
|
||||
- Report coverage status
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Implementation matches spec
|
||||
- **WHEN** implementation appears to satisfy a requirement
|
||||
- **THEN** report which files/lines implement it
|
||||
- **AND** mark requirement as covered
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Implementation diverges from spec
|
||||
- **WHEN** implementation exists but doesn't match spec intent
|
||||
- **THEN** report the divergence as WARNING
|
||||
- **AND** explain what differs
|
||||
- **AND** suggest: either update implementation or update spec to match reality
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Missing implementation
|
||||
- **WHEN** no implementation found for a requirement
|
||||
- **THEN** report as CRITICAL issue
|
||||
- **AND** suggest: "Implement requirement X" with guidance on what's needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Coherence Verification
|
||||
The agent SHALL verify that implementation is sensible and follows design decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Design.md adherence check
|
||||
- **WHEN** verifying coherence
|
||||
- **AND** design.md exists for the change
|
||||
- **THEN** extract key decisions from design.md
|
||||
- **AND** verify implementation follows those decisions
|
||||
- **AND** report any deviations
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: No design.md
|
||||
- **WHEN** verifying coherence
|
||||
- **AND** no design.md exists
|
||||
- **THEN** skip design adherence check
|
||||
- **AND** note "No design.md to verify against"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Design decision followed
|
||||
- **WHEN** implementation follows a design decision
|
||||
- **THEN** report as confirmed
|
||||
- **AND** cite evidence from code
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Design decision violated
|
||||
- **WHEN** implementation contradicts a design decision
|
||||
- **THEN** report as WARNING
|
||||
- **AND** explain the contradiction
|
||||
- **AND** suggest: either update implementation or update design.md
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Code pattern consistency
|
||||
- **WHEN** verifying coherence
|
||||
- **THEN** check if new code follows existing project patterns
|
||||
- **AND** flag any significant deviations as suggestions
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Verification Report Format
|
||||
The agent SHALL produce a structured, prioritized report.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Report summary
|
||||
- **WHEN** verification completes
|
||||
- **THEN** display summary scorecard:
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Verification Report: <change-name>
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
| Dimension | Status |
|
||||
|--------------|----------|
|
||||
| Completeness | X/Y |
|
||||
| Correctness | X/Y |
|
||||
| Coherence | Followed |
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Issue prioritization
|
||||
- **WHEN** issues are found
|
||||
- **THEN** group and display in priority order:
|
||||
1. CRITICAL - Must fix before archive (missing implementation, incomplete tasks)
|
||||
2. WARNING - Should fix (divergence from spec/design, missing tests)
|
||||
3. SUGGESTION - Nice to fix (pattern inconsistencies, minor improvements)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Actionable recommendations
|
||||
- **WHEN** reporting an issue
|
||||
- **THEN** include specific, actionable fix recommendation
|
||||
- **AND** reference relevant files and line numbers where applicable
|
||||
- **AND** avoid vague suggestions like "consider reviewing"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: All checks pass
|
||||
- **WHEN** no issues found across all dimensions
|
||||
- **THEN** display:
|
||||
```
|
||||
All checks passed. Ready for archive.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Critical issues found
|
||||
- **WHEN** CRITICAL issues exist
|
||||
- **THEN** display:
|
||||
```
|
||||
X critical issue(s) found. Fix before archiving.
|
||||
```
|
||||
- **AND** do NOT suggest running archive
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Only warnings/suggestions
|
||||
- **WHEN** no CRITICAL issues but warnings exist
|
||||
- **THEN** display:
|
||||
```
|
||||
No critical issues. Y warning(s) to consider.
|
||||
Ready for archive (with noted improvements).
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Flexible Artifact Handling
|
||||
The agent SHALL gracefully handle changes with varying artifact completeness.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Minimal change (tasks only)
|
||||
- **WHEN** change has only tasks.md
|
||||
- **THEN** verify task completion only
|
||||
- **AND** skip spec and design checks
|
||||
- **AND** note which checks were skipped
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Change with specs but no design
|
||||
- **WHEN** change has tasks.md and delta specs but no design.md
|
||||
- **THEN** verify completeness and correctness
|
||||
- **AND** skip design adherence
|
||||
- **AND** still check code coherence against project patterns
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Full change (all artifacts)
|
||||
- **WHEN** change has proposal, design, specs, and tasks
|
||||
- **THEN** perform all verification checks
|
||||
- **AND** cross-reference artifacts for consistency
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
# Tasks: Add /opsx:verify Skill
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Skill Template Functions
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Add `getVerifyChangeSkillTemplate()` to skill-templates.ts
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Add `getOpsxVerifyCommandTemplate()` to skill-templates.ts
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Integration with artifact-experimental-setup
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Import verify template functions in artifact-workflow.ts
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Add verify to skills array in artifactExperimentalSetupCommand
|
||||
- [x] 2.3 Add verify to commands array in artifactExperimentalSetupCommand
|
||||
- [x] 2.4 Add verify to help text output
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Verification (Build & Test)
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Verify TypeScript compilation succeeds
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Verify all 8 skills are now included (was 7, now 8)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Change: Add View Dashboard Command
|
||||
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
|
||||
Users need a quick, at-a-glance overview of their OpenSpec project status without running multiple commands. Currently, users must run `openspec list --changes` and `openspec list --specs` separately to understand the project state. A unified dashboard view would improve developer experience and provide immediate insight into project progress.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
|
||||
### Added `openspec view` Command
|
||||
|
||||
The new command provides an interactive dashboard displaying:
|
||||
- Summary metrics (total specs, requirements, changes, task progress)
|
||||
- Active changes with visual progress bars
|
||||
- Completed changes
|
||||
- Specifications with requirement counts
|
||||
|
||||
### Specifications Affected
|
||||
|
||||
- **cli-view** (NEW): Complete specification for the view dashboard command
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Details
|
||||
|
||||
### File Structure
|
||||
- Created `/src/core/view.ts` implementing the `ViewCommand` class
|
||||
- Registered command in `/src/cli/index.ts`
|
||||
- Reuses existing utilities from `task-progress.ts` and `MarkdownParser`
|
||||
|
||||
### Visual Design
|
||||
- Uses Unicode box drawing characters for borders
|
||||
- Color coding: cyan for specs, yellow for active, green for completed
|
||||
- Progress bars using filled (█) and empty (░) blocks
|
||||
- Clean alignment with proper padding
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Approach
|
||||
- Async data fetching from changes and specs directories
|
||||
- Parallel processing of specs and changes
|
||||
- Error handling for missing or invalid data
|
||||
- Maintains consistency with existing list command output
|
||||
+109
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
||||
# CLI View Command - Changes
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Dashboard Display
|
||||
|
||||
The system SHALL provide a `view` command that displays a dashboard overview of specs and changes.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Basic dashboard display
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec view`
|
||||
- **THEN** system displays a formatted dashboard with sections for summary, active changes, completed changes, and specifications
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: No OpenSpec directory
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec view` in a directory without OpenSpec
|
||||
- **THEN** system displays error message "✗ No openspec directory found"
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Summary Section
|
||||
|
||||
The dashboard SHALL display a summary section with key project metrics.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Complete summary display
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** dashboard is rendered with specs and changes
|
||||
- **THEN** system shows total number of specifications and requirements
|
||||
- **AND** shows number of active changes in progress
|
||||
- **AND** shows number of completed changes
|
||||
- **AND** shows overall task progress percentage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Empty project summary
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** no specs or changes exist
|
||||
- **THEN** summary shows zero counts for all metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Active Changes Display
|
||||
|
||||
The dashboard SHALL show active changes with visual progress indicators.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Active changes with progress bars
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** there are in-progress changes with tasks
|
||||
- **THEN** system displays each change with change name left-aligned
|
||||
- **AND** visual progress bar using Unicode characters
|
||||
- **AND** percentage completion on the right
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: No active changes
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** all changes are completed or no changes exist
|
||||
- **THEN** active changes section is omitted from display
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Completed Changes Display
|
||||
|
||||
The dashboard SHALL list completed changes in a separate section.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Completed changes listing
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** there are completed changes (all tasks done)
|
||||
- **THEN** system shows them with checkmark indicators in a dedicated section
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Mixed completion states
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** some changes are complete and others active
|
||||
- **THEN** system separates them into appropriate sections
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Specifications Display
|
||||
|
||||
The dashboard SHALL display specifications sorted by requirement count.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Specs listing with counts
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** specifications exist in the project
|
||||
- **THEN** system shows specs sorted by requirement count (descending) with count labels
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Specs with parsing errors
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** a spec file cannot be parsed
|
||||
- **THEN** system includes it with 0 requirement count
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Visual Formatting
|
||||
|
||||
The dashboard SHALL use consistent visual formatting with colors and symbols.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Color coding
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** dashboard elements are displayed
|
||||
- **THEN** system uses cyan for specification items
|
||||
- **AND** yellow for active changes
|
||||
- **AND** green for completed items
|
||||
- **AND** dim gray for supplementary text
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Progress bar rendering
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** displaying progress bars
|
||||
- **THEN** system uses filled blocks (█) for completed portions and light blocks (░) for remaining
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
The view command SHALL handle errors gracefully.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: File system errors
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** file system operations fail
|
||||
- **THEN** system continues with available data and omits inaccessible items
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Invalid data structures
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** specs or changes have invalid format
|
||||
- **THEN** system skips invalid items and continues rendering
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Phase
|
||||
- [x] Research existing list command implementation
|
||||
- [x] Design dashboard layout and information architecture
|
||||
- [x] Choose appropriate command verb (`view`)
|
||||
- [x] Define visual elements (progress bars, colors, layout)
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Implementation
|
||||
- [x] Create ViewCommand class in `/src/core/view.ts`
|
||||
- [x] Implement getChangesData method for fetching change information
|
||||
- [x] Implement getSpecsData method for fetching spec information
|
||||
- [x] Implement displaySummary method for summary metrics
|
||||
- [x] Add progress bar visualization with Unicode characters
|
||||
- [x] Implement color coding using chalk
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration
|
||||
- [x] Import ViewCommand in CLI index
|
||||
- [x] Register `openspec view` command with commander
|
||||
- [x] Add proper error handling and ora spinner integration
|
||||
- [x] Ensure command appears in help documentation
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Processing
|
||||
- [x] Reuse TaskProgress utilities for change progress
|
||||
- [x] Integrate MarkdownParser for spec requirement counting
|
||||
- [x] Handle async operations for file system access
|
||||
- [x] Sort specifications by requirement count
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing and Validation
|
||||
- [x] Build project successfully with new command
|
||||
- [x] Test command with sample data
|
||||
- [x] Verify correct requirement counts match list --specs
|
||||
- [x] Test progress bar display for various completion states
|
||||
- [x] Run existing test suite to ensure no regressions
|
||||
- [x] Verify TypeScript compilation with no errors
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation
|
||||
- [x] Add command description in CLI help
|
||||
- [x] Create change proposal documentation
|
||||
- [x] Update README with view command example (if needed)
|
||||
- [x] Add view command to user documentation (if exists)
|
||||
|
||||
## Polish
|
||||
- [x] Ensure consistent formatting and alignment
|
||||
- [x] Add helpful footer text referencing list commands
|
||||
- [x] Optimize for terminal width considerations
|
||||
- [x] Review and refine color choices for accessibility
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
# Add AGENTS.md Standard Support To Init/Update
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- Teach `openspec init` to manage a root-level `AGENTS.md` file using the same marker system as `CLAUDE.md`.
|
||||
- Allow `openspec update` to refresh or scaffold that root `AGENTS.md` so AGENTS-compatible tools always receive current instructions.
|
||||
- Keep the existing `openspec/AGENTS.md` template as the canonical source while ensuring assistants that read `AGENTS.md` opt-in instructions get the latest guidance automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
The README now points teams to AGENTS.md-compatible assistants, but the CLI only manages `CLAUDE.md`. Projects must hand-roll a root `AGENTS.md` file to benefit from the standard, and updates will drift unless maintainers remember to copy content manually. Extending `init` and `update` closes that gap so OpenSpec actually delivers on the promise of first-class AGENTS support.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal
|
||||
1. Extend the `openspec init` selection flow with an "AGENTS.md standard" option that creates or refreshes a root `AGENTS.md` file wrapped in OpenSpec markers, mirroring the existing CLAUDE integration.
|
||||
2. When generating the file, pull the managed content from the same template used in `openspec/AGENTS.md`, ensuring both locations stay in sync.
|
||||
3. Update `openspec update` so it always refreshes the root `AGENTS.md` (creating it if missing) alongside `openspec/AGENTS.md` and any other configured assistants.
|
||||
4. Document the new behavior in CLI specs and verify marker handling (no duplicates, preserve user content outside the block) with tests for both commands.
|
||||
|
||||
## Out of Scope
|
||||
- Adding additional AGENTS-specific prompts or workflows beyond the shared instructions block.
|
||||
- Non-interactive flags or bulk configuration for multiple standards in one run.
|
||||
- Broader restructuring of how templates are stored or loaded.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Mitigations
|
||||
- **Risk:** Accidentally overwriting user-edited content surrounding the managed block.
|
||||
- **Mitigation:** Reuse the existing marker-update helper shared with `CLAUDE.md`, and add tests that cover files containing custom text before and after the block.
|
||||
- **Risk:** Divergence between `openspec/AGENTS.md` and the root file.
|
||||
- **Mitigation:** Source the root file content from the canonical template rather than duplicating strings inline.
|
||||
- **Risk:** Confusion about when the file is created.
|
||||
- **Mitigation:** Log creation vs update, and ensure help text references the AGENTS option during `init`.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: AI Tool Configuration
|
||||
The command SHALL configure AI coding assistants with OpenSpec instructions based on user selection.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Prompting for AI tool selection
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** run
|
||||
- **THEN** prompt user to select AI tools to configure:
|
||||
- Claude Code (✅ OpenSpec custom slash commands available)
|
||||
- Cursor (✅ OpenSpec custom slash commands available)
|
||||
- AGENTS.md (works with Codex, Amp, Copilot, …)
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: AI Tool Configuration Details
|
||||
The command SHALL properly configure selected AI tools with OpenSpec-specific instructions using a marker system.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Configuring Claude Code
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** Claude Code is selected
|
||||
- **THEN** create or update `CLAUDE.md` in the project root directory (not inside openspec/)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Configuring AGENTS standard
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** the AGENTS.md standard is selected
|
||||
- **THEN** create or update `AGENTS.md` in the project root directory (not inside openspec/)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Creating new CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** CLAUDE.md does not exist
|
||||
- **THEN** create new file with OpenSpec content wrapped in markers:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
|
||||
# OpenSpec Project
|
||||
|
||||
This document provides instructions for AI coding assistants on how to use OpenSpec conventions for spec-driven development. Follow these rules precisely when working on OpenSpec-enabled projects.
|
||||
|
||||
This project uses OpenSpec for spec-driven development. Specifications are the source of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
See @openspec/AGENTS.md for detailed conventions and guidelines.
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Creating new AGENTS.md
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** AGENTS.md does not exist in the project root
|
||||
- **THEN** create new file with OpenSpec content wrapped in markers using the same template as CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating existing CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** CLAUDE.md already exists
|
||||
- **THEN** preserve all existing content
|
||||
- **AND** insert OpenSpec content at the beginning of the file using markers
|
||||
- **AND** ensure markers don't duplicate if they already exist
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating existing AGENTS.md
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** AGENTS.md already exists in the project root
|
||||
- **THEN** preserve all existing content
|
||||
- **AND** ensure the OpenSpec-managed block at the beginning of the file is refreshed without duplicating markers
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Managing content with markers
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** using the marker system
|
||||
- **THEN** use `<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` to mark the beginning of managed content
|
||||
- **AND** use `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->` to mark the end of managed content
|
||||
- **AND** allow OpenSpec to update its content without affecting user customizations
|
||||
- **AND** preserve all content outside the markers intact
|
||||
|
||||
WHY use markers:
|
||||
- Users may have existing CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md instructions they want to keep
|
||||
- OpenSpec can update its instructions in future versions
|
||||
- Clear boundary between OpenSpec-managed and user-managed content
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Update Behavior
|
||||
The update command SHALL update OpenSpec instruction files to the latest templates in a team-friendly manner.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Running update command
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec update`
|
||||
- **THEN** the command SHALL:
|
||||
- Check if the `openspec` directory exists
|
||||
- Replace `openspec/AGENTS.md` with the latest template (complete replacement)
|
||||
- Create or refresh a root-level `AGENTS.md` file using the managed marker block (create if missing)
|
||||
- Update **only existing** AI tool configuration files (e.g., CLAUDE.md)
|
||||
- Check each registered AI tool configurator
|
||||
- For each configurator, check if its file exists
|
||||
- Update only files that already exist using their markers
|
||||
- Preserve user content outside markers
|
||||
- Display success message listing updated files
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Tool-Agnostic Updates
|
||||
The update command SHALL handle file updates in a predictable and safe manner while respecting team tool choices.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating files
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** updating files
|
||||
- **THEN** completely replace `openspec/AGENTS.md` with the latest template
|
||||
- **AND** create or update the root-level `AGENTS.md` using the OpenSpec markers
|
||||
- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed blocks in **existing** AI tool files using markers
|
||||
- **AND** use the default directory name `openspec`
|
||||
- **AND** be idempotent (repeated runs have no additional effect)
|
||||
- **AND** respect team members' AI tool choices by not creating additional tool files beyond the root `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Core Files Always Updated
|
||||
The update command SHALL always update the core OpenSpec files and display an ASCII-safe success message.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Successful update
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** the update completes successfully
|
||||
- **THEN** replace `openspec/AGENTS.md` with the latest template
|
||||
- **AND** ensure the root-level `AGENTS.md` matches the latest template via the marker block
|
||||
- **AND** update existing AI tool configuration files within markers
|
||||
- **AND** display the message: "Updated OpenSpec instructions"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Extend Init Workflow
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Add an "AGENTS.md standard" option to the `openspec init` tool-selection prompt, respecting the existing UI conventions.
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Generate or refresh a root-level `AGENTS.md` file using the OpenSpec markers when that option is selected, sourcing content from the canonical template.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Enhance Update Command
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Ensure `openspec update` writes the root `AGENTS.md` from the latest template (creating it if missing) alongside `openspec/AGENTS.md`.
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Update success messaging and logging to reflect creation vs refresh of the AGENTS standard file.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Shared Template Handling
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Refactor template utilities if necessary so both commands reuse the same content without duplication.
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Add automated tests covering init/update flows for projects with and without an existing `AGENTS.md`, ensuring markers behave correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Documentation
|
||||
- [x] 4.1 Update CLI specs and user-facing docs to describe AGENTS standard support.
|
||||
- [x] 4.2 Run `openspec validate add-agents-md-config --strict` and document any notable behavior changes.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Allow Additional AI Tool Initialization After Setup
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- Let `openspec init` configure new AI coding tools for projects that already contain an OpenSpec structure.
|
||||
- Keep the initialization flow safe by skipping structure creation and only generating files for tools the user explicitly selects.
|
||||
- Provide clear feedback so users know which tool files were added versus already present.
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
Today `openspec init` exits with an error once an `openspec/` directory exists. That protects the directory layout, but it blocks
|
||||
teams that start with one assistant (for example, Claude Code) and later want to add another such as Cursor. They have to create
|
||||
those files by hand or rerun `init` in a clean clone, which undermines the "easy onboarding" promise. Letting the command extend
|
||||
an existing installation keeps the workflow consistent and avoids manual file management.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal
|
||||
1. Detect an existing OpenSpec structure at the start of `openspec init` and branch into an "extend" mode instead of exiting.
|
||||
- Announce that the base structure already exists and that the command will only manage AI tool configuration files.
|
||||
- Keep the existing guard for directories or files we must not overwrite.
|
||||
2. Present the usual AI tool selection prompt even in extend mode, showing which tools are already configured.
|
||||
- Skip disabled options that remain "coming soon".
|
||||
- Mark already configured tools as such so users know whether selecting them will refresh or add files.
|
||||
3. When the user selects additional tools, generate the same initialization files that a fresh run would create (e.g., Cursor
|
||||
workspace files) while leaving untouched tools intact apart from marker-managed sections.
|
||||
- Do nothing when the user selects no new tools and keep the previous error messaging to avoid silently succeeding.
|
||||
4. Summarize the outcome (created, refreshed, skipped) before exiting with code 0 when work was performed.
|
||||
- Include friendly guidance that future updates to shared content still come from `openspec update`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Out of Scope
|
||||
- Changing how `openspec update` discovers or updates AI tool files.
|
||||
- Supporting brand-new AI tools beyond those already wired into the CLI.
|
||||
- Adding non-interactive flags for selecting multiple tools in one run (follow-up if needed).
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Mitigations
|
||||
- **User confusion about extend mode** → Explicitly log what will happen before prompting and summarise results afterward.
|
||||
- **Accidental overwrites** → Continue using marker-based updates and skip files unless the user chooses that tool.
|
||||
- **Inconsistent state if init fails mid-run** → Reuse existing rollback/transaction logic so partial writes clean up.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Safety Checks
|
||||
The command SHALL perform safety checks to prevent overwriting existing structures and ensure proper permissions.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Detecting existing initialization
|
||||
- **WHEN** the `openspec/` directory already exists
|
||||
- **THEN** inform the user that OpenSpec is already initialized, skip recreating the base structure, and enter an extend mode
|
||||
- **AND** continue to the AI tool selection step so additional tools can be configured
|
||||
- **AND** display the existing-initialization error message only when the user declines to add any AI tools
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Interactive Mode
|
||||
The command SHALL provide an interactive menu for AI tool selection with clear navigation instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Displaying interactive menu
|
||||
- **WHEN** run in fresh or extend mode
|
||||
- **THEN** present a looping select menu that lets users toggle tools with Enter and finish via a "Done" option
|
||||
- **AND** label already configured tools with "(already configured)" while keeping disabled options marked "coming soon"
|
||||
- **AND** change the prompt copy in extend mode to "Which AI tools would you like to add or refresh?"
|
||||
- **AND** display inline instructions clarifying that Enter toggles a tool and selecting "Done" confirms the list
|
||||
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Additional AI Tool Initialization
|
||||
`openspec init` SHALL allow users to add configuration files for new AI coding assistants after the initial setup.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Configuring an extra tool after initial setup
|
||||
- **GIVEN** an `openspec/` directory already exists and at least one AI tool file is present
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user runs `openspec init` and selects a different supported AI tool
|
||||
- **THEN** generate that tool's configuration files with OpenSpec markers the same way as during first-time initialization
|
||||
- **AND** leave existing tool configuration files unchanged except for managed sections that need refreshing
|
||||
- **AND** exit with code 0 and display a success summary highlighting the newly added tool files
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Success Output Enhancements
|
||||
`openspec init` SHALL summarize tool actions when initialization or extend mode completes.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Showing tool summary
|
||||
- **WHEN** the command completes successfully
|
||||
- **THEN** display a categorized summary of tools that were created, refreshed, or skipped (including already-configured skips)
|
||||
- **AND** personalize the "Next steps" header using the names of the selected tools, defaulting to a generic label when none remain
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Exit Code Adjustments
|
||||
`openspec init` SHALL treat extend mode with no selected tools as a guarded error.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Preventing empty extend runs
|
||||
- **WHEN** OpenSpec is already initialized and the user selects no additional tools
|
||||
- **THEN** exit with code 1 after showing the existing-initialization guidance message
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Extend Init Guard
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Detect existing OpenSpec structures at the start of `openspec init` and enter an extend mode instead of failing.
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Log that core scaffolding will be skipped while still protecting against missing write permissions.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Update AI Tool Selection
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Present AI tool choices even in extend mode, indicating which tools are already configured.
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Ensure disabled "coming soon" tools remain non-selectable.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Generate Additional Tool Files
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Create configuration files for newly selected tools while leaving untouched tools unaffected apart from marker-managed sections.
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Summarize created, refreshed, and skipped tools before exiting with the appropriate code.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Verification
|
||||
- [x] 4.1 Add tests covering rerunning `openspec init` to add another tool and the scenario where the user declines to add anything.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
||||
# Add Slash Command Support for Coding Agents
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- Enable OpenSpec to generate and update custom slash commands for supported coding agents (Claude Code and Cursor).
|
||||
- Provide three slash commands aligned with OpenSpec's workflow: proposal (start a change proposal), apply (implement), and archive.
|
||||
- Share slash command templating between agents to make future extensions simple.
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
Developers use different coding agents and editors. Having consistent slash commands across tools for the OpenSpec workflow reduces friction and ensures a standard way to trigger the workflow. Supporting both Claude Code and Cursor now lays a foundation for future agents that introduce slash command features.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal
|
||||
1. During `openspec init`, when a user selects a supported tool, generate slash command configuration for three OpenSpec workflow stages:
|
||||
- Claude (namespaced): `/openspec/proposal`, `/openspec/apply`, `/openspec/archive`.
|
||||
- Cursor (flat, prefixed): `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive`.
|
||||
- Semantics:
|
||||
- Create – scaffold a change (ID, `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, delta specs); validate strictly.
|
||||
- Apply – implement an approved change; complete tasks; validate strictly.
|
||||
- Archive – archive after deployment; update specs if needed.
|
||||
- Each command file MUST embed concise, step-by-step instructions sourced from `openspec/README.md` (see Template Content section).
|
||||
2. Store slash command files per tool:
|
||||
- Claude Code: `.claude/commands/openspec/{proposal,apply,archive}.md`
|
||||
- Cursor: `.cursor/commands/{openspec-proposal,openspec-apply,openspec-archive}.md`
|
||||
- Ensure nested directories are created.
|
||||
3. Command file format and metadata:
|
||||
- Use Markdown with optional YAML frontmatter for tool metadata (name/title, description, category/tags) when supported by the tool.
|
||||
- Place OpenSpec markers around the body only, never inside frontmatter.
|
||||
- Keep the visible slash name, file name, and any frontmatter `name`/`id` consistently aligned (e.g., `proposal`, `openspec-proposal`).
|
||||
- Namespacing: categorize these under “OpenSpec” and prefer unique IDs (e.g., `openspec-proposal`) to avoid collisions.
|
||||
4. Centralize templates: define command bodies once and reuse across tools; apply minimal per-tool wrappers (frontmatter, categories, filenames).
|
||||
5. During `openspec update`, refresh only existing slash command files (per-file basis) within markers; do not create missing files or new tools.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Ideas
|
||||
- Introduce `SlashCommandConfigurator` to manage multiple files per tool.
|
||||
- Expose targets rather than a single `configFileName` (e.g., `getTargets(): Array<{ path: string; kind: 'slash'; id: string }>`).
|
||||
- Provide `generateAll(projectPath, openspecDir)` for init and `updateExisting(projectPath, openspecDir)` for update.
|
||||
- Per-tool adapters add only frontmatter and pathing; bodies come from shared templates.
|
||||
- Templates live in `TemplateManager` with helpers that extract concise, authoritative snippets from `openspec/README.md`.
|
||||
- Update flow logs per-file results so users see exactly which slash files were refreshed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Marker Placement
|
||||
- Markers MUST wrap only the Markdown body contents:
|
||||
- Frontmatter (if present) goes first.
|
||||
- Then `<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` … body … `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->`.
|
||||
- Avoid inserting markers into the YAML block to prevent parse errors.
|
||||
|
||||
### Idempotency and Creation Rules
|
||||
- `init`: create all three files for the chosen tool(s) once; subsequent `init` runs are no-ops for existing files.
|
||||
- `update`: refresh only files that exist; skip missing ones without creating new files.
|
||||
- Directory creation for `.claude/commands/openspec/` and `.cursor/commands/` is the configurator’s responsibility.
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Naming & UX
|
||||
- Claude Code: use namespacing in the slash itself for readability and grouping: `/openspec/proposal`, `/openspec/apply`, `/openspec/archive`.
|
||||
- Cursor: use flat names with an `openspec-` prefix: `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive`. Group via `category: OpenSpec` when supported.
|
||||
- Consistency: align file names, visible slash names, and any frontmatter `id` (e.g., `id: openspec-apply`).
|
||||
- Migration: do not rename existing commands during `update`; apply new naming only on `init` (or via an explicit migrate step).
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
- Validate exact metadata/frontmatter supported by each tool version; if unsupported, omit frontmatter and ship Markdown body only.
|
||||
- Confirm the final Cursor command file location for the targeted versions; fall back to Markdown-only if Cursor does not parse frontmatter.
|
||||
- Evaluate additional commands beyond the initial three (e.g., `/show-change`, `/validate-all`) based on user demand.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives
|
||||
- Hard-code slash command text per tool (rejected: duplicates content; increases maintenance).
|
||||
- Delay Cursor support until its config stabilizes (partial accept): gate Cursor behind a feature flag until verified in real environments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks
|
||||
- Tool configuration formats may change, requiring updates to wrappers/frontmatter.
|
||||
- Incorrect paths or categories can hide commands; add path existence checks and clear logging.
|
||||
- Marker misuse (inside frontmatter) can break parsing; enforce placement rules in tests.
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Work
|
||||
- Support additional editors/agents that expose slash command APIs.
|
||||
- Allow users to customize command names and categories during `openspec init`.
|
||||
- Provide a dedicated command to regenerate slash commands without running full `update`.
|
||||
|
||||
## File Format Examples
|
||||
The following examples illustrate expected structure. If a tool does not support frontmatter, omit the YAML block and keep only the markers + body.
|
||||
|
||||
### Claude Code: `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: OpenSpec: Proposal
|
||||
description: Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly.
|
||||
category: OpenSpec
|
||||
tags: [openspec, change]
|
||||
---
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
|
||||
...command body from shared template...
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Slash invocation: `/openspec/proposal` (namespaced)
|
||||
|
||||
### Cursor: `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: /openspec-proposal
|
||||
id: openspec-proposal
|
||||
category: OpenSpec
|
||||
description: Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly.
|
||||
---
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
|
||||
...command body from shared template...
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Slash invocation: `/openspec-proposal` (flat, prefixed)
|
||||
|
||||
## Template Content
|
||||
Templates should be brief, actionable, and sourced from `openspec/README.md` to avoid duplication. Each command body includes:
|
||||
- Guardrails: ask 1–2 clarifying questions if needed; follow minimal-complexity rules; use `pnpm` for Node projects.
|
||||
- Step list tailored to the workflow stage (proposal, apply, archive), including strict validation commands.
|
||||
- Pointers to `openspec show`, `openspec list`, and troubleshooting tips when validation fails.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Strategy
|
||||
- Golden snapshots for generated files per tool (frontmatter + markers + body).
|
||||
- Partial presence tests: if 1–2 files exist, `update` only refreshes those and does not create missing ones.
|
||||
- Marker placement tests: ensure markers never appear inside frontmatter; cover missing/duplicated marker recovery behavior.
|
||||
- Logging tests: `update` reports per-file updates for slash commands.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
|
||||
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.opencode/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/commands/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
+22
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
|
||||
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cursor
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.cursor/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for OpenCode
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.opencode/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Missing slash command file
|
||||
- **WHEN** a tool lacks a slash command file
|
||||
- **THEN** do not create a new file during update
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Templates and Configurators
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Create shared templates for the Proposal, Apply, and Archive commands with instructions for each workflow stage from `openspec/README.md`.
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Implement a `SlashCommandConfigurator` base and tool-specific configurators for Claude Code and Cursor.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Claude Code Integration
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Generate `.claude/commands/openspec/{proposal,apply,archive}.md` during `openspec init` using shared templates.
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Update existing `.claude/commands/openspec/*` files during `openspec update`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Cursor Integration
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Generate `.cursor/commands/{openspec-proposal,openspec-apply,openspec-archive}.md` during `openspec init` using shared templates.
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Update existing `.cursor/commands/*` files during `openspec update`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Verification
|
||||
- [x] 4.1 Add tests verifying slash command files are created and updated correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. OpenCode Integration
|
||||
- [x] 5.1 Generate `.opencode/commands/{openspec-proposal,openspec-apply,openspec-archive}.md` during `openspec init` using shared templates.
|
||||
- [x] 5.2 Update existing `.opencode/commands/*` files during `openspec update`.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
Recent cross-shell regressions for `openspec` commands revealed that our existing unit/integration tests do not exercise the packaged CLI or shell-specific behavior. The prior attempt at Vitest spawn tests stalled because it coupled e2e coverage with `pnpm pack` installs, which fail in network-restricted environments. With those findings incorporated, we now need an approved plan to realign the work.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
- Adopt a phased strategy that first stabilizes direct spawn testing of the built CLI (`node dist/cli/index.js`) using lightweight fixtures and a shared `runCLI` helper.
|
||||
- Expand coverage once the spawn harness is stable, keeping the initial matrix focused on bash jobs for Linux/macOS and `pwsh` on Windows while exercising both the direct `node dist/cli/index.js` invocation and the bin shim with non-TTY defaults and captured diagnostics.
|
||||
- Treat packaging/install validation as an optional CI safeguard: when a runner has registry access, run a simple pnpm-based pack→install→smoke-test flow; otherwise document it as out of scope while closing remaining hardening items.
|
||||
- Close out the remaining cross-shell hardening items: ensure `.gitattributes` covers packaged assets, enforce executable bits for CLI shims during CI, and finish the pending SIGINT handling improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
- Tests: add `test/cli-e2e` spawn suite, create the shared `runCLI` helper, and adjust `vitest.setup.ts` as needed.
|
||||
- Tooling: update GitHub Actions workflows with the lightweight matrix above and (optionally) a packaging install check where network is available.
|
||||
- Docs: note phase progress and any limitations inline in this proposal (or the relevant spec) so future phases have clear context.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1 Status
|
||||
- Shared `test/helpers/run-cli.ts` guarantees the CLI bundle exists before spawning and enforces non-TTY defaults for every invocation.
|
||||
- New `test/cli-e2e/basic.test.ts` covers `--help`, `--version`, a successful `validate --all --json`, and an unknown-item error path against the `tmp-init` fixture copy.
|
||||
- Legacy top-level `validate` exec tests now rely on `runCLI`, avoiding manual `execSync` usage while keeping their fixture authoring intact.
|
||||
- CI matrix groundwork is in place (bash on Linux/macOS, pwsh on Windows) so the spawn suite runs the same way the helper does across supported shells.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
## 1. Phase 1 – Stabilize Local Spawn Coverage
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Add `test/helpers/run-cli.ts` that ensures the build runs once and executes `node dist/cli/index.js` with non-TTY defaults; update `vitest.setup.ts` to reuse the shared build step.
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Seed `test/cli-e2e` using the minimal fixture set (`tmp-init` or copy) to cover help/version, a happy-path `validate`, and a representative error flow via the new helper.
|
||||
- [x] 1.3 Migrate the highest-value existing CLI exec tests (e.g., validate) onto `runCLI` and summarize Phase 1 coverage in this proposal for the next phase.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Phase 2 – Expand Cross-Shell Validation
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Exercise both entry points (`node dist/cli/index.js`, `bin/openspec.js`) in the spawn suite and add diagnostics for shell/OS context.
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Extend GitHub Actions to run the spawn suite on bash jobs for Linux/macOS and a `pwsh` job on Windows; capture shell/OS diagnostics and note follow-ups for additional shells.
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -21,5 +21,5 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Optional (Not Needed Now)
|
||||
- [x] 5.1 Add optional root param to discovery helpers (default process.cwd())
|
||||
- [ ] 5.2 Consider threading root through command constructors if ever required
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
The current `openspec init` flow assumes a single assistant selection and stops once an OpenSpec structure already exists. That makes onboarding feel rigid: teams cannot configure multiple tools in one pass, they do not learn which files were refreshed, and the success copy always references Claude even when other assistants are involved.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
- Allow selecting multiple assistants during `openspec init`, including refreshing existing configurations in a single run.
|
||||
- Provide richer onboarding copy that summarizes which tool files were created or refreshed and guides users on next steps for each assistant.
|
||||
- Align generated AI-instruction content and specs so CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md share the same OpenSpec guidance.
|
||||
- Update specs and tests to cover the multi-select prompt, improved summaries, and extend-mode coordination.
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
- Specs: `cli-init`
|
||||
- Code: `src/core/init.ts`, `src/core/config.ts`, `src/core/templates/*`, `src/core/configurators/*`
|
||||
- Tests: `test/core/init.test.ts`, `test/core/update.test.ts`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: AI Tool Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
The command SHALL configure AI coding assistants with OpenSpec instructions based on user selection.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Prompting for AI tool selection
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** run interactively
|
||||
- **THEN** prompt the user with "Which AI tools do you use?" using a multi-select menu
|
||||
- **AND** list every available tool with a checkbox:
|
||||
- Claude Code (creates or refreshes CLAUDE.md and slash commands)
|
||||
- Cursor (creates or refreshes `.cursor/commands/*` slash commands)
|
||||
- AGENTS.md standard (creates or refreshes AGENTS.md with OpenSpec markers)
|
||||
- **AND** show "(already configured)" beside tools whose managed files exist so users understand selections will refresh content
|
||||
- **AND** treat disabled tools as "coming soon" and keep them unselectable
|
||||
- **AND** allow confirming with Enter after selecting one or more tools
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: AI Tool Configuration Details
|
||||
|
||||
The command SHALL properly configure selected AI tools with OpenSpec-specific instructions using a marker system.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Configuring Claude Code
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** Claude Code is selected
|
||||
- **THEN** create or update `CLAUDE.md` in the project root directory (not inside openspec/)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Creating new CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** CLAUDE.md does not exist
|
||||
- **THEN** create new file with OpenSpec content wrapped in markers:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
|
||||
# OpenSpec Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
Instructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development.
|
||||
|
||||
## TL;DR Quick Checklist
|
||||
- Search existing work: `openspec spec list --long`, `openspec list`
|
||||
- Decide scope: new capability vs modify existing capability
|
||||
- Pick a unique `change-id`: verb-led kebab-case (`add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`)
|
||||
- Scaffold: `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, and spec deltas
|
||||
- Validate with `openspec validate [change-id] --strict`
|
||||
- Request approval before implementation
|
||||
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating existing CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** CLAUDE.md already exists
|
||||
- **THEN** preserve all existing content
|
||||
- **AND** insert OpenSpec content at the beginning of the file using markers
|
||||
- **AND** ensure markers don't duplicate if they already exist
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Managing content with markers
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** using the marker system
|
||||
- **THEN** use `<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` to mark the beginning of managed content
|
||||
- **AND** use `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->` to mark the end of managed content
|
||||
- **AND** allow OpenSpec to update its content without affecting user customizations
|
||||
- **AND** preserve all content outside the markers intact
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Interactive Mode
|
||||
|
||||
The command SHALL provide an interactive menu for AI tool selection with clear navigation instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Displaying interactive menu
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** run
|
||||
- **THEN** prompt the user with: "Which AI tools do you use?"
|
||||
- **AND** show a checkbox-based multi-select menu with available tools (Claude Code, Cursor, AGENTS.md standard)
|
||||
- **AND** show disabled options as "coming soon" (not selectable)
|
||||
- **AND** display inline help indicating Space toggles selections and Enter confirms
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Navigating the menu
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user is in the menu
|
||||
- **THEN** allow arrow keys to move between options
|
||||
- **AND** allow Spacebar to toggle the highlighted option
|
||||
- **AND** allow Enter key to confirm all current selections
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Success Output
|
||||
|
||||
The command SHALL provide clear, actionable next steps upon successful initialization.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Displaying success message
|
||||
|
||||
- **WHEN** initialization completes successfully
|
||||
- **THEN** display a success banner followed by actionable prompts tailored to the selected tools
|
||||
- **AND** summarize which assistant files were created versus refreshed (e.g., `CLAUDE.md (created)`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md (refreshed)`)
|
||||
- **AND** include copy-pasteable onboarding prompts for each configured assistant, replacing placeholder text ([YOUR FEATURE HERE]) with real guidance to customize
|
||||
- **AND** reference AGENTS.md-compatible assistants when no tool-specific file exists (e.g., when only AGENTS.md standard is selected)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
## 1. Planning & Spec Updates
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Confirm overlap with `add-multi-agent-init` and coordinate extend-mode flow
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Update `openspec/specs/cli-init/spec.md` to capture multi-select onboarding requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Implementation
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Add multi-select support to the `openspec init` prompt, including indicators for existing tool configs
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Enhance success messaging to summarize created/refreshed assets per tool
|
||||
- [x] 2.3 Ensure shared instruction template is applied consistently (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, slash commands)
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Quality
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Expand unit tests for init/update flows covering multi-select and summaries
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Perform `openspec init` smoke test in a temp directory (document output)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
||||
# Remove Diff Command
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The `openspec diff` command adds unnecessary complexity to the OpenSpec CLI for several reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Redundant functionality**: The `openspec show` command already provides comprehensive visualization of changes through structured JSON output and markdown rendering
|
||||
2. **Maintenance burden**: The diff command requires a separate dependency (jest-diff) and additional code complexity (~227 lines)
|
||||
3. **Limited value**: Developers can achieve better diff visualization using existing tools:
|
||||
- Git diff for actual file changes
|
||||
- The `show` command for structured change viewing
|
||||
- Standard diff utilities for comparing spec files directly
|
||||
4. **Inconsistent with verb-noun pattern**: The command doesn't follow the preferred verb-first command structure that other commands are migrating to
|
||||
|
||||
## Solution
|
||||
|
||||
Remove the `openspec diff` command entirely and guide users to more appropriate alternatives:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **For viewing change content**: Use `openspec show <change-name>` which provides:
|
||||
- Structured JSON output with `--json` flag
|
||||
- Markdown rendering for human-readable format
|
||||
- Delta-only views with `--deltas-only` flag
|
||||
- Full spec content visualization
|
||||
|
||||
2. **For comparing files**: Use standard tools:
|
||||
- `git diff` for version control comparisons
|
||||
- System diff utilities for file-by-file comparisons
|
||||
- IDE diff viewers for visual comparisons
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
- **Reduced complexity**: Removes ~227 lines of code and the jest-diff dependency
|
||||
- **Clearer user journey**: Directs users to the canonical `show` command for viewing changes
|
||||
- **Lower maintenance**: Fewer commands to maintain and test
|
||||
- **Better alignment**: Focuses on the core OpenSpec workflow without redundant features
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Files to Remove
|
||||
- `/src/core/diff.ts` - The entire diff command implementation
|
||||
- `/openspec/specs/cli-diff/spec.md` - The diff command specification
|
||||
|
||||
### Files to Update
|
||||
- `/src/cli/index.ts` - Remove diff command registration (lines 8, 84-96)
|
||||
- `/package.json` - Remove jest-diff dependency
|
||||
- `/README.md` - Remove diff command documentation
|
||||
- `/openspec/README.md` - Remove diff command references
|
||||
- Various documentation files mentioning `openspec diff`
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration Guide for Users
|
||||
|
||||
Users currently using `openspec diff` should transition to:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Before
|
||||
openspec diff add-feature
|
||||
|
||||
# After - view the change proposal
|
||||
openspec show add-feature
|
||||
|
||||
# After - view only the deltas
|
||||
openspec show add-feature --json --deltas-only
|
||||
|
||||
# After - use git for file comparisons
|
||||
git diff openspec/specs openspec/changes/add-feature/specs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks
|
||||
|
||||
- **User disruption**: Existing users may have workflows depending on the diff command
|
||||
- Mitigation: Provide clear migration guide and deprecation period
|
||||
|
||||
- **Loss of visual diff**: The colored, unified diff format will no longer be available
|
||||
- Mitigation: Users can use git diff or other tools for visual comparisons
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- Successful removal with no broken dependencies
|
||||
- Documentation updated to reflect the change
|
||||
- Tests passing without the diff command
|
||||
- Reduced package size from removing jest-diff dependency
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
# Remove Diff Command - Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Remove Core Implementation
|
||||
- [x] Delete `/src/core/diff.ts`
|
||||
- [x] Remove DiffCommand import from `/src/cli/index.ts`
|
||||
- [x] Remove diff command registration from CLI
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Remove Specifications
|
||||
- [x] Delete `/openspec/specs/cli-diff/spec.md`
|
||||
- [x] Archive the spec for historical reference if needed
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Update Dependencies
|
||||
- [x] Remove jest-diff from package.json dependencies
|
||||
- [x] Run pnpm install to update lock file
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Update Documentation
|
||||
- [x] Update main README.md to remove diff command references
|
||||
- [x] Update openspec/README.md to remove diff command from command list
|
||||
- [x] Update CLAUDE.md template if it mentions diff command
|
||||
- [x] Update any example workflows that use diff command
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Update Related Files
|
||||
- [x] Search and update any remaining references to "openspec diff" in:
|
||||
- Template files
|
||||
- Test files (if any exist for diff command)
|
||||
- Archive documentation
|
||||
- Change proposals
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Testing
|
||||
- [x] Ensure all tests pass after removal
|
||||
- [x] Verify CLI help text no longer shows diff command
|
||||
- [x] Test that show command provides adequate replacement functionality
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Documentation of Alternative Workflows
|
||||
- [x] Document how to use `openspec show` for viewing changes
|
||||
- [x] Document how to use git diff for file comparisons
|
||||
- [x] Add migration guide to help text or documentation
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
# Change: Sort Active Changes by Progress
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
- The dashboard currently lists active changes in filesystem discovery order.
|
||||
- Users cannot quickly spot proposals that have not started or are nearly complete.
|
||||
- Inconsistent ordering between runs makes it harder to track progress when many changes exist.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal
|
||||
1. Update the Active Changes list in the dashboard to sort by percentage of completion in ascending order so 0% items show first.
|
||||
2. When two changes share the same completion percentage, break ties deterministically by change identifier (alphabetical).
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
- Highlights work that has not started yet, enabling quicker prioritization.
|
||||
- Provides consistent ordering across machines and repeated runs.
|
||||
- Keeps the dashboard compact while communicating the most important status signal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Mitigations
|
||||
- **Risk:** Sorting logic could regress rendering when progress data is missing.
|
||||
- **Mitigation:** Treat missing progress as 0% so items still surface and document behavior in tests.
|
||||
- **Risk:** Additional sorting could impact performance for large change sets.
|
||||
- **Mitigation:** The number of active changes is typically small; sorting a few entries is negligible.
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
- Dashboard output shows active changes ordered by ascending completion percentage with deterministic tie-breaking.
|
||||
- Unit coverage verifying the sort when percentages vary and when ties occur.
|
||||
+9
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Active Changes Display
|
||||
The dashboard SHALL show active changes with visual progress indicators.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Active changes ordered by completion percentage
|
||||
- **WHEN** multiple active changes are displayed with progress information
|
||||
- **THEN** list them sorted by completion percentage ascending so 0% items appear first
|
||||
- **AND** treat missing progress values as 0% for ordering
|
||||
- **AND** break ties by change identifier in ascending alphabetical order to keep output deterministic
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Dashboard Sorting Logic
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Update the Active Changes rendering to sort by completion percentage ascending.
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Treat missing progress as 0% and break ties alphabetically by change identifier.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Verification
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Add tests that cover different completion percentages and tie cases to confirm deterministic ordering.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
# Update Agent Instruction File Name
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
The agent instructions live in `openspec/README.md`, which clashes with conventional project README usage and creates confusion for tooling and contributors.
|
||||
|
||||
## Solution
|
||||
Rename the agent instruction file to `openspec/AGENTS.md` and update OpenSpec tooling to use the new filename:
|
||||
- `openspec init` generates `AGENTS.md` instead of `README.md`
|
||||
- Templates and code reference `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- Specifications and documentation are updated accordingly
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
- Clear separation from project documentation
|
||||
- Consistent naming with other agent instruction files
|
||||
- Simplifies tooling and project onboarding
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
- Rename instruction file and template
|
||||
- Update CLI commands (`init`, `update`) to read/write `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- Adjust specs and documentation to reference the new path
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks
|
||||
- Existing projects may still rely on `README.md`
|
||||
- Tooling may miss lingering references to the old filename
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
- `openspec init` creates `openspec/AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- `openspec update` refreshes `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- All specs reference `openspec/AGENTS.md`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Directory Creation
|
||||
The command SHALL create the complete OpenSpec directory structure with all required directories and files.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Creating OpenSpec structure
|
||||
- **WHEN** `openspec init` is executed
|
||||
- **THEN** create the following directory structure:
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── project.md
|
||||
├── AGENTS.md
|
||||
├── specs/
|
||||
└── changes/
|
||||
└── archive/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: File Generation
|
||||
The command SHALL generate required template files with appropriate content for immediate use.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating template files
|
||||
- **WHEN** initializing OpenSpec
|
||||
- **THEN** generate `AGENTS.md` containing complete OpenSpec instructions for AI assistants
|
||||
- **AND** generate `project.md` with project context template
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: AI Tool Configuration Details
|
||||
|
||||
The command SHALL properly configure selected AI tools with OpenSpec-specific instructions using a marker system.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Creating new CLAUDE.md
|
||||
- **WHEN** CLAUDE.md does not exist
|
||||
- **THEN** create new file with OpenSpec content wrapped in markers including reference to `@openspec/AGENTS.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Success Output
|
||||
|
||||
The command SHALL provide clear, actionable next steps upon successful initialization.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Displaying success message
|
||||
- **WHEN** initialization completes successfully
|
||||
- **THEN** include prompt: "Please explain the OpenSpec workflow from openspec/AGENTS.md and how I should work with you on this project"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Update Behavior
|
||||
The update command SHALL update OpenSpec instruction files to the latest templates in a team-friendly manner.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Running update command
|
||||
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec update`
|
||||
- **THEN** replace `openspec/AGENTS.md` with the latest template
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: File Handling
|
||||
The update command SHALL handle file updates in a predictable and safe manner.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating files
|
||||
- **WHEN** updating files
|
||||
- **THEN** completely replace `openspec/AGENTS.md` with the latest template
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Core Files Always Updated
|
||||
The update command SHALL always update the core OpenSpec files and display an ASCII-safe success message.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Successful update
|
||||
- **WHEN** the update completes successfully
|
||||
- **THEN** replace `openspec/AGENTS.md` with the latest template
|
||||
+27
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Project Structure
|
||||
An OpenSpec project SHALL maintain a consistent directory structure for specifications and changes.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Initializing project structure
|
||||
- **WHEN** an OpenSpec project is initialized
|
||||
- **THEN** it SHALL have this structure:
|
||||
```
|
||||
openspec/
|
||||
├── project.md # Project-specific context
|
||||
├── AGENTS.md # AI assistant instructions
|
||||
├── specs/ # Current deployed capabilities
|
||||
│ └── [capability]/ # Single, focused capability
|
||||
│ ├── spec.md # WHAT and WHY
|
||||
│ └── design.md # HOW (optional, for established patterns)
|
||||
└── changes/ # Proposed changes
|
||||
├── [change-name]/ # Descriptive change identifier
|
||||
│ ├── proposal.md # Why, what, and impact
|
||||
│ ├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist
|
||||
│ ├── design.md # Technical decisions (optional)
|
||||
│ └── specs/ # Complete future state
|
||||
│ └── [capability]/
|
||||
│ └── spec.md # Clean markdown (no diff syntax)
|
||||
└── archive/ # Completed changes
|
||||
└── YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
# Update Agent Instruction File Name - Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Rename Instruction File
|
||||
- [x] Rename `openspec/README.md` to `openspec/AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- [x] Update root references to new path
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Update Templates
|
||||
- [x] Rename `src/core/templates/readme-template.ts` to `agents-template.ts`
|
||||
- [x] Update exported constant from `readmeTemplate` to `agentsTemplate`
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Adjust CLI Commands
|
||||
- [x] Modify `openspec init` to generate `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- [x] Update `openspec update` to refresh `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- [x] Ensure CLAUDE.md markers link to `@openspec/AGENTS.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Update Specifications
|
||||
- [x] Modify `cli-init` spec to reference `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- [x] Modify `cli-update` spec to reference `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- [x] Modify `openspec-conventions` spec to include `AGENTS.md` in project structure
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Validation
|
||||
- [x] `pnpm test`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
# Update Markdown Parser CRLF Handling
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
Windows users report that `openspec validate` raises “Change must have a Why section” even when the section exists (see GitHub issue #77). The CLI currently splits markdown on `\n` and compares headers without stripping `\r`, so files saved with CRLF line endings keep a trailing carriage return in the header token. As a result the parser fails to detect `## Why`/`## What Changes`, triggering false validation errors and breaking the workflow on Windows-default editors.
|
||||
|
||||
## Solution
|
||||
- Normalize markdown content inside the parser so CRLF and lone-CR inputs are treated as `\n` before section detection, trimming any carriage returns from titles and content comparisons.
|
||||
- Reuse the normalized reader everywhere `MarkdownParser` is constructed to keep behavior consistent for validation, view, spec, and list flows.
|
||||
- Add regression coverage that reproduces the failure (unit test around `parseChange` and a CLI spawn/e2e test that writes a CRLF change then runs `openspec validate`).
|
||||
- Update the `cli-validate` spec to codify the expectation that required sections are recognized regardless of line-ending style.
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
- Restores correct validation behavior for Windows editors without requiring manual line-ending conversion.
|
||||
- Locks in the fix with targeted tests so future parser refactors keep cross-platform support.
|
||||
- Clarifies the spec so downstream work (e.g., cross-shell e2e plan) understands the non-negotiable behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks
|
||||
- Low: parser normalization touches shared code paths that parse specs and changes; need to ensure no regressions in other command consumers (mitigated by existing parser tests plus the new CRLF fixtures).
|
||||
|
||||
+9
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
## ADDED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Parser SHALL handle cross-platform line endings
|
||||
The markdown parser SHALL correctly identify sections regardless of line ending format (LF, CRLF, CR).
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Required sections parsed with CRLF line endings
|
||||
- **GIVEN** a change proposal markdown saved with CRLF line endings
|
||||
- **AND** the document contains `## Why` and `## What Changes`
|
||||
- **WHEN** running `openspec validate <change-id>`
|
||||
- **THEN** validation SHALL recognize the sections and NOT raise parsing errors
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
## 1. Guard the regression
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Add a unit test that feeds a CRLF change document into `MarkdownParser.parseChange` and asserts `Why`/`What Changes` are detected.
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Add a CLI spawn/e2e test that writes a CRLF change, runs `openspec validate`, and expects success.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Normalize parsing
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Normalize line endings when constructing `MarkdownParser` so headers and content comparisons ignore `\r`.
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Ensure all CLI entry points (validate, view, spec conversion) reuse the normalized parser path.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Document and verify
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Update the `cli-validate` spec with a scenario covering CRLF line endings.
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Run the parser and CLI test suites (`pnpm test`, relevant spawn tests) to confirm the fix.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
- Codex (the VS Code extension formerly known as Codeium Chat) exposes "slash commands" by reading Markdown prompt files from `~/.codex/prompts/`. Each file name becomes the `/command` users can run, with YAML frontmatter for metadata (`description`, `argument-hint`) and `$ARGUMENTS` to capture user input. The workflow screenshot shared by Kevin Kern ("Codex problem analyzer") shows the format OpenSpec should target so teams can invoke curated workflows straight from the chat palette.
|
||||
- Teams already rely on OpenSpec to manage the slash-command surface area for Claude, Cursor, OpenCode, Kilo Code, and Windsurf. Leaving Codex out forces them to manually copy/paste OpenSpec guardrails into `~/.codex/prompts/*.md`, which drifts quickly and undermines the "single source of truth" promise of the CLI.
|
||||
- Codex commands live outside the repository (under the user's home directory), so shipping an automated configurator that both scaffolds the prompts and keeps them refreshed via `openspec update` eliminates error-prone manual steps and keeps OpenSpec instructions synchronized across assistants.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
- Add Codex to the `openspec init` tool picker with the same "already configured" detection we use for other editors, wiring an implementation that writes managed Markdown prompts directly to Codex's global directory (`~/.codex/prompts` or `$CODEX_HOME/prompts`) with OpenSpec marker blocks.
|
||||
- Produce three Codex prompt files—`openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`—whose content mirrors the shared slash-command templates while using YAML frontmatter (`description` and `argument-hint` fields) and `$ARGUMENTS` to capture all arguments as a single string (matching the GitHub Copilot pattern and official Codex specification).
|
||||
- Document Codex's global-only discovery and that OpenSpec writes prompts directly to `~/.codex/prompts` (or `$CODEX_HOME/prompts`).
|
||||
- Teach `openspec update` to refresh existing Codex prompts in-place (and only when they already exist) in the global directory, updating both frontmatter and body.
|
||||
- Document Codex support alongside other slash-command integrations and add regression coverage that exercises init/update behaviour against a temporary global prompts directory via `CODEX_HOME`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
- Specs: `cli-init`, `cli-update`
|
||||
- Code: `src/core/config.ts`, `src/core/configurators/slash/*`, `src/core/templates/slash-command-templates.ts`, CLI tool summaries, docs
|
||||
- Tests: integration coverage for Codex prompt scaffolding and refresh logic
|
||||
- Docs: README and CHANGELOG entries announcing Codex slash-command support
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Spec Reference
|
||||
- `specs/cli-init/spec.md`
|
||||
- Requirements cover init UX, directory scaffolding, AI tool configuration, and the existing slash-command support for Claude Code, Cursor, and OpenCode.
|
||||
- Our `## MODIFIED` delta in `changes/.../specs/cli-init/spec.md` copies the full "Slash Command Configuration" requirement (header, description, and all scenarios) before appending the new Codex scenario so archiving will retain every prior scenario.
|
||||
- `specs/cli-update/spec.md`
|
||||
- Requirements define update preconditions, template refresh behavior, and slash-command refresh logic for Claude Code, Cursor, and OpenCode.
|
||||
- The corresponding delta preserves the entire "Slash Command Updates" requirement while adding the Codex refresh scenario, ensuring the archive workflow replaces the block without losing the existing scenarios or the "Missing slash command file" guardrail.
|
||||
+56
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: AI Tool Configuration
|
||||
The command SHALL configure AI coding assistants with OpenSpec instructions using a marker system.
|
||||
#### Scenario: Prompting for AI tool selection
|
||||
- **WHEN** run interactively
|
||||
- **THEN** prompt the user with "Which AI tools do you use?" using a multi-select menu
|
||||
- **AND** list every available tool with a checkbox:
|
||||
- Claude Code (creates or refreshes CLAUDE.md and slash commands)
|
||||
- Cursor (creates or refreshes `.cursor/commands/*` slash commands)
|
||||
- OpenCode (creates or refreshes `.opencode/command/openspec-*.md` slash commands)
|
||||
- Windsurf (creates or refreshes `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-*.md` workflows)
|
||||
- Kilo Code (creates or refreshes `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-*.md` workflows)
|
||||
- Codex (creates or refreshes global prompts at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-*.md`)
|
||||
- AGENTS.md standard (creates or refreshes AGENTS.md with OpenSpec markers)
|
||||
- **AND** show "(already configured)" beside tools whose managed files exist so users understand selections will refresh content
|
||||
- **AND** treat disabled tools as "coming soon" and keep them unselectable
|
||||
- **AND** allow confirming with Enter after selecting one or more tools
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
|
||||
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.opencode/command/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/command/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/command/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Windsurf
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Windsurf during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Kilo Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Kilo Code during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Codex
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Codex during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create global prompt files at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-proposal.md`, `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-apply.md`, and `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-archive.md` (or under `$CODEX_HOME/prompts` if set)
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that map the first numbered placeholder (`$1`) to the primary user input (e.g., change identifier or question text)
|
||||
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the prompts without touching surrounding custom notes
|
||||
+41
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
|
||||
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cursor
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.cursor/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for OpenCode
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.opencode/command/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Windsurf
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.windsurf/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Kilo Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.kilocode/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Codex
|
||||
- **GIVEN** the global Codex prompt directory contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec update`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared slash-command templates (including placeholder guidance)
|
||||
- **AND** preserve any unmanaged content outside the OpenSpec marker block
|
||||
- **AND** skip creation when a Codex prompt file is missing
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Missing slash command file
|
||||
- **WHEN** a tool lacks a slash command file
|
||||
- **THEN** do not create a new file during update
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
## 1. CLI integration
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Add Codex to the init tool picker with display text that clarifies prompts live in the global `.codex/prompts/` directory and implement "already configured" detection by checking for managed Codex prompt files.
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Implement a `CodexSlashCommandConfigurator` that writes `.codex/prompts/openspec-{proposal,apply,archive}.md`, ensuring the prompt directory exists and wrapping content in OpenSpec markers.
|
||||
// (No helper command required)
|
||||
- [x] 1.3 Register the configurator with the slash-command registry and include Codex in init/update wiring so both commands invoke the new configurator when appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Prompt templates
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Extend the shared slash-command templates (or add a Codex-specific wrapper) to inject numbered placeholders (`$1`, `$2`, …) where Codex expects user-supplied arguments.
|
||||
- [x] 2.2 Verify generated Markdown stays within Codex's formatting expectations (no front matter, heading-first layout) and matches the problem-analyzer style shown in the reference screenshot.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Update support & tests
|
||||
- [x] 3.1 Update the `openspec update` flow to refresh existing Codex prompts without creating new ones when files are missing.
|
||||
- [x] 3.2 Add integration coverage that exercises init/update against a temporary global Codex prompts directory by setting `CODEX_HOME`, asserting marker preservation and idempotent updates.
|
||||
- [x] 3.3 Document Codex's global-only discovery and automatic installation in README and CHANGELOG.
|
||||
- [x] 3.3 Confirm error handling surfaces clear paths when the CLI cannot write to the Codex prompt directory (permissions, missing home directory, etc.).
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Documentation
|
||||
- [x] 4.1 Document Codex slash-command support in the README and changelog alongside other assistant integrations.
|
||||
- [x] 4.2 Add a release note snippet that points Codex users to the generated `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, and `/openspec-archive` commands.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
- GitHub Copilot supports custom slash commands through markdown files in `.github/prompts/<name>.prompt.md`. Each file includes YAML frontmatter with a `description` label and uses `$ARGUMENTS` to capture user input. This format allows teams to expose curated workflows directly in Copilot's chat interface.
|
||||
- Teams already rely on OpenSpec to manage slash-command configurations for Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Codex, Kilo Code, and Windsurf. Excluding GitHub Copilot forces developers to manually maintain OpenSpec prompts in `.github/prompts/`, which leads to drift and undermines OpenSpec's "single source of truth" promise.
|
||||
- GitHub Copilot discovers prompts from the repository's `.github/prompts/` directory, making it straightforward to version control and share across the team. Adding automated generation and refresh through `openspec init` and `openspec update` eliminates manual synchronization and keeps OpenSpec instructions consistent across all AI assistants.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
- Add GitHub Copilot to the `openspec init` tool picker with "already configured" detection similar to other editors, wiring an implementation that writes managed Markdown prompt files to `.github/prompts/` with OpenSpec marker blocks.
|
||||
- Generate three GitHub Copilot prompt files—`openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `openspec-archive.prompt.md`—whose content mirrors shared slash-command templates while conforming to Copilot's frontmatter and `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder convention.
|
||||
- Document GitHub Copilot's repository-based discovery and that OpenSpec writes prompts to `.github/prompts/` with managed blocks.
|
||||
- Teach `openspec update` to refresh existing GitHub Copilot prompts in-place (only when they already exist) in the repository's `.github/prompts/` directory.
|
||||
- Document GitHub Copilot support alongside other slash-command integrations and add test coverage that exercises init/update behavior for `.github/prompts/` files.
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
- Specs: `cli-init`, `cli-update`
|
||||
- Code: `src/core/configurators/slash/github-copilot.ts` (new), `src/core/configurators/slash/registry.ts`, `src/core/templates/slash-command-templates.ts`, CLI tool summaries, docs
|
||||
- Tests: integration coverage for GitHub Copilot prompt scaffolding and refresh logic
|
||||
- Docs: README and CHANGELOG entries announcing GitHub Copilot slash-command support
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Spec Reference
|
||||
- `specs/cli-init/spec.md`
|
||||
- Requirements cover init UX, directory scaffolding, AI tool configuration, and existing slash-command support for Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Codex, Kilo Code, and Windsurf.
|
||||
- Our `## MODIFIED` delta in `changes/.../specs/cli-init/spec.md` will copy the full "Slash Command Configuration" requirement (header, description, and all scenarios) before appending the new GitHub Copilot scenario so archiving retains every prior scenario.
|
||||
- `specs/cli-update/spec.md`
|
||||
- Requirements define update preconditions, template refresh behavior, and slash-command refresh logic for existing tools.
|
||||
- The corresponding delta preserves the entire "Slash Command Updates" requirement while adding the GitHub Copilot refresh scenario, ensuring the archive workflow replaces the block without losing existing scenarios or the "Missing slash command file" guardrail.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
|
||||
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.opencode/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/commands/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Windsurf
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Windsurf during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Kilo Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Kilo Code during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Codex
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects Codex during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create global prompt files at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-proposal.md`, `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-apply.md`, and `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-archive.md` (or under `$CODEX_HOME/prompts` if set)
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that map the first numbered placeholder (`$1`) to the primary user input (e.g., change identifier or question text)
|
||||
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the prompts without touching surrounding custom notes
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user selects GitHub Copilot during initialization
|
||||
- **THEN** create `.github/prompts/openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `.github/prompts/openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `.github/prompts/openspec-archive.prompt.md`
|
||||
- **AND** populate each file with YAML frontmatter containing a `description` field that summarizes the workflow stage
|
||||
- **AND** include `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder to capture user input
|
||||
- **AND** wrap the shared template body with OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the content
|
||||
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
|
||||
+48
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
|
||||
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cursor
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.cursor/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for OpenCode
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.opencode/command/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Windsurf
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.windsurf/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Kilo Code
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.kilocode/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Codex
|
||||
- **GIVEN** the global Codex prompt directory contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
|
||||
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec update`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared slash-command templates (including placeholder guidance)
|
||||
- **AND** preserve any unmanaged content outside the OpenSpec marker block
|
||||
- **AND** skip creation when a Codex prompt file is missing
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
|
||||
- **WHEN** `.github/prompts/` contains `openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `openspec-archive.prompt.md`
|
||||
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates while preserving the YAML frontmatter
|
||||
- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed block between markers
|
||||
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Missing slash command file
|
||||
- **WHEN** a tool lacks a slash command file
|
||||
- **THEN** do not create a new file during update
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
## Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Create `src/core/configurators/slash/github-copilot.ts` implementing `SlashCommandConfigurator` base class
|
||||
- Implement `getRelativePath()` to return `.github/prompts/openspec-{proposal,apply,archive}.prompt.md`
|
||||
- Implement `getFrontmatter()` to generate YAML frontmatter with `description` field and include `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder
|
||||
- Implement `generateAll()` to create `.github/prompts/` directory and write three prompt files with frontmatter, markers, and shared template bodies
|
||||
- Implement `updateExisting()` to refresh only the managed block between markers while preserving frontmatter
|
||||
- Set `toolId = "github-copilot"` and `isAvailable = true`
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Register GitHub Copilot configurator in `src/core/configurators/slash/registry.ts`
|
||||
- Import `GitHubCopilotSlashCommandConfigurator`
|
||||
- Add to `SLASH_COMMAND_CONFIGURATORS` array
|
||||
- Update tool picker display name to "GitHub Copilot"
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Update `src/core/init.ts` to include GitHub Copilot in the AI tool selection prompt
|
||||
- Add GitHub Copilot to the available tools list with detection for existing `.github/prompts/openspec-*.prompt.md` files
|
||||
- Display "(already configured)" when prompt files exist
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Update `src/core/update.ts` to refresh GitHub Copilot prompts when they exist
|
||||
- Call `updateExisting()` for GitHub Copilot configurator when `.github/prompts/` contains OpenSpec prompt files
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Add integration tests for GitHub Copilot slash command generation
|
||||
- Test `generateAll()` creates three prompt files with correct structure (frontmatter + markers + body)
|
||||
- Test `updateExisting()` preserves frontmatter and only updates managed blocks
|
||||
- Test that missing prompt files are not created during update
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Update documentation
|
||||
- Add GitHub Copilot to README slash-command support table
|
||||
- Document `.github/prompts/` as the discovery location
|
||||
- Add CHANGELOG entry for GitHub Copilot support
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
- Kilo Code executes \"slash commands\" by loading markdown workflows from `.kilocode/workflows/` (or the global `~/.kilocode/workflows/`) and running them when a user types `/workflow-name.md`, making project-local workflow files the analogue to the slash-command files we already ship for other tools.\\
|
||||
([Workflows | Kilo Code Docs](https://kilocode.ai/docs/features/slash-commands/workflows))
|
||||
- Those workflows are plain markdown with step-by-step instructions that can call built-in tools and MCP integrations, so reusing OpenSpec's shared proposal/apply/archive bodies keeps behaviour aligned across assistants without inventing new content.
|
||||
- OpenSpec already detects configured tools and refreshes marker-wrapped files during `init`/`update`; extending the same mechanism to `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-*.md` ensures Kilo Code stays in sync with one source of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Changes
|
||||
- Add Kilo Code to the `openspec init` tool picker with \"already configured\" detection, including wiring for extend mode so teams can refresh Kilo Code assets.
|
||||
- Implement a `KiloCodeSlashCommandConfigurator` that creates `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-{proposal,apply,archive}.md`, ensuring the workflow directory exists and wrapping shared content in OpenSpec markers (no front matter required).
|
||||
- Teach `openspec update` to refresh existing Kilo Code workflows (and only those that already exist) using the shared slash-command templates.
|
||||
- Update documentation, release notes, and integration tests so the new workflow support is covered alongside Claude, Cursor, OpenCode, and Windsurf.
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
- Specs: `cli-init`, `cli-update`
|
||||
- Code: `src/core/config.ts`, `src/core/configurators/(registry|slash/*)`, `src/core/templates/slash-command-templates.ts`, CLI wiring for tool summaries
|
||||
- Tests: init/update workflow coverage, regression for marker preservation in `.kilocode/workflows/`
|
||||
- Docs: README / CHANGELOG updates advertising Kilo Code workflow support
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user