Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
Tabish Bidiwale 56a4d88649 cleanup init command 2025-10-01 22:47:27 +10:00
Tabish Bidiwale 363262c8a8 Merge main into always-install-agentsmd 2025-10-01 22:15:10 +10:00
Tabish Bidiwale d7e905066c Update CLI init to install root agents 2025-10-01 21:55:21 +10:00
22 changed files with 80 additions and 564 deletions
+2 -15
View File
@@ -8,13 +8,8 @@ permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write
concurrency:
group: release-${{ github.ref }}
cancel-in-progress: false
jobs:
prepare:
if: github.repository == 'Fission-AI/OpenSpec'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
@@ -29,22 +24,14 @@ jobs:
with:
node-version: '20'
cache: 'pnpm'
registry-url: 'https://registry.npmjs.org'
scope: '@fission-ai'
always-auth: true
- run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
# Opens/updates the Version Packages PR; publishes when the Version PR merges
# Opens/updates the Version Packages PR; no publishing here
- name: Create/Update Version PR
uses: changesets/action@v1
with:
title: 'chore(release): version packages'
createGithubReleases: true
# Use CI-specific release script: relies on version PR having been merged
# so package.json already contains the bumped version.
publish: pnpm run release:ci
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
NPM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}
NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}
+72
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
name: Publish to npm
on:
release:
types: [published]
workflow_dispatch: {}
permissions:
contents: read
id-token: write
concurrency:
group: publish-${{ github.ref }}
cancel-in-progress: false
jobs:
publish:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
env:
NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4
with:
version: 9
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20'
cache: 'pnpm'
registry-url: 'https://registry.npmjs.org'
scope: '@fission-ai'
always-auth: true
- run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
- name: Build project
run: pnpm run build
- name: Ensure running from a tag
run: |
if [[ "$GITHUB_REF" != refs/tags/* ]]; then
echo "This workflow must run from a tag (got: $GITHUB_REF)";
exit 1;
fi
- name: Verify release tag matches package.json
run: |
TAG="${GITHUB_REF_NAME#v}"
PKG_VERSION=$(node -p "require('./package.json').version")
if [ "$TAG" != "$PKG_VERSION" ]; then
echo "Tag v$TAG does not match package.json $PKG_VERSION"; exit 1
fi
- name: Debug npm auth and context
run: |
test -n "$NODE_AUTH_TOKEN" || (echo "NODE_AUTH_TOKEN is missing" && exit 1)
echo "NODE_AUTH_TOKEN present"
npm --version
pnpm --version
node --version
npm config get registry
npm whoami
npm ping
- run: pnpm test
- name: Publish
run: pnpm publish --access public --provenance --no-git-checks
+3 -10
View File
@@ -1,23 +1,16 @@
# @fission-ai/openspec
## 0.8.1
### Patch Changes
- d070d08: Fix CLI version mismatch and add a release guard that validates the packed tarball prints the same version as package.json via `openspec --version`.
## 0.8.0
## Unreleased
### Minor Changes
- c29b06d: Add Windsurf support.
- Always generate the root `AGENTS.md` stub during `openspec init`, regroup the tool prompt into native vs. other assistants, and refresh docs to reflect the universal hand-off.
## 0.7.0
### Minor Changes
- Add native Kilo Code workflow integration so `openspec init` and `openspec update` manage `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-*.md` files.
- Always scaffold the managed root `AGENTS.md` hand-off stub and regroup the AI tool prompts during init/update to keep instructions consistent.
- Add Kilo Code workflow support so `openspec init` scaffolds `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-*.md` and `openspec update` refreshes them in place.
## 0.6.0
+2 -15
View File
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
<a href="https://nodejs.org/"><img alt="node version" src="https://img.shields.io/node/v/@fission-ai/openspec?style=flat-square" /></a>
<a href="./LICENSE"><img alt="License: MIT" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-blue.svg?style=flat-square" /></a>
<a href="https://conventionalcommits.org"><img alt="Conventional Commits" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Conventional%20Commits-1.0.0-yellow.svg?style=flat-square" /></a>
<a href="https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC"><img alt="Discord" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Discord-Join%20the%20community-5865F2?logo=discord&logoColor=white&style=flat-square" /></a>
<a href="https://discord.gg/saTQQGQZ"><img alt="Discord" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Discord-Join%20the%20community-5865F2?logo=discord&logoColor=white&style=flat-square" /></a>
</p>
<p align="center">
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
</p>
<p align="center">
Follow <a href="https://x.com/0xTab">@0xTab on X</a> for updates · Join the <a href="https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC">OpenSpec Discord</a> for help and questions.
Follow <a href="https://x.com/0xTab">@0xTab on X</a> for updates · Join the <a href="https://discord.gg/saTQQGQZ">OpenSpec Discord</a> for help and questions.
</p>
# OpenSpec
@@ -40,15 +40,6 @@ Key outcomes:
- Shared visibility into what's proposed, active, or archived.
- Works with the AI tools you already use: custom slash commands where supported, context rules everywhere else.
## How OpenSpec compares (at a glance)
- **Lightweight**: simple workflow, no API keys, minimal setup.
- **Brownfield-first**: works great beyond 0→1. OpenSpec separates the source of truth from proposals: `openspec/specs/` (current truth) and `openspec/changes/` (proposed updates). This keeps diffs explicit and manageable across features.
- **Change tracking**: proposals, tasks, and spec deltas live together; archiving merges the approved updates back into specs.
- **Compared to spec-kit & Kiro**: those shine for brand-new features (0→1). OpenSpec also excels when modifying existing behavior (1→n), especially when updates span multiple specs.
See the full comparison in [How OpenSpec Compares](#how-openspec-compares).
## How It Works
```
@@ -94,7 +85,6 @@ These tools have built-in OpenSpec commands. Select the OpenSpec integration whe
| **Cursor** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` |
| **OpenCode** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` |
| **Kilo Code** | `/openspec-proposal.md`, `/openspec-apply.md`, `/openspec-archive.md` (`.kilocode/workflows/`) |
| **Windsurf** | `/openspec-proposal`, `/openspec-apply`, `/openspec-archive` (`.windsurf/workflows/`) |
Kilo Code discovers team workflows automatically. Save the generated files under `.kilocode/workflows/` and trigger them from the command palette with `/openspec-proposal.md`, `/openspec-apply.md`, or `/openspec-archive.md`.
@@ -305,9 +295,6 @@ Deltas are "patches" that show how specs change:
## How OpenSpec Compares
### vs. spec-kit
OpenSpec’s two-folder model (`openspec/specs/` for the current truth, `openspec/changes/` for proposed updates) keeps state and diffs separate. This scales when you modify existing features or touch multiple specs. spec-kit is strong for greenfield/0→1 but provides less structure for cross-spec updates and evolving features.
### vs. Kiro.dev
OpenSpec groups every change for a feature in one folder (`openspec/changes/feature-name/`), making it easy to track related specs, tasks, and designs together. Kiro spreads updates across multiple spec folders, which can make feature tracking harder.
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
## Why
Manual setup for new changes leads to formatting mistakes in spec deltas and slows agents who must recreate the same file skeletons for every proposal. A built-in scaffold command will generate compliant templates so assistants can focus on the change content instead of structure.
## What Changes
- Add an `openspec scaffold <change-id>` CLI command that creates a change directory with validated `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and spec delta templates.
- Update CLI documentation and quick-reference guidance so agents discover the scaffold workflow before drafting files manually.
- Add automated coverage (unit/integ tests) to ensure the command respects existing naming rules and generated Markdown passes validation.
## Impact
- Affected specs: `specs/cli-scaffold`
- Affected code: `src/cli/index.ts`, `src/commands`, `docs/`
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Scaffolding Command Registration
The CLI SHALL expose an `openspec scaffold <change-id>` command that validates the change identifier before generating files.
#### Scenario: Registering scaffold command
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec scaffold add-user-notifications`
- **THEN** the CLI SHALL reject invalid identifiers (non kebab-case) before proceeding
- **AND** display usage documentation via `openspec scaffold --help`
- **AND** exit with code 0 after successful scaffolding
### Requirement: Change Directory Structure
The scaffold command SHALL create the standard change workspace with proposal, tasks, optional design, and delta directories laid out according to OpenSpec conventions.
#### Scenario: Generating change workspace
- **WHEN** scaffolding a new change with id `add-user-notifications`
- **THEN** create `openspec/changes/add-user-notifications/`
- **AND** generate `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and `design.md` (commented placeholder content) in that directory when missing
- **AND** create `openspec/changes/add-user-notifications/specs/` ready for capability-specific deltas
### Requirement: Template Content Guidance
The scaffold command SHALL populate generated Markdown files with OpenSpec-compliant templates so authors can copy, edit, and pass validation without reformatting.
#### Scenario: Populating proposal and tasks templates
- **WHEN** the scaffold command writes `proposal.md`
- **THEN** include the `## Why`, `## What Changes`, and `## Impact` headings with placeholder guidance text
- **AND** ensure `tasks.md` starts with `## 1. Implementation` and numbered checklist items using `- [ ]` syntax
- **AND** annotate optional sections (like `design.md`) with inline TODO comments so users understand when to keep or delete them
### Requirement: Delta Spec Creation
The scaffold command SHALL create at least one capability delta file with correctly formatted requirement and scenario placeholders that guide authors to enter the actual behavior.
#### Scenario: Creating spec delta skeleton
- **WHEN** scaffolding a change and the capability `cli-scaffold` is provided interactively or via flags
- **THEN** generate `openspec/changes/add-user-notifications/specs/cli-scaffold/spec.md`
- **AND** include `## ADDED Requirements` with at least one `### Requirement:` block and matching `#### Scenario:` entries that remind the author to replace placeholder text
- **AND** ensure the generated delta passes `openspec validate add-user-notifications --strict` until the author edits it
### Requirement: Idempotent Execution
The scaffold command SHALL be safe to rerun, preserving user edits while filling in any missing managed sections.
#### Scenario: Rerunning scaffold on existing change
- **WHEN** the command is executed again for an existing change directory containing user-edited files
- **THEN** leave existing content untouched except for managed placeholder regions or missing files that need creation
- **AND** update the filesystem summary to highlight which files were skipped, created, or refreshed
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
## 1. CLI scaffolding command
- [ ] 1.1 Register an `openspec scaffold` command in the CLI entrypoint with `change-id` argument validation.
- [ ] 1.2 Implement generator logic that creates the change directory structure plus default `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and delta spec skeletons without overwriting existing populated files.
## 2. Templates and documentation
- [ ] 2.1 Surface copy/paste templates and scaffold usage in the top-level quick reference for `openspec/AGENTS.md`.
- [ ] 2.2 Refresh other CLI docs (`docs/`, README) to mention the scaffold workflow and link to instructions.
## 3. Test coverage
- [ ] 3.1 Add unit tests covering name validation, file generation, and idempotent reruns.
- [ ] 3.2 Add integration coverage ensuring generated files pass `openspec validate --strict` without manual edits.
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
## Why
Validation errors like "no deltas found" or "missing requirement text" do not tell agents how to recover, leading to repeated failures. Making error output specific about headers, required text, and next actions will help assistants fix issues in a single pass.
## What Changes
- Extend `openspec validate` error reporting so each failure names the exact header, file, and expected structure, including concrete examples of compliant Markdown.
- Tailor messages for the most common mistakes (missing delta sections, absent descriptive requirement text, missing scenarios) with actionable fixes and suggested debug commands.
- Update docs/help output so the improved messaging is discoverable (e.g., `--help`, troubleshooting section).
- Add regression coverage to lock in the richer messaging for the top validation paths.
## Impact
- Affected specs: `specs/cli-validate`
- Affected code: `src/commands/validate.ts`, `src/core/validation`, `docs/`
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Validation SHALL provide actionable remediation steps
Validation output SHALL include specific guidance to fix each error, including expected structure, example headers, and suggested commands to verify fixes.
#### Scenario: No deltas found in change
- **WHEN** validating a change with zero parsed deltas
- **THEN** show error "No deltas found" with guidance:
- Explain that change specs must include `## ADDED Requirements`, `## MODIFIED Requirements`, `## REMOVED Requirements`, or `## RENAMED Requirements`
- Remind authors that files must live under `openspec/changes/{id}/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
- Include an explicit note: "Spec delta files cannot start with titles before the operation headers"
- Suggest running `openspec change show {id} --json --deltas-only` for debugging
#### Scenario: Missing required sections
- **WHEN** a required section is missing
- **THEN** include expected header names and a minimal skeleton:
- For Spec: `## Purpose`, `## Requirements`
- For Change: `## Why`, `## What Changes`
- Provide an example snippet of the missing section with placeholder prose ready to copy
- Mention the quick-reference section in `openspec/AGENTS.md` as the authoritative template
#### Scenario: Missing requirement descriptive text
- **WHEN** a requirement header lacks descriptive text before scenarios
- **THEN** emit an error explaining that `### Requirement:` lines must be followed by narrative text before any `#### Scenario:` headers
- Show compliant example: "### Requirement: Foo" followed by "The system SHALL ..."
- Suggest adding 1-2 sentences describing the normative behavior prior to listing scenarios
- Reference the pre-validation checklist in `openspec/AGENTS.md`
### Requirement: Validator SHALL detect likely misformatted scenarios and warn with a fix
The validator SHALL recognize bulleted lines that look like scenarios (e.g., lines beginning with WHEN/THEN/AND) and emit a targeted warning with a conversion example to `#### Scenario:`.
#### Scenario: Bulleted WHEN/THEN under a Requirement
- **WHEN** bullets that start with WHEN/THEN/AND are found under a requirement without any `#### Scenario:` headers
- **THEN** emit warning: "Scenarios must use '#### Scenario:' headers", and show a conversion template:
```
#### Scenario: Short name
- **WHEN** ...
- **THEN** ...
- **AND** ...
```
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
## 1. Messaging enhancements
- [ ] 1.1 Inventory current validation failures and map each to the desired message improvements.
- [ ] 1.2 Implement structured error builders that include file paths, normalized header names, and example fixes.
- [ ] 1.3 Ensure `openspec validate --help` and troubleshooting docs mention the richer messages and debug tips.
## 2. Tests
- [ ] 2.1 Add unit tests for representative errors (no deltas, missing requirement body, missing scenarios) asserting the new wording.
- [ ] 2.2 Add integration coverage verifying the Next steps footer reflects contextual guidance.
## 3. Documentation
- [ ] 3.1 Update troubleshooting sections and CLI docs with sample output from the enhanced errors.
- [ ] 3.2 Note the change in CHANGELOG or release notes if applicable.
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
## Why
Agents fumble proposal formatting because the essential Markdown templates and formatting rules are buried mid-document. Reorganizing `openspec/AGENTS.md` with a prominent quick-reference and embedded examples will help assistants follow the process without guesswork.
## What Changes
- Restructure `openspec/AGENTS.md` so file formats and scaffold templates appear in a top-level quick-reference section before workflow prose.
- Embed copy/paste templates for `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, `design.md`, and spec deltas alongside inline examples within the workflow steps.
- Add a pre-validation checklist that highlights the most common formatting pitfalls before running `openspec validate`.
- Split content into beginner vs. advanced sections to progressively disclose complexity while keeping advanced guidance accessible.
## Impact
- Affected specs: `specs/docs-agent-instructions`
- Affected code: `openspec/AGENTS.md`, `docs/`
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Quick Reference Placement
The AI instructions SHALL begin with a quick-reference section that surfaces required file structures, templates, and formatting rules before any narrative guidance.
#### Scenario: Loading templates at the top
- **WHEN** `openspec/AGENTS.md` is regenerated or updated
- **THEN** the first substantive section after the title SHALL provide copy-ready headings for `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, spec deltas, and scenario formatting
- **AND** link each template to the corresponding workflow step for deeper reading
### Requirement: Embedded Templates and Examples
`openspec/AGENTS.md` SHALL include complete copy/paste templates and inline examples exactly where agents make corresponding edits.
#### Scenario: Providing file templates
- **WHEN** authors reach the workflow guidance for drafting proposals and deltas
- **THEN** provide fenced Markdown templates that match the required structure (`## Why`, `## ADDED Requirements`, `#### Scenario:` etc.)
- **AND** accompany each template with a brief example showing correct header usage and scenario bullets
### Requirement: Pre-validation Checklist
`openspec/AGENTS.md` SHALL offer a concise pre-validation checklist that highlights common formatting mistakes before running `openspec validate`.
#### Scenario: Highlighting common validation failures
- **WHEN** a reader reaches the validation guidance
- **THEN** present a checklist reminding them to verify requirement headers, scenario formatting, and delta sections
- **AND** include reminders about at least `#### Scenario:` usage and descriptive requirement text before scenarios
### Requirement: Progressive Disclosure of Workflow Guidance
The documentation SHALL separate beginner essentials from advanced topics so newcomers can focus on core steps without losing access to advanced workflows.
#### Scenario: Organizing beginner and advanced sections
- **WHEN** reorganizing `openspec/AGENTS.md`
- **THEN** keep an introductory section limited to the minimum steps (scaffold, draft, validate, request review)
- **AND** move advanced topics (multi-capability changes, archiving details, tooling deep dives) into clearly labeled later sections
- **AND** provide anchor links from the quick-reference to those advanced sections
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
## 1. Instruction redesign
- [ ] 1.1 Draft a quick-reference section that surfaces file templates and formatting rules at the top of `openspec/AGENTS.md`.
- [ ] 1.2 Reorganize the workflow narrative with inline examples and progressive disclosure for advanced topics.
## 2. Templates and checklists
- [ ] 2.1 Add copy/paste templates for proposal, tasks, design, and spec delta files.
- [ ] 2.2 Insert a pre-validation checklist capturing common lint failures before running `openspec validate`.
## 3. Documentation updates
- [ ] 3.1 Update supporting docs or README pointers so contributors find the redesigned instructions.
- [ ] 3.2 Confirm examples and references stay in sync with the new scaffold command guidance.
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
## Why
Today’s process requires maintainers to merge the Changesets PR, cut a tag, and draft the GitHub release by hand. npm publish then runs from our existing workflow after the GitHub release is published. The human-in-the-loop steps (versioning, tagging, release notes) slow us down and risk drift between npm, tags, and changelog.
## What Changes
- Use the single `changesets/action` on pushes to `main` to either open/update the version PR or, when the release PR is merged, run our publish command automatically using repository secrets.
- Add a `release` script that builds and runs `changeset publish` so the action handles version bumps, changelog commits, npm publish, and GitHub releases end-to-end.
- Enable `createGithubReleases: true` so GitHub releases are created from the changeset data right after publishing.
- Document the automated flow, required secrets, guardrails, and recovery steps (rollback, hotfixes).
## Two-Phase Rollout (Two PRs)
1) Phase 1 — Dry run (no publish)
- Update the existing `release-prepare.yml` to wire up `changesets/action` with `createGithubReleases: true` and a no-op `publish` command (e.g., `echo 'dry run'`).
- Keep `.github/workflows/release-publish.yml` intact. This avoids any publish path changes while we verify that the version PR behavior and permissions are correct.
- Add a repository guard (`if: github.repository == 'Fission-AI/OpenSpec'`) and a concurrency group for safety.
2) Phase 2 — Enable publish and consolidate
- Add `"release": "pnpm run build && pnpm exec changeset publish"` to `package.json`.
- Change `release-prepare.yml` to use `with: publish: pnpm run release` and `env: NPM_TOKEN: \\${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}` plus the default `GITHUB_TOKEN`.
- Remove `.github/workflows/release-publish.yml` to avoid double-publish. Publishing now happens when the version PR is merged.
## Guardrails
- Concurrency: `concurrency: { group: release-\\${{ github.ref }}, cancel-in-progress: false }` on the workflow to serialize releases.
- Repository/branch guard: run publish logic only on upstream `main` (`if: github.repository == 'Fission-AI/OpenSpec' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'`).
- Permissions: ensure `contents: write` and `pull-requests: write` for opening/updating the version PR; `packages: read` optional.
## Rollback and Hotfixes
- Rollback: revert the release PR merge (which reverts version bumps/changelog); if a tag or GitHub release was created, delete the tag and release; deprecate the npm version if necessary (`npm deprecate @fission-ai/openspec@x.y.z 'reason'`).
- Hotfix (urgent, no pending changesets): create a changeset for the fix and merge the release PR; in emergencies, run a manual bump/publish but reconcile with Changesets by adding a follow-up changeset to align versions.
## Required Secrets
- `NPM_TOKEN` with publish rights for the `@fission-ai` scope.
- Default `GITHUB_TOKEN` (provided by GitHub) for opening/updating the version PR and creating GitHub releases.
## How the Maintainer Flow Changes
| Step | Current process | Future process |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Prepare release | Merge changeset PR, then manually draft release notes and tags | Merge release PR; action updates versions and handles changelog automatically |
| Publish npm package | Happens automatically after GitHub release | Happens automatically via `changeset publish` invoked by the action |
| GitHub release | Draft manually and sync with changelog | Action creates GitHub releases from changeset data |
| Docs/process | Follow manual tagging/release steps | Docs describe automated flow + recovery and hotfix paths |
## Impact
- Automation: reuse `.github/workflows/release-prepare.yml` (phase 1: dry-run, phase 2: publish) and remove `.github/workflows/release-publish.yml` in phase 2.
- Package metadata: add `release` script to `package.json`.
- Docs: update README or `/docs` to show the automated flow, secrets, guardrails, and recovery steps.
## Acceptance Criteria
- Phase 1: merges to `main` open/update a version PR; on merge, the action’s `publish` step is a no-op; no npm publish occurs; logs confirm intended behavior; GitHub releases creation is wired but inert due to no publish.
- Phase 2: merges to `main` run `pnpm run release` from the action; npm package publishes successfully; GitHub release is created automatically; `.github/workflows/release-publish.yml` is removed; no duplicate publishes occur.
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
## 1. Release workflow automation
- [ ] 1.1 Add a `.github/workflows/release.yml` that runs on pushes to `main`, sets up pnpm + Node 20, installs dependencies, and invokes `changesets/action@v1` with `publish: pnpm run release`.
- [ ] 1.2 Configure the action with `createGithubReleases: true` and document required secrets (`NPM_TOKEN`, default `GITHUB_TOKEN`) plus recommended concurrency safeguards.
- [ ] 1.3 Validate the workflow using `act` or a dry-run push to confirm the action opens release PRs when changesets exist and publishes when the release PR merge lands.
## 2. Package release script
- [ ] 2.1 Add a `release` script to `package.json` that builds the project and runs `changeset publish` using pnpm.
- [ ] 2.2 Ensure the script respects the existing `prepare`/`prepublishOnly` hooks to avoid duplicate builds and update documentation or scripts if adjustments are needed.
## 3. Documentation and recovery steps
- [ ] 3.1 Update maintainer docs (e.g., README or `/docs`) with the end-to-end automated release flow, explicitly removing the manual tag/release steps that are no longer required and explaining how changesets drive the release PR.
- [ ] 3.2 Document fallback steps for failed publishes (rerun workflow, manual publish) and the hotfix path when a release must be cut without pending changesets.
+1 -5
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@fission-ai/openspec",
"version": "0.8.1",
"version": "0.6.0",
"description": "AI-native system for spec-driven development",
"keywords": [
"openspec",
@@ -46,10 +46,6 @@
"test:coverage": "vitest --coverage",
"prepare": "pnpm run build",
"prepublishOnly": "pnpm run build",
"check:pack-version": "node scripts/pack-version-check.mjs",
"release": "pnpm run release:ci",
"release:ci": "pnpm run check:pack-version && pnpm exec changeset publish",
"release:local": "pnpm exec changeset version && pnpm run check:pack-version && pnpm exec changeset publish",
"changeset": "changeset"
},
"engines": {
-111
View File
@@ -1,111 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env node
// Guard: Ensure the packed tarball's CLI `--version` matches package.json.
//
// Notes:
// - We intentionally use `npm pack` (not pnpm) because `npm pack --json` is
// consistently supported and returns the tarball metadata we need. The
// project uses pnpm for install/publish, but this guard only needs to pack
// locally and verify the installed CLI output.
// - `npm pack` triggers the package's `prepare` script (build), and
// `changeset publish` triggers `prepublishOnly` (also builds here). This
// means an explicit build is not strictly necessary for the guard.
import { execFileSync } from 'child_process';
import { mkdtempSync, readFileSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from 'fs';
import { tmpdir } from 'os';
import path from 'path';
function log(msg) {
if (process.env.CI) return; // keep CI logs quiet by default
console.log(msg);
}
function run(cmd, args, opts = {}) {
return execFileSync(cmd, args, { encoding: 'utf-8', stdio: ['ignore', 'pipe', 'pipe'], ...opts });
}
function npmPack() {
try {
const jsonOut = run('npm', ['pack', '--json', '--silent']);
const arr = JSON.parse(jsonOut);
if (Array.isArray(arr) && arr.length > 0) {
const last = arr[arr.length - 1];
const file = (last && typeof last === 'object' && last.filename) || (typeof last === 'string' ? last : null);
if (file) return String(file).trim();
}
// Unexpected JSON shape or empty array; fallback to plain output
const out = run('npm', ['pack', '--silent']).trim();
const lines = out.split(/\r?\n/);
return lines[lines.length - 1].trim();
} catch (e) {
// Fallback for environments not supporting --json
const out = run('npm', ['pack', '--silent']).trim();
const lines = out.split(/\r?\n/);
return lines[lines.length - 1].trim();
}
}
function main() {
const pkg = JSON.parse(readFileSync(path.join(process.cwd(), 'package.json'), 'utf-8'));
const expected = pkg.version;
let work;
let tgzPath;
try {
log(`Packing @fission-ai/openspec@${expected}...`);
const filename = npmPack();
tgzPath = path.resolve(filename);
log(`Created: ${tgzPath}`);
work = mkdtempSync(path.join(tmpdir(), 'openspec-pack-check-'));
log(`Temp dir: ${work}`);
// Make a tiny project
writeFileSync(
path.join(work, 'package.json'),
JSON.stringify({ name: 'pack-check', private: true }, null, 2)
);
// Try to avoid noisy output and speed up
const env = {
...process.env,
npm_config_loglevel: 'silent',
npm_config_audit: 'false',
npm_config_fund: 'false',
npm_config_progress: 'false',
};
// Install the tarball
run('npm', ['install', tgzPath, '--silent', '--no-audit', '--no-fund'], { cwd: work, env });
// Run the installed CLI via Node to avoid bin resolution/platform issues
const binRel = path.join('node_modules', '@fission-ai', 'openspec', 'bin', 'openspec.js');
const actual = run(process.execPath, [binRel, '--version'], { cwd: work }).trim();
if (actual !== expected) {
throw new Error(
`Packed CLI version mismatch: expected ${expected}, got ${actual}. ` +
'Ensure the dist is built and the CLI reads version from package.json.'
);
}
log('Version check passed.');
} finally {
// Always attempt cleanup
if (work) {
try { rmSync(work, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {}
}
if (tgzPath) {
try { rmSync(tgzPath, { force: true }); } catch {}
}
}
}
try {
main();
console.log('✅ pack-version-check: OK');
} catch (err) {
console.error(`❌ pack-version-check: ${err.message}`);
process.exit(1);
}
-1
View File
@@ -21,6 +21,5 @@ export const AI_TOOLS: AIToolOption[] = [
{ name: 'Cursor', value: 'cursor', available: true, successLabel: 'Cursor' },
{ name: 'OpenCode', value: 'opencode', available: true, successLabel: 'OpenCode' },
{ name: 'Kilo Code', value: 'kilocode', available: true, successLabel: 'Kilo Code' },
{ name: 'Windsurf', value: 'windsurf', available: true, successLabel: 'Windsurf' },
{ name: 'AGENTS.md (works with Codex, Amp, VS Code, GitHub Copilot, …)', value: 'agents', available: false, successLabel: 'your AGENTS.md-compatible assistant' }
];
-3
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
import { SlashCommandConfigurator } from './base.js';
import { ClaudeSlashCommandConfigurator } from './claude.js';
import { CursorSlashCommandConfigurator } from './cursor.js';
import { WindsurfSlashCommandConfigurator } from './windsurf.js';
import { KiloCodeSlashCommandConfigurator } from './kilocode.js';
import { OpenCodeSlashCommandConfigurator } from './opencode.js';
@@ -11,13 +10,11 @@ export class SlashCommandRegistry {
static {
const claude = new ClaudeSlashCommandConfigurator();
const cursor = new CursorSlashCommandConfigurator();
const windsurf = new WindsurfSlashCommandConfigurator();
const kilocode = new KiloCodeSlashCommandConfigurator();
const opencode = new OpenCodeSlashCommandConfigurator();
this.configurators.set(claude.toolId, claude);
this.configurators.set(cursor.toolId, cursor);
this.configurators.set(windsurf.toolId, windsurf);
this.configurators.set(kilocode.toolId, kilocode);
this.configurators.set(opencode.toolId, opencode);
}
-27
View File
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
import { SlashCommandConfigurator } from './base.js';
import { SlashCommandId } from '../../templates/index.js';
const FILE_PATHS: Record<SlashCommandId, string> = {
proposal: '.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md',
apply: '.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md',
archive: '.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md'
};
export class WindsurfSlashCommandConfigurator extends SlashCommandConfigurator {
readonly toolId = 'windsurf';
readonly isAvailable = true;
protected getRelativePath(id: SlashCommandId): string {
return FILE_PATHS[id];
}
protected getFrontmatter(id: SlashCommandId): string | undefined {
const descriptions: Record<SlashCommandId, string> = {
proposal: 'Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly.',
apply: 'Implement an approved OpenSpec change and keep tasks in sync.',
archive: 'Archive a deployed OpenSpec change and update specs.'
};
const description = descriptions[id];
return `---\ndescription: ${description}\nauto_execution_mode: 3\n---`;
}
}
-56
View File
@@ -129,50 +129,6 @@ describe('InitCommand', () => {
expect(updatedContent).toContain('Custom instructions here');
});
it('should create Windsurf workflows when Windsurf is selected', async () => {
queueSelections('windsurf', DONE);
await initCommand.execute(testDir);
const wsProposal = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md'
);
const wsApply = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md'
);
const wsArchive = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md'
);
expect(await fileExists(wsProposal)).toBe(true);
expect(await fileExists(wsApply)).toBe(true);
expect(await fileExists(wsArchive)).toBe(true);
const proposalContent = await fs.readFile(wsProposal, 'utf-8');
expect(proposalContent).toContain('---');
expect(proposalContent).toContain('description: Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly.');
expect(proposalContent).toContain('auto_execution_mode: 3');
expect(proposalContent).toContain('<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->');
expect(proposalContent).toContain('**Guardrails**');
const applyContent = await fs.readFile(wsApply, 'utf-8');
expect(applyContent).toContain('---');
expect(applyContent).toContain('description: Implement an approved OpenSpec change and keep tasks in sync.');
expect(applyContent).toContain('auto_execution_mode: 3');
expect(applyContent).toContain('<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->');
expect(applyContent).toContain('Work through tasks sequentially');
const archiveContent = await fs.readFile(wsArchive, 'utf-8');
expect(archiveContent).toContain('---');
expect(archiveContent).toContain('description: Archive a deployed OpenSpec change and update specs.');
expect(archiveContent).toContain('auto_execution_mode: 3');
expect(archiveContent).toContain('<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->');
expect(archiveContent).toContain('Run `openspec archive <id> --yes`');
});
it('should always create AGENTS.md in project root', async () => {
queueSelections(DONE);
@@ -443,18 +399,6 @@ describe('InitCommand', () => {
const preselected = secondRunArgs.initialSelected ?? [];
expect(preselected).toContain('kilocode');
});
it('should mark Windsurf as already configured during extend mode', async () => {
queueSelections('windsurf', DONE, 'windsurf', DONE);
await initCommand.execute(testDir);
await initCommand.execute(testDir);
const secondRunArgs = mockPrompt.mock.calls[1][0];
const wsChoice = secondRunArgs.choices.find(
(choice: any) => choice.value === 'windsurf'
);
expect(wsChoice.configured).toBe(true);
});
});
describe('error handling', () => {
-75
View File
@@ -220,81 +220,6 @@ Old body
consoleSpy.mockRestore();
});
it('should refresh existing Windsurf workflows', async () => {
const wsPath = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md'
);
await fs.mkdir(path.dirname(wsPath), { recursive: true });
const initialContent = `## OpenSpec: Apply (Windsurf)
Intro
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
Old body
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->`;
await fs.writeFile(wsPath, initialContent);
const consoleSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'log');
await updateCommand.execute(testDir);
const updated = await fs.readFile(wsPath, 'utf-8');
expect(updated).toContain('Work through tasks sequentially');
expect(updated).not.toContain('Old body');
expect(updated).toContain('## OpenSpec: Apply (Windsurf)');
const [logMessage] = consoleSpy.mock.calls[0];
expect(logMessage).toContain(
'Updated slash commands: .windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md'
);
consoleSpy.mockRestore();
});
it('should preserve Windsurf content outside markers during update', async () => {
const wsPath = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md'
);
await fs.mkdir(path.dirname(wsPath), { recursive: true });
const initialContent = `## Custom Intro Title\nSome intro text\n<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->\nOld body\n<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->\n\nFooter stays`;
await fs.writeFile(wsPath, initialContent);
await updateCommand.execute(testDir);
const updated = await fs.readFile(wsPath, 'utf-8');
expect(updated).toContain('## Custom Intro Title');
expect(updated).toContain('Footer stays');
expect(updated).not.toContain('Old body');
expect(updated).toContain('Validate with `openspec validate <id> --strict`');
});
it('should not create missing Windsurf workflows on update', async () => {
const wsApply = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md'
);
// Only create apply; leave proposal and archive missing
await fs.mkdir(path.dirname(wsApply), { recursive: true });
await fs.writeFile(
wsApply,
'<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->\nOld\n<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->'
);
await updateCommand.execute(testDir);
const wsProposal = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md'
);
const wsArchive = path.join(
testDir,
'.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md'
);
// Confirm they weren't created by update
await expect(FileSystemUtils.fileExists(wsProposal)).resolves.toBe(false);
await expect(FileSystemUtils.fileExists(wsArchive)).resolves.toBe(false);
});
it('should handle no AI tool files present', async () => {
// Execute update command with no AI tool files
const consoleSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'log');