mirror of
https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec.git
synced 2026-10-03 22:13:19 +08:00
Compare commits
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
9d425865c1 | ||
|
|
a490dbbc78 | ||
|
|
fc0e2319b1 |
+26
-1
@@ -10,6 +10,23 @@ OpenSpec is an AI-native system for change-driven development where:
|
||||
- **AI drives the process** - You generate proposals, humans review and approve
|
||||
- **Specs are living documentation** - Always kept in sync with deployed code
|
||||
|
||||
## Start Simple
|
||||
|
||||
**Default to minimal implementations:**
|
||||
- New features should be <100 lines of code initially
|
||||
- Use the simplest solution that works
|
||||
- Avoid premature optimization (no caching, parallelization, or complex patterns without proven need)
|
||||
- Choose boring technology over cutting-edge solutions
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity triggers** - Only add complexity when you have:
|
||||
- **Performance data** showing current solution is too slow
|
||||
- **Scale requirements** with specific numbers (>1000 users, >100MB data)
|
||||
- **Multiple use cases** requiring the same abstraction
|
||||
- **Regulatory compliance** mandating specific patterns
|
||||
- **Security threats** that simple solutions cannot address
|
||||
|
||||
When triggered, document the specific justification in your change proposal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Directory Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -72,6 +89,11 @@ Before any task:
|
||||
- Adding tests for existing behavior
|
||||
- Documentation fixes
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity assessment:**
|
||||
- If your solution requires >100 lines of new code, justify the complexity
|
||||
- If adding dependencies, frameworks, or architectural patterns, document why simpler alternatives won't work
|
||||
- Default to single-file implementations until proven insufficient
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Creating a Change Proposal
|
||||
|
||||
When a user requests a significant change:
|
||||
@@ -383,10 +405,12 @@ Progress communication:
|
||||
- "Implementing approved changes..."
|
||||
|
||||
### For AI Assistants
|
||||
- **Bias toward simplicity** - Propose the minimal solution that works
|
||||
- Use your exploration tools liberally before proposing
|
||||
- Batch operations for efficiency
|
||||
- Communicate your progress
|
||||
- It's OK to revise proposals based on discoveries
|
||||
- **Question complexity** - If your solution feels complex, simplify first
|
||||
|
||||
## Edge Case Handling
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -442,6 +466,7 @@ Proposal REQUIRED if:
|
||||
- Specs must always reflect deployed reality
|
||||
- Changes are proposed, not imposed
|
||||
- Impact analysis prevents surprises
|
||||
- The simplicity is the power - just markdown files
|
||||
- Simplicity is the power - just markdown files, minimal solutions
|
||||
- Start simple, add complexity only when justified
|
||||
|
||||
By following these conventions, you enable true spec-driven development where documentation stays current, changes are traceable, and evolution is intentional.
|
||||
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Update OpenSpec README
|
||||
- [ ] 1.1 Add "Start Simple" section after Core Principle
|
||||
- [ ] 1.2 Add complexity triggers to "When to Create Change Proposals" section
|
||||
- [ ] 1.3 Update AI workflow guidance to emphasize minimal implementations
|
||||
- [x] 1.1 Add "Start Simple" section after Core Principle
|
||||
- [x] 1.2 Add complexity triggers to "When to Create Change Proposals" section
|
||||
- [x] 1.3 Update AI workflow guidance to emphasize minimal implementations
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Update CLAUDE.md
|
||||
- [ ] 2.1 Add complexity management rules to project instructions
|
||||
- [x] 2.1 Add complexity management rules to project instructions
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
# Update Command Specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
As a developer using OpenSpec, I want to update the OpenSpec instructions in my project when new versions are released, so that I can benefit from improvements to AI agent instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Update Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The update command SHALL update OpenSpec instruction files to the latest templates.
|
||||
|
||||
WHEN a user runs `openspec update` THEN the command SHALL:
|
||||
- Check if the `openspec` directory exists
|
||||
- Replace `openspec/README.md` with the latest template (complete replacement)
|
||||
- Update the OpenSpec-managed block in `CLAUDE.md` using markers
|
||||
- Preserve user content outside markers
|
||||
- Create `CLAUDE.md` if missing
|
||||
- Display ASCII-safe success message: "Updated OpenSpec instructions"
|
||||
|
||||
### Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
The command SHALL require:
|
||||
- An existing `openspec` directory (created by `openspec init`)
|
||||
|
||||
IF the `openspec` directory does not exist THEN:
|
||||
- Display error: "No OpenSpec directory found. Run 'openspec init' first."
|
||||
- Exit with code 1
|
||||
|
||||
### File Handling
|
||||
|
||||
The update command SHALL:
|
||||
- Completely replace `openspec/README.md` with the latest template
|
||||
- Update only the OpenSpec-managed block in `CLAUDE.md` using markers
|
||||
- Use the default directory name `openspec`
|
||||
- Be idempotent (repeated runs have no additional effect)
|
||||
|
||||
## Edge Cases
|
||||
|
||||
### File Permissions
|
||||
IF file write fails THEN let the error bubble up naturally with file path.
|
||||
|
||||
### Missing CLAUDE.md
|
||||
IF CLAUDE.md doesn't exist THEN create it with the template content.
|
||||
|
||||
### Custom Directory Name
|
||||
Not supported in this change. The default directory name `openspec` SHALL be used.
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
Users SHALL be able to:
|
||||
- Update OpenSpec instructions with a single command
|
||||
- Get the latest AI agent instructions
|
||||
- See clear confirmation of the update
|
||||
|
||||
The update process SHALL be:
|
||||
- Simple and fast (no version checking)
|
||||
- Predictable (same result every time)
|
||||
- Self-contained (no network required)
|
||||
@@ -4,4 +4,23 @@ This document provides instructions for AI coding assistants on how to use OpenS
|
||||
|
||||
This project uses OpenSpec for spec-driven development. Specifications are the source of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
See @openspec/README.md for detailed conventions and guidelines.`;
|
||||
See @openspec/README.md for detailed conventions and guidelines.
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity Management
|
||||
|
||||
**Default to minimal solutions:**
|
||||
- Propose <100 lines of new code for features
|
||||
- Prefer single-file implementations until proven insufficient
|
||||
- Avoid frameworks, abstractions, and optimizations without clear justification
|
||||
- Choose boring, well-understood patterns over novel approaches
|
||||
|
||||
**Question requests for complexity:**
|
||||
- Caching? → Ask for performance data and targets
|
||||
- New framework? → Suggest plain code first
|
||||
- Extra layers? → Start with the thinnest viable design
|
||||
|
||||
**Justify complexity with data:**
|
||||
- Performance metrics showing current solution is too slow
|
||||
- Concrete scale requirements (e.g., >1000 users, >100MB data)
|
||||
- Multiple proven use cases requiring an abstraction
|
||||
`;
|
||||
@@ -10,6 +10,23 @@ OpenSpec is an AI-native system for change-driven development where:
|
||||
- **AI drives the process** - You generate proposals, humans review and approve
|
||||
- **Specs are living documentation** - Always kept in sync with deployed code
|
||||
|
||||
## Start Simple
|
||||
|
||||
**Default to minimal implementations:**
|
||||
- New features should be <100 lines of code initially
|
||||
- Use the simplest solution that works
|
||||
- Avoid premature optimization (no caching, parallelization, or complex patterns without proven need)
|
||||
- Choose boring technology over cutting-edge solutions
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity triggers** - Only add complexity when you have:
|
||||
- **Performance data** showing current solution is too slow
|
||||
- **Scale requirements** with specific numbers (>1000 users, >100MB data)
|
||||
- **Multiple use cases** requiring the same abstraction
|
||||
- **Regulatory compliance** mandating specific patterns
|
||||
- **Security threats** that simple solutions cannot address
|
||||
|
||||
When triggered, document the specific justification in your change proposal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Directory Structure
|
||||
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
@@ -72,6 +89,11 @@ Before any task:
|
||||
- Adding tests for existing behavior
|
||||
- Documentation fixes
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity assessment:**
|
||||
- If your solution requires >100 lines of new code, justify the complexity
|
||||
- If adding dependencies, frameworks, or architectural patterns, document why simpler alternatives won't work
|
||||
- Default to single-file implementations until proven insufficient
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Creating a Change Proposal
|
||||
|
||||
When a user requests a significant change:
|
||||
@@ -383,10 +405,12 @@ Progress communication:
|
||||
- "Implementing approved changes..."
|
||||
|
||||
### For AI Assistants
|
||||
- **Bias toward simplicity** - Propose the minimal solution that works
|
||||
- Use your exploration tools liberally before proposing
|
||||
- Batch operations for efficiency
|
||||
- Communicate your progress
|
||||
- It's OK to revise proposals based on discoveries
|
||||
- **Question complexity** - If your solution feels complex, simplify first
|
||||
|
||||
## Edge Case Handling
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -442,7 +466,8 @@ Proposal REQUIRED if:
|
||||
- Specs must always reflect deployed reality
|
||||
- Changes are proposed, not imposed
|
||||
- Impact analysis prevents surprises
|
||||
- The simplicity is the power - just markdown files
|
||||
- Simplicity is the power - just markdown files, minimal solutions
|
||||
- Start simple, add complexity only when justified
|
||||
|
||||
By following these conventions, you enable true spec-driven development where documentation stays current, changes are traceable, and evolution is intentional.
|
||||
`;
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user