Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
Tabish Bidiwale 8ea48c5eaa fix: use actionCommand for telemetry command tracking
The preAction hook receives (thisCommand, actionCommand) where thisCommand
is the root program and actionCommand is the actual subcommand being run.
Using thisCommand was incorrectly tracking the root command instead of
the actual subcommand executed by the user.
2026-01-10 15:07:06 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 4715138927 fix: set USERPROFILE for Windows compatibility in telemetry tests (#469)
On Windows, os.homedir() uses the USERPROFILE environment variable
instead of HOME. The telemetry config tests were only mocking HOME,
causing them to fail on Windows CI.
2026-01-09 23:36:54 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 940898c1c5 Add optional anonymous usage statistics (#468)
* chore: add proposal for PostHog analytics integration

Introduces the proposal artifact for adding opt-in telemetry to OpenSpec
using PostHog. Covers command tracking, feature adoption metrics, and
privacy-respecting consent management.

* feat: add optional anonymous usage statistics

Introduces privacy-first usage analytics to help understand how OpenSpec
is being used. Key privacy protections:

- Only tracks command names and version (no arguments, paths, or content)
- Opt-out via OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0 or DO_NOT_TRACK=1
- Auto-disabled in CI environments
- No IP address collection (explicitly disabled)
- Anonymous ID is a random UUID with no PII

Uses PostHog with a reverse proxy to avoid ad blockers. First-run shows
a one-line notice informing users about the collection.

* docs: make telemetry section collapsible and concise
2026-01-09 23:10:31 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale d49a88c3bb feat: add /opsx:explore command for exploratory thinking (#467)
Wire up the explore skill and slash command templates to the
artifact-experimental-setup command. This adds /opsx:explore as
a thinking partner mode for exploring ideas, investigating problems,
and clarifying requirements before committing to a change.

Changes:
- Add imports for getExploreSkillTemplate and getOpsxExploreCommandTemplate
- Add explore skill to skills array (generates openspec-explore/SKILL.md)
- Add explore command to commands array (generates opsx/explore.md)
- Add /opsx:explore to CLI usage message
- Update docs/experimental-workflow.md with explore command
2026-01-09 20:15:26 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale bb9f6ce0ea docs: add OPSX experimental workflow visibility to README (#460)
* docs: add OPSX experimental workflow visibility to README

Add a subtle banner near the top and an Experimental Features section
before Contributing to draw attention to the new OPSX workflow.

* docs: reframe OPSX messaging around fluid iteration

Update messaging to emphasize the core value proposition:
- No phases, just actions
- Dependencies are enablers, not gates
- Update artifacts as you learn during implementation

The previous "step-by-step artifact creation" framing incorrectly
suggested more bureaucracy. OPSX is about less rigidity, not more.

* docs: add architecture deep dive with ASCII diagrams

Add comprehensive comparison of standard vs OPSX workflow architecture:
- Philosophy: phases vs actions
- Component architecture diagrams
- Dependency graph model
- Information flow comparison
- Iteration model comparison
- Custom schema example

* docs: emphasize hackability and experimentation rationale

Add "Why We Built This" section explaining the meta-level motivation:
- Instructions were hardcoded, hard to improve
- Needed granular, testable artifacts
- Wanted to experiment with different workflows without code changes
- OPSX makes the instruction system itself hackable

Update README banner and experimental features section to highlight
schema-driven, hackable nature alongside fluid iteration benefits.

* docs: reframe hackability as user benefit, not just internal

OPSX isn't just for OpenSpec devs to experiment - it's for everyone:
- Teams can create workflows that match how they work
- Power users can tweak prompts to get better AI outputs
- Contributors can experiment without releases

Updated framing from "we needed" to "now anyone can".

* docs: add guidance on when to update vs. start fresh

Addresses a common question: when does "update as you learn" become
"this is different work"? Adds heuristics based on intent, scope
overlap, and completability to help users make the judgment call.
2026-01-09 20:09:53 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale ae85a7229d fix: offer parent flags in Bash and PowerShell completions when subcommands exist (#466)
When a command has both flags and subcommands, the Bash and PowerShell
completion generators now check if the user is typing a flag (input
starts with `-`) before offering subcommand completions. This fixes the
issue where parent-level flags were never suggested.

Before: `openspec config --<TAB>` → Only showed subcommands
After: `openspec config --<TAB>` → Shows parent flags when input starts with `-`

Fixes #463
2026-01-09 19:40:13 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 504c93bdf1 fix: skip additional Windows-specific tests (#465)
* fix: skip additional Windows-specific tests

- fish-installer: skip uninstall permission test (chmod on directory)
- powershell-installer: skip "skip configuration when script line exists"
  test (Windows has dual profile paths so the second profile gets configured)

* refactor: use ENOTDIR approach for cross-platform install error tests

Instead of platform-specific invalid paths (Z:\ or /root), create a
temporary file and use it as homeDir. This guarantees deterministic
ENOTDIR failures when trying to create subdirectories on all platforms.
2026-01-09 16:26:26 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale c4a54a8d54 fix: skip Windows-specific permission tests that rely on chmod() (#464)
fs.chmod() on directories doesn't restrict write access on Windows since
Windows uses ACLs that Node.js doesn't control. Additionally, admin users
and CI runners can bypass read-only attributes. Skip these tests on Windows
and use platform-specific invalid paths in cross-platform tests.

Fixes #401 (bash/pwsh completion commit breaking Windows e2e tests).
2026-01-09 16:06:15 -08:00
38d2356836 feature/bash_fish_power_shells_completions (#401)
* added CLI completions support for: bash, fish and powershell

* Add bash/fish/powershell completions

* Archive extend-shell-completions

* Archive extend-shell-completions

* Fix canWriteFile control flow and add tests

* Fix bash completion fallback and security escaping

  - Add _init_completion fallback for systems without bash-completion
  - Fix command injection escaping in Fish/PowerShell generators
  - Add Bash command name escaping for security
  - Add comprehensive security tests for all generators
  - Fix test placement issues in bash/powershell test files

* refactor: extract completion templates and standardize naming

Extract static template literals from generators into separate template files.
Standardize naming to {SHELL}_STATIC_HELPERS and {SHELL}_DYNAMIC_HELPERS.

- Create bash/fish/powershell/zsh template files
- Rename constants: BASH_HELPERS → BASH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS,
  FISH_HELPER_FUNCTIONS → FISH_STATIC_HELPERS,
  POWERSHELL_HELPERS → POWERSHELL_DYNAMIC_HELPERS
- Update generator imports
- Remove ~99 lines of boilerplate from generators

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update spec to reflect multi-shell support

Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: add all shells to zsh completion suggestions

* feat: add --yes flag to completion uninstall

* fix: remove bash-completion dependency from fallback

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: use printf instead of echo for Fish tab output

Fish's echo doesn't interpret escape sequences, so \t outputs
literally instead of as a tab character. Use printf for proper
tab-separated completion output.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: make UX messages shell-aware

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: add Homebrew paths for bash-completion detection

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: support both PowerShell Core and Windows PS 5.1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: preserve colon handling in bash completion

Add -n : option to _init_completion to prevent colons from being
treated as word separators. This is important for spec/change IDs
that may contain colons.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: update completion tests to match implementation changes

Updated bash-generator test to expect `-n :` flag in _init_completion call.
Updated powershell-installer tests to match refactored implementation that
supports both PowerShell Core and Windows PowerShell 5.1.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Tabish Bidiwale <30385142+TabishB@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-01-09 15:49:50 -08:00
Neroyangandneroyang 3f67debf65 feat: change the frontmatter of the Codebuddy Slash Commands (#462)
* feat: change the frontmatter of the Codebuddy Slash Commands

* fix: fix the issue mentioned by coderabbitai

* feat: change the init.test

* feat: change the init.test

---------

Co-authored-by: neroyang <neroyang@tencent.com>
2026-01-09 10:08:59 -08:00
github-actions[bot]andTabish Bidiwale 533cb0fa87 chore(release): version packages (#458)
* Version Packages

* chore: trigger CI

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tabish Bidiwale <tabishbidiwale@gmail.com>
2026-01-07 00:38:00 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 8dfd824477 Add changeset for OPSX experimental workflow commands (#457) 2026-01-07 00:35:04 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 3ed1270316 docs: add experimental workflow (OPSX) user guide (#456)
Adds documentation for the experimental artifact-based workflow:
- Setup instructions (Claude Code only for now)
- Command reference for all /opsx:* commands
- Usage examples and tips
- Comparison with standard workflow
- Feedback links to Discord and GitHub
2026-01-07 00:24:14 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale eb15cdb983 chore: archive completed changes and clean up stale ones (#455)
Archive 5 completed changes:
- opsx-archive-command (synced specs)
- add-specs-apply-command
- add-per-change-schema-metadata
- make-apply-instructions-schema-aware (synced specs)
- add-agent-schema-selection

Delete 5 stale/abandoned changes:
- add-fingerprinting (no tasks, 7 weeks old)
- add-scaffold-command (0/7 tasks, 7 weeks old)
- add-proposal-frontmatter (no tasks, 8 weeks old)
- add-interactive-proposal-command (no tasks, 8 weeks old)
- make-validation-scope-aware (0/8 tasks, 4 months old)

Sync delta specs to main:
- Add opsx-archive-skill spec (new capability)
- Update cli-artifact-workflow spec with Schema Apply Block and
  Apply Instructions Command requirements
2026-01-06 23:52:11 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale cd172a4427 feat: add smart sync check to /opsx:archive command (#452)
Instead of blindly asking "want to sync?", archive now performs a quick
check to see if delta specs actually need syncing:

- Extracts requirement names from delta specs
- Checks if corresponding main spec exists
- Checks if ADDED requirements appear in main spec
- Only prompts if sync appears needed

Also improves archive output to always show specs status:
- ✓ Synced to main specs
- No delta specs
- ⚠️ Not synced
2026-01-06 17:41:45 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale b7f5a429de feat: add /opsx:archive command for archiving completed changes (#451)
Add `/opsx:archive` slash command to complete the OPSX workflow lifecycle.
This command archives completed changes in the experimental workflow with:

- Change selection prompt (if not specified)
- Artifact completion check using `openspec status --json`
- Task completion check (parsing tasks.md for `- [ ]`)
- Spec sync prompt (offers `/opsx:sync` before archiving if specs exist)
- Archive to `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`
- Clear output formatting for success, warnings, and errors

This completes the OPSX command suite:
- /opsx:new - Start a change
- /opsx:continue - Create next artifact
- /opsx:ff - Fast-forward all artifacts
- /opsx:apply - Implement tasks
- /opsx:sync - Sync delta specs
- /opsx:archive - Archive completed change (NEW)
2026-01-06 17:21:37 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale a5c10ed5e7 feat: add /opsx:sync command for syncing delta specs to main specs (#450)
* feat: add /opsx:sync command for syncing delta specs to main specs

Add a new agent-driven skill that syncs delta specs from a change to main specs
without requiring archiving. This enables:

- Updating main specs during active development
- Intelligent merging (partial updates, adding scenarios)
- Idempotent operation (safe to run multiple times)

Implementation:
- Extract shared specs-apply logic from archive.ts to specs-apply.ts
- Add getSyncSpecsSkillTemplate and getOpsxSyncCommandTemplate
- Register /opsx:sync in artifact-experimental-setup
- Add specs-sync-skill main spec

* fix: rename specs apply to specs sync throughout change artifacts

Update all references:
- /opsx:specs → /opsx:sync
- specs-apply-skill → specs-sync-skill
- Remove cli-artifact-workflow delta spec (no CLI command)
- Update proposal, design, and tasks docs
2026-01-06 16:32:22 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 1bc849554c feat: add /opsx:ff command for fast-forward artifact creation (#448)
Adds a new fast-forward command that creates all artifacts needed for
implementation in one go, instead of stepping through them individually.

Changes:
- Add `applyRequires` field to status JSON output (shows which artifacts
  are required before the apply phase can begin)
- Add skill template for openspec-ff-change
- Add command template for /opsx:ff slash command
- Register templates in artifact-workflow setup command

The fast-forward command uses the schema's `apply.requires` configuration
to determine when to stop creating artifacts, making it schema-agnostic.
2026-01-06 11:49:03 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale d73705736f feat: make apply instructions schema-aware (#444)
* feat: make apply instructions schema-aware

The `generateApplyInstructions` function was hardcoded to check for
`spec-driven` artifacts. This change makes it read artifact definitions
from the schema's new `apply` block, enabling support for different
workflows like TDD.

Changes:
- Add `ApplyPhaseSchema` Zod schema with `requires`, `tracks`, and
  `instruction` fields to types.ts
- Update `SchemaYamlSchema` to include optional `apply` field
- Add `apply` block to spec-driven and tdd schemas
- Refactor `generateApplyInstructions` to:
  - Load schema via `resolveSchema()`
  - Read `apply.requires` for required artifacts
  - Check artifact existence dynamically (supports glob patterns)
  - Use `apply.tracks` for progress tracking (or skip if null)
  - Use `apply.instruction` for custom guidance
  - Build `contextFiles` from all existing artifacts in schema
- Handle fallback when schema has no `apply` block (require all artifacts)
- Add 8 new tests for schema-aware apply behavior

* fix: improve apply instructions robustness and consistency

- Fix artifactOutputExists to properly handle glob patterns cross-platform
  by using path.sep and verifying actual file matches
- Remove redundant if/else in contextFiles loop
- Distinguish between missing tracks file vs empty tracks file
- Use consistent { error: } key in ApplyPhaseSchema validation
- Rename fallback test to accurately describe what it tests

* test: add fallback behavior tests for schemas without apply block

Add two tests that verify the fallback logic when a schema lacks an
apply block:
- Blocks when not all artifacts exist (requires ALL artifacts)
- Ready state with default instruction when all artifacts exist

Uses XDG_DATA_HOME to create temporary user schemas for testing.
2026-01-05 22:45:27 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale ed924ffcff feat: add agent schema selection to experimental artifact workflow (#445)
- Add `openspec schemas` CLI command with `--json` option for agents
- Add `listSchemasWithInfo()` helper to get schema metadata (name, description, artifacts)
- Update `openspec-new-change` skill to prompt for schema selection
- Update `openspec-continue-change` skill to read schema dynamically from status
- Update `openspec-apply-change` skill to use schema-specific context files
- Update all slash commands (/opsx:new, /opsx:continue, /opsx:apply) to be schema-agnostic
- Add documentation for when to use each schema (spec-driven vs tdd)

Agents can now create changes with different workflow schemas and the skills
dynamically adapt based on the selected schema's artifact sequence.
2026-01-05 22:32:22 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 1786684af6 feat: add per-change schema metadata (.openspec.yaml) (#443)
This feature enables workflow schema auto-detection for changes:

- Add ChangeMetadataSchema Zod schema to types.ts
- Create change-metadata.ts with writeChangeMetadata(), readChangeMetadata()
- Update createChange() to accept optional schema param and write metadata
- Modify loadChangeContext() to auto-detect schema from .openspec.yaml
- Add --schema option to openspec new change command
- Update status/instructions commands to auto-detect schema from metadata

Schema resolution order:
1. Explicit --schema flag (if provided)
2. Schema from .openspec.yaml in change directory
3. Default 'spec-driven'
2026-01-05 17:13:52 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale 51fb10db5e feat: add slash commands to artifact-experimental-setup (#442)
Extend the `openspec artifact-experimental-setup` command to also generate
slash commands alongside Agent Skills.

Changes:
- Add CommandTemplate interface and template functions for /opsx:new,
  /opsx:continue, and /opsx:apply commands
- Modify artifactExperimentalSetupCommand() to create slash command files
  at .claude/commands/opsx/
- Update success message to show both skills and slash commands created

The setup command now creates:
- 3 Agent Skills (.claude/skills/)
- 3 Slash Commands (.claude/commands/opsx/)
2026-01-05 17:08:46 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale cac54042ce feat: add Agent Skills for experimental artifact workflow (#424)
* feat: add Agent Skills for experimental artifact workflow

Implements Task #3 from the experimental release plan:
- Create skill templates for openspec-new-change and openspec-continue-change
- Add artifact-experimental-setup CLI command
- Generate Agent Skills in .claude/skills/ directory
- Support cross-editor compatibility (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf)

Skills follow the Agent Skills specification and provide:
- Natural language invocation by AI assistants
- Step-by-step artifact creation workflow
- Dependency-driven change management

* fix: update GitHub issues URL to correct repository

Replace placeholder `https://github.com/your-org/openspec/issues`
with correct URL `https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/issues` in:
- docs/experimental-release-plan.md
- src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts

Verified against package.json repository.url field.

* feat: add openspec-apply-change skill for task implementation

Add the apply skill to guide agents through implementing tasks from an
OpenSpec change:

- Add `openspec instructions apply` CLI command that parses tasks.md and
  returns context files, progress tracking, and dynamic instructions
- Add `getApplyChangeSkillTemplate()` to skill-templates.ts with full
  workflow guidance for implementing tasks
- Update artifact-experimental-setup to generate all three skills:
  openspec-new-change, openspec-continue-change, openspec-apply-change

The apply skill supports the fluid "actions on a change" model:
- Can be invoked anytime (if tasks.md exists)
- Handles blocked/ready/all_done states
- Guides agents to pause on issues and suggest artifact updates
- Tracks progress via task checkboxes

* docs: mark apply skill implementation steps as complete

* feat: add Capabilities section to proposal template

Enrich the proposal template to explicitly capture capability discovery:

- Add "Capabilities" section with "New Capabilities" and "Modified
  Capabilities" subsections to proposal template
- Update proposal instruction in schema.yaml to guide agents on
  researching existing specs and listing capabilities
- Update skill instructions with detailed guidance for the Capabilities
  section

This creates a clear contract between proposal and specs phases - each
capability listed in the proposal will need a corresponding spec file.

* feat: remove redundant `openspec next` command

The `next` command was redundant with `status` - both show which artifacts
are ready to create. The status command provides more context (done/ready/blocked)
and is the single source of truth for artifact state.

Changes:
- Remove nextCommand function and CLI registration from artifact-workflow.ts
- Update skill templates to use status instead of next
- Update docs and specs to reflect removal
- Add REMOVED Requirements section to cli-artifact-workflow spec
- Remove 7 tests for the next command

Migration: Use `openspec status --change <id> --json` and filter artifacts
with `status: "ready"` to find artifacts that can be created next.

* docs: clarify kebab-case naming in proposal template

Update HTML comments in the Capabilities section to explicitly instruct
using kebab-case identifiers with examples (user-auth, data-export,
api-rate-limiting).

* feat: add change proposals for per-change schema metadata

Add two related change proposals for enabling schema selection in the
experimental artifact workflow:

1. add-per-change-schema-metadata: Store schema choice in .openspec.yaml
   per change, enabling auto-detection in workflow commands. Includes
   Zod schema design and delta specs for cli-artifact-workflow.

2. add-agent-schema-selection: Follow-up to update agent skills to
   support dynamic schema selection (depends on metadata change).

Also includes:
- Example .openspec.yaml in add-frontmatter-to-openspec-artifact-files
- Clarify "Modified Capabilities" guidance in proposal template

* remove test change

* feat: fix design.md as optional, update docs, add schema-aware apply proposal

Changes:
- Fix generateApplyInstructions to treat design.md as optional (not required)
- Update experimental-release-plan.md CLI output to match implementation
- Add openspec-apply-change skill to docs (was missing)
- Fix test flow numbering after adding apply skill verification step
- Add change proposal for making apply instructions schema-aware

The schema-aware proposal introduces an `implementation` block in schema.yaml
to define when a change becomes implementable and how to track progress.
2026-01-05 16:42:17 -08:00
Tabish Bidiwale c47cdaafe2 fix: archive add-antigravity-support and fix-cline-workflows-implementation (#423)
Archives two changes that were missing complete requirement content in their
spec deltas, which would have caused data loss during archival:

1. add-antigravity-support: Adds Antigravity IDE support to cli-init and
   cli-update with proper workflow file generation in `.agent/workflows/`

2. fix-cline-workflows-implementation: Corrects Cline paths from `.clinerules/`
   to `.clinerules/workflows/` to match Cline's official workflow conventions

Both deltas were fixed to include all 15 slash command scenarios (14 existing +
1 new Antigravity) to prevent loss of existing requirements when archived.
2025-12-31 00:12:07 +11:00
Tabish Bidiwale ea5aa0e562 feat: enhance artifact instructions with inline guidance and XML output (#422)
* feat: enhance artifact instructions with inline guidance and XML output

Schema changes:
- Add `instruction` field to artifacts for inline creation guidance
- Include detailed instructions for proposal, specs, design, and tasks

Instruction loader enhancements:
- Return `instruction` field from schema
- Include `changeDir` for full path resolution
- Enrich dependency info with `path` and `description` fields

CLI output improvements:
- New XML-style format for `openspec instructions` (better for AI parsing)
- Structured tags: <artifact>, <task>, <context>, <output>, <template>
- Dependencies now show full paths for easy file reading
- JSON output includes all new fields

* docs: add schema customization and workflow gap documentation

- schema-customization.md: Guide for customizing artifact schemas
- schema-workflow-gaps.md: Analysis of current workflow limitations

* test: fix list test for new default sort order

Update test to explicitly use sort='name' since the default
changed from alphabetical to most-recently-modified.
2025-12-30 22:28:49 +11:00
Tabish Bidiwale 48b5ed9657 feat: enhance list command with last modified timestamps and sorting (#421)
- Add lastModified field showing when each change was last modified
- Default sort order is now "recent" (most recently modified first)
- Add --sort option to choose between "recent" and "name" ordering
- Add --json option for programmatic access with structured output
- Fall back to directory mtime for empty change directories
- Display relative time (e.g., "2h ago", "3d ago") in human output
2025-12-30 22:06:17 +11:00
Tabish Bidiwale fb7ff527a6 proposal: add artifact workflow CLI commands (Slice 4) (#415)
* proposal: add artifact workflow CLI commands (Slice 4)

Add CLI commands for artifact workflow operations:
- `openspec status --change <id>` - Show artifact completion state
- `openspec next --change <id>` - Show ready artifacts
- `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>` - Get enriched template
- `openspec templates --change <id>` - Show template paths
- `openspec new change <name>` - Create new change

Commands are top-level for fluid UX and implemented in isolation
for easy removal (experimental feature).

* fix: remove --change from templates command

Templates are schema-level, not change-level. The command now uses
--schema instead of --change for consistency with how templates
are actually resolved.

* rename: cli-workflow -> cli-artifact-workflow

More specific capability name that clarifies which workflow the CLI
commands are for.

* feat: implement artifact workflow CLI commands (Slice 4)

Add experimental CLI commands for artifact-based workflow management:
- `openspec status --change <id>` - display artifact completion status
- `openspec next --change <id>` - show artifacts ready to create
- `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>` - output enriched template
- `openspec templates [--schema <name>]` - show resolved template paths
- `openspec new change <name>` - create new change directory

Features:
- JSON output support (--json flag) for all commands
- Color-coded status indicators (green/yellow/red)
- Progress spinners during loading
- --no-color and NO_COLOR env support
- --schema option for custom schema selection
- Comprehensive error handling with helpful messages

All commands are isolated in src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts for easy
removal if the feature doesn't work out. Help text marks them as experimental.

* fix: update specs glob to match nested directory structure

The schema used specs/*.md but specs are stored as specs/<capability>/spec.md.
Updated to specs/**/*.md so openspec status/next correctly detect spec completion.

* test: update test to match new specs glob pattern

* chore: archive add-artifact-workflow-cli change

- Move change to archive/2025-12-28-add-artifact-workflow-cli
- Create cli-artifact-workflow spec

* feat: unify change state model for scaffolded changes

- Update artifact workflow commands to work with scaffolded changes
- Add draft changes section to dashboard view
- Fix completed changes to require tasks.total > 0
- Archive unify-change-state-model change

* fix: validate change name format to prevent path traversal

Add validation in validateChangeExists() to ensure --change parameter
is a valid kebab-case ID before constructing file paths. This prevents
path traversal attacks like --change "../foo" or --change "/etc/passwd".

- Reuses existing validateChangeName() from change-utils.ts
- Adds 3 tests for path traversal, absolute paths, and slashes
2025-12-29 16:55:56 +11:00
128 changed files with 17070 additions and 779 deletions
+31
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,36 @@
# @fission-ai/openspec
## 0.18.0
### Minor Changes
- 8dfd824: Add OPSX experimental workflow commands and enhanced artifact system
**New Commands:**
- `/opsx:ff` - Fast-forward through artifact creation, generating all needed artifacts in one go
- `/opsx:sync` - Sync delta specs from a change to main specs
- `/opsx:archive` - Archive completed changes with smart sync check
**Artifact Workflow Enhancements:**
- Schema-aware apply instructions with inline guidance and XML output
- Agent schema selection for experimental artifact workflow
- Per-change schema metadata via `.openspec.yaml` files
- Agent Skills for experimental artifact workflow
- Instruction loader for template loading and change context
- Restructured schemas as directories with templates
**Improvements:**
- Enhanced list command with last modified timestamps and sorting
- Change creation utilities for better workflow support
**Fixes:**
- Normalize paths for cross-platform glob compatibility
- Allow REMOVED requirements when creating new spec files
## 0.17.2
### Patch Changes
+51
View File
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
Follow <a href="https://x.com/0xTab">@0xTab on X</a> for updates · Join the <a href="https://discord.gg/YctCnvvshC">OpenSpec Discord</a> for help and questions.
</p>
<p align="center">
<sub>🧪 <strong>New:</strong> <a href="docs/experimental-workflow.md">Experimental Workflow (OPSX)</a> — schema-driven, hackable, fluid. Iterate on workflows without code changes.</sub>
</p>
# OpenSpec
OpenSpec aligns humans and AI coding assistants with spec-driven development so you agree on what to build before any code is written. **No API keys required.**
@@ -368,6 +372,53 @@ Run `openspec update` whenever someone switches tools so your agents pick up the
2. **Refresh agent instructions**
- Run `openspec update` inside each project to regenerate AI guidance and ensure the latest slash commands are active.
## Experimental Features
<details>
<summary><strong>🧪 OPSX: Fluid, Iterative Workflow</strong> (Claude Code only)</summary>
**Why this exists:**
- Standard workflow is locked down — you can't tweak instructions or customize
- When AI output is bad, you can't improve the prompts yourself
- Same workflow for everyone, no way to match how your team works
**What's different:**
- **Hackable** — edit templates and schemas yourself, test immediately, no rebuild
- **Granular** — each artifact has its own instructions, test and tweak individually
- **Customizable** — define your own workflows, artifacts, and dependencies
- **Fluid** — no phase gates, update any artifact anytime
```
You can always go back:
proposal ──→ specs ──→ design ──→ tasks ──→ implement
▲ ▲ ▲ │
└───────────┴──────────┴────────────────────┘
```
| Command | What it does |
|---------|--------------|
| `/opsx:new` | Start a new change |
| `/opsx:continue` | Create the next artifact (based on what's ready) |
| `/opsx:ff` | Fast-forward (all planning artifacts at once) |
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks, updating artifacts as needed |
| `/opsx:archive` | Archive when done |
**Setup:** `openspec artifact-experimental-setup`
[Full documentation →](docs/experimental-workflow.md)
</details>
<details>
<summary><strong>Telemetry</strong> – OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats (opt-out: <code>OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0</code>)</summary>
We collect only command names and version to understand usage patterns. No arguments, paths, content, or PII. Automatically disabled in CI.
**Opt-out:** `export OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` or `export DO_NOT_TRACK=1`
</details>
## Contributing
- Install dependencies: `pnpm install`
+926
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,926 @@
# OpenSpec Experimental Release Plan
This document outlines the plan to release the experimental artifact workflow system for user testing.
## Overview
The goal is to allow users to test the new artifact-driven workflow system alongside the existing OpenSpec commands. This experimental system (`opsx`) provides a more granular, step-by-step approach to creating change artifacts.
## Three Workflow Modes
### 1. Old Workflow (Current Production)
- **Commands**: `/openspec:proposal`, `/openspec:apply`, `/openspec:archive`
- **Behavior**: Hardcoded slash commands that generate all artifacts in one command
- **Status**: Production, unchanged
### 2. New Artifact System - Batch Mode (Future)
- **Commands**: Refactored `/openspec:proposal` using schemas
- **Behavior**: Schema-driven but generates all artifacts at once (like legacy)
- **Status**: Not in scope for this experimental release
- **Note**: This is a future refactor to unify the old system with schemas
### 3. New Artifact System - Granular Mode (Experimental)
- **Commands**: `/opsx:new`, `/opsx:continue`
- **Behavior**: One artifact at a time, dependency-driven, iterative
- **Status**: Target for this experimental release
---
## Work Items
### 1. Rename AWF to OPSX
**Current State:**
- Commands: `/awf:start`, `/awf:continue`
- Files: `.claude/commands/awf/start.md`, `.claude/commands/awf/continue.md`
**Target State:**
- Commands: `/opsx:new`, `/opsx:continue`
- Files: `.claude/commands/opsx/new.md`, `.claude/commands/opsx/continue.md`
**Tasks:**
- [x] Create `.claude/commands/opsx/` directory
- [x] Rename `start.md` → `new.md` and update content
- [x] Copy `continue.md` with updated references
- [x] Update all references from "awf" to "opsx" in command content
- [x] Update frontmatter (name, description) to use "opsx" naming
- [x] Remove `.claude/commands/awf/` directory
**CLI Commands:**
The underlying CLI commands (`openspec status`, `openspec instructions`, etc.) remain unchanged. Only the slash command names change.
---
### 2. Remove WF Skill Files
**Current State:**
- `.claude/commands/wf/start.md` - References non-existent `openspec wf` commands
- `.claude/commands/wf/continue.md` - References non-existent `openspec wf` commands
**Target State:**
- Directory and files removed
**Tasks:**
- [x] Delete `.claude/commands/wf/start.md`
- [x] Delete `.claude/commands/wf/continue.md`
- [x] Delete `.claude/commands/wf/` directory
---
### 3. Add Agent Skills for Experimental Workflow
**Purpose:**
Generate experimental workflow skills using the [Agent Skills](https://agentskills.io/specification) open standard.
**Why Skills Instead of Slash Commands:**
- **Cross-editor compatibility**: Skills work in Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and other compatible editors automatically
- **Simpler implementation**: Single directory (`.claude/skills/`) instead of 18+ editor-specific configurators
- **Standard format**: Open standard with simple YAML frontmatter + markdown
- **User invocation**: Users explicitly invoke skills when they want to use them
**Behavior:**
1. Create `.claude/skills/` directory if it doesn't exist
2. Generate two skills using the Agent Skills specification:
- `openspec-new-change/SKILL.md` - Start a new change with artifact workflow
- `openspec-continue-change/SKILL.md` - Continue working on a change (create next artifact)
3. Skills are added **alongside** existing `/openspec:*` commands (not replacing)
**Supported Editors:**
- Claude Code (native support)
- Cursor (native support via Settings → Rules → Import Settings)
- Windsurf (imports `.claude` configs)
- Cline, Codex, and other Agent Skills-compatible editors
**Tasks:**
- [x] Create skill template content for `openspec-new-change` (based on current opsx:new)
- [x] Create skill template content for `openspec-continue-change` (based on current opsx:continue)
- [x] Add temporary `artifact-experimental-setup` command to CLI
- [x] Implement skill file generation (YAML frontmatter + markdown body)
- [x] Add success message with usage instructions
**Note:** The `artifact-experimental-setup` command is temporary and will be merged into `openspec init` once the experimental workflow is promoted to stable.
**Skill Format:**
Each skill is a directory with a `SKILL.md` file:
```
.claude/skills/
├── openspec-new-change/
│ └── SKILL.md # name, description, instructions
├── openspec-continue-change/
│ └── SKILL.md # name, description, instructions
└── openspec-apply-change/
└── SKILL.md # name, description, instructions
```
**CLI Interface:**
```bash
openspec artifact-experimental-setup
# Output:
# 🧪 Experimental Artifact Workflow Skills Created
#
# ✓ .claude/skills/openspec-new-change/SKILL.md
# ✓ .claude/skills/openspec-continue-change/SKILL.md
# ✓ .claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
#
# 📖 Usage:
#
# Skills work automatically in compatible editors:
# • Claude Code - Auto-detected, ready to use
# • Cursor - Enable in Settings → Rules → Import Settings
# • Windsurf - Auto-imports from .claude directory
#
# Ask Claude naturally:
# • "I want to start a new OpenSpec change to add <feature>"
# • "Continue working on this change"
#
# Claude will automatically use the appropriate skill.
#
# 💡 This is an experimental feature.
# Feedback welcome at: https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/issues
```
**Implementation Notes:**
- Simple file writing: Create directories and write templated `SKILL.md` files (no complex logic)
- Use existing `FileSystemUtils.writeFile()` pattern like slash command configurators
- Template structure: YAML frontmatter + markdown body
- Keep existing `/opsx:*` slash commands for now (manual cleanup later)
- Skills use invocation model (user explicitly asks Claude to use them)
- Skill `description` field guides when Claude suggests using the skill
- Each `SKILL.md` has required fields: `name` (matches directory) and `description`
---
### 4. Update `/opsx:new` Command Content
**Current Behavior (awf:start):**
1. Ask user what they want to build (if no input)
2. Create change directory
3. Show artifact status
4. Show what's ready
5. Get instructions for proposal
6. STOP and wait
**New Behavior (opsx:new):**
Same flow but with updated naming:
- References to "awf" → "opsx"
- References to `/awf:continue` → `/opsx:continue`
- Update frontmatter name/description
**Tasks:**
- [x] Update all "awf" references to "opsx"
- [x] Update command references in prompt text
- [x] Verify CLI commands still work (they use `openspec`, not `awf`)
---
### 5. Update `/opsx:continue` Command Content
**Current Behavior (awf:continue):**
1. Prompt for change selection (if not provided)
2. Check current status
3. Create ONE artifact based on what's ready
4. Show progress and what's unlocked
5. STOP
**New Behavior (opsx:continue):**
Same flow with updated naming.
**Tasks:**
- [x] Update all "awf" references to "opsx"
- [x] Update command references in prompt text
---
### 6. End-to-End Testing
**Objective:**
Run through a complete workflow with Claude using the new skills to create a real feature, validating the entire flow works.
**Test Scenario:**
Use a real OpenSpec feature as the test case (dog-fooding).
**Test Flow:**
1. Run `openspec artifact-experimental-setup` to create skills
2. Verify `.claude/skills/openspec-new-change/SKILL.md` created
3. Verify `.claude/skills/openspec-continue-change/SKILL.md` created
4. Verify `.claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md` created
5. Ask Claude: "I want to start a new OpenSpec change to add feature X"
6. Verify Claude invokes the `openspec-new-change` skill
7. Verify change directory created at `openspec/changes/add-feature-x/`
8. Verify proposal template shown
9. Ask Claude: "Continue working on this change"
10. Verify Claude invokes the `openspec-continue-change` skill
11. Verify `proposal.md` created with content
12. Ask Claude: "Continue" (create specs)
13. Verify `specs/*.md` created
14. Ask Claude: "Continue" (create design)
15. Verify `design.md` created
16. Ask Claude: "Continue" (create tasks)
17. Verify `tasks.md` created
18. Verify status shows 4/4 complete
19. Implement the feature based on tasks
20. Run `/openspec:archive` to archive the change
**Validation Checklist:**
- [ ] `openspec artifact-experimental-setup` creates correct directory structure
- [ ] Skills are auto-detected in Claude Code
- [ ] Skill descriptions trigger appropriate invocations
- [ ] Skills create change directory and show proposal template
- [ ] Skills correctly identify ready artifacts
- [ ] Skills create artifacts with meaningful content
- [ ] Dependency detection works (specs requires proposal, etc.)
- [ ] Progress tracking is accurate
- [ ] Template content is useful and well-structured
- [ ] Error handling works (invalid names, missing changes, etc.)
- [ ] Works with different schemas (spec-driven, tdd)
- [ ] Test in Cursor (Settings → Rules → Import Settings)
**Document Results:**
- Create test log documenting what worked and what didn't
- Note any friction points or confusing UX
- Identify bugs or improvements needed before user release
---
### 7. Documentation for Users
**Create user-facing documentation explaining:**
1. **What is the experimental workflow?**
- A new way to create OpenSpec changes step-by-step using Agent Skills
- One artifact at a time with dependency tracking
- More interactive and iterative than the batch approach
- Works across Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and other compatible editors
2. **How to set up experimental workflow**
```bash
openspec artifact-experimental-setup
```
Note: This is a temporary command that will be integrated into `openspec init` once promoted to stable.
3. **Available skills**
- `openspec-new-change` - Start a new change with artifact workflow
- `openspec-continue-change` - Continue working (create next artifact)
4. **How to use**
- **Claude Code**: Skills are auto-detected, just ask Claude naturally
- "I want to start a new OpenSpec change to add X"
- "Continue working on this change"
- **Cursor**: Enable in Settings → Rules → Import Settings
- **Windsurf**: Auto-imports `.claude` directory
5. **Example workflow**
- Step-by-step walkthrough with natural language interactions
- Show how Claude invokes skills based on user requests
6. **Feedback mechanism**
- GitHub issue template for feedback
- What to report (bugs, UX issues, suggestions)
**Tasks:**
- [ ] Create `docs/experimental-workflow.md` user guide
- [ ] Add GitHub issue template for experimental feedback
- [ ] Update README with mention of experimental features
---
## Dependency Graph
```
1. Remove WF skill files
└── (no dependencies)
2. Rename AWF to OPSX
└── (no dependencies)
3. Add Agent Skills
└── Depends on: Rename AWF to OPSX (uses opsx content as templates)
4. Update opsx:new content
└── Depends on: Rename AWF to OPSX
5. Update opsx:continue content
└── Depends on: Rename AWF to OPSX
6. E2E Testing
└── Depends on: Add Agent Skills (tests the skills workflow)
7. User Documentation
└── Depends on: E2E Testing (need to know final behavior)
```
---
## Out of Scope
The following are explicitly NOT part of this experimental release:
1. **Batch mode refactor** - Making legacy `/openspec:proposal` use schemas
2. **New schemas** - Only shipping with existing `spec-driven` and `tdd`
3. **Schema customization UI** - No `openspec schema list` or similar
4. **Multiple editor support in CLI** - Skills work cross-editor automatically via `.claude/skills/`
5. **Replacing existing commands** - Skills are additive, not replacing `/openspec:*` or `/opsx:*`
---
## Success Criteria
The experimental release is ready when:
1. `openspec-new-change`, `openspec-continue-change`, and `openspec-apply-change` skills work end-to-end
2. `openspec artifact-experimental-setup` creates skills in `.claude/skills/`
3. Skills work in Claude Code and are compatible with Cursor/Windsurf
4. At least one complete workflow has been tested manually
5. User documentation exists explaining how to generate and use skills
6. Feedback mechanism is in place
7. WF skill files are removed
8. No references to "awf" remain in user-facing content
---
## Open Questions
1. **Schema selection** - Should `opsx:new` allow selecting a schema, or always use `spec-driven`?
- Current: Always uses `spec-driven` as default
- Consider: Add `--schema tdd` option or prompt
2. **Namespace in CLI** - Should experimental CLI commands be namespaced?
- Current: `openspec status`, `openspec instructions` (no namespace)
- Alternative: `openspec opsx status` (explicit experimental namespace)
- Recommendation: Keep current, less typing for users
3. **Deprecation path** - If opsx becomes the default, how do we migrate?
- Not needed for experimental release
- Document that command names may change
---
## Estimated Work Breakdown
| Item | Complexity | Notes |
|------|------------|-------|
| Remove WF files | Trivial | Just delete 2 files + directory |
| Rename AWF → OPSX | Low | File renames + content updates |
| Add Agent Skills | **Low** | **Simple: 3-4 files, single output directory, standard format** |
| Update opsx:new content | Low | Text replacements |
| Update opsx:continue content | Low | Text replacements |
| E2E Testing | Medium | Manual testing, documenting results |
| User Documentation | Medium | New docs, issue template |
**Key Improvement:** Switching to Agent Skills reduces complexity significantly:
- **Before:** 20+ files (type definitions, 18+ editor configurators, editor selection UI)
- **After:** 3-4 files (skill templates, simple CLI command)
- **Cross-editor:** Works automatically in Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf without extra code
---
## User Feedback from E2E Testing
### What Worked Well
1. **Clear dependency graph** ⭐ HIGH PRIORITY - KEEP
- The status command showing blocked/unblocked artifacts was intuitive:
```
[x] proposal
[ ] design
[-] tasks (blocked by: design, specs)
```
- Users always knew what they could work on next
- **Relevance**: Core UX strength to preserve
2. **Structured instructions output** ⭐ HIGH PRIORITY - KEEP
- `openspec instructions <artifact>` gave templates, output paths, and context in one call
- Very helpful for understanding what to create
- **Relevance**: Essential for agent-driven workflow
3. **Simple scaffolding** ✅ WORKS WELL
- `openspec new change "name"` just worked - created directory structure without fuss
- **Relevance**: Good baseline, room for improvement (see pain points)
---
### Pain Points & Confusion
1. **Redundant CLI calls** ⚠️ MEDIUM PRIORITY
- Users called both `status` AND `next` every time, but they overlap significantly
- `status` already shows what's blocked
- **Recommendation**: Consider merging or making `next` give actionable guidance beyond just listing names
- **Relevance**: Reduces friction in iterative workflow
2. **Specs directory structure was ambiguous** 🔥 HIGH PRIORITY - FIX
- Instructions said: `Write to: .../specs/**/*.md`
- Users had to guess: `specs/spec.md`? `specs/game/spec.md`? `specs/tic-tac-toe/spec.md`?
- Users ended up doing manual `mkdir -p .../specs/tic-tac-toe` then writing `spec.md` inside
- **Recommendation**: CLI should scaffold this directory structure automatically
- **Relevance**: Critical agent UX - ambiguous paths cause workflow friction
3. **Repetitive --change flag** ⚠️ MEDIUM PRIORITY
- Every command needed `--change "tic-tac-toe-game"`
- After 10+ calls, this felt verbose
- **Recommendation**: `openspec use "tic-tac-toe-game"` to set context, then subsequent commands assume that change
- **Relevance**: Quality of life improvement for iterative sessions
4. **No validation feedback** 🔥 HIGH PRIORITY - ADD
- After writing each artifact, users just ran `status` hoping it would show `[x]`
- Questions raised:
- How did it know the artifact was "done"? File existence?
- What if spec format was wrong (e.g., wrong heading levels)?
- **Recommendation**: Add `openspec validate --change "name"` to check content quality
- **Relevance**: Critical for user confidence and catching errors early
5. **Query-heavy, action-light CLI** 🔥 HIGH PRIORITY - ENHANCE
- Most commands retrieve info. The only "action" is `new change`
- Artifact creation is manual Write to guessed paths
- **Recommendation**: `openspec create proposal --change "name"` could scaffold the file with template pre-filled, then user just edits
- **Relevance**: Directly impacts agent productivity - reduce manual file writing
6. **Instructions output was verbose** ⚠️ LOW PRIORITY
- XML-style output (`<artifact>`, `<template>`, `<instruction>`) was parseable but long
- Key info (output path, template) was buried in ~50 lines
- **Recommendation**: Add compact mode or structured JSON output for agents
- **Relevance**: Nice-to-have for agent parsing efficiency
---
### Workflow Friction
1. **Mandatory "STOP and wait" after showing proposal template** ⚠️ MEDIUM PRIORITY
- The skill said "STOP and wait" after showing the proposal template
- This felt overly cautious when user had already provided enough context (e.g., "tic tac toe, single player vs AI, minimal aesthetics")
- **Recommendation**: Make the pause optional or conditional based on context clarity
- **Relevance**: Reduces unnecessary round-trips in agent conversations
2. **No connection to implementation** 🔥 HIGH PRIORITY - ROADMAP ITEM
- After 4/4 artifacts complete, then what? The workflow ends at planning
- No `openspec apply` or guidance on how to execute the tasks
- User asked "would you like me to implement?" but that's outside OpenSpec's scope currently
- **Recommendation**: Add implementation bridge - either:
- `openspec apply` command to start execution phase
- Clear handoff to existing `/openspec:apply` workflow
- Documentation on next steps after planning completes
- **Relevance**: Critical missing piece - users expect end-to-end workflow
---
### Priority Summary
**MUST FIX (High Priority):**
1. Specs directory structure ambiguity (#2)
2. Add validation feedback (#4)
3. Make CLI more action-oriented (#5)
4. Bridge to implementation phase (#2 in Workflow Friction)
5. Keep clear dependency graph (#1 in What Worked)
6. Keep structured instructions (#2 in What Worked)
**SHOULD FIX (Medium Priority):**
1. Reduce redundant CLI calls (#1)
2. Repetitive `--change` flag (#3)
3. Mandatory STOP behavior (#1 in Workflow Friction)
**NICE TO HAVE (Low Priority):**
1. Compact instructions output mode (#6)
---
## Design Decisions (from E2E Testing Feedback)
Based on dev testing and analysis of agent workflow friction, we identified three blockers for experimental release and made the following decisions.
### Blockers Identified
From the pain points in E2E testing, three issues are blocking the experimental release:
1. **Specs directory ambiguity** - Agents don't know where to write spec files or how to name capabilities
2. **CLI is query-heavy** - Most commands retrieve info, artifact creation is manual
3. **Apply integration missing** - After 4/4 artifacts complete, no guidance on implementation phase
### Decision 1: Capability Discovery in Proposal (RESOLVED)
**Problem:** The specs artifact instruction says "Create one spec file per capability in `specs/<name>/spec.md`" but:
- Agent doesn't know what `<name>` should be
- Capability identification requires research (existing specs, codebase)
- Proposal template asks for "Affected specs" but doesn't structure it
- Research happens implicitly, output isn't captured
**Decision:** Enrich the proposal template to explicitly capture capability discovery.
**Current proposal template:**
```markdown
## Why
## What Changes
## Impact
- Affected specs: List capabilities... ← vague, easy to skip
- Affected code: ...
```
**New proposal template:**
```markdown
## Why
## What Changes
## Capabilities
### New Capabilities
<!-- Capabilities being introduced (will create new specs/<name>/spec.md) -->
- `<name>`: <brief description of what this capability covers>
### Modified Capabilities
<!-- Existing capabilities being changed (will update existing specs) -->
- `<existing-name>`: <what's changing>
## Impact
<!-- Affected code, APIs, dependencies, systems -->
```
**Rationale:**
- Proposal already asks for capabilities (just poorly) - this makes it explicit
- Captured output is reviewable (vs implicit research that can't be verified)
- Creates clear contract between proposal and specs phases
- Distinguishes NEW vs MODIFIED upfront (critical for specs phase)
- Agent can't skip research - it's part of the deliverable
**Implementation:**
- Update `schemas/spec-driven/templates/proposal.md`
- Update proposal instruction in `schemas/spec-driven/schema.yaml`
- Update skill instructions to guide capability discovery
### Decision 2: CLI Action Commands (IN PROGRESS)
**Problem:** CLI is mostly query-oriented. Agents run `openspec status`, `openspec next`, `openspec instructions` but then must manually write files.
#### Decision 2a: Remove `openspec next` command (RESOLVED)
**Problem:** The `next` command is redundant. It only shows which artifacts are ready, but `status` already shows this information (artifacts with status "ready" vs "blocked" vs "done").
**Current behavior:**
```bash
openspec status --change "X" # Shows: proposal (done), specs (ready), design (blocked), tasks (blocked)
openspec next --change "X" # Shows: ["specs"] ← redundant
```
**Decision:** Remove the `next` command. Agents should use `status` which provides the same info plus more context.
**Implementation:**
- Remove `next` command from CLI
- Update skill instructions to use `status` instead of `next`
- Update AGENTS.md references
#### Decision 2b: CLI Scaffolding (RESOLVED - NO)
**Problem:** After getting instructions, agents manually write files. Should CLI scaffold artifacts instead?
**Options considered:**
- Add `openspec create <artifact>` commands that scaffold files with templates
- Keep current approach where agent writes files directly from instructions
- Hybrid: CLI can scaffold, agent can also write directly
**Decision:** Keep current flow. No scaffolding commands.
**Rationale (from agent ergonomics perspective):**
- One Write is better than multiple Edits - agent composes full content atomically
- `instructions` already provides template in context - scaffolding just moves it to a file
- Fewer tool calls: `instructions` + Write (2) vs `create` + `instructions` + Read + Edit×N (4+)
- Scaffolding doesn't solve the real problem (not knowing WHAT to write)
- Real problem solved by proposal template change (capability discovery)
**For multi-file artifacts (specs):** Scaffolding can't help because CLI doesn't know capability names until proposal is complete. The capability discovery in proposal solves this.
### Decision 3: Apply Integration (RESOLVED)
**Original problem:** After planning completes (4/4 artifacts), the experimental workflow ends. No guidance on implementation.
**Key insight: No phases, just actions.**
Through discussion, we realized phases (planning → implementation → archive) are an artificial constraint. Work is fluid:
- You might start implementing, realize the design is wrong → update design.md
- You're halfway through tasks, discover a new requirement → update specs
- You bounce between "planning" and "implementing" constantly
**The better model: Actions on a Change**
A change is a thing (with artifacts). Actions are verbs you perform on a change. Actions aren't phases - they're fluid operations you can perform anytime.
| Action | What it does | Skill | CLI Command |
|--------|--------------|-------|-------------|
| `new` | Create a change (scaffold directory) | `opsx:new` | `openspec new change` |
| `continue` | Create next artifact (dependency-aware) | `opsx:continue` | `openspec instructions` |
| `apply` | Implement tasks (execute, check off) | `opsx:apply` (NEW) | TBD |
| `update` | Refresh/update artifacts based on learnings | `opsx:update` (NEW) | TBD |
| `explore` | Research, ask questions, understand | `opsx:explore` (NEW) | TBD |
| `validate` | Check artifacts are correct/complete | TBD | `openspec validate` |
| `archive` | Finalize and move to archive | existing | `openspec archive` |
**Key principles:**
- Actions are modeled as skills (primary interface for agents)
- Some skills have matching CLI commands for convenience
- Skills and CLI commands are decoupled - not everything needs both
- Actions can be performed in any order (with soft prerequisites)
- No linear phase gates
**What the schema defines:**
- Artifacts (what they are, where they go)
- Dependencies (what must exist first)
- Required vs optional
- Templates + instructions
**What the schema does NOT define:**
- Phases
- When you can modify things
- Linear workflow
**Progress tracking:**
- tasks.md checkboxes = implementation progress
- Artifact existence = planning progress
- Archive readiness = user decides (or all tasks done)
**For experimental release:**
- Create `opsx:apply` skill (guidance for implementing tasks)
- Document the "actions on a change" model
- Other actions (update, explore) can come later
---
### Design: `openspec-apply-change` Skill
#### Overview
The apply skill guides agents through implementing tasks from a completed (or in-progress) change. Unlike the old `/openspec:apply` command, this skill:
- Is **fluid** - can be invoked anytime, not just after all artifacts are done
- Allows **artifact updates** - if implementation reveals issues, update design/specs
- Works **until done** - keeps going through tasks until complete or blocked
- Tracks **progress via checkboxes** - tasks.md is the source of truth
#### Skill Metadata
```yaml
name: openspec-apply-change
description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
```
#### When to Invoke
The skill should be invoked when:
- User says "implement this change" or "start implementing"
- User says "work on the tasks" or "do the next task"
- User says "apply this change"
- All artifacts are complete and user wants to proceed
- User wants to continue implementation after a break
#### Input
- Optionally: change name
- Optionally: specific task number to work on
- If omitted: prompt for change selection (same pattern as continue-change)
#### Steps
```markdown
**Steps**
1. **If no change name provided, prompt for selection**
Run `openspec list --json` to get available changes. Use **AskUserQuestion** to let user select.
Show changes that have tasks.md (implementation-ready).
Mark changes with incomplete tasks as "(In Progress)".
2. **Get apply instructions**
```bash
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
```
This returns:
- Context file paths (proposal, specs, design, tasks)
- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
**Handle states:**
- If blocked (missing artifacts): show message, suggest `openspec-continue-change`
- If all done: congratulate, suggest archive
- Otherwise: proceed to implementation
3. **Read context files**
Read the files listed in the instructions:
- `proposal.md` - why and what
- `specs/*.md` - requirements and scenarios
- `design.md` - technical approach (if exists)
- `tasks.md` - the implementation checklist
4. **Show current progress**
Display:
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
5. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in tasks.md: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`
- Continue to next task
**Pause if:**
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
6. **On completion or pause, show status**
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
```
#### Output Format
**During implementation:**
```
## Implementing: add-user-auth
Working on task 3/7: Create UserAuth service class
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: Add login endpoint to AuthController
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 5/7: Add JWT token generation
[...implementation happening...]
```
**On completion:**
```
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** add-user-auth
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Create UserAuth service class
- [x] Add login endpoint to AuthController
- [x] Add JWT token generation
- [x] Add logout endpoint
- [x] Add auth middleware
- [x] Write unit tests
- [x] Update API documentation
All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.
```
**On pause (issue encountered):**
```
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** add-user-auth
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
Task 5 "Add JWT token generation" - the design specifies using RS256 but
the existing auth library only supports HS256.
**Options:**
1. Update design.md to use HS256 instead
2. Add a new JWT library that supports RS256
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
```
#### Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context before starting (specs, design)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
#### Fluid Workflow Integration
The apply skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
**Can be invoked anytime:**
- Before all artifacts are done (if tasks.md exists)
- After partial implementation
- Interleaved with other actions (update, continue)
**Allows artifact updates:**
- If implementation reveals design issues → suggest `opsx:update` or manual edit
- If requirements need clarification → suggest updating specs
- Not phase-locked - work fluidly
**Example fluid workflow:**
```
User: "Implement add-user-auth"
→ openspec-apply-change: implements tasks 1, 2, 3, 4...
→ Pauses at task 5: "Design says RS256 but library only supports HS256"
User: "Let's use HS256 instead, update the design"
→ User edits design.md (or uses opsx:update in future)
User: "Continue implementing"
→ openspec-apply-change: implements tasks 5, 6, 7
→ "All tasks complete! Ready to archive."
```
#### CLI Commands Used
```bash
openspec list --json # List changes for selection
openspec status --change "<name>" # Check artifact completion
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" # Get apply instructions (NEW)
# File reads via Read tool for proposal, specs, design, tasks
# File edits via Edit tool for checking off tasks
```
#### New CLI Command: `openspec instructions apply`
For consistency with artifact instructions.
**Usage:**
```bash
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" [--json]
```
**Output (Markdown format):**
```markdown
## Apply: add-user-auth
### Context Files
- proposal: openspec/changes/add-user-auth/proposal.md
- specs: openspec/changes/add-user-auth/specs/**/*.md
- design: openspec/changes/add-user-auth/design.md
- tasks: openspec/changes/add-user-auth/tasks.md
### Progress
2/7 complete
### Tasks
- [x] Create UserAuth service class
- [x] Add login endpoint
- [ ] Add JWT token generation
- [ ] Add logout endpoint
- [ ] Add auth middleware
- [ ] Write unit tests
- [ ] Update API documentation
### Instruction
Read context files, work through pending tasks, mark complete as you go.
Pause if you hit blockers or need clarification.
```
**Benefits of CLI command:**
- **Consistency** - same pattern as `openspec instructions <artifact>`
- **Structured output** - progress, tasks, context paths in one call
- **Clean format** - markdown is readable and compact (vs verbose XML)
- **Extensibility** - can add more sections later if needed
- **JSON option** - `--json` flag available for programmatic use
#### Differences from Old `/openspec:apply`
| Aspect | Old `/openspec:apply` | New `openspec-apply-change` |
|--------|----------------------|----------------------------|
| Invocation | After all artifacts done | Anytime (if tasks.md exists) |
| Granularity | All tasks at once | All tasks, but pauses on issues |
| Artifact updates | Not mentioned | Encouraged when needed |
| Progress tracking | Update all at end | Update after each task |
| Flow control | Push through everything | Pause on blockers, resume after |
| Context loading | Read once at start | Read context, reference as needed |
| Issue handling | Not specified | Pause, present options, wait for guidance |
#### Implementation Notes
1. **Add CLI command**: Add `openspec instructions apply` to artifact-workflow.ts
- Parse tasks.md for progress (count done/pending)
- Return context paths, progress, task list, simple instruction
2. **Add to skill-templates.ts**: Create `getApplyChangeSkillTemplate()` function
3. **Update artifact-experimental-setup**: Generate this skill alongside new/continue
4. **Update skills list**: Add to `.claude/skills/` directory
5. **Test the flow**: Verify it works with existing changes that have tasks.md
---
## Next Steps
1. ~~Review this plan and confirm scope~~ (Done - blockers identified)
2. ~~Design decisions~~ (Done - all 3 blockers resolved)
3. ~~Design apply skill~~ (Done - documented above)
4. ~~Implement proposal template change (Decision 1 - capability discovery)~~ (Done)
5. ~~Remove `openspec next` command (Decision 2a)~~ (Done)
6. ~~Add `openspec instructions apply` CLI command~~ (Done)
7. ~~Create `openspec-apply-change` skill~~ (Done)
8. Conduct E2E testing with updated workflow
9. Write user docs (document "actions on a change" model)
10. Release to test users
+540
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,540 @@
# Experimental Workflow (OPSX)
> **Status:** Experimental. Things might break. Feedback welcome on [Discord](https://discord.gg/BYjPaKbqMt).
>
> **Compatibility:** Claude Code only (for now)
## What Is It?
OPSX is a **fluid, iterative workflow** for OpenSpec changes. No more rigid phases — just actions you can take anytime.
## Why This Exists
The standard OpenSpec workflow works, but it's **locked down**:
- **Instructions are hardcoded** — buried in TypeScript, you can't change them
- **All-or-nothing** — one big command creates everything, can't test individual pieces
- **Fixed structure** — same workflow for everyone, no customization
- **Black box** — when AI output is bad, you can't tweak the prompts
**OPSX opens it up.** Now anyone can:
1. **Experiment with instructions** — edit a template, see if the AI does better
2. **Test granularly** — validate each artifact's instructions independently
3. **Customize workflows** — define your own artifacts and dependencies
4. **Iterate quickly** — change a template, test immediately, no rebuild
```
Standard workflow: OPSX:
┌────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────────┐
│ Hardcoded in package │ │ schema.yaml │◄── You edit this
│ (can't change) │ │ templates/*.md │◄── Or this
│ ↓ │ │ ↓ │
│ Wait for new release │ │ Instant effect │
│ ↓ │ │ ↓ │
│ Hope it's better │ │ Test it yourself │
└────────────────────────┘ └────────────────────────┘
```
**This is for everyone:**
- **Teams** — create workflows that match how you actually work
- **Power users** — tweak prompts to get better AI outputs for your codebase
- **OpenSpec contributors** — experiment with new approaches without releases
We're all still learning what works best. OPSX lets us learn together.
## The User Experience
**The problem with linear workflows:**
You're "in planning phase", then "in implementation phase", then "done". But real work doesn't work that way. You implement something, realize your design was wrong, need to update specs, continue implementing. Linear phases fight against how work actually happens.
**OPSX approach:**
- **Actions, not phases** — create, implement, update, archive — do any of them anytime
- **Dependencies are enablers** — they show what's possible, not what's required next
- **Update as you learn** — halfway through implementation? Go back and fix the design. That's normal.
```
You can always go back:
┌────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
▼ │
proposal ──→ specs ──→ design ──→ tasks ──→ implement
▲ ▲ ▲ │
│ │ │ │
└───────────┴──────────┴───────────────┘
update as you learn
```
## Setup
```bash
# 1. Make sure you have openspec installed and initialized
openspec init
# 2. Generate the experimental skills
openspec artifact-experimental-setup
```
This creates skills in `.claude/skills/` that Claude Code auto-detects.
## Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---------|--------------|
| `/opsx:explore` | Think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements |
| `/opsx:new` | Start a new change |
| `/opsx:continue` | Create the next artifact (based on what's ready) |
| `/opsx:ff` | Fast-forward — create all planning artifacts at once |
| `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks, updating artifacts as needed |
| `/opsx:sync` | Sync delta specs to main specs |
| `/opsx:archive` | Archive when done |
## Usage
### Explore an idea
```
/opsx:explore
```
Think through ideas, investigate problems, compare options. No structure required - just a thinking partner. When insights crystallize, transition to `/opsx:new` or `/opsx:ff`.
### Start a new change
```
/opsx:new
```
You'll be asked what you want to build and which workflow schema to use.
### Create artifacts
```
/opsx:continue
```
Shows what's ready to create based on dependencies, then creates one artifact. Use repeatedly to build up your change incrementally.
```
/opsx:ff add-dark-mode
```
Creates all planning artifacts at once. Use when you have a clear picture of what you're building.
### Implement (the fluid part)
```
/opsx:apply
```
Works through tasks, checking them off as you go. **Key difference:** if you discover issues during implementation, you can update your specs, design, or tasks — then continue. No phase gates.
### Finish up
```
/opsx:sync # Update main specs with your delta specs
/opsx:archive # Move to archive when done
```
## When to Update vs. Start Fresh
OPSX lets you update artifacts anytime. But when does "update as you learn" become "this is different work"?
### What a Proposal Captures
A proposal defines three things:
1. **Intent** — What problem are you solving?
2. **Scope** — What's in/out of bounds?
3. **Approach** — How will you solve it?
The question is: which changed, and by how much?
### Update the Existing Change When:
**Same intent, refined execution**
- You discover edge cases you didn't consider
- The approach needs tweaking but the goal is unchanged
- Implementation reveals the design was slightly off
**Scope narrows**
- You realize full scope is too big, want to ship MVP first
- "Add dark mode" → "Add dark mode toggle (system preference in v2)"
**Learning-driven corrections**
- Codebase isn't structured how you thought
- A dependency doesn't work as expected
- "Use CSS variables" → "Use Tailwind's dark: prefix instead"
### Start a New Change When:
**Intent fundamentally changed**
- The problem itself is different now
- "Add dark mode" → "Add comprehensive theme system with custom colors, fonts, spacing"
**Scope exploded**
- Change grew so much it's essentially different work
- Original proposal would be unrecognizable after updates
- "Fix login bug" → "Rewrite auth system"
**Original is completable**
- The original change can be marked "done"
- New work stands alone, not a refinement
- Complete "Add dark mode MVP" → Archive → New change "Enhance dark mode"
### The Heuristics
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Is this the same work? │
└──────────────┬──────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Same intent? >50% overlap? Can original
Same problem? Same scope? be "done" without
│ │ these changes?
│ │ │
┌────────┴────────┐ ┌──────┴──────┐ ┌───────┴───────┐
│ │ │ │ │ │
YES NO YES NO NO YES
│ │ │ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
UPDATE NEW UPDATE NEW UPDATE NEW
```
| Test | Update | New Change |
|------|--------|------------|
| **Identity** | "Same thing, refined" | "Different work" |
| **Scope overlap** | >50% overlaps | <50% overlaps |
| **Completion** | Can't be "done" without changes | Can finish original, new work stands alone |
| **Story** | Update chain tells coherent story | Patches would confuse more than clarify |
### The Principle
> **Update preserves context. New change provides clarity.**
>
> Choose update when the history of your thinking is valuable.
> Choose new when starting fresh would be clearer than patching.
Think of it like git branches:
- Keep committing while working on the same feature
- Start a new branch when it's genuinely new work
- Sometimes merge a partial feature and start fresh for phase 2
## What's Different?
| | Standard (`/openspec:proposal`) | Experimental (`/opsx:*`) |
|---|---|---|
| **Structure** | One big proposal document | Discrete artifacts with dependencies |
| **Workflow** | Linear phases: plan → implement → archive | Fluid actions — do anything anytime |
| **Iteration** | Awkward to go back | Update artifacts as you learn |
| **Customization** | Fixed structure | Schema-driven (define your own artifacts) |
**The key insight:** work isn't linear. OPSX stops pretending it is.
## Architecture Deep Dive
This section explains how OPSX works under the hood and how it compares to the standard workflow.
### Philosophy: Phases vs Actions
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STANDARD WORKFLOW │
│ (Phase-Locked, All-or-Nothing) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ PLANNING │ ───► │ IMPLEMENTING │ ───► │ ARCHIVING │ │
│ │ PHASE │ │ PHASE │ │ PHASE │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ /openspec:proposal /openspec:apply /openspec:archive │
│ │
│ • Creates ALL artifacts at once │
│ • Can't go back to update specs during implementation │
│ • Phase gates enforce linear progression │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OPSX WORKFLOW │
│ (Fluid Actions, Iterative) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ ACTIONS (not phases) │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ new ◄──► continue ◄──► apply ◄──► sync │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ └──────────┴───────────┴──────────┘ │ │
│ │ any order │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ • Create artifacts one at a time OR fast-forward │
│ • Update specs/design/tasks during implementation │
│ • Dependencies enable progress, phases don't exist │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Component Architecture
**Standard workflow** uses hardcoded templates in TypeScript:
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STANDARD WORKFLOW COMPONENTS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Hardcoded Templates (TypeScript strings) │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ Configurators (18+ classes, one per editor) │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ Generated Command Files (.claude/commands/openspec/*.md) │
│ │
│ • Fixed structure, no artifact awareness │
│ • Change requires code modification + rebuild │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**OPSX** uses external schemas and a dependency graph engine:
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OPSX COMPONENTS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Schema Definitions (YAML) │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ name: spec-driven │ │
│ │ artifacts: │ │
│ │ - id: proposal │ │
│ │ generates: proposal.md │ │
│ │ requires: [] ◄── Dependencies │ │
│ │ - id: specs │ │
│ │ generates: specs/**/*.md ◄── Glob patterns │ │
│ │ requires: [proposal] ◄── Enables after proposal │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ Artifact Graph Engine │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ • Topological sort (dependency ordering) │ │
│ │ • State detection (filesystem existence) │ │
│ │ • Rich instruction generation (templates + context) │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ Skill Files (.claude/skills/openspec-*/SKILL.md) │
│ │
│ • Cross-editor compatible (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf) │
│ • Skills query CLI for structured data │
│ • Fully customizable via schema files │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Dependency Graph Model
Artifacts form a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Dependencies are **enablers**, not gates:
```
proposal
(root node)
│
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
│ │
▼ ▼
specs design
(requires: (requires:
proposal) proposal)
│ │
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
│
▼
tasks
(requires:
specs, design)
│
▼
┌──────────────┐
│ APPLY PHASE │
│ (requires: │
│ tasks) │
└──────────────┘
```
**State transitions:**
```
BLOCKED ────────────────► READY ────────────────► DONE
│ │ │
Missing All deps File exists
dependencies are DONE on filesystem
```
### Information Flow
**Standard workflow** — agent receives static instructions:
```
User: "/openspec:proposal"
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Static instructions: │
│ • Create proposal.md │
│ • Create tasks.md │
│ • Create design.md │
│ • Create specs/*.md │
│ │
│ No awareness of what exists or │
│ dependencies between artifacts │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
Agent creates ALL artifacts in one go
```
**OPSX** — agent queries for rich context:
```
User: "/opsx:continue"
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Step 1: Query current state │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ $ openspec status --change "add-auth" --json │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ { │ │
│ │ "artifacts": [ │ │
│ │ {"id": "proposal", "status": "done"}, │ │
│ │ {"id": "specs", "status": "ready"}, ◄── First ready │ │
│ │ {"id": "design", "status": "ready"}, │ │
│ │ {"id": "tasks", "status": "blocked", "missingDeps": ["specs"]}│ │
│ │ ] │ │
│ │ } │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Step 2: Get rich instructions for ready artifact │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ $ openspec instructions specs --change "add-auth" --json │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ { │ │
│ │ "template": "# Specification\n\n## ADDED Requirements...", │ │
│ │ "dependencies": [{"id": "proposal", "path": "...", "done": true}│ │
│ │ "unlocks": ["tasks"] │ │
│ │ } │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Step 3: Read dependencies → Create ONE artifact → Show what's unlocked │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Iteration Model
**Standard workflow** — awkward to iterate:
```
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│/proposal│ ──► │ /apply │ ──► │/archive │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
│ │
│ ├── "Wait, the design is wrong"
│ │
│ ├── Options:
│ │ • Edit files manually (breaks context)
│ │ • Abandon and start over
│ │ • Push through and fix later
│ │
│ └── No official "go back" mechanism
│
└── Creates ALL artifacts at once
```
**OPSX** — natural iteration:
```
/opsx:new ───► /opsx:continue ───► /opsx:apply ───► /opsx:archive
│ │ │
│ │ ├── "The design is wrong"
│ │ │
│ │ ▼
│ │ Just edit design.md
│ │ and continue!
│ │ │
│ │ ▼
│ │ /opsx:apply picks up
│ │ where you left off
│ │
│ └── Creates ONE artifact, shows what's unlocked
│
└── Scaffolds change, waits for direction
```
### Custom Schemas
Create your own workflow by adding a schema to `~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/`:
```
~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/research-first/
├── schema.yaml
└── templates/
├── research.md
├── proposal.md
└── tasks.md
schema.yaml:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ name: research-first │
│ artifacts: │
│ - id: research # Added before proposal │
│ generates: research.md │
│ requires: [] │
│ │
│ - id: proposal │
│ generates: proposal.md │
│ requires: [research] # Now depends on research │
│ │
│ - id: tasks │
│ generates: tasks.md │
│ requires: [proposal] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Dependency Graph:
research ──► proposal ──► tasks
```
### Summary
| Aspect | Standard | OPSX |
|--------|----------|------|
| **Templates** | Hardcoded TypeScript | External YAML + Markdown |
| **Dependencies** | None (all at once) | DAG with topological sort |
| **State** | Phase-based mental model | Filesystem existence |
| **Customization** | Edit source, rebuild | Create schema.yaml |
| **Iteration** | Phase-locked | Fluid, edit anything |
| **Editor Support** | 18+ configurator classes | Single skills directory |
## Schemas
Schemas define what artifacts exist and their dependencies. Currently available:
- **spec-driven** (default): proposal → specs → design → tasks
- **tdd**: tests → implementation → docs
Run `openspec schemas` to see available schemas.
## Tips
- Use `/opsx:explore` to think through an idea before committing to a change
- `/opsx:ff` when you know what you want, `/opsx:continue` when exploring
- During `/opsx:apply`, if something's wrong — fix the artifact, then continue
- Tasks track progress via checkboxes in `tasks.md`
- Check status anytime: `openspec status --change "name"`
## Feedback
This is rough. That's intentional — we're learning what works.
Found a bug? Have ideas? Join us on [Discord](https://discord.gg/BYjPaKbqMt) or open an issue on [GitHub](https://github.com/Fission-AI/openspec/issues).
+211
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
# Schema Customization
This document describes how users can customize OpenSpec schemas and templates, the current manual process, and the gap that needs to be addressed.
---
## Overview
OpenSpec uses a 2-level schema resolution system following the XDG Base Directory Specification:
1. **User override**: `${XDG_DATA_HOME}/openspec/schemas/<name>/`
2. **Package built-in**: `<npm-package>/schemas/<name>/`
When a schema is requested (e.g., `spec-driven`), the resolver checks the user directory first. If found, that entire schema directory is used. Otherwise, it falls back to the package's built-in schema.
---
## Current Manual Process
To override the default `spec-driven` schema, a user must:
### 1. Determine the correct directory path
| Platform | Path |
|----------|------|
| macOS/Linux | `~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/` |
| Windows | `%LOCALAPPDATA%\openspec\schemas\` |
| All (if set) | `$XDG_DATA_HOME/openspec/schemas/` |
### 2. Create the directory structure
```bash
# macOS/Linux example
mkdir -p ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/templates
```
### 3. Find and copy the default schema files
The user must locate the installed npm package to copy the defaults:
```bash
# Find the package location (varies by install method)
npm list -g openspec --parseable
# or
which openspec && readlink -f $(which openspec)
# Copy files from the package's schemas/ directory
cp <package-path>/schemas/spec-driven/schema.yaml ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/
cp <package-path>/schemas/spec-driven/templates/*.md ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/templates/
```
### 4. Modify the copied files
Edit `schema.yaml` to change the workflow structure:
```yaml
name: spec-driven
version: 1
description: My custom workflow
artifacts:
- id: proposal
generates: proposal.md
description: Initial proposal
template: proposal.md
requires: []
# Add, remove, or modify artifacts...
```
Edit templates in `templates/` to customize the content guidance.
### 5. Verify the override is active
Currently there's no command to verify which schema is being used. Users must trust that the file exists in the right location.
---
## Gap Analysis
The current process has several friction points:
| Issue | Impact |
|-------|--------|
| **Path discovery** | Users must know XDG conventions and platform-specific paths |
| **Package location** | Finding the npm package path varies by install method (global, local, pnpm, yarn, volta, etc.) |
| **No scaffolding** | Users must manually create directories and copy files |
| **No verification** | No way to confirm which schema is actually being resolved |
| **No diffing** | When upgrading openspec, users can't see what changed in built-in templates |
| **Full copy required** | Must copy entire schema even to change one template |
### User Stories Not Currently Supported
1. *"I want to add a `research` artifact before `proposal`"* — requires manual copy and edit
2. *"I want to customize just the proposal template"* — must copy entire schema
3. *"I want to see what the default schema looks like"* — must find package path
4. *"I want to revert to defaults"* — must delete files and hope paths are correct
5. *"I upgraded openspec, did the templates change?"* — no way to diff
---
## Proposed Solution: Schema Configurator
A CLI command (or set of commands) that handles path resolution and file operations for users.
### Option A: Single `openspec schema` command
```bash
# List available schemas (built-in and user overrides)
openspec schema list
# Show where a schema resolves from
openspec schema which spec-driven
# Output: /Users/me/.local/share/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/ (user override)
# Output: /usr/local/lib/node_modules/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/ (built-in)
# Copy a built-in schema to user directory for customization
openspec schema copy spec-driven
# Creates ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/ with all files
# Show diff between user override and built-in
openspec schema diff spec-driven
# Remove user override (revert to built-in)
openspec schema reset spec-driven
# Validate a schema
openspec schema validate spec-driven
```
### Option B: Dedicated `openspec customize` command
```bash
# Interactive schema customization
openspec customize
# Prompts: Which schema? What do you want to change? etc.
# Copy and open for editing
openspec customize spec-driven
# Copies to user dir, prints path, optionally opens in $EDITOR
```
### Option C: Init-time schema selection
```bash
# During project init, offer schema customization
openspec init
# ? Select a workflow schema:
# > spec-driven (default)
# tdd
# minimal
# custom (copy and edit)
```
### Recommended Approach
**Option A** provides the most flexibility and follows Unix conventions (subcommands for discrete operations). Key commands in priority order:
1. `openspec schema list` — see what's available
2. `openspec schema which <name>` — debug resolution
3. `openspec schema copy <name>` — scaffold customization
4. `openspec schema diff <name>` — compare with built-in
5. `openspec schema reset <name>` — revert to defaults
---
## Implementation Considerations
### Path Resolution
The resolver already exists in `src/core/artifact-graph/resolver.ts`:
```typescript
export function getPackageSchemasDir(): string { ... }
export function getUserSchemasDir(): string { ... }
export function getSchemaDir(name: string): string | null { ... }
export function listSchemas(): string[] { ... }
```
New commands would leverage these existing functions.
### File Operations
- Copy should preserve file permissions
- Copy should not overwrite existing user files without `--force`
- Reset should prompt for confirmation
### Template-Only Overrides
A future enhancement could support overriding individual templates without copying the entire schema. This would require changes to the resolution logic:
```
Current: schema dir (user) OR schema dir (built-in)
Future: schema.yaml from user OR built-in
+ each template from user OR built-in (independent fallback)
```
This adds complexity but enables the "I just want to change one template" use case.
---
## Related Documents
- [Schema Workflow Gaps](./schema-workflow-gaps.md) — End-to-end workflow analysis and phased implementation plan
## Related Files
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `src/core/artifact-graph/resolver.ts` | Schema resolution logic |
| `src/core/artifact-graph/instruction-loader.ts` | Template loading |
| `src/core/global-config.ts` | XDG path helpers |
| `schemas/spec-driven/` | Default schema and templates |
+378
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
# Schema Workflow: End-to-End Analysis
This document analyzes the complete user journey for working with schemas in OpenSpec, identifies gaps, and proposes a phased solution.
---
## Current State
### What Exists
| Component | Status |
|-----------|--------|
| Schema resolution (XDG) | 2-level: user override → package built-in |
| Built-in schemas | `spec-driven`, `tdd` |
| Artifact workflow commands | `status`, `next`, `instructions`, `templates` with `--schema` flag |
| Change creation | `openspec new change <name>` — no schema binding |
### What's Missing
| Component | Status |
|-----------|--------|
| Schema bound to change | Not stored — must pass `--schema` every time |
| Project-local schemas | Not supported — can't version control with repo |
| Schema management CLI | None — manual path discovery required |
| Project default schema | None — hardcoded to `spec-driven` |
---
## User Journey Analysis
### Scenario 1: Using a Non-Default Schema
**Goal:** User wants to use TDD workflow for a new feature.
**Today's experience:**
```bash
openspec new change add-auth
# Creates directory, no schema info stored
openspec status --change add-auth
# Shows spec-driven artifacts (WRONG - user wanted TDD)
# User realizes mistake...
openspec status --change add-auth --schema tdd
# Correct, but must remember --schema every time
# 6 months later...
openspec status --change add-auth
# Wrong again - nobody remembers this was TDD
```
**Problems:**
- Schema is a runtime argument, not persisted
- Easy to forget `--schema` and get wrong results
- No record of intended schema for future reference
---
### Scenario 2: Customizing a Schema
**Goal:** User wants to add a "research" artifact before "proposal".
**Today's experience:**
```bash
# Step 1: Figure out where to put overrides
# Must know XDG conventions:
# macOS/Linux: ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/
# Windows: %LOCALAPPDATA%\openspec\schemas/
# Step 2: Create directory structure
mkdir -p ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/my-workflow/templates
# Step 3: Find the npm package to copy defaults
npm list -g openspec --parseable
# Output varies by package manager:
# npm: /usr/local/lib/node_modules/openspec
# pnpm: ~/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/node_modules/openspec
# volta: ~/.volta/tools/image/packages/openspec/...
# yarn: ~/.config/yarn/global/node_modules/openspec
# Step 4: Copy files
cp -r <package-path>/schemas/spec-driven/* \
~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/my-workflow/
# Step 5: Edit schema.yaml and templates
# No way to verify override is active
# No way to diff against original
```
**Problems:**
- Must know XDG path conventions
- Finding npm package path varies by install method
- No tooling to scaffold or verify
- No diff capability when upgrading openspec
---
### Scenario 3: Team Sharing Custom Workflow
**Goal:** Team wants everyone to use the same custom schema.
**Today's options:**
1. Everyone manually sets up XDG override — error-prone, drift risk
2. Document setup in README — still manual, easy to miss
3. Publish separate npm package — overkill for most teams
4. Check schema into repo — **not supported** (no project-local resolution)
**Problems:**
- No project-local schema resolution
- Can't version control custom schemas with the codebase
- No single source of truth for team workflow
---
## Gap Summary
| Gap | Impact | Workaround |
|-----|--------|------------|
| Schema not bound to change | Wrong results, forgotten context | Remember to pass `--schema` |
| No project-local schemas | Can't share via repo | Manual XDG setup per machine |
| No schema management CLI | Manual path hunting | Know XDG + find npm package |
| No project default schema | Must specify every time | Always pass `--schema` |
| No init-time schema selection | Missed setup opportunity | Manual config |
---
## Proposed Architecture
### New File Structure
```
openspec/
├── config.yaml # Project config (NEW)
├── schemas/ # Project-local schemas (NEW)
│ └── my-workflow/
│ ├── schema.yaml
│ └── templates/
│ ├── research.md
│ ├── proposal.md
│ └── ...
└── changes/
└── add-auth/
├── change.yaml # Change metadata (NEW)
├── proposal.md
└── ...
```
### config.yaml (Project Config)
```yaml
# openspec/config.yaml
defaultSchema: spec-driven
```
Sets the project-wide default schema. Used when:
- Creating new changes without `--schema`
- Running commands on changes without `change.yaml`
### change.yaml (Change Metadata)
```yaml
# openspec/changes/add-auth/change.yaml
schema: tdd
created: 2025-01-15T10:30:00Z
description: Add user authentication system
```
Binds a specific schema to a change. Created automatically by `openspec new change`.
### Schema Resolution Order
```
1. ./openspec/schemas/<name>/ # Project-local
2. ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/<name>/ # User global (XDG)
3. <npm-package>/schemas/<name>/ # Built-in
```
Project-local takes priority, enabling version-controlled custom schemas.
### Schema Selection Order (Per Command)
```
1. --schema CLI flag # Explicit override
2. change.yaml in change directory # Change-specific binding
3. openspec/config.yaml defaultSchema # Project default
4. "spec-driven" # Hardcoded fallback
```
---
## Ideal User Experience
### Creating a Change
```bash
# Uses project default (from config.yaml, or spec-driven)
openspec new change add-auth
# Creates openspec/changes/add-auth/change.yaml:
# schema: spec-driven
# created: 2025-01-15T10:30:00Z
# Explicit schema for this change
openspec new change add-auth --schema tdd
# Creates change.yaml with schema: tdd
```
### Working with Changes
```bash
# Auto-reads schema from change.yaml — no --schema needed
openspec status --change add-auth
# Output: "Change: add-auth (schema: tdd)"
# Shows which artifacts are ready/blocked/done
# Explicit override still works (with informational message)
openspec status --change add-auth --schema spec-driven
# "Note: change.yaml specifies 'tdd', using 'spec-driven' per --schema flag"
```
### Customizing Schemas
```bash
# See what's available
openspec schema list
# Built-in:
# spec-driven proposal → specs → design → tasks
# tdd spec → tests → implementation → docs
# Project: (none)
# User: (none)
# Copy to project for customization
openspec schema copy spec-driven my-workflow
# Created ./openspec/schemas/my-workflow/
# Edit schema.yaml and templates/ to customize
# Copy to global (user-level override)
openspec schema copy spec-driven --global
# Created ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/
# See where a schema resolves from
openspec schema which spec-driven
# ./openspec/schemas/spec-driven/ (project)
# or: ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/ (user)
# or: /usr/local/lib/node_modules/openspec/schemas/spec-driven/ (built-in)
# Compare override with built-in
openspec schema diff spec-driven
# Shows diff between user/project version and package built-in
# Remove override, revert to built-in
openspec schema reset spec-driven
# Removes ./openspec/schemas/spec-driven/ (or --global for user dir)
```
### Project Setup
```bash
openspec init
# ? Select default workflow schema:
# > spec-driven (proposal → specs → design → tasks)
# tdd (spec → tests → implementation → docs)
# (custom schemas if detected)
#
# Writes to openspec/config.yaml:
# defaultSchema: spec-driven
```
---
## Implementation Phases
### Phase 1: Change Metadata (change.yaml)
**Priority:** High
**Solves:** "Forgot --schema", lost context, wrong results
**Scope:**
- Create `change.yaml` when running `openspec new change`
- Store `schema`, `created` timestamp
- Modify workflow commands to read schema from `change.yaml`
- `--schema` flag overrides (with informational message)
- Backwards compatible: missing `change.yaml` → use default
**change.yaml format:**
```yaml
schema: tdd
created: 2025-01-15T10:30:00Z
```
**Migration:**
- Existing changes without `change.yaml` continue to work
- Default to `spec-driven` (current behavior)
- Optional: `openspec migrate` to add `change.yaml` to existing changes
---
### Phase 2: Project-Local Schemas
**Priority:** High
**Solves:** Team sharing, version control, no XDG knowledge needed
**Scope:**
- Add `./openspec/schemas/` to resolution order (first priority)
- `openspec schema copy <name> [new-name]` creates in project by default
- `--global` flag for user-level XDG directory
- Teams can commit `openspec/schemas/` to repo
**Resolution order:**
```
1. ./openspec/schemas/<name>/ # Project-local (NEW)
2. ~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/<name>/ # User global
3. <npm-package>/schemas/<name>/ # Built-in
```
---
### Phase 3: Schema Management CLI
**Priority:** Medium
**Solves:** Path discovery, scaffolding, debugging
**Commands:**
```bash
openspec schema list # Show available schemas with sources
openspec schema which <name> # Show resolution path
openspec schema copy <name> [to] # Copy for customization
openspec schema diff <name> # Compare with built-in
openspec schema reset <name> # Remove override
openspec schema validate <name> # Validate schema.yaml structure
```
---
### Phase 4: Project Config + Init Enhancement
**Priority:** Low
**Solves:** Project-wide defaults, streamlined setup
**Scope:**
- Add `openspec/config.yaml` with `defaultSchema` field
- `openspec init` prompts for schema selection
- Store selection in `config.yaml`
- Commands use as fallback when no `change.yaml` exists
**config.yaml format:**
```yaml
defaultSchema: spec-driven
```
---
## Backwards Compatibility
| Scenario | Behavior |
|----------|----------|
| Existing change without `change.yaml` | Uses `--schema` flag or project default or `spec-driven` |
| Existing project without `config.yaml` | Falls back to `spec-driven` |
| `--schema` flag provided | Overrides `change.yaml` (with info message) |
| No project-local schemas dir | Skipped in resolution, checks user/built-in |
All existing functionality continues to work. New features are additive.
---
## Related Documents
- [Schema Customization](./schema-customization.md) — Details on manual override process and CLI gaps
- [Artifact POC](./artifact_poc.md) — Core artifact graph architecture
## Related Code
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `src/core/artifact-graph/resolver.ts` | Schema resolution logic |
| `src/core/artifact-graph/instruction-loader.ts` | Template loading |
| `src/core/global-config.ts` | XDG path helpers |
| `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts` | CLI commands |
| `src/utils/change-utils.ts` | Change creation utilities |
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** the user selects Antigravity during initialization
- **THEN** create `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.agent/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.agent/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** ensure each file begins with YAML frontmatter that contains only a `description: <stage summary>` field followed by the shared OpenSpec workflow instructions wrapped in managed markers
- **AND** populate the workflow body with the same proposal/apply/archive guidance used for other tools so Antigravity behaves like Windsurf while pointing to the `.agent/workflows/` directory
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones, and ensure the OpenCode archive command accepts change ID arguments.
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** `.agent/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh the OpenSpec-managed portion of each file so the workflow copy matches other tools while preserving the existing single-field `description` frontmatter
- **AND** skip creating any missing workflow files during update, mirroring the behavior for Windsurf and other IDEs
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
## Why
Manual setup for new changes leads to formatting mistakes in spec deltas and slows agents who must recreate the same file skeletons for every proposal. A built-in scaffold command will generate compliant templates so assistants can focus on the change content instead of structure.
## What Changes
- Add an `openspec scaffold <change-id>` CLI command that creates a change directory (if it does not already exist) with validated `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and spec delta templates.
- Update CLI documentation and quick-reference guidance so agents discover the scaffold workflow before drafting files manually, including reminders on when to create spec deltas.
- Add automated coverage (unit/integ tests) to ensure the command respects naming rules, copies templates correctly, fails for existing directories, and produces output that passes `openspec validate --strict` untouched.
## Impact
- Affected specs: `specs/cli-scaffold`
- Affected code: `src/cli/index.ts`, `src/commands`, `docs/`
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Scaffolding Command Registration
The CLI SHALL expose an `openspec scaffold <change-id>` command that validates the change identifier before generating files.
#### Scenario: Registering scaffold command
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec scaffold add-user-notifications`
- **THEN** the CLI SHALL reject invalid identifiers (non kebab-case) before proceeding
- **AND** display usage documentation via `openspec scaffold --help`
- **AND** exit with code 0 after successful scaffolding
### Requirement: Change Directory Structure
The scaffold command SHALL create the standard change workspace (if it does not already exist) with proposal, tasks, optional design, and `specs/` directories laid out according to OpenSpec conventions.
#### Scenario: Generating change workspace
- **WHEN** scaffolding a new change with id `add-user-notifications`
- **THEN** create `openspec/changes/add-user-notifications/` if it does not exist
- **AND** copy the default template bundle (proposal, tasks, design placeholders) into that directory in a single operation
- **AND** create an empty `openspec/changes/add-user-notifications/specs/` directory ready for capability-specific deltas that will be authored later
### Requirement: Template Content Guidance
The scaffold command SHALL populate generated Markdown files with OpenSpec-compliant templates so authors can copy, edit, and pass validation without reformatting.
#### Scenario: Populating proposal and tasks templates
- **WHEN** the scaffold command writes `proposal.md`
- **THEN** include the `## Why`, `## What Changes`, and `## Impact` headings with placeholder guidance text
- **AND** ensure `tasks.md` starts with `## 1. Implementation` and numbered checklist items using `- [ ]` syntax
- **AND** annotate optional sections (like `design.md`) with inline TODO comments so users understand when to keep or delete them
- **AND** include a short reminder inside `specs/README.md` (or similar) instructing authors to add deltas once they know the affected capability
### Requirement: Idempotent Execution
The scaffold command SHALL be safe to rerun, preserving user edits while filling in any missing managed sections.
#### Scenario: Rerunning scaffold on existing change
- **WHEN** the command is executed again for an existing change directory containing user-edited files
- **THEN** leave existing content untouched except for managed placeholder regions or missing files that need creation
- **AND** update the filesystem summary to highlight which files were skipped, created, or refreshed
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
## 1. CLI scaffolding command
- [ ] 1.1 Register an `openspec scaffold` command in the CLI entrypoint with `change-id` argument validation.
- [ ] 1.2 Implement generator logic that copies the default change template bundle (`proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, `specs/README.md`) into `openspec/changes/<id>/`, creating the directory tree in a single pass.
- [ ] 1.3 Detect when `openspec/changes/<id>/` already exists and exit with a clear error instead of overwriting user files.
## 2. Templates and documentation
- [ ] 2.1 Update `openspec/AGENTS.md` quick reference so agents see `openspec scaffold` before drafting files manually.
- [ ] 2.2 Refresh CLI docs/README/help text to mention the scaffold workflow, template bundle contents, and when to add spec deltas manually.
## 3. Test coverage
- [ ] 3.1 Add unit tests covering name validation, template copying, and existing-directory failures.
- [ ] 3.2 Add integration coverage ensuring a freshly scaffolded change (without deltas) passes `openspec validate --strict` until the author customizes it.
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
# Change Proposal: Extend Shell Completions
## Why
Zsh completions provide an excellent developer experience, but many developers use bash, fish, or PowerShell. Extending completion support to these shells removes friction for the majority of developers who don't use Zsh.
## What Changes
This change adds bash, fish, and PowerShell completion support following the same architectural patterns, documentation methodology, and testing rigor established for Zsh completions.
## Deltas
- **Spec:** `cli-completion`
- **Operation:** MODIFIED
- **Description:** Extend completion generation, installation, and testing requirements to support bash, fish, and PowerShell while maintaining the existing Zsh implementation and architectural patterns
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
# cli-completion Spec Delta
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Native Shell Behavior Integration
The completion system SHALL respect and integrate with each supported shell's native completion patterns and user interaction model.
#### Scenario: Zsh native completion
- **WHEN** generating Zsh completion scripts
- **THEN** use Zsh completion system with `_arguments`, `_describe`, and `compadd`
- **AND** completions SHALL trigger on single TAB (standard Zsh behavior)
- **AND** display as an interactive menu that users navigate with TAB/arrow keys
- **AND** support Oh My Zsh's enhanced menu styling automatically
#### Scenario: Bash native completion
- **WHEN** generating Bash completion scripts
- **THEN** use Bash completion with `complete` builtin and `COMPREPLY` array
- **AND** completions SHALL trigger on double TAB (standard Bash behavior)
- **AND** display as space-separated list or column format
- **AND** support both bash-completion v1 and v2 patterns
#### Scenario: Fish native completion
- **WHEN** generating Fish completion scripts
- **THEN** use Fish's `complete` command with conditions
- **AND** completions SHALL trigger on single TAB with auto-suggestion preview
- **AND** display with Fish's native coloring and description alignment
- **AND** leverage Fish's built-in caching automatically
#### Scenario: PowerShell native completion
- **WHEN** generating PowerShell completion scripts
- **THEN** use `Register-ArgumentCompleter` with scriptblock
- **AND** completions SHALL trigger on TAB with cycling behavior
- **AND** display with PowerShell's native completion UI
- **AND** support both Windows PowerShell 5.1 and PowerShell Core 7+
#### Scenario: No custom UX patterns
- **WHEN** implementing completion for any shell
- **THEN** do NOT attempt to customize completion trigger behavior
- **AND** do NOT override shell-specific navigation patterns
- **AND** ensure completions feel native to experienced users of that shell
### Requirement: Shell Detection
The completion system SHALL automatically detect the user's current shell environment.
#### Scenario: Detecting Zsh from environment
- **WHEN** no shell is explicitly specified
- **THEN** read the `$SHELL` environment variable
- **AND** extract the shell name from the path (e.g., `/bin/zsh` → `zsh`)
- **AND** validate the shell is one of: `zsh`, `bash`, `fish`, `powershell`
- **AND** throw an error if the shell is not supported
#### Scenario: Detecting Bash from environment
- **WHEN** `$SHELL` contains `bash` in the path
- **THEN** detect shell as `bash`
- **AND** proceed with bash-specific completion logic
#### Scenario: Detecting Fish from environment
- **WHEN** `$SHELL` contains `fish` in the path
- **THEN** detect shell as `fish`
- **AND** proceed with fish-specific completion logic
#### Scenario: Detecting PowerShell from environment
- **WHEN** `$PSModulePath` environment variable is present
- **THEN** detect shell as `powershell`
- **AND** proceed with PowerShell-specific completion logic
#### Scenario: Unsupported shell detection
- **WHEN** shell path indicates an unsupported shell
- **THEN** throw error: "Shell '<name>' is not supported. Supported shells: zsh, bash, fish, powershell"
### Requirement: Completion Generation
The completion command SHALL generate completion scripts for all supported shells on demand.
#### Scenario: Generating Zsh completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion generate zsh`
- **THEN** output a complete Zsh completion script to stdout
- **AND** include completions for all commands: init, list, show, validate, archive, view, update, change, spec, completion
- **AND** include all command-specific flags and options
- **AND** use Zsh's `_arguments` and `_describe` built-in functions
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs
#### Scenario: Generating Bash completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion generate bash`
- **THEN** output a complete Bash completion script to stdout
- **AND** include completions for all commands and subcommands
- **AND** use `complete -F` with custom completion function
- **AND** populate `COMPREPLY` with appropriate suggestions
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs via `openspec __complete`
#### Scenario: Generating Fish completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion generate fish`
- **THEN** output a complete Fish completion script to stdout
- **AND** use `complete -c openspec` with conditions
- **AND** include command-specific completions with `--condition` predicates
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs via `openspec __complete`
- **AND** include descriptions for each completion option
#### Scenario: Generating PowerShell completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion generate powershell`
- **THEN** output a complete PowerShell completion script to stdout
- **AND** use `Register-ArgumentCompleter -CommandName openspec`
- **AND** implement scriptblock that handles command context
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs via `openspec __complete`
- **AND** return `[System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]` objects
### Requirement: Installation Automation
The completion command SHALL automatically install completion scripts into shell configuration files for all supported shells.
#### Scenario: Installing for Oh My Zsh
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install zsh`
- **THEN** detect if Oh My Zsh is installed by checking for `$ZSH` environment variable or `~/.oh-my-zsh/` directory
- **AND** create custom completions directory at `~/.oh-my-zsh/custom/completions/` if it doesn't exist
- **AND** write completion script to `~/.oh-my-zsh/custom/completions/_openspec`
- **AND** ensure `~/.oh-my-zsh/custom/completions` is in `$fpath` by updating `~/.zshrc` if needed
- **AND** display success message with instruction to run `exec zsh` or restart terminal
#### Scenario: Installing for standard Zsh
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install zsh` and Oh My Zsh is not detected
- **THEN** create completions directory at `~/.zsh/completions/` if it doesn't exist
- **AND** write completion script to `~/.zsh/completions/_openspec`
- **AND** add `fpath=(~/.zsh/completions $fpath)` to `~/.zshrc` if not already present
- **AND** add `autoload -Uz compinit && compinit` to `~/.zshrc` if not already present
- **AND** display success message with instruction to run `exec zsh` or restart terminal
#### Scenario: Installing for Bash with bash-completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install bash`
- **THEN** detect if bash-completion is installed by checking for `/usr/share/bash-completion` or `/etc/bash_completion.d`
- **AND** if bash-completion is available, write to `/etc/bash_completion.d/openspec` (with sudo) or `~/.local/share/bash-completion/completions/openspec`
- **AND** if bash-completion is not available, write to `~/.bash_completion.d/openspec` and source it from `~/.bashrc`
- **AND** add sourcing line to `~/.bashrc` using marker-based updates if needed
- **AND** display success message with instruction to run `exec bash` or restart terminal
#### Scenario: Installing for Fish
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install fish`
- **THEN** create Fish completions directory at `~/.config/fish/completions/` if it doesn't exist
- **AND** write completion script to `~/.config/fish/completions/openspec.fish`
- **AND** Fish automatically loads completions from this directory (no config file modification needed)
- **AND** display success message indicating completions are immediately available
#### Scenario: Installing for PowerShell
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install powershell`
- **THEN** detect PowerShell profile location via `$PROFILE` environment variable or default paths
- **AND** create profile directory if it doesn't exist
- **AND** add completion script import to profile using marker-based updates
- **AND** write completion script to PowerShell modules directory or alongside profile
- **AND** display success message with instruction to restart PowerShell or run `. $PROFILE`
#### Scenario: Auto-detecting shell for installation
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install` without specifying a shell
- **THEN** detect current shell using shell detection logic
- **AND** install completion for the detected shell (zsh, bash, fish, or powershell)
- **AND** display which shell was detected
#### Scenario: Already installed
- **WHEN** completion is already installed for the target shell
- **THEN** display message indicating completion is already installed
- **AND** offer to reinstall/update by overwriting existing files
- **AND** exit with code 0
### Requirement: Uninstallation
The completion command SHALL remove installed completion scripts and configuration for all supported shells.
#### Scenario: Uninstalling Zsh completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall zsh`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation before proceeding (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user declines, cancel uninstall and display "Uninstall cancelled."
- **AND** if user confirms, remove `~/.oh-my-zsh/custom/completions/_openspec` if Oh My Zsh is detected
- **AND** remove `~/.zsh/completions/_openspec` if standard Zsh setup is detected
- **AND** remove fpath modifications from `~/.zshrc` using marker-based removal
- **AND** display success message
#### Scenario: Uninstalling Bash completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall bash`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user confirms, remove completion file from bash-completion directory or `~/.bash_completion.d/`
- **AND** remove sourcing lines from `~/.bashrc` using marker-based removal
- **AND** display success message
#### Scenario: Uninstalling Fish completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall fish`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user confirms, remove `~/.config/fish/completions/openspec.fish`
- **AND** display success message (no config file modification needed)
#### Scenario: Uninstalling PowerShell completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall powershell`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user confirms, remove completion import from PowerShell profile using marker-based removal
- **AND** remove completion script file
- **AND** display success message
#### Scenario: Auto-detecting shell for uninstallation
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall` without specifying a shell
- **THEN** detect current shell and uninstall completion for that shell
#### Scenario: Not installed
- **WHEN** attempting to uninstall completion that isn't installed
- **THEN** display error message indicating completion is not installed
- **AND** exit with code 1
### Requirement: Architecture Patterns
The completion implementation SHALL follow clean architecture principles with TypeScript best practices, supporting multiple shells through a plugin-based pattern.
#### Scenario: Shell-specific generators
- **WHEN** implementing completion generators
- **THEN** create generator classes for each shell: `ZshGenerator`, `BashGenerator`, `FishGenerator`, `PowerShellGenerator`
- **AND** implement a common `CompletionGenerator` interface with method:
- `generate(commands: CommandDefinition[]): string` - Returns complete shell script
- **AND** each generator handles shell-specific syntax, escaping, and patterns
- **AND** all generators consume the same `CommandDefinition[]` from the command registry
#### Scenario: Shell-specific installers
- **WHEN** implementing completion installers
- **THEN** create installer classes for each shell: `ZshInstaller`, `BashInstaller`, `FishInstaller`, `PowerShellInstaller`
- **AND** implement a common `CompletionInstaller` interface with methods:
- `install(script: string): Promise<InstallationResult>` - Installs completion script
- `uninstall(): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }>` - Removes completion
- **AND** each installer handles shell-specific paths, config files, and installation patterns
#### Scenario: Factory pattern for shell selection
- **WHEN** selecting shell-specific implementation
- **THEN** use `CompletionFactory` class with static methods:
- `createGenerator(shell: SupportedShell): CompletionGenerator`
- `createInstaller(shell: SupportedShell): CompletionInstaller`
- **AND** factory uses switch statements with TypeScript exhaustiveness checking
- **AND** adding new shell requires updating `SupportedShell` type and factory cases
#### Scenario: Dynamic completion providers
- **WHEN** implementing dynamic completions
- **THEN** create a `CompletionProvider` class that encapsulates project discovery logic
- **AND** implement methods:
- `getChangeIds(): Promise<string[]>` - Discovers active change IDs
- `getSpecIds(): Promise<string[]>` - Discovers spec IDs
- `isOpenSpecProject(): boolean` - Checks if current directory is OpenSpec-enabled
- **AND** implement caching with 2-second TTL using class properties
#### Scenario: Command registry
- **WHEN** defining completable commands
- **THEN** create a centralized `CommandDefinition` type with properties:
- `name: string` - Command name
- `description: string` - Help text
- `flags: FlagDefinition[]` - Available flags
- `acceptsPositional: boolean` - Whether command takes positional arguments
- `positionalType: string` - Type of positional (change-id, spec-id, path, shell)
- `subcommands?: CommandDefinition[]` - Nested subcommands
- **AND** export a `COMMAND_REGISTRY` constant with all command definitions
- **AND** all generators consume this registry to ensure consistency across shells
#### Scenario: Type-safe shell detection
- **WHEN** implementing shell detection
- **THEN** define a `SupportedShell` type as literal type: `'zsh' | 'bash' | 'fish' | 'powershell'`
- **AND** implement `detectShell()` function in `src/utils/shell-detection.ts`
- **AND** return detected shell or throw error with supported shells list
### Requirement: Testing Support
The completion implementation SHALL be testable with unit and integration tests for all supported shells.
#### Scenario: Mock shell environment
- **WHEN** writing tests for shell detection
- **THEN** allow overriding `$SHELL` and `$PSModulePath` environment variables
- **AND** use dependency injection for file system operations
- **AND** test detection for all four shells independently
#### Scenario: Generator output verification
- **WHEN** testing completion generators
- **THEN** create test suite for each shell generator (zsh, bash, fish, powershell)
- **AND** verify generated scripts contain expected patterns for that shell
- **AND** test that command registry is properly consumed
- **AND** ensure dynamic completion placeholders are present
- **AND** verify shell-specific syntax and escaping
#### Scenario: Installer simulation
- **WHEN** testing installation logic
- **THEN** create test suite for each shell installer
- **AND** use temporary test directories instead of actual home directories
- **AND** verify file creation without modifying real shell configurations
- **AND** test path resolution logic independently
- **AND** mock file system operations to avoid side effects
#### Scenario: Cross-shell consistency
- **WHEN** testing completion behavior
- **THEN** verify all shells support the same commands and flags
- **AND** verify dynamic completions work consistently across shells
- **AND** ensure error messages are consistent across shells
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
# Implementation Tasks
## Phase 1: Foundation and Bash Support
- [x] Update `SupportedShell` type in `src/utils/shell-detection.ts` to include `'bash' | 'fish' | 'powershell'`
- [x] Extend shell detection logic to recognize bash, fish, and PowerShell from environment variables
- [x] Create `src/core/completions/generators/bash-generator.ts` implementing `CompletionGenerator` interface
- [x] Create `src/core/completions/installers/bash-installer.ts` implementing `CompletionInstaller` interface
- [x] Update `CompletionFactory.createGenerator()` to support bash
- [x] Update `CompletionFactory.createInstaller()` to support bash
- [x] Create test file `test/core/completions/generators/bash-generator.test.ts` mirroring zsh test structure
- [x] Create test file `test/core/completions/installers/bash-installer.test.ts` mirroring zsh test structure
- [x] Verify bash completions work manually: `openspec completion install bash && exec bash`
## Phase 2: Fish Support
- [x] Create `src/core/completions/generators/fish-generator.ts` implementing `CompletionGenerator` interface
- [x] Create `src/core/completions/installers/fish-installer.ts` implementing `CompletionInstaller` interface
- [x] Update `CompletionFactory.createGenerator()` to support fish
- [x] Update `CompletionFactory.createInstaller()` to support fish
- [x] Create test file `test/core/completions/generators/fish-generator.test.ts`
- [x] Create test file `test/core/completions/installers/fish-installer.test.ts`
- [x] Verify fish completions work manually: `openspec completion install fish`
## Phase 3: PowerShell Support
- [x] Create `src/core/completions/generators/powershell-generator.ts` implementing `CompletionGenerator` interface
- [x] Create `src/core/completions/installers/powershell-installer.ts` implementing `CompletionInstaller` interface
- [x] Update `CompletionFactory.createGenerator()` to support powershell
- [x] Update `CompletionFactory.createInstaller()` to support powershell
- [x] Create test file `test/core/completions/generators/powershell-generator.test.ts`
- [x] Create test file `test/core/completions/installers/powershell-installer.test.ts`
- [x] Verify PowerShell completions work manually on Windows or macOS PowerShell
## Phase 4: Documentation and Testing
- [x] Update `CLAUDE.md` or relevant documentation to mention all four supported shells
- [x] Add cross-shell consistency test verifying all shells support same commands
- [x] Run `pnpm test` to ensure all tests pass
- [x] Run `pnpm run build` to verify TypeScript compilation
- [x] Test all shells on different platforms (Linux for bash/fish/zsh, Windows/macOS for PowerShell)
## Phase 5: Validation and Cleanup
- [x] Run `openspec validate extend-shell-completions --strict` and resolve all issues
- [x] Update error messages to list all four supported shells
- [x] Verify `openspec completion --help` documentation is current
- [x] Test auto-detection works for all shells
- [x] Ensure uninstall works cleanly for all shells
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
## Context
Slice 4 of the artifact workflow POC. The core functionality (ArtifactGraph, InstructionLoader, change-utils) is complete. This slice adds CLI commands to expose the artifact workflow to users.
**Key constraint**: This is experimental. Commands must be isolated for easy removal if the feature doesn't work out.
## Goals / Non-Goals
- **Goals:**
- Expose artifact workflow status and instructions via CLI
- Provide fluid UX with top-level verb commands
- Support both human-readable and JSON output
- Enable agents to programmatically query workflow state
- Keep implementation isolated for easy removal
- **Non-Goals:**
- Interactive artifact creation wizards (future work)
- Schema management commands (deferred)
- Auto-detection of active change (CLI is deterministic, agents infer)
## Decisions
### Command Structure: Top-Level Verbs
Commands are top-level for maximum fluidity:
```
openspec status --change <id>
openspec next --change <id>
openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>
openspec templates [--schema <name>]
openspec new change <name>
```
**Rationale:**
- Most fluid UX - fewest keystrokes
- Commands are unique enough to avoid conflicts
- Simple mental model for users
**Trade-off accepted:** Slight namespace pollution, but commands are distinct and can be removed cleanly.
### Experimental Isolation
All artifact workflow commands are implemented in a single file:
```
src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts
```
**To remove the feature:**
1. Delete `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts`
2. Remove ~5 lines from `src/cli/index.ts`
No other files touched, no risk to stable functionality.
### Deterministic CLI with Explicit `--change`
All change-specific commands require `--change <id>`:
```bash
openspec status --change add-auth # explicit, works
openspec status # error: missing --change
```
**Rationale:**
- CLI is pure, testable, no hidden state
- Agents infer change from conversation and pass explicitly
- No config file tracking "active change"
- Consistent with POC design philosophy
### New Change Command Structure
Creating changes uses explicit subcommand:
```bash
openspec new change add-feature
```
**Rationale:**
- `openspec new <name>` is ambiguous (new what?)
- `openspec new change <name>` is clear and extensible
- Can add `openspec new spec <name>` later if needed
### Output Formats
- **Default**: Human-readable text with visual indicators
- Status: `[x]` done, `[ ]` ready, `[-]` blocked
- Colors: green (done), yellow (ready), red (blocked)
- **JSON** (`--json`): Machine-readable for scripts and agents
### Error Handling
- Missing `--change`: Error listing available changes
- Unknown change: Error with suggestion
- Unknown artifact: Error listing valid artifacts
- Missing schema: Error with schema resolution details
## Risks / Trade-offs
| Risk | Mitigation |
|------|------------|
| Top-level commands pollute namespace | Commands are distinct; isolated for easy removal |
| `status` confused with git | Context (`--change`) makes it clear |
| Feature doesn't work out | Single file deletion removes everything |
## Implementation Notes
- All commands in `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts`
- Imports from `src/core/artifact-graph/` for all operations
- Uses `getActiveChangeIds()` from `item-discovery.ts` for change listing
- Follows existing CLI patterns (ora spinners, commander.js options)
- Help text marks commands as "Experimental"
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
## Why
The ArtifactGraph (Slice 1) and InstructionLoader (Slice 3) provide programmatic APIs for artifact-based workflow management. Users currently have no CLI interface to:
- See artifact completion status for a change
- Discover what artifacts are ready to create
- Get enriched instructions for creating artifacts
- Create new changes with proper validation
This proposal adds CLI commands that expose the artifact workflow functionality to users and agents.
## What Changes
- **NEW**: `openspec status --change <id>` shows artifact completion state
- **NEW**: `openspec next --change <id>` shows artifacts ready to create
- **NEW**: `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>` outputs enriched template
- **NEW**: `openspec templates [--schema <name>]` shows resolved template paths
- **NEW**: `openspec new change <name>` creates a new change directory
All commands are top-level for fluid UX. They integrate with existing core modules:
- Uses `loadChangeContext()`, `formatChangeStatus()`, `generateInstructions()` from instruction-loader
- Uses `ArtifactGraph`, `detectCompleted()` from artifact-graph
- Uses `createChange()`, `validateChangeName()` from change-utils
**Experimental isolation**: All commands are implemented in a single file (`src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts`) for easy removal if the feature doesn't work out. Help text marks them as experimental.
## Impact
- Affected specs: NEW `cli-artifact-workflow` capability
- Affected code:
- `src/cli/index.ts` - register new commands
- `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts` - new command implementations
- No changes to existing commands or specs
- Builds on completed Slice 1, 2, and 3 implementations
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
# cli-artifact-workflow Specification
## Purpose
CLI commands for artifact workflow operations, exposing the artifact graph and instruction loader functionality to users and agents. Commands are top-level for fluid UX and implemented in isolation for easy removal.
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Status Command
The system SHALL display artifact completion status for a change.
#### Scenario: Show status with all states
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system displays each artifact with status indicator:
- `[x]` for completed artifacts
- `[ ]` for ready artifacts
- `[-]` for blocked artifacts (with missing dependencies listed)
#### Scenario: Status shows completion summary
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
- **THEN** output includes completion percentage and count (e.g., "2/4 artifacts complete")
#### Scenario: Status JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with changeName, schemaName, isComplete, and artifacts array
#### Scenario: Missing change parameter
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status` without `--change`
- **THEN** the system displays an error with list of available changes
#### Scenario: Unknown change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change unknown-id`
- **THEN** the system displays an error indicating the change does not exist
### Requirement: Next Command
The system SHALL show which artifacts are ready to be created.
#### Scenario: Show ready artifacts
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system lists artifacts whose dependencies are all satisfied
#### Scenario: No artifacts ready
- **WHEN** all artifacts are either completed or blocked
- **THEN** the system indicates no artifacts are ready (with explanation)
#### Scenario: All artifacts complete
- **WHEN** all artifacts in the change are completed
- **THEN** the system indicates the change is complete
#### Scenario: Next JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON array of ready artifact IDs
### Requirement: Instructions Command
The system SHALL output enriched instructions for creating an artifact.
#### Scenario: Show enriched instructions
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system outputs:
- Artifact metadata (ID, output path, description)
- Template content
- Dependency status (done/missing)
- Unlocked artifacts (what becomes available after completion)
#### Scenario: Instructions JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON matching ArtifactInstructions interface
#### Scenario: Unknown artifact
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions unknown-artifact --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing valid artifact IDs for the schema
#### Scenario: Artifact with unmet dependencies
- **WHEN** user requests instructions for a blocked artifact
- **THEN** the system displays instructions with a warning about missing dependencies
### Requirement: Templates Command
The system SHALL show resolved template paths for all artifacts in a schema.
#### Scenario: List template paths with default schema
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec templates`
- **THEN** the system displays each artifact with its resolved template path using the default schema
#### Scenario: List template paths with custom schema
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec templates --schema tdd`
- **THEN** the system displays template paths for the specified schema
#### Scenario: Templates JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec templates --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON mapping artifact IDs to template paths
#### Scenario: Template resolution source
- **WHEN** displaying template paths
- **THEN** the system indicates whether each template is from user override or package built-in
### Requirement: New Change Command
The system SHALL create new change directories with validation.
#### Scenario: Create valid change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature`
- **THEN** the system creates `openspec/changes/add-feature/` directory
#### Scenario: Invalid change name
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change "Add Feature"` with invalid name
- **THEN** the system displays validation error with guidance
#### Scenario: Duplicate change name
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change existing-change` for an existing change
- **THEN** the system displays an error indicating the change already exists
#### Scenario: Create with description
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature --description "Add new feature"`
- **THEN** the system creates the change directory with description in README.md
### Requirement: Schema Selection
The system SHALL support custom schema selection for workflow commands.
#### Scenario: Default schema
- **WHEN** user runs workflow commands without `--schema`
- **THEN** the system uses the "spec-driven" schema
#### Scenario: Custom schema
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --schema tdd`
- **THEN** the system uses the specified schema for artifact graph
#### Scenario: Unknown schema
- **WHEN** user specifies an unknown schema
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing available schemas
### Requirement: Output Formatting
The system SHALL provide consistent output formatting.
#### Scenario: Color output
- **WHEN** terminal supports colors
- **THEN** status indicators use colors: green (done), yellow (ready), red (blocked)
#### Scenario: No color output
- **WHEN** `--no-color` flag is used or NO_COLOR environment variable is set
- **THEN** output uses text-only indicators without ANSI colors
#### Scenario: Progress indication
- **WHEN** loading change state takes time
- **THEN** the system displays a spinner during loading
### Requirement: Experimental Isolation
The system SHALL implement artifact workflow commands in isolation for easy removal.
#### Scenario: Single file implementation
- **WHEN** artifact workflow feature is implemented
- **THEN** all commands are in `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts`
#### Scenario: Help text marking
- **WHEN** user runs `--help` on any artifact workflow command
- **THEN** help text indicates the command is experimental
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
## 1. Core Command Implementation
- [x] 1.1 Create `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts` with all commands
- [x] 1.2 Implement `status` command with text output
- [x] 1.3 Implement `next` command with text output
- [x] 1.4 Implement `instructions` command with text output
- [x] 1.5 Implement `templates` command with text output
- [x] 1.6 Implement `new change` subcommand using createChange()
## 2. CLI Registration
- [x] 2.1 Register `status` command in `src/cli/index.ts`
- [x] 2.2 Register `next` command in `src/cli/index.ts`
- [x] 2.3 Register `instructions` command in `src/cli/index.ts`
- [x] 2.4 Register `templates` command in `src/cli/index.ts`
- [x] 2.5 Register `new` command group with `change` subcommand
## 3. Output Formatting
- [x] 3.1 Add `--json` flag support to all commands
- [x] 3.2 Add color-coded status indicators (done/ready/blocked)
- [x] 3.3 Add progress spinner for loading operations
- [x] 3.4 Support `--no-color` flag
## 4. Error Handling
- [x] 4.1 Handle missing `--change` parameter with helpful error
- [x] 4.2 Handle unknown change names with list of available changes
- [x] 4.3 Handle unknown artifact names with valid options
- [x] 4.4 Handle schema resolution errors
## 5. Options and Flags
- [x] 5.1 Add `--schema` option for custom schema selection
- [x] 5.2 Add `--description` option to `new change` command
- [x] 5.3 Ensure options follow existing CLI patterns
## 6. Testing
- [x] 6.1 Add smoke tests for each command
- [x] 6.2 Test error cases (missing change, unknown artifact)
- [x] 6.3 Test JSON output format
- [x] 6.4 Test with different schemas
## 7. Documentation
- [x] 7.1 Add help text for all commands marked as "Experimental"
- [ ] 7.2 Update AGENTS.md with new commands (post-archive)
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
# Design: Unify Change State Model
## Overview
This change fixes two bugs with minimal disruption to the existing system:
1. **View bug**: Empty changes incorrectly shown as "Completed"
2. **Artifact workflow bug**: Commands fail on scaffolded changes
## Key Design Decision: Two Systems, Two Purposes
The task-based and artifact-based systems serve **different purposes** and should coexist:
| System | Purpose | Used By |
|--------|---------|---------|
| **Task Progress** | Track implementation work | `openspec view`, `openspec list` |
| **Artifact Progress** | Track planning/spec work | `openspec status`, `openspec next` |
We do NOT merge these systems. Instead, we fix each to work correctly in its domain.
## Change 1: Fix View Command
### Current Logic (Buggy)
```typescript
// view.ts line 90
if (progress.total === 0 || progress.completed === progress.total) {
completed.push({ name: entry.name });
}
```
Problem: `total === 0` means "no tasks defined yet", not "all tasks done".
### New Logic
```typescript
if (progress.total === 0) {
draft.push({ name: entry.name });
} else if (progress.completed === progress.total) {
completed.push({ name: entry.name });
} else {
active.push({ name: entry.name, progress });
}
```
### View Output Change
**Before:**
```
Completed Changes
─────────────────
✓ add-feature (all tasks done - correct)
✓ test-workflow (no tasks - WRONG)
```
**After:**
```
Draft Changes
─────────────────
○ test-workflow (no tasks yet)
Active Changes
─────────────────
◉ add-scaffold [████░░░░] 3/7 tasks
Completed Changes
─────────────────
✓ add-feature (all tasks done)
```
## Change 2: Fix Artifact Workflow Discovery
### Current Logic (Buggy)
```typescript
// artifact-workflow.ts - validateChangeExists()
const activeChanges = await getActiveChangeIds(projectRoot);
if (!activeChanges.includes(changeName)) {
throw new Error(`Change '${changeName}' not found...`);
}
```
Problem: `getActiveChangeIds()` requires `proposal.md`, but artifact workflow should work on empty directories to help create the first artifact.
### New Logic
```typescript
async function validateChangeExists(changeName: string, projectRoot: string): Promise<string> {
const changePath = path.join(projectRoot, 'openspec', 'changes', changeName);
// Check directory existence directly, not proposal.md
if (!fs.existsSync(changePath) || !fs.statSync(changePath).isDirectory()) {
// List available changes for helpful error message
const entries = await fs.promises.readdir(
path.join(projectRoot, 'openspec', 'changes'),
{ withFileTypes: true }
);
const available = entries
.filter(e => e.isDirectory() && e.name !== 'archive' && !e.name.startsWith('.'))
.map(e => e.name);
if (available.length === 0) {
throw new Error('No changes found. Create one with: openspec new change <name>');
}
throw new Error(`Change '${changeName}' not found. Available:\n ${available.join('\n ')}`);
}
return changeName;
}
```
### Behavior Change
```bash
# Before
$ openspec new change foo
$ openspec status --change foo
Error: Change 'foo' not found.
# After
$ openspec new change foo
$ openspec status --change foo
Change: foo
Progress: 0/4 artifacts complete
[ ] proposal
[-] specs (blocked by: proposal)
[-] design (blocked by: proposal)
[-] tasks (blocked by: specs, design)
```
## What Stays the Same
1. **`getActiveChangeIds()`** - Still requires `proposal.md` (used by validate, show)
2. **`getArchivedChangeIds()`** - Unchanged
3. **Active/Completed semantics** - Still based on task checkboxes
4. **Validation** - Still requires `proposal.md` to have something to validate
## File Changes
| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `src/core/view.ts` | Add draft category, fix completion logic |
| `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts` | Update `validateChangeExists()` to use directory existence |
| `test/commands/artifact-workflow.test.ts` | Add tests for scaffolded changes |
## Testing Strategy
1. **Unit test**: `validateChangeExists()` with scaffolded change
2. **View test**: Verify three categories render correctly
3. **Manual test**: Full workflow from `new change` → `status` → `view`
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
# Proposal: Unify Change State Model
## Problem Statement
Two bugs create inconsistent behavior when working with changes:
### Bug 1: Empty changes shown as "Completed" in view
```typescript
// view.ts line 90
if (progress.total === 0 || progress.completed === progress.total) {
completed.push({ name: entry.name }); // BUG: total === 0 ≠ completed
}
```
Result: `openspec new change foo && openspec view` shows `foo` as "Completed" when it has no content.
### Bug 2: Artifact workflow commands can't find scaffolded changes
```typescript
// item-discovery.ts - getActiveChangeIds()
const proposalPath = path.join(changesPath, entry.name, 'proposal.md');
await fs.access(proposalPath); // Only returns changes WITH proposal.md
```
Result: `openspec status --change foo` says "not found" even though the directory exists.
## Root Cause
The system conflates two different concepts:
| Concept | Question | Source of Truth |
|---------|----------|-----------------|
| **Planning Progress** | Are all spec documents created? | File existence (ArtifactGraph) |
| **Implementation Progress** | Is the coding work done? | Task checkboxes (tasks.md) |
## Proposed Solution
### Fix 1: Add "Draft" state to view command
Keep Active/Completed with their existing meanings, but fix the bug:
| State | Criteria | Meaning |
|-------|----------|---------|
| **Draft** | No tasks.md OR `tasks.total === 0` | Still planning |
| **Active** | `tasks.total > 0` AND `completed < total` | Implementing |
| **Completed** | `tasks.total > 0` AND `completed === total` | Done |
### Fix 2: Artifact workflow uses directory existence
Update `validateChangeExists()` to check if the directory exists, not if `proposal.md` exists. This allows the artifact workflow to guide users through creating their first artifact.
### Keep existing discovery functions
`getActiveChangeIds()` continues to require `proposal.md` for backward compatibility with validation and other commands.
## What Changes
| Command | Before | After |
|---------|--------|-------|
| `openspec view` | Empty = "Completed" | Empty = "Draft" |
| `openspec status --change X` | Requires proposal.md | Works on any directory |
| `openspec validate X` | Requires proposal.md | Unchanged (still requires it) |
## Breaking Changes
### Minimal Breaking Change
1. **`openspec view` output**: Empty changes move from "Completed" section to new "Draft" section
### Non-Breaking
- Active/Completed semantics unchanged (still task-based)
- `getActiveChangeIds()` unchanged
- `openspec validate` unchanged
- Archived changes unaffected
## Out of Scope
- Merging task-based and artifact-based progress (they serve different purposes)
- Changing what "Completed" means (it stays = all tasks done)
- Adding artifact progress to view command (separate enhancement)
- Shell tab completions for artifact workflow commands (not yet registered)
## Related Commands Analysis
| Command | Uses `getActiveChangeIds()` | Should include scaffolded? | Change needed? |
|---------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------|
| `openspec view` | No (reads dirs directly) | Yes → Draft section | **Yes** |
| `openspec list` | No (reads dirs directly) | Yes (shows "No tasks") | No |
| `openspec status/next/instructions` | Yes | Yes | **Yes** |
| `openspec validate` | Yes | No (can't validate empty) | No |
| `openspec show` | Yes | No (nothing to show) | No |
| Tab completions | Yes | Future enhancement | No |
## Success Criteria
1. `openspec new change foo && openspec view` shows `foo` in "Draft" section
2. `openspec new change foo && openspec status --change foo` works
3. Changes with all tasks done still show as "Completed"
4. All existing tests pass
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
# cli-artifact-workflow Specification Delta
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Status Command
The system SHALL display artifact completion status for a change, including scaffolded (empty) changes.
> **Fixes bug**: Previously required `proposal.md` to exist via `getActiveChangeIds()`.
#### Scenario: Show status with all states
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system displays each artifact with status indicator:
- `[x]` for completed artifacts
- `[ ]` for ready artifacts
- `[-]` for blocked artifacts (with missing dependencies listed)
#### Scenario: Status shows completion summary
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
- **THEN** output includes completion percentage and count (e.g., "2/4 artifacts complete")
#### Scenario: Status JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with changeName, schemaName, isComplete, and artifacts array
#### Scenario: Status on scaffolded change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>` on a change with no artifacts
- **THEN** system displays all artifacts with their status
- **AND** root artifacts (no dependencies) show as ready `[ ]`
- **AND** dependent artifacts show as blocked `[-]`
#### Scenario: Missing change parameter
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status` without `--change`
- **THEN** the system displays an error with list of available changes
- **AND** includes scaffolded changes (directories without proposal.md)
#### Scenario: Unknown change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change unknown-id`
- **AND** directory `openspec/changes/unknown-id/` does not exist
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing all available change directories
### Requirement: Next Command
The system SHALL show which artifacts are ready to be created, including for scaffolded changes.
#### Scenario: Show ready artifacts
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system lists artifacts whose dependencies are all satisfied
#### Scenario: No artifacts ready
- **WHEN** all artifacts are either completed or blocked
- **THEN** the system indicates no artifacts are ready (with explanation)
#### Scenario: All artifacts complete
- **WHEN** all artifacts in the change are completed
- **THEN** the system indicates the change is complete
#### Scenario: Next JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON array of ready artifact IDs
#### Scenario: Next on scaffolded change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id>` on a change with no artifacts
- **THEN** system shows root artifacts (e.g., "proposal") as ready to create
### Requirement: Instructions Command
The system SHALL output enriched instructions for creating an artifact, including for scaffolded changes.
#### Scenario: Show enriched instructions
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system outputs:
- Artifact metadata (ID, output path, description)
- Template content
- Dependency status (done/missing)
- Unlocked artifacts (what becomes available after completion)
#### Scenario: Instructions JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON matching ArtifactInstructions interface
#### Scenario: Unknown artifact
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions unknown-artifact --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing valid artifact IDs for the schema
#### Scenario: Artifact with unmet dependencies
- **WHEN** user requests instructions for a blocked artifact
- **THEN** the system displays instructions with a warning about missing dependencies
#### Scenario: Instructions on scaffolded change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions proposal --change <id>` on a scaffolded change
- **THEN** system outputs template and metadata for creating the proposal
- **AND** does not require any artifacts to already exist
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
# cli-view Specification Delta
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Draft Changes Display
The dashboard SHALL display changes without tasks in a separate "Draft" section.
#### Scenario: Draft changes listing
- **WHEN** there are changes with no tasks.md or zero tasks defined
- **THEN** system shows them in a "Draft Changes" section
- **AND** uses a distinct indicator (e.g., `○`) to show draft status
#### Scenario: Draft section ordering
- **WHEN** multiple draft changes exist
- **THEN** system sorts them alphabetically by name
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Completed Changes Display
The dashboard SHALL list completed changes in a separate section, only showing changes with ALL tasks completed.
> **Fixes bug**: Previously, changes with `total === 0` were incorrectly shown as completed.
#### Scenario: Completed changes listing
- **WHEN** there are changes with `tasks.total > 0` AND `tasks.completed === tasks.total`
- **THEN** system shows them with checkmark indicators in a dedicated section
#### Scenario: Mixed completion states
- **WHEN** some changes are complete and others active
- **THEN** system separates them into appropriate sections
#### Scenario: Empty changes not completed
- **WHEN** a change has no tasks.md or zero tasks defined
- **THEN** system does NOT show it in "Completed Changes" section
- **AND** shows it in "Draft Changes" section instead
### Requirement: Summary Section
The dashboard SHALL display a summary section with key project metrics, including draft change count.
#### Scenario: Complete summary display
- **WHEN** dashboard is rendered with specs and changes
- **THEN** system shows total number of specifications and requirements
- **AND** shows number of draft changes
- **AND** shows number of active changes in progress
- **AND** shows number of completed changes
- **AND** shows overall task progress percentage
#### Scenario: Empty project summary
- **WHEN** no specs or changes exist
- **THEN** summary shows zero counts for all metrics
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# Tasks: Unify Change State Model
## Phase 1: Fix Artifact Workflow Discovery
- [x] Update `validateChangeExists()` in `artifact-workflow.ts` to check directory existence instead of using `getActiveChangeIds()`
- [x] Update error message to list all change directories (not just those with proposal.md)
- [x] Add test for `openspec status --change <scaffolded-change>`
- [x] Add test for `openspec next --change <scaffolded-change>`
- [x] Add test for `openspec instructions proposal --change <scaffolded-change>`
## Phase 2: Fix View Command
- [x] Update `getChangesData()` in `view.ts` to return three categories: draft, active, completed
- [x] Fix completion logic: `total === 0` → draft, not completed
- [x] Add "Draft Changes" section to dashboard rendering
- [x] Update summary to include draft count
- [x] Add test for draft changes appearing correctly in view
## Phase 3: Cleanup and Validation
- [x] Clean up test changes (`test-workflow`, `test-workflow-2`)
- [x] Run full test suite
- [x] Manual test: `openspec new change foo && openspec status --change foo`
- [x] Manual test: `openspec new change foo && openspec view` shows foo in Draft
- [x] Validate with `openspec validate unify-change-state-model --strict`
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
# Delta for CLI Init
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** the user selects Antigravity during initialization
- **THEN** create `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.agent/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.agent/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** ensure each file begins with YAML frontmatter that contains only a `description: <stage summary>` field followed by the shared OpenSpec workflow instructions wrapped in managed markers
- **AND** populate the workflow body with the same proposal/apply/archive guidance used for other tools so Antigravity behaves like Windsurf while pointing to the `.agent/workflows/` directory
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** the user selects CodeBuddy Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** the user selects Cline during initialization
- **THEN** create `.clinerules/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Crush
- **WHEN** the user selects Crush during initialization
- **THEN** create `.crush/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.crush/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.crush/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Factory Droid
- **WHEN** the user selects Factory Droid during initialization
- **THEN** create `.factory/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.factory/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.factory/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that include Factory-compatible YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** include the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in the template body so droid receives any user-supplied input
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
- **THEN** create `.opencode/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Windsurf
- **WHEN** the user selects Windsurf during initialization
- **THEN** create `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Kilo Code
- **WHEN** the user selects Kilo Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Codex
- **WHEN** the user selects Codex during initialization
- **THEN** create global prompt files at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-proposal.md`, `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-apply.md`, and `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-archive.md` (or under `$CODEX_HOME/prompts` if set)
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that map the first numbered placeholder (`$1`) to the primary user input (e.g., change identifier or question text)
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the prompts without touching surrounding custom notes
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
- **WHEN** the user selects GitHub Copilot during initialization
- **THEN** create `.github/prompts/openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `.github/prompts/openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `.github/prompts/openspec-archive.prompt.md`
- **AND** populate each file with YAML frontmatter containing a `description` field that summarizes the workflow stage
- **AND** include `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder to capture user input
- **AND** wrap the shared template body with OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the content
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Gemini CLI
- **WHEN** the user selects Gemini CLI during initialization
- **THEN** create `.gemini/commands/openspec/proposal.toml`, `.gemini/commands/openspec/apply.toml`, and `.gemini/commands/openspec/archive.toml`
- **AND** populate each file as TOML that sets a stage-specific `description = "<summary>"` and a multi-line `prompt = """` block with the shared OpenSpec template
- **AND** wrap the OpenSpec managed markers (`<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` / `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->`) inside the `prompt` value so `openspec update` can safely refresh the body between markers without touching the TOML framing
- **AND** ensure the slash-command copy matches the existing proposal/apply/archive templates used by other tools
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for iFlow CLI
- **WHEN** the user selects iFlow CLI during initialization
- **THEN** create `.iflow/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.iflow/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.iflow/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include YAML frontmatter with `name`, `id`, `category`, and `description` fields for each command
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for RooCode
- **WHEN** the user selects RooCode during initialization
- **THEN** create `.roo/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.roo/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.roo/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include simple Markdown headings (e.g., `# OpenSpec: Proposal`) without YAML frontmatter
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers where applicable so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
# Delta for CLI Update
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones, and ensure the OpenCode archive command accepts change ID arguments.
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** `.agent/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh the OpenSpec-managed portion of each file so the workflow copy matches other tools while preserving the existing single-field `description` frontmatter
- **AND** skip creating any missing workflow files during update, mirroring the behavior for Windsurf and other IDEs
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** `.clinerules/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Crush
- **WHEN** `.crush/commands/` contains `openspec/proposal.md`, `openspec/apply.md`, and `openspec/archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cursor
- **WHEN** `.cursor/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Factory Droid
- **WHEN** `.factory/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared Factory templates that include YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** ensure the template body retains the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder so user input keeps flowing into droid
- **AND** update only the content inside the OpenSpec managed markers, leaving any unmanaged notes untouched
- **AND** skip creating missing files during update
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for OpenCode
- **WHEN** `.opencode/command/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **AND** ensure the archive command includes `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in frontmatter for accepting change ID arguments
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Windsurf
- **WHEN** `.windsurf/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Kilo Code
- **WHEN** `.kilocode/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Codex
- **GIVEN** the global Codex prompt directory contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec update`
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared slash-command templates (including placeholder guidance)
- **AND** preserve any unmanaged content outside the OpenSpec marker block
- **AND** skip creation when a Codex prompt file is missing
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
- **WHEN** `.github/prompts/` contains `openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `openspec-archive.prompt.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates while preserving the YAML frontmatter
- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed block between markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Gemini CLI
- **WHEN** `.gemini/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.toml`, `apply.toml`, and `archive.toml`
- **THEN** refresh the body of each file using the shared proposal/apply/archive templates
- **AND** replace only the content between `<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` and `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->` markers inside the `prompt = """` block so the TOML framing (`description`, `prompt`) stays intact
- **AND** skip creating any missing `.toml` files during update; only pre-existing Gemini commands are refreshed
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for iFlow CLI
- **WHEN** `.iflow/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** preserve the YAML frontmatter with `name`, `id`, `category`, and `description` fields
- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed block between markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Missing slash command file
- **WHEN** a tool lacks a slash command file
- **THEN** do not create a new file during update
@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ The Cline implementation was architecturally incorrect. According to Cline's off
- **BREAKING**: Existing Cline users will need to re-run `openspec init` to get the corrected workflow files
## Impact
- Affected specs: cli-init (corrected Cline workflow paths)
- Affected specs: cli-init, cli-update (corrected Cline workflow paths)
- Affected code: `src/core/configurators/slash/cline.ts`, test files, README.md
- Modified files: `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-*.md` (moved from `.clinerules/openspec-*.md`)
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
# Delta for CLI Init
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** the user selects Antigravity during initialization
- **THEN** create `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.agent/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.agent/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** ensure each file begins with YAML frontmatter that contains only a `description: <stage summary>` field followed by the shared OpenSpec workflow instructions wrapped in managed markers
- **AND** populate the workflow body with the same proposal/apply/archive guidance used for other tools so Antigravity behaves like Windsurf while pointing to the `.agent/workflows/` directory
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** the user selects CodeBuddy Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** the user selects Cline during initialization
- **THEN** create `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Crush
- **WHEN** the user selects Crush during initialization
- **THEN** create `.crush/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.crush/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.crush/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Factory Droid
- **WHEN** the user selects Factory Droid during initialization
- **THEN** create `.factory/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.factory/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.factory/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that include Factory-compatible YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** include the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in the template body so droid receives any user-supplied input
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
- **THEN** create `.opencode/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Windsurf
- **WHEN** the user selects Windsurf during initialization
- **THEN** create `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Kilo Code
- **WHEN** the user selects Kilo Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Codex
- **WHEN** the user selects Codex during initialization
- **THEN** create global prompt files at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-proposal.md`, `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-apply.md`, and `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-archive.md` (or under `$CODEX_HOME/prompts` if set)
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that map the first numbered placeholder (`$1`) to the primary user input (e.g., change identifier or question text)
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the prompts without touching surrounding custom notes
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
- **WHEN** the user selects GitHub Copilot during initialization
- **THEN** create `.github/prompts/openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `.github/prompts/openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `.github/prompts/openspec-archive.prompt.md`
- **AND** populate each file with YAML frontmatter containing a `description` field that summarizes the workflow stage
- **AND** include `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder to capture user input
- **AND** wrap the shared template body with OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the content
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Gemini CLI
- **WHEN** the user selects Gemini CLI during initialization
- **THEN** create `.gemini/commands/openspec/proposal.toml`, `.gemini/commands/openspec/apply.toml`, and `.gemini/commands/openspec/archive.toml`
- **AND** populate each file as TOML that sets a stage-specific `description = "<summary>"` and a multi-line `prompt = """` block with the shared OpenSpec template
- **AND** wrap the OpenSpec managed markers (`<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` / `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->`) inside the `prompt` value so `openspec update` can safely refresh the body between markers without touching the TOML framing
- **AND** ensure the slash-command copy matches the existing proposal/apply/archive templates used by other tools
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for iFlow CLI
- **WHEN** the user selects iFlow CLI during initialization
- **THEN** create `.iflow/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.iflow/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.iflow/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include YAML frontmatter with `name`, `id`, `category`, and `description` fields for each command
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for RooCode
- **WHEN** the user selects RooCode during initialization
- **THEN** create `.roo/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.roo/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.roo/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include simple Markdown headings (e.g., `# OpenSpec: Proposal`) without YAML frontmatter
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers where applicable so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
# Delta for CLI Update
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones, and ensure the OpenCode archive command accepts change ID arguments.
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** `.agent/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh the OpenSpec-managed portion of each file so the workflow copy matches other tools while preserving the existing single-field `description` frontmatter
- **AND** skip creating any missing workflow files during update, mirroring the behavior for Windsurf and other IDEs
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** `.clinerules/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Crush
- **WHEN** `.crush/commands/` contains `openspec/proposal.md`, `openspec/apply.md`, and `openspec/archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cursor
- **WHEN** `.cursor/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Factory Droid
- **WHEN** `.factory/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared Factory templates that include YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** ensure the template body retains the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder so user input keeps flowing into droid
- **AND** update only the content inside the OpenSpec managed markers, leaving any unmanaged notes untouched
- **AND** skip creating missing files during update
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for OpenCode
- **WHEN** `.opencode/command/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **AND** ensure the archive command includes `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in frontmatter for accepting change ID arguments
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Windsurf
- **WHEN** `.windsurf/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Kilo Code
- **WHEN** `.kilocode/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Codex
- **GIVEN** the global Codex prompt directory contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec update`
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared slash-command templates (including placeholder guidance)
- **AND** preserve any unmanaged content outside the OpenSpec marker block
- **AND** skip creation when a Codex prompt file is missing
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
- **WHEN** `.github/prompts/` contains `openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `openspec-archive.prompt.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates while preserving the YAML frontmatter
- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed block between markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Gemini CLI
- **WHEN** `.gemini/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.toml`, `apply.toml`, and `archive.toml`
- **THEN** refresh the body of each file using the shared proposal/apply/archive templates
- **AND** replace only the content between `<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` and `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->` markers inside the `prompt = """` block so the TOML framing (`description`, `prompt`) stays intact
- **AND** skip creating any missing `.toml` files during update; only pre-existing Gemini commands are refreshed
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for iFlow CLI
- **WHEN** `.iflow/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** preserve the YAML frontmatter with `name`, `id`, `category`, and `description` fields
- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed block between markers
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Missing slash command file
- **WHEN** a tool lacks a slash command file
- **THEN** do not create a new file during update
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
## Why
With per-change schema metadata in place (see `add-per-change-schema-metadata`), agents can now create changes with different workflow schemas. However, the agent skills are still hardcoded to `spec-driven` artifacts and don't offer schema selection to users.
## What Changes
**Scope: Experimental artifact workflow agent skills**
**Depends on:** `add-per-change-schema-metadata` (must be implemented first)
- Update `openspec-new-change` skill to prompt user for schema selection
- Update `openspec-continue-change` skill to work with any schema's artifacts
- Update `openspec-apply-change` skill to handle schema-specific task structures
- Add schema descriptions to help users choose appropriate workflow
## Capabilities
### Modified Capabilities
- `cli-artifact-workflow`: Agent skills support dynamic schema selection
## Impact
- **Affected code**: `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts`
- **User experience**: Users can choose TDD, spec-driven, or future workflows when starting a change
- **Agent behavior**: Skills read artifact list from schema rather than hardcoding
- **Backward compatible**: Default remains `spec-driven` if user doesn't choose
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
## Prerequisites
- [x] 0.1 Implement `add-per-change-schema-metadata` change first
## 1. Schema Discovery
- [x] 1.1 Add CLI command or helper to list schemas with descriptions (for agent use)
- [x] 1.2 Ensure `openspec templates --schema <name>` returns artifact list for any schema
## 2. Update New Change Skill
- [x] 2.1 Add schema selection prompt using AskUserQuestion tool
- [x] 2.2 Present available schemas with descriptions (spec-driven, tdd, etc.)
- [x] 2.3 Pass selected schema to `openspec new change --schema <name>`
- [x] 2.4 Update output to show which schema/workflow was selected
## 3. Update Continue Change Skill
- [x] 3.1 Remove hardcoded artifact references (proposal, specs, design, tasks)
- [x] 3.2 Read artifact list dynamically from `openspec status --json`
- [x] 3.3 Adjust artifact creation guidelines to be schema-agnostic
- [x] 3.4 Handle schema-specific artifact types (e.g., TDD's `tests` artifact)
## 4. Update Apply Change Skill
- [x] 4.1 Make task detection work with different schema structures
- [x] 4.2 Adjust context file reading for schema-specific artifacts
## 5. Documentation
- [x] 5.1 Add schema descriptions to help text or skill instructions
- [x] 5.2 Document when to use each schema (TDD for bug fixes, spec-driven for features, etc.)
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
## Context
The experimental artifact workflow supports multiple schemas (`spec-driven`, `tdd`), but schema selection must be passed on every command. This creates friction for agents and users.
We need a lightweight metadata file to persist the schema choice per change.
## Goals / Non-Goals
**Goals:**
- Store schema choice once at change creation
- Auto-detect schema in experimental workflow commands
- Maintain backward compatibility (no metadata = default)
- Validate metadata with Zod schema
**Non-Goals:**
- Migrate existing changes (they use default)
- Extend to legacy commands
- Store additional metadata beyond schema (keep minimal for now)
## Decisions
### Decision: Zod Schema Design
The metadata file (`.openspec.yaml`) will be validated with this Zod schema:
```typescript
// src/core/artifact-graph/types.ts (or new metadata.ts)
import { z } from 'zod';
import { listSchemas } from './resolver.js';
/**
* Schema for per-change metadata stored in .openspec.yaml
*/
export const ChangeMetadataSchema = z.object({
// Required: which workflow schema this change uses
schema: z.string().min(1, { message: 'schema is required' }).refine(
(val) => listSchemas().includes(val),
(val) => ({ message: `Unknown schema '${val}'. Available: ${listSchemas().join(', ')}` })
),
// Optional: creation timestamp (ISO date string)
created: z.string().regex(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/, {
message: 'created must be YYYY-MM-DD format'
}).optional(),
});
export type ChangeMetadata = z.infer<typeof ChangeMetadataSchema>;
```
**Rationale:**
- `schema` is required and validated against available schemas at parse time
- `created` is optional, ISO date format for consistency
- Minimal fields - can extend later without breaking existing files
- Follows existing codebase pattern (see `ArtifactSchema`, `SchemaYamlSchema`)
### Decision: File Location and Format
**Location:** `openspec/changes/<name>/.openspec.yaml`
**Format:**
```yaml
schema: tdd
created: 2025-01-05
```
**Alternatives considered:**
- `change.yaml` - less hidden, but clutters directory
- Frontmatter in `proposal.md` - couples to proposal existence
- `openspec.json` - YAML matches existing schema files
### Decision: Read/Write Functions
```typescript
// src/utils/change-metadata.ts
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
import * as path from 'node:path';
import * as yaml from 'yaml';
import { ChangeMetadataSchema, type ChangeMetadata } from '../core/artifact-graph/types.js';
const METADATA_FILENAME = '.openspec.yaml';
export function writeChangeMetadata(
changeDir: string,
metadata: ChangeMetadata
): void {
// Validate before writing
const validated = ChangeMetadataSchema.parse(metadata);
const content = yaml.stringify(validated);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(changeDir, METADATA_FILENAME), content);
}
export function readChangeMetadata(
changeDir: string
): ChangeMetadata | null {
const metaPath = path.join(changeDir, METADATA_FILENAME);
if (!fs.existsSync(metaPath)) {
return null;
}
const content = fs.readFileSync(metaPath, 'utf-8');
const parsed = yaml.parse(content);
// Validate and return (throws ZodError if invalid)
return ChangeMetadataSchema.parse(parsed);
}
```
### Decision: Schema Resolution Order
When determining which schema to use:
1. **Explicit `--schema` flag** (highest priority - user override)
2. **`.openspec.yaml` metadata** (persisted choice)
3. **Default `spec-driven`** (fallback)
```typescript
function resolveSchemaForChange(
changeDir: string,
explicitSchema?: string
): string {
if (explicitSchema) return explicitSchema;
const metadata = readChangeMetadata(changeDir);
if (metadata?.schema) return metadata.schema;
return 'spec-driven';
}
```
## Risks / Trade-offs
- **Extra file per change** → Minimal overhead, hidden file
- **YAML parsing dependency** → Already using `yaml` package for schema files
- **Schema validation at read time** → Fail fast with clear error if corrupted
## Migration Plan
No migration needed:
- Existing changes without `.openspec.yaml` continue to work (use default)
- New changes created with `openspec new change --schema X` get metadata file
## Open Questions
- Should `openspec new change` prompt for schema interactively if not specified? (Leaning no - default is fine)
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
## Why
Currently, the schema (workflow type) must be passed via `--schema` flag on every experimental workflow command. This is repetitive and error-prone. Agents have no way to know which schema a change uses, so they default to `spec-driven` and cannot leverage alternative workflows like `tdd`.
## What Changes
**Scope: Experimental artifact workflow only** (`openspec new change`, `openspec status`, `openspec instructions`, `openspec templates`)
- Store schema choice in `.openspec.yaml` metadata file when creating a change via `openspec new change`
- Auto-detect schema from metadata in experimental workflow commands
- Make `--schema` flag optional (override only, metadata takes precedence)
- Add `--schema` option to `openspec new change` command
**Not affected**: Legacy commands (`openspec validate`, `openspec archive`, `openspec list`, `openspec show`)
## Capabilities
### New Capabilities
- `change-metadata`: Reading/writing per-change metadata files
### Modified Capabilities
- `cli-artifact-workflow`: Commands auto-detect schema from change metadata
## Impact
- **Affected code**: `src/utils/change-utils.ts`, `src/core/artifact-graph/instruction-loader.ts`, `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts`
- **Agent skills**: Can be simplified - no longer need to pass schema explicitly
- **Backward compatible**: Changes without `.openspec.yaml` fall back to `spec-driven` default
- **Isolation**: All changes contained within experimental workflow code; legacy commands untouched
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Change Metadata
The system SHALL store and validate per-change metadata in `.openspec.yaml` files using a Zod schema.
#### Scenario: Metadata file created with new change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature --schema tdd`
- **THEN** the system creates `.openspec.yaml` in the change directory
- **AND** the file contains `schema: tdd` and `created: <YYYY-MM-DD>`
#### Scenario: Metadata validated on read
- **WHEN** the system reads `.openspec.yaml`
- **AND** the `schema` field references an unknown schema
- **THEN** the system displays a validation error listing available schemas
#### Scenario: Metadata schema validation
- **WHEN** `.openspec.yaml` contains invalid YAML or missing required fields
- **THEN** the system displays a Zod validation error with details
#### Scenario: Missing metadata file
- **WHEN** a change directory has no `.openspec.yaml` file
- **THEN** the system falls back to the default schema (`spec-driven`)
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: New Change Command
The system SHALL create new change directories with validation and optional schema metadata.
#### Scenario: Create valid change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature`
- **THEN** the system creates `openspec/changes/add-feature/` directory
- **AND** creates `.openspec.yaml` with `schema: spec-driven` (default)
#### Scenario: Create change with schema
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature --schema tdd`
- **THEN** the system creates `openspec/changes/add-feature/` directory
- **AND** creates `.openspec.yaml` with `schema: tdd`
#### Scenario: Invalid schema on create
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature --schema unknown`
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing available schemas
- **AND** does not create the change directory
#### Scenario: Invalid change name
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change "Add Feature"` with invalid name
- **THEN** the system displays validation error with guidance
#### Scenario: Duplicate change name
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change existing-change` for an existing change
- **THEN** the system displays an error indicating the change already exists
#### Scenario: Create with description
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature --description "Add new feature"`
- **THEN** the system creates the change directory with description in README.md
### Requirement: Schema Selection
The system SHALL support custom schema selection for workflow commands, with automatic detection from change metadata.
#### Scenario: Schema auto-detected from metadata
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>` without `--schema`
- **AND** the change has `.openspec.yaml` with `schema: tdd`
- **THEN** the system uses the `tdd` schema
#### Scenario: Explicit schema overrides metadata
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --schema spec-driven`
- **AND** the change has `.openspec.yaml` with `schema: tdd`
- **THEN** the system uses `spec-driven` (explicit flag wins)
#### Scenario: Default schema fallback
- **WHEN** user runs workflow commands without `--schema`
- **AND** the change has no `.openspec.yaml` file
- **THEN** the system uses the "spec-driven" schema
#### Scenario: Custom schema via flag
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --schema tdd`
- **THEN** the system uses the specified schema for artifact graph
#### Scenario: Unknown schema
- **WHEN** user specifies an unknown schema
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing available schemas
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
## 1. Zod Schema and Types
- [x] 1.1 Add `ChangeMetadataSchema` Zod schema to `src/core/artifact-graph/types.ts`
- [x] 1.2 Export `ChangeMetadata` type inferred from schema
## 2. Core Metadata Functions
- [x] 2.1 Create `src/utils/change-metadata.ts` with `writeChangeMetadata()` function
- [x] 2.2 Add `readChangeMetadata()` function with Zod validation
- [x] 2.3 Update `createChange()` to accept optional `schema` param and write metadata
## 3. Auto-Detection in Instruction Loader
- [x] 3.1 Modify `loadChangeContext()` to read schema from `.openspec.yaml`
- [x] 3.2 Make `schemaName` parameter optional (fall back to metadata, then default)
## 4. CLI Updates
- [x] 4.1 Add `--schema <name>` option to `openspec new change` command
- [x] 4.2 Verify existing commands (`status`, `instructions`) work with auto-detection
## 5. Tests
- [x] 5.1 Test `ChangeMetadataSchema` validates correctly (valid/invalid cases)
- [x] 5.2 Test `writeChangeMetadata()` creates valid YAML
- [x] 5.3 Test `readChangeMetadata()` parses and validates schema
- [x] 5.4 Test `loadChangeContext()` auto-detects schema from metadata
- [x] 5.5 Test fallback to default when no metadata exists
- [x] 5.6 Test `--schema` flag overrides metadata
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
schema: spec-driven
created: 2026-01-06
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
## Context
Currently, delta specs are only applied to main specs when running `openspec archive`. This bundles two concerns:
1. Applying spec changes (delta → main)
2. Archiving the change (move to archive folder)
Users want flexibility to sync specs earlier, especially when iterating. The archive command already contains the reconciliation logic in `buildUpdatedSpec()`.
## Goals / Non-Goals
**Goals:**
- Decouple spec syncing from archiving
- Provide `/opsx:sync` skill for agents to sync specs on demand
- Keep operation idempotent (safe to run multiple times)
**Non-Goals:**
- Tracking whether specs have been synced (no state)
- Changing archive behavior (it will continue to apply specs)
- Supporting partial application (all deltas sync together)
## Decisions
### 1. Reuse existing reconciliation logic
**Decision**: Extract `buildUpdatedSpec()` logic from `ArchiveCommand` into a shared module.
**Rationale**: The archive command already implements delta parsing and application. Rather than duplicate, we extract and reuse.
**Alternatives considered**:
- Duplicate logic in new command (rejected: maintenance burden)
- Have sync call archive with flags (rejected: coupling)
### 2. No state tracking
**Decision**: Don't track whether specs have been synced. Each invocation reads delta and main specs, reconciles.
**Rationale**:
- Idempotent operations don't need state
- Avoids sync issues between flag and reality
- Simpler implementation and mental model
**Alternatives considered**:
- Track `specsSynced: true` in `.openspec.yaml` (rejected: unnecessary complexity)
- Store snapshot of synced deltas (rejected: over-engineering)
### 3. Agent-driven approach (no CLI command)
**Decision**: The `/opsx:sync` skill is fully agent-driven - the agent reads delta specs and directly edits main specs.
**Rationale**:
- Allows intelligent merging (add scenarios without copying entire requirements)
- Delta represents *intent*, not wholesale replacement
- More flexible and natural editing workflow
- Archive still uses programmatic merge (for finalized changes)
### 4. Archive behavior unchanged
**Decision**: Archive continues to apply specs as part of its flow. If specs are already reconciled, the operation is a no-op.
**Rationale**: Backward compatibility. Users who don't use `/opsx:sync` get the same experience.
## Risks / Trade-offs
**[Risk] Multiple changes modify same spec**
→ Last to sync wins. Same as today with archive. Users should coordinate or use sequential archives.
**[Risk] User syncs specs then continues editing deltas**
→ Running `/opsx:sync` again reconciles. Idempotent design handles this.
**[Trade-off] No undo mechanism**
→ Users can `git checkout` main specs if needed. Explicit undo command is out of scope.
## Implementation Approach
1. Extract spec application logic from `ArchiveCommand.buildUpdatedSpec()` into `src/core/specs-apply.ts`
2. Add skill template for `/opsx:sync` in `skill-templates.ts`
3. Register skill in managed skills
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
## Why
Spec application is currently bundled with archive - users must run `openspec archive` to apply delta specs to main specs. This couples two distinct concerns (applying specs vs. archiving the change) and forces users to wait until they're "done" to see main specs updated. Users want the flexibility to sync specs earlier in the workflow while iterating.
## What Changes
- Add `/opsx:sync` skill that syncs delta specs to main specs as a standalone action
- The operation is idempotent - safe to run multiple times, agent reconciles main specs to match deltas
- Archive continues to work as today (applies specs if not already reconciled, then moves to archive)
- No new state tracking - the agent reads delta and main specs, reconciles on each run
- Agent-driven approach allows intelligent merging (partial updates, adding scenarios)
**Workflow becomes:**
```
/opsx:new → /opsx:continue → /opsx:apply → archive
│
└── /opsx:sync (optional, anytime)
```
## Capabilities
### New Capabilities
- `specs-sync-skill`: Skill template for `/opsx:sync` command that reconciles main specs with delta specs
### Modified Capabilities
- None (agent-driven, no CLI command needed)
## Impact
- **Skills**: New `openspec-sync-specs` skill in `skill-templates.ts`
- **Archive**: No changes needed - already does reconciliation, will continue to work
- **Agent workflow**: Users gain flexibility to sync specs before archive
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Specs Sync Skill
The system SHALL provide an `/opsx:sync` skill that syncs delta specs from a change to the main specs.
#### Scenario: Sync delta specs to main specs
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:sync` with a change name
- **THEN** the agent reads delta specs from `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/`
- **AND** reads corresponding main specs from `openspec/specs/`
- **AND** reconciles main specs to match what the deltas describe
#### Scenario: Idempotent operation
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:sync` multiple times on the same change
- **THEN** the result is the same as running it once
- **AND** no duplicate requirements are created
#### Scenario: Change selection prompt
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:sync` without specifying a change
- **THEN** the agent prompts user to select from available changes
- **AND** shows changes that have delta specs
### Requirement: Delta Reconciliation Logic
The agent SHALL reconcile main specs with delta specs using the delta operation headers.
#### Scenario: ADDED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## ADDED Requirements` with a requirement
- **AND** the requirement does not exist in main spec
- **THEN** add the requirement to main spec
#### Scenario: ADDED requirement already exists
- **WHEN** delta contains `## ADDED Requirements` with a requirement
- **AND** a requirement with the same name already exists in main spec
- **THEN** update the existing requirement to match the delta version
#### Scenario: MODIFIED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## MODIFIED Requirements` with a requirement
- **AND** the requirement exists in main spec
- **THEN** replace the requirement in main spec with the delta version
#### Scenario: REMOVED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## REMOVED Requirements` with a requirement name
- **AND** the requirement exists in main spec
- **THEN** remove the requirement from main spec
#### Scenario: RENAMED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## RENAMED Requirements` with FROM:/TO: format
- **AND** the FROM requirement exists in main spec
- **THEN** rename the requirement to the TO name
#### Scenario: New capability spec
- **WHEN** delta spec exists for a capability not in main specs
- **THEN** create new main spec file at `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
### Requirement: Skill Output
The skill SHALL provide clear feedback on what was synced.
#### Scenario: Show synced changes
- **WHEN** reconciliation completes successfully
- **THEN** display summary of changes per capability:
- Number of requirements added
- Number of requirements modified
- Number of requirements removed
- Number of requirements renamed
#### Scenario: No changes needed
- **WHEN** main specs already match delta specs
- **THEN** display "Specs already in sync - no changes needed"
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
## Tasks
### Core Implementation
- [x] Extract spec application logic from `ArchiveCommand` into `src/core/specs-apply.ts`
- Move `buildUpdatedSpec()`, `findSpecUpdates()`, `writeUpdatedSpec()` to shared module
- Keep `ArchiveCommand` importing from the new module
- Ensure all validation logic is preserved
### Skill Template
- [x] Add `getSyncSpecsSkillTemplate()` function in `src/core/templates/skill-templates.ts`
- Skill name: `openspec-sync-specs`
- Description: Sync delta specs to main specs
- **Agent-driven**: Instructions for agent to read deltas and edit main specs directly
- [x] Add `/opsx:sync` slash command template in `skill-templates.ts`
- Mirror the skill template for slash command format
- **Agent-driven**: No CLI command, agent does the merge
### Registration
- [x] Register skill in managed skills (via `artifact-experimental-setup`)
- Add to skill list with appropriate metadata
- Ensure it appears in setup output
### Design Decision
**Why agent-driven instead of CLI-driven?**
The programmatic merge operates at requirement-level granularity:
- MODIFIED requires copying ALL scenarios, not just the changed ones
- If agent forgets a scenario, it gets deleted
- Delta specs become bloated with copied content
Agent-driven approach:
- Agent can apply partial updates (add a scenario without copying others)
- Delta represents *intent*, not wholesale replacement
- More flexible and natural editing workflow
- Archive still uses programmatic merge (for finalized changes)
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
## Why
The `generateApplyInstructions` function is hardcoded to check for `spec-driven` artifacts (`proposal.md`, `specs/`, `design.md`, `tasks.md`). If a user selects a different schema like `tdd`, the apply instructions are meaningless - they check for files that don't exist in that schema.
This blocks the experimental workflow from supporting multiple schemas properly.
## What Changes
**Scope: Experimental artifact workflow** (`openspec instructions apply`)
**Depends on:** `add-per-change-schema-metadata` (to know which schema a change uses)
- Make `generateApplyInstructions` read artifact definitions from the schema
- Dynamically determine which artifacts exist based on schema
- Define when a change becomes "implementable" (see Design Decision below)
- Generate schema-appropriate context files and instructions
## Design Decision: When is a change implementable?
This is the key question. Different approaches:
### Option A: Explicit `apply` artifact in schema
Add a field to mark which artifact is the "implementation gate":
```yaml
artifacts:
- id: tasks
generates: tasks.md
apply: true # ← This artifact triggers apply mode
```
**Pros:** Explicit, flexible
**Cons:** Another field to maintain, what if multiple artifacts are `apply: true`?
### Option B: Leaf artifacts are implementable
The artifact(s) with no dependents (nothing depends on them) are the apply target.
- `spec-driven`: `tasks` is a leaf → apply = execute tasks
- `tdd`: `docs` is a leaf → but that doesn't make sense for TDD...
**Pros:** No extra schema field, derived from graph
**Cons:** Doesn't match TDD semantics (implementation is the action, not docs)
### Option C: Schema-level `apply_phase` definition
Add a top-level field to the schema:
```yaml
name: spec-driven
apply_phase:
requires: [tasks] # Must exist before apply
tracks: tasks.md # File with checkboxes to track
instruction: "Work through tasks, mark complete as you go"
```
```yaml
name: tdd
apply_phase:
requires: [tests] # Must have tests before implementing
tracks: null # No checkbox tracking - just make tests pass
instruction: "Run tests, implement until green, refactor"
```
**Pros:** Full flexibility, schema controls its own apply semantics
**Cons:** More complex schema format
### Option D: Convention-based (artifact ID matching)
If artifact ID is `tasks` or `implementation`, it's the apply target.
**Pros:** Simple, no schema changes
**Cons:** Brittle, doesn't work for custom schemas
### Option E: All artifacts complete → apply available
Apply becomes available when ALL schema artifacts exist. Implementation is whatever the user does after planning.
**Pros:** Simple, no schema changes
**Cons:** Doesn't guide what "apply" means for different workflows
---
## Decision: Add `apply` block to schema.yaml
Add a top-level `apply` field to schema definitions:
```yaml
name: spec-driven
version: 1
description: Default OpenSpec workflow
artifacts:
# ... existing artifacts ...
apply:
requires: [tasks] # Artifacts that must exist before apply
tracks: tasks.md # File with checkboxes for progress (optional)
instruction: | # Guidance shown to agent
Read context files, work through pending tasks, mark complete as you go.
Pause if you hit blockers or need clarification.
```
```yaml
name: tdd
version: 1
description: Test-driven development workflow
artifacts:
# ... existing artifacts ...
apply:
requires: [tests] # Must have tests before implementing
tracks: null # No checkbox tracking
instruction: |
Run tests to see failures. Implement minimal code to pass each test.
Refactor while keeping tests green.
```
**Key properties:**
- `requires`: Array of artifact IDs that must exist before apply is available
- `tracks`: Path to file with checkboxes (relative to change dir), or `null` if no tracking
- `instruction`: Custom guidance for the apply phase
**Fallback behavior:** Schemas without `apply` block default to "all artifacts must exist"
## Capabilities
### Modified Capabilities
- `cli-artifact-workflow`: Apply instructions become schema-aware
## Impact
- **Affected code**: `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts` (generateApplyInstructions)
- **Schema format**: May need new `apply_phase` field
- **Existing schemas**: Need to add apply_phase to `spec-driven` and `tdd`
- **Backward compatible**: Schemas without apply_phase can use default behavior
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Schema Apply Block
The system SHALL support an `apply` block in schema definitions that controls when and how implementation begins.
#### Scenario: Schema with apply block
- **WHEN** a schema defines an `apply` block
- **THEN** the system uses `apply.requires` to determine which artifacts must exist before apply
- **AND** uses `apply.tracks` to identify the file for progress tracking (or null if none)
- **AND** uses `apply.instruction` for guidance shown to the agent
#### Scenario: Schema without apply block
- **WHEN** a schema has no `apply` block
- **THEN** the system requires all artifacts to exist before apply is available
- **AND** uses default instruction: "All artifacts complete. Proceed with implementation."
### Requirement: Apply Instructions Command
The system SHALL generate schema-aware apply instructions via `openspec instructions apply`.
#### Scenario: Generate apply instructions
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions apply --change <id>`
- **AND** all required artifacts (per schema's `apply.requires`) exist
- **THEN** the system outputs:
- Context files from all existing artifacts
- Schema-specific instruction text
- Progress tracking file path (if `apply.tracks` is set)
#### Scenario: Apply blocked by missing artifacts
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions apply --change <id>`
- **AND** required artifacts are missing
- **THEN** the system indicates apply is blocked
- **AND** lists which artifacts must be created first
#### Scenario: Apply instructions JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions apply --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with:
- `contextFiles`: array of paths to existing artifacts
- `instruction`: the apply instruction text
- `tracks`: path to progress file or null
- `applyRequires`: list of required artifact IDs
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Status Command
The system SHALL display artifact completion status for a change, including apply readiness.
#### Scenario: Status JSON includes apply requirements
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with:
- `changeName`, `schemaName`, `isComplete`, `artifacts` array
- `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed for apply phase
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
## Prerequisites
- [x] 0.1 Implement `add-per-change-schema-metadata` first (to auto-detect schema)
## 1. Schema Format
- [x] 1.1 Add `ApplyPhaseSchema` Zod schema to `src/core/artifact-graph/types.ts`
- [x] 1.2 Update `SchemaYamlSchema` to include optional `apply` field
- [x] 1.3 Export `ApplyPhase` type
## 2. Update Existing Schemas
- [x] 2.1 Add `apply` block to `schemas/spec-driven/schema.yaml`
- [x] 2.2 Add `apply` block to `schemas/tdd/schema.yaml`
## 3. Refactor generateApplyInstructions
- [x] 3.1 Load schema via `resolveSchema(schemaName)`
- [x] 3.2 Read `apply.requires` to determine required artifacts
- [x] 3.3 Check artifact existence dynamically (not hardcoded paths)
- [x] 3.4 Use `apply.tracks` for progress tracking (or skip if null)
- [x] 3.5 Use `apply.instruction` for the instruction text
- [x] 3.6 Build `contextFiles` from all existing artifacts in schema
## 4. Handle Fallback
- [x] 4.1 If schema has no `apply` block, require all artifacts to exist
- [x] 4.2 Default instruction: "All artifacts complete. Proceed with implementation."
## 5. Tests
- [x] 5.1 Test apply instructions with spec-driven schema
- [x] 5.2 Test apply instructions with tdd schema
- [x] 5.3 Test fallback when schema has no apply block
- [x] 5.4 Test blocked state when required artifacts missing
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
schema: spec-driven
created: 2026-01-07
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
## Context
The experimental workflow (OPSX) provides a complete lifecycle for creating changes:
- `/opsx:new` - Scaffold a new change with schema
- `/opsx:continue` - Create next artifact
- `/opsx:ff` - Fast-forward all artifacts
- `/opsx:apply` - Implement tasks
- `/opsx:sync` - Sync delta specs to main
The missing piece is archiving. The existing `openspec archive` command works but:
1. Applies specs programmatically (not agent-driven)
2. Doesn't use the artifact graph for completion checking
3. Doesn't integrate with the OPSX workflow philosophy
## Goals / Non-Goals
**Goals:**
- Add `/opsx:archive` skill to complete the OPSX workflow lifecycle
- Use artifact graph for schema-aware completion checking
- Integrate with `/opsx:sync` for agent-driven spec syncing
- Preserve `.openspec.yaml` schema metadata in archive
**Non-Goals:**
- Replacing the existing `openspec archive` CLI command
- Changing how specs are applied in the CLI command
- Modifying the artifact graph or schema system
## Decisions
### Decision 1: Skill-only implementation (no new CLI command)
The `/opsx:archive` will be a slash command/skill only, not a new CLI command.
**Rationale**: The existing `openspec archive` CLI command already handles the core archive functionality (moving to archive folder, date prefixing). The OPSX version just needs different pre-archive checks and optional sync prompting, which are agent behaviors better suited to a skill.
**Alternatives considered**:
- Adding flags to `openspec archive` (e.g., `--experimental`) - Rejected: adds complexity to CLI, harder to maintain two code paths
- New CLI command `openspec archive-experimental` - Rejected: unnecessary duplication, agent skills are the OPSX pattern
### Decision 2: Prompt for sync before archive
The skill will check for unsynced delta specs and prompt the user before archiving.
**Rationale**: The OPSX philosophy is agent-driven intelligent merging via `/opsx:sync`. Rather than programmatically applying specs like the regular archive command, we prompt the user to sync first if needed. This maintains workflow flexibility (user can decline and just archive).
**Flow**:
1. Check if `specs/` directory exists in the change
2. If yes, ask: "This change has delta specs. Would you like to sync them to main specs before archiving?"
3. If user says yes, execute `/opsx:sync` logic
4. Proceed with archive regardless of answer
### Decision 3: Use artifact graph for completion checking
The skill will use `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to check artifact completion instead of just validating proposal.md and specs.
**Rationale**: The experimental workflow is schema-aware. Different schemas have different required artifacts. The artifact graph knows which artifacts are complete/incomplete for the current schema.
**Behavior**:
- Show warning if any artifacts are not `done`
- Don't block archive (user may have valid reasons to archive early)
- List incomplete artifacts so user can make informed decision
### Decision 4: Reuse tasks.md completion check from regular archive
The skill will parse tasks.md and warn about incomplete tasks, same as regular archive.
**Rationale**: Task completion checking is valuable regardless of workflow. The logic is simple (count `- [ ]` vs `- [x]`) and doesn't need special OPSX handling.
### Decision 5: Move change to archive/ with date prefix
Same archive behavior as regular command: move to `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`.
**Rationale**: Consistency with existing archive convention. The `.openspec.yaml` file moves with the change, preserving schema metadata.
## Risks / Trade-offs
**Risk**: Users confused about when to use `/opsx:archive` vs `openspec archive`
→ **Mitigation**: Documentation should clarify: use `/opsx:archive` if you've been using the OPSX workflow, use `openspec archive` otherwise. Both produce the same archived result.
**Risk**: Incomplete sync if user declines and has delta specs
→ **Mitigation**: The prompt is informational; user has full control. They may want to archive without syncing (e.g., abandoned change). Log a note in output.
**Trade-off**: No programmatic spec application in OPSX archive
→ **Accepted**: This is intentional. OPSX philosophy is agent-driven merging. If user wants programmatic application, use `openspec archive` instead.
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
## Why
The experimental workflow (OPSX) provides a schema-driven, artifact-by-artifact approach to creating changes with `/opsx:new`, `/opsx:continue`, `/opsx:ff`, `/opsx:apply`, and `/opsx:sync`. However, there's no corresponding archive command to finalize and archive completed changes. Users must currently fall back to the regular `openspec archive` command, which doesn't integrate with the OPSX philosophy of agent-driven spec syncing and schema-aware artifact tracking.
## What Changes
- Add `/opsx:archive` slash command for archiving changes in the experimental workflow
- Use artifact graph to check completion status (schema-aware) instead of just validating proposal + specs
- Prompt for `/opsx:sync` before archiving instead of programmatically applying specs
- Preserve `.openspec.yaml` schema metadata when moving to archive
- Integrate with existing OPSX commands for a cohesive workflow
## Capabilities
### New Capabilities
- `opsx-archive-skill`: Slash command and skill for archiving completed changes in the experimental workflow. Checks artifact completion via artifact graph, verifies task completion, optionally syncs specs via `/opsx:sync`, and moves the change to `archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`.
### Modified Capabilities
(none - this is a new skill that doesn't modify existing specs)
## Impact
- New file: `.claude/commands/opsx/archive.md`
- New skill definition (generated via `openspec artifact-experimental-setup`)
- No changes to existing archive command or other OPSX commands
- Completes the OPSX command suite for full lifecycle management
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill
The system SHALL provide an `/opsx:archive` skill that archives completed changes in the experimental workflow.
#### Scenario: Archive a change with all artifacts complete
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:archive` with a change name
- **AND** all artifacts in the schema are complete
- **AND** all tasks are complete
- **THEN** the agent moves the change to `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`
- **AND** displays success message with archived location
#### Scenario: Change selection prompt
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:archive` without specifying a change
- **THEN** the agent prompts user to select from available changes
- **AND** shows only active changes (excludes archive/)
### Requirement: Artifact Completion Check
The skill SHALL check artifact completion status using the artifact graph before archiving.
#### Scenario: Incomplete artifacts warning
- **WHEN** agent checks artifact status
- **AND** one or more artifacts have status other than `done`
- **THEN** display warning listing incomplete artifacts
- **AND** prompt user for confirmation to continue
- **AND** proceed if user confirms
#### Scenario: All artifacts complete
- **WHEN** agent checks artifact status
- **AND** all artifacts have status `done`
- **THEN** proceed without warning
### Requirement: Task Completion Check
The skill SHALL check task completion status from tasks.md before archiving.
#### Scenario: Incomplete tasks found
- **WHEN** agent reads tasks.md
- **AND** incomplete tasks are found (marked with `- [ ]`)
- **THEN** display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
- **AND** prompt user for confirmation to continue
- **AND** proceed if user confirms
#### Scenario: All tasks complete
- **WHEN** agent reads tasks.md
- **AND** all tasks are complete (marked with `- [x]`)
- **THEN** proceed without task-related warning
#### Scenario: No tasks file
- **WHEN** tasks.md does not exist
- **THEN** proceed without task-related warning
### Requirement: Spec Sync Prompt
The skill SHALL prompt to sync delta specs before archiving if specs exist.
#### Scenario: Delta specs exist
- **WHEN** agent checks for delta specs
- **AND** `specs/` directory exists in the change with spec files
- **THEN** prompt user: "This change has delta specs. Would you like to sync them to main specs before archiving?"
- **AND** if user confirms, execute `/opsx:sync` logic
- **AND** proceed with archive regardless of sync choice
#### Scenario: No delta specs
- **WHEN** agent checks for delta specs
- **AND** no `specs/` directory or no spec files exist
- **THEN** proceed without sync prompt
### Requirement: Archive Process
The skill SHALL move the change to the archive folder with date prefix.
#### Scenario: Successful archive
- **WHEN** archiving a change
- **THEN** create `archive/` directory if it doesn't exist
- **AND** generate target name as `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>` using current date
- **AND** move entire change directory to archive location
- **AND** preserve `.openspec.yaml` file in archived change
#### Scenario: Archive already exists
- **WHEN** target archive directory already exists
- **THEN** fail with error message
- **AND** suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
### Requirement: Skill Output
The skill SHALL provide clear feedback about the archive operation.
#### Scenario: Archive complete with sync
- **WHEN** archive completes after syncing specs
- **THEN** display summary:
- Specs synced (from `/opsx:sync` output)
- Change archived to location
- Schema that was used
#### Scenario: Archive complete without sync
- **WHEN** archive completes without syncing specs
- **THEN** display summary:
- Note that specs were not synced (if applicable)
- Change archived to location
- Schema that was used
#### Scenario: Archive complete with warnings
- **WHEN** archive completes with incomplete artifacts or tasks
- **THEN** include note about what was incomplete
- **AND** suggest reviewing if archive was intentional
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
## 1. Create Slash Command
- [x] 1.1 Create `.claude/commands/opsx/archive.md` with skill definition
- [x] 1.2 Add YAML frontmatter (name, description, category, tags)
- [x] 1.3 Implement change selection logic (prompt if not provided)
- [x] 1.4 Implement artifact completion check using `openspec status --json`
- [x] 1.5 Implement task completion check (parse tasks.md for `- [ ]`)
- [x] 1.6 Implement spec sync prompt (check for specs/ directory, offer `/opsx:sync`)
- [x] 1.7 Implement archive process (move to archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/)
- [x] 1.8 Add output formatting for success/warning cases
## 2. Regenerate Skills
- [x] 2.1 Run `openspec artifact-experimental-setup` to regenerate skills
- [x] 2.2 Verify skill appears in `.claude/skills/` directory
## 3. Testing
- [x] 3.1 Test `/opsx:archive` with a complete change (all artifacts, all tasks done)
- [x] 3.2 Test `/opsx:archive` with incomplete artifacts (verify warning shown)
- [x] 3.3 Test `/opsx:archive` with incomplete tasks (verify warning shown)
- [x] 3.4 Test `/opsx:archive` with delta specs (verify sync prompt shown)
- [x] 3.5 Test `/opsx:archive` without change name (verify selection prompt)
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
schema: spec-driven
created: 2026-01-10
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
## Context
OpenSpec needs usage analytics to understand adoption and inform product decisions. PostHog provides a privacy-conscious analytics platform suitable for open source projects.
## Goals / Non-Goals
**Goals:**
- Track daily/weekly/monthly active usage
- Understand command usage patterns
- Keep implementation minimal and privacy-respecting
- Enable opt-out with minimal friction
**Non-Goals:**
- Detailed error tracking or diagnostics
- User identification or profiling
- Complex event hierarchies
- Full CLI command for telemetry management (env var sufficient for now)
## Decisions
### Opt-Out Model
**Decision:** Telemetry enabled by default, opt-out via environment variable.
```bash
OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0 # Disable telemetry
DO_NOT_TRACK=1 # Industry standard, also respected
```
Auto-disabled when `CI=true` is detected.
**Rationale:**
- Opt-in typically yields ~3% participation—not enough for meaningful data
- Understanding usage patterns requires statistically significant sample sizes
- Environment variable opt-out is simple and immediate
- Respecting `DO_NOT_TRACK` follows industry convention
**Alternatives considered:**
- Opt-in only - Insufficient data for product decisions
- Config file setting - More complex, env var sufficient for MVP
- Full `openspec telemetry` command - Can add later if users request
### Event Design
**Decision:** Single event type with minimal properties.
```typescript
{
event: 'command_executed',
properties: {
command: 'init', // Command name only
version: '1.2.3' // OpenSpec version
}
}
```
**Rationale:**
- Answers the core questions: how much usage, which commands are popular
- PostHog derives DAU/WAU/MAU from anonymous user counts over time
- No arguments, paths, or content—clean privacy story
- Easy to explain in disclosure notice
**Not tracked:**
- Command arguments
- File paths or contents
- Error messages or stack traces
- Project names or spec content
- IP addresses (`$ip: null` explicitly set)
### Anonymous ID
**Decision:** Random UUID, lazily generated on first telemetry send, stored in global config.
```typescript
// ~/.config/openspec/config.json
{
"telemetry": {
"anonymousId": "f47ac10b-58cc-4372-a567-0e02b2c3d479"
}
}
```
**Rationale:**
- Random UUID has no relation to the person—can't be reversed
- Stored in config so same user = same ID across sessions (needed for DAU/WAU/MAU)
- Lazy generation means no ID created if user opts out before first command
- User can delete config to reset identity
**Alternatives considered:**
- Machine-derived hash (hostname, MAC) - Feels invasive, fingerprint-like
- Per-session UUID - Breaks user counting metrics entirely
### SDK Configuration
**Decision:** PostHog Node SDK with immediate flush, shutdown on exit.
```typescript
const posthog = new PostHog(API_KEY, {
flushAt: 1, // Send immediately, don't batch
flushInterval: 0 // No timer-based flushing
});
// Before CLI exits
await posthog.shutdown();
```
**Rationale:**
- CLI processes are short-lived; batching would lose events
- `flushAt: 1` ensures each event sends immediately
- `shutdown()` guarantees flush before process exit
- Adds ~100-300ms to exit—negligible for typical CLI workflows
**Error handling:**
- Network failures silently ignored (telemetry shouldn't break CLI)
- `shutdown()` wrapped in try/catch
### Hook Location
**Decision:** Commander.js `preAction` and `postAction` hooks.
```typescript
program
.hook('preAction', (thisCommand) => {
maybeShowTelemetryNotice();
trackCommand(thisCommand.name(), VERSION);
})
.hook('postAction', async () => {
await shutdown();
});
```
**Rationale:**
- Centralized—one place for all telemetry logic
- Automatic—new commands get tracked without code changes
- Clean separation—command handlers don't know about telemetry
**Subcommand handling:**
- Track full command path for nested commands (e.g., `change:apply`)
### First-Run Notice
**Decision:** One-liner on first command ever, stored "seen" flag in config.
```
Note: OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats. Opt out: OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0
```
**Rationale:**
- First command (not just `init`) ensures notice is always seen
- Non-blocking—no prompt, just informational
- One-liner is visible but not intrusive
- Storing "seen" in config prevents repeated display
**Config after first run:**
```json
{
"telemetry": {
"anonymousId": "...",
"noticeSeen": true
}
}
```
## Risks / Trade-offs
| Risk | Mitigation |
|------|------------|
| Users prefer opt-in | Clear disclosure, trivial opt-out, transparent about what's collected |
| GDPR concerns | No personal data, no IP, user can delete config |
| Slows CLI exit by ~200ms | Negligible for most workflows; can optimize if needed |
| PostHog outage affects CLI | Fire-and-forget with timeout; failures are silent |
## Open Questions
None—design is intentionally minimal. Future enhancements (dedicated command, workflow tracking) can be added based on user feedback.
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
## Why
OpenSpec currently has no visibility into how the tool is being used. Without analytics, we cannot:
- Understand which commands and features are most valuable to users
- Measure adoption and usage patterns
- Make data-driven decisions about product development
Adding PostHog analytics enables product insights while respecting user privacy through transparent, opt-out telemetry.
## What Changes
- Add PostHog Node.js SDK as a dependency
- Implement telemetry system with environment variable opt-out
- Track command usage (command name and version only)
- Show first-run notice informing users about telemetry
- Store anonymous ID in global config (`~/.config/openspec/config.json`)
- Respect `DO_NOT_TRACK` and `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` environment variables
- Auto-disable in CI environments
## Capabilities
### New Capabilities
- `telemetry`: Anonymous usage analytics using PostHog. Covers command tracking, opt-out controls, and first-run disclosure notice.
### Modified Capabilities
- `global-config`: Add telemetry state storage (anonymous ID, notice seen flag)
## Impact
- **Dependencies**: Add `posthog-node` package
- **Privacy**: Opt-out via env var, no personal data collected, clear disclosure
- **Configuration**: New global config fields for telemetry state
- **Network**: Async event sending with flush on exit (~100-300ms added)
- **CI/CD**: Telemetry auto-disabled when `CI=true`
- **Documentation**: Update README with telemetry disclosure
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Global configuration storage
The system SHALL store global configuration in `~/.config/openspec/config.json`, including telemetry state with `anonymousId` and `noticeSeen` fields.
#### Scenario: Initial config creation
- **WHEN** no global config file exists
- **AND** the first telemetry event is about to be sent
- **THEN** the system creates `~/.config/openspec/config.json` with telemetry configuration
#### Scenario: Telemetry config structure
- **WHEN** reading or writing telemetry configuration
- **THEN** the config contains a `telemetry` object with `anonymousId` (string UUID) and `noticeSeen` (boolean) fields
#### Scenario: Config file format
- **WHEN** storing configuration
- **THEN** the system writes valid JSON that can be read and modified by users
#### Scenario: Existing config preservation
- **WHEN** adding telemetry fields to an existing config file
- **THEN** the system preserves all existing configuration fields
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Command execution tracking
The system SHALL send a `command_executed` event to PostHog when any CLI command executes, including only the command name and OpenSpec version as properties.
#### Scenario: Standard command execution
- **WHEN** a user runs any openspec command
- **THEN** the system sends a `command_executed` event with `command` and `version` properties
#### Scenario: Subcommand execution
- **WHEN** a user runs a nested command like `openspec change apply`
- **THEN** the system sends a `command_executed` event with the full command path (e.g., `change:apply`)
### Requirement: Privacy-preserving event design
The system SHALL NOT include command arguments, file paths, project names, spec content, error messages, or IP addresses in telemetry events.
#### Scenario: Command with arguments
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec init my-project --force`
- **THEN** the telemetry event contains only `command: "init"` and `version: "<version>"` without arguments
#### Scenario: IP address exclusion
- **WHEN** the system sends a telemetry event
- **THEN** the event explicitly sets `$ip: null` to prevent IP tracking
### Requirement: Environment variable opt-out
The system SHALL disable telemetry when `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` environment variables are set.
#### Scenario: OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY opt-out
- **WHEN** `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` is set in the environment
- **THEN** the system sends no telemetry events
#### Scenario: DO_NOT_TRACK opt-out
- **WHEN** `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` is set in the environment
- **THEN** the system sends no telemetry events
#### Scenario: Environment variable takes precedence
- **WHEN** the user has previously used the CLI (config exists)
- **AND** the user sets `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0`
- **THEN** telemetry is disabled regardless of config state
### Requirement: CI environment auto-disable
The system SHALL automatically disable telemetry when `CI=true` environment variable is detected.
#### Scenario: CI environment detection
- **WHEN** `CI=true` is set in the environment
- **THEN** the system sends no telemetry events
#### Scenario: CI with explicit enable
- **WHEN** `CI=true` is set
- **AND** `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=1` is explicitly set
- **THEN** telemetry remains disabled (CI takes precedence for privacy)
### Requirement: First-run telemetry notice
The system SHALL display a one-line telemetry disclosure notice on the first command execution, before any telemetry is sent.
#### Scenario: First command execution
- **WHEN** a user runs their first openspec command
- **AND** telemetry is enabled
- **THEN** the system displays: "Note: OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats. Opt out: OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0"
#### Scenario: Subsequent command execution
- **WHEN** a user has already seen the notice (noticeSeen: true in config)
- **THEN** the system does not display the notice
#### Scenario: Notice before telemetry
- **WHEN** displaying the first-run notice
- **THEN** the notice appears before any telemetry event is sent
### Requirement: Anonymous user identification
The system SHALL generate a random UUID as an anonymous identifier on first telemetry send, stored in global config.
#### Scenario: First telemetry event
- **WHEN** the first telemetry event is sent
- **AND** no anonymousId exists in config
- **THEN** the system generates a random UUID v4 and stores it in config
#### Scenario: Persistent identity
- **WHEN** a user runs multiple commands across sessions
- **THEN** the same anonymousId is used for all events
#### Scenario: Lazy generation with opt-out
- **WHEN** a user opts out before running any command
- **THEN** no anonymousId is ever generated or stored
### Requirement: Immediate event sending
The system SHALL send telemetry events immediately without batching, using `flushAt: 1` and `flushInterval: 0` configuration.
#### Scenario: Event transmission timing
- **WHEN** a command executes
- **THEN** the telemetry event is sent immediately, not queued for batch transmission
### Requirement: Graceful shutdown
The system SHALL call `posthog.shutdown()` before CLI exit to ensure pending events are flushed.
#### Scenario: Normal exit
- **WHEN** a command completes successfully
- **THEN** the system awaits `shutdown()` before exiting
#### Scenario: Error exit
- **WHEN** a command fails with an error
- **THEN** the system still awaits `shutdown()` before exiting
### Requirement: Silent failure handling
The system SHALL silently ignore telemetry failures without affecting CLI functionality.
#### Scenario: Network failure
- **WHEN** the telemetry request fails due to network error
- **THEN** the CLI command completes normally without error message
#### Scenario: PostHog outage
- **WHEN** PostHog service is unavailable
- **THEN** the CLI command completes normally without error message
#### Scenario: Shutdown failure
- **WHEN** `shutdown()` fails or times out
- **THEN** the CLI exits normally without error message
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
## 1. Setup
- [x] 1.1 Add `posthog-node` package as a dependency
- [x] 1.2 Create `src/telemetry/` module directory
- [x] 1.3 Add PostHog API key configuration (environment variable or embedded)
## 2. Global Config
- [x] 2.1 Create or extend global config module for `~/.config/openspec/config.json`
- [x] 2.2 Implement read/write functions that preserve existing config fields
- [x] 2.3 Define telemetry config structure (`anonymousId`, `noticeSeen`)
## 3. Core Telemetry Module
- [x] 3.1 Implement `isTelemetryEnabled()` checking `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY`, `DO_NOT_TRACK`, and `CI` env vars
- [x] 3.2 Implement `getOrCreateAnonymousId()` with lazy UUID generation
- [x] 3.3 Initialize PostHog client with `flushAt: 1` and `flushInterval: 0`
- [x] 3.4 Implement `trackCommand(commandName, version)` with `$ip: null`
- [x] 3.5 Implement `shutdown()` with try/catch for silent failure handling
## 4. First-Run Notice
- [x] 4.1 Implement `maybeShowTelemetryNotice()` function
- [x] 4.2 Check `noticeSeen` flag before displaying notice
- [x] 4.3 Display notice text: "Note: OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats. Opt out: OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0"
- [x] 4.4 Update `noticeSeen` in config after first display
## 5. CLI Integration
- [x] 5.1 Add Commander.js `preAction` hook to show notice and track command
- [x] 5.2 Add Commander.js `postAction` hook to call shutdown
- [x] 5.3 Handle subcommand path extraction (e.g., `change:apply`)
## 6. Testing
- [x] 6.1 Test opt-out via `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0`
- [x] 6.2 Test opt-out via `DO_NOT_TRACK=1`
- [x] 6.3 Test auto-disable in CI environment
- [x] 6.4 Test first-run notice display and noticeSeen persistence
- [x] 6.5 Test anonymous ID generation and persistence
- [x] 6.6 Test silent failure on network error (mock PostHog)
## 7. Documentation
- [x] 7.1 Add telemetry disclosure section to README
- [x] 7.2 Document opt-out methods (`OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0`, `DO_NOT_TRACK=1`)
- [x] 7.3 Document what data is collected and not collected
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
## Why
CodeBuddy slash command configurator currently uses inconsistent frontmatter fields compared to other tools. It uses `category` and `tags` fields (like Crush) but should use `argument-hint` field (like Factory, Auggie, and Codex) for better consistency. Additionally, the `proposal` command is missing frontmatter fields entirely. After reviewing CodeBuddy's official documentation, the correct format should use `description` and `argument-hint` fields with square bracket parameter format.
## What Changes
- Replace `category` and `tags` fields with `argument-hint` field in CodeBuddy frontmatter
- Add missing frontmatter fields to the `proposal` command
- Use correct square bracket format for `argument-hint` parameters (e.g., `[change-id]`)
- Ensure consistency with CodeBuddy's official documentation
## Impact
- Affected specs: cli-init, cli-update
- Affected code: `src/core/configurators/slash/codebuddy.ts`
- CodeBuddy users will get proper argument hints in the correct format for slash commands
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** the user selects Antigravity during initialization
- **THEN** create `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.agent/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.agent/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** ensure each file begins with YAML frontmatter that contains only a `description: <stage summary>` field followed by the shared OpenSpec workflow instructions wrapped in managed markers
- **AND** populate the workflow body with the same proposal/apply/archive guidance used for other tools so Antigravity behaves like Windsurf while pointing to the `.agent/workflows/` directory
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** the user selects CodeBuddy Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that include CodeBuddy-compatible YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** use square bracket format for `argument-hint` parameters (e.g., `[change-id]`)
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** the user selects Cline during initialization
- **THEN** create `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Crush
- **WHEN** the user selects Crush during initialization
- **THEN** create `.crush/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.crush/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.crush/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Factory Droid
- **WHEN** the user selects Factory Droid during initialization
- **THEN** create `.factory/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.factory/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.factory/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that include Factory-compatible YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** include the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in the template body so droid receives any user-supplied input
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
- **THEN** create `.opencode/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/commands/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Windsurf
- **WHEN** the user selects Windsurf during initialization
- **THEN** create `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Kilo Code
- **WHEN** the user selects Kilo Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Codex
- **WHEN** the user selects Codex during initialization
- **THEN** create global prompt files at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-proposal.md`, `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-apply.md`, and `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-archive.md` (or under `$CODEX_HOME/prompts` if set)
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that map the first numbered placeholder (`$1`) to the primary user input (e.g., change identifier or question text)
- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the prompts without touching surrounding custom notes
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones, and ensure the OpenCode archive command accepts change ID arguments.
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** `.agent/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh the OpenSpec-managed portion of each file so the workflow copy matches other tools while preserving the existing single-field `description` frontmatter
- **AND** skip creating any missing workflow files during update, mirroring the behavior for Windsurf and other IDEs
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared CodeBuddy templates that include YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** use square bracket format for `argument-hint` parameters (e.g., `[change-id]`)
- **AND** preserve any user customizations outside the OpenSpec managed markers
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** `.clinerules/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Crush
- **WHEN** `.crush/commands/` contains `openspec/proposal.md`, `openspec/apply.md`, and `openspec/archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cursor
- **WHEN** `.cursor/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Factory Droid
- **WHEN** `.factory/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared Factory templates that include YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** ensure the template body retains the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder so user input keeps flowing into droid
- **AND** update only the content inside the OpenSpec managed markers, leaving any unmanaged notes untouched
- **AND** skip creating missing files during update
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for OpenCode
- **WHEN** `.opencode/command/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **AND** ensure the archive command includes `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in frontmatter for accepting change ID arguments
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Windsurf
- **WHEN** `.windsurf/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
## 1. Implementation
- [x] 1.1 Update CodeBuddy frontmatter to use `argument-hint` instead of `category` and `tags`
- [x] 1.2 Add missing frontmatter fields to the `proposal` command
- [x] 1.3 Ensure all three commands (proposal, apply, archive) have consistent frontmatter structure
- [x] 1.4 Test the changes by running `openspec init` and `openspec update`
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
# Delta for CLI Init
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** the user selects Cline during initialization
- **THEN** create `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
## Why
Validation currently errors on changes without spec deltas, even when the change is intentionally proposal-only or tooling-only. This creates false negatives and noisy CI.
## What Changes
- Make change validation scope-aware: validate only artifacts that exist.
- Only error on "No deltas found" if spec delta files exist but parse to zero deltas.
- Keep archive stricter: if specs exist but parse to zero deltas, fail; allow `--skip-specs` for tooling-only changes.
## Impact
- Affected specs: cli-validate
- Affected code: `src/commands/validate.ts`, `src/core/validation/validator.ts`
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Scope-Aware Change Validation
The validator SHALL validate only artifacts that exist for a change, avoiding errors for proposal-only or tooling-only changes.
#### Scenario: Proposal-only change
- **WHEN** a change contains `proposal.md` but has no `specs/` directory or contains no `*/spec.md` files
- **THEN** validate the proposal (Why/What sections)
- **AND** do not require or validate spec deltas
#### Scenario: Delta validation when specs exist
- **WHEN** a change contains one or more `specs/<capability>/spec.md` files
- **THEN** validate delta-formatted specs with existing rules (SHALL/MUST, scenarios, duplicates, conflicts)
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Validation SHALL provide actionable remediation steps
Validation output SHALL include specific guidance to fix each error, including expected structure, example headers, and suggested commands to verify fixes.
#### Scenario: No deltas found in change
- **WHEN** validating a change that contains `specs/` with one or more `*/spec.md` files but the parser finds zero deltas
- **THEN** show error "No deltas found" with guidance:
- Ensure `openspec/changes/{id}/specs/` has `.md` files that include delta headers
- Use delta headers: `## ADDED Requirements`, `## MODIFIED Requirements`, `## REMOVED Requirements`, `## RENAMED Requirements`
- Each requirement must include at least one `#### Scenario:` block
- Try: `openspec change show {id} --json --deltas-only` to inspect parsed deltas
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
## 1. Validator changes
- [ ] 1.1 Change `validateChangeDeltaSpecs` to only emit "Change must have at least one delta" when `specs/` exists and contains at least one `*/spec.md` but parsed total deltas is 0
- [ ] 1.2 Return valid (no error) when `specs/` directory is missing or has no `spec.md` files
## 2. CLI changes
- [ ] 2.1 In bulk validation, keep current behavior (call delta validator). Behavior remains correct after 1.1
- [ ] 2.2 Add a short INFO log in human-readable mode when a change has no `specs/` (optional)
## 3. Documentation
- [ ] 3.1 Update README and template: "Validation checks only existing artifacts. Proposal-only changes are valid without spec deltas."
## 4. Tests
- [ ] 4.1 Add test: proposal-only change passes validation without deltas
- [ ] 4.2 Add test: specs present but zero parsed deltas → ERROR
- [ ] 4.3 Add test: specs present with proper deltas → valid
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
# cli-artifact-workflow Specification
## Purpose
TBD - created by archiving change add-artifact-workflow-cli. Update Purpose after archive.
## Requirements
### Requirement: Status Command
The system SHALL display artifact completion status for a change, including scaffolded (empty) changes.
> **Fixes bug**: Previously required `proposal.md` to exist via `getActiveChangeIds()`.
#### Scenario: Show status with all states
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system displays each artifact with status indicator:
- `[x]` for completed artifacts
- `[ ]` for ready artifacts
- `[-]` for blocked artifacts (with missing dependencies listed)
#### Scenario: Status shows completion summary
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
- **THEN** output includes completion percentage and count (e.g., "2/4 artifacts complete")
#### Scenario: Status JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with changeName, schemaName, isComplete, and artifacts array
#### Scenario: Status JSON includes apply requirements
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with:
- `changeName`, `schemaName`, `isComplete`, `artifacts` array
- `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed for apply phase
#### Scenario: Status on scaffolded change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>` on a change with no artifacts
- **THEN** system displays all artifacts with their status
- **AND** root artifacts (no dependencies) show as ready `[ ]`
- **AND** dependent artifacts show as blocked `[-]`
#### Scenario: Missing change parameter
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status` without `--change`
- **THEN** the system displays an error with list of available changes
- **AND** includes scaffolded changes (directories without proposal.md)
#### Scenario: Unknown change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change unknown-id`
- **AND** directory `openspec/changes/unknown-id/` does not exist
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing all available change directories
### Requirement: Instructions Command
The system SHALL output enriched instructions for creating an artifact, including for scaffolded changes.
#### Scenario: Show enriched instructions
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system outputs:
- Artifact metadata (ID, output path, description)
- Template content
- Dependency status (done/missing)
- Unlocked artifacts (what becomes available after completion)
#### Scenario: Instructions JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON matching ArtifactInstructions interface
#### Scenario: Unknown artifact
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions unknown-artifact --change <id>`
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing valid artifact IDs for the schema
#### Scenario: Artifact with unmet dependencies
- **WHEN** user requests instructions for a blocked artifact
- **THEN** the system displays instructions with a warning about missing dependencies
#### Scenario: Instructions on scaffolded change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions proposal --change <id>` on a scaffolded change
- **THEN** system outputs template and metadata for creating the proposal
- **AND** does not require any artifacts to already exist
### Requirement: Templates Command
The system SHALL show resolved template paths for all artifacts in a schema.
#### Scenario: List template paths with default schema
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec templates`
- **THEN** the system displays each artifact with its resolved template path using the default schema
#### Scenario: List template paths with custom schema
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec templates --schema tdd`
- **THEN** the system displays template paths for the specified schema
#### Scenario: Templates JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec templates --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON mapping artifact IDs to template paths
#### Scenario: Template resolution source
- **WHEN** displaying template paths
- **THEN** the system indicates whether each template is from user override or package built-in
### Requirement: New Change Command
The system SHALL create new change directories with validation.
#### Scenario: Create valid change
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature`
- **THEN** the system creates `openspec/changes/add-feature/` directory
#### Scenario: Invalid change name
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change "Add Feature"` with invalid name
- **THEN** the system displays validation error with guidance
#### Scenario: Duplicate change name
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change existing-change` for an existing change
- **THEN** the system displays an error indicating the change already exists
#### Scenario: Create with description
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec new change add-feature --description "Add new feature"`
- **THEN** the system creates the change directory with description in README.md
### Requirement: Schema Selection
The system SHALL support custom schema selection for workflow commands.
#### Scenario: Default schema
- **WHEN** user runs workflow commands without `--schema`
- **THEN** the system uses the "spec-driven" schema
#### Scenario: Custom schema
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --schema tdd`
- **THEN** the system uses the specified schema for artifact graph
#### Scenario: Unknown schema
- **WHEN** user specifies an unknown schema
- **THEN** the system displays an error listing available schemas
### Requirement: Output Formatting
The system SHALL provide consistent output formatting.
#### Scenario: Color output
- **WHEN** terminal supports colors
- **THEN** status indicators use colors: green (done), yellow (ready), red (blocked)
#### Scenario: No color output
- **WHEN** `--no-color` flag is used or NO_COLOR environment variable is set
- **THEN** output uses text-only indicators without ANSI colors
#### Scenario: Progress indication
- **WHEN** loading change state takes time
- **THEN** the system displays a spinner during loading
### Requirement: Experimental Isolation
The system SHALL implement artifact workflow commands in isolation for easy removal.
#### Scenario: Single file implementation
- **WHEN** artifact workflow feature is implemented
- **THEN** all commands are in `src/commands/artifact-workflow.ts`
#### Scenario: Help text marking
- **WHEN** user runs `--help` on any artifact workflow command
- **THEN** help text indicates the command is experimental
### Requirement: Schema Apply Block
The system SHALL support an `apply` block in schema definitions that controls when and how implementation begins.
#### Scenario: Schema with apply block
- **WHEN** a schema defines an `apply` block
- **THEN** the system uses `apply.requires` to determine which artifacts must exist before apply
- **AND** uses `apply.tracks` to identify the file for progress tracking (or null if none)
- **AND** uses `apply.instruction` for guidance shown to the agent
#### Scenario: Schema without apply block
- **WHEN** a schema has no `apply` block
- **THEN** the system requires all artifacts to exist before apply is available
- **AND** uses default instruction: "All artifacts complete. Proceed with implementation."
### Requirement: Apply Instructions Command
The system SHALL generate schema-aware apply instructions via `openspec instructions apply`.
#### Scenario: Generate apply instructions
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions apply --change <id>`
- **AND** all required artifacts (per schema's `apply.requires`) exist
- **THEN** the system outputs:
- Context files from all existing artifacts
- Schema-specific instruction text
- Progress tracking file path (if `apply.tracks` is set)
#### Scenario: Apply blocked by missing artifacts
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions apply --change <id>`
- **AND** required artifacts are missing
- **THEN** the system indicates apply is blocked
- **AND** lists which artifacts must be created first
#### Scenario: Apply instructions JSON output
- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions apply --change <id> --json`
- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with:
- `contextFiles`: array of paths to existing artifacts
- `instruction`: the apply instruction text
- `tracks`: path to progress file or null
- `applyRequires`: list of required artifact IDs
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: Next Command
**Reason**: Redundant with Status Command - `openspec status` already shows which artifacts are ready (status: "ready") vs blocked vs done.
**Migration**: Use `openspec status --change <id> --json` and filter artifacts with `status: "ready"` to find artifacts that can be created next.
+187 -42
View File
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
# cli-completion Specification
## Purpose
Provide shell completion scripts for the OpenSpec CLI, enabling tab-completion for commands, flags, and dynamic values (change IDs, spec IDs) in supported shells. Currently supports Zsh with architecture designed for future shell expansion.
Provide shell completion scripts for the OpenSpec CLI, enabling tab-completion for commands, flags, and dynamic values (change IDs, spec IDs) across multiple shells. Supports Zsh, Bash, Fish, and PowerShell.
## Requirements
### Requirement: Native Shell Behavior Integration
The completion system SHALL respect and integrate with Zsh's native completion patterns and user interaction model.
The completion system SHALL respect and integrate with each supported shell's native completion patterns and user interaction model.
#### Scenario: Zsh native completion
@@ -15,12 +15,36 @@ The completion system SHALL respect and integrate with Zsh's native completion p
- **AND** display as an interactive menu that users navigate with TAB/arrow keys
- **AND** support Oh My Zsh's enhanced menu styling automatically
#### Scenario: Bash native completion
- **WHEN** generating Bash completion scripts
- **THEN** use Bash completion with `complete` builtin and `COMPREPLY` array
- **AND** completions SHALL trigger on double TAB (standard Bash behavior)
- **AND** display as space-separated list or column format
- **AND** support both bash-completion v1 and v2 patterns
#### Scenario: Fish native completion
- **WHEN** generating Fish completion scripts
- **THEN** use Fish's `complete` command with conditions
- **AND** completions SHALL trigger on single TAB with auto-suggestion preview
- **AND** display with Fish's native coloring and description alignment
- **AND** leverage Fish's built-in caching automatically
#### Scenario: PowerShell native completion
- **WHEN** generating PowerShell completion scripts
- **THEN** use `Register-ArgumentCompleter` with scriptblock
- **AND** completions SHALL trigger on TAB with cycling behavior
- **AND** display with PowerShell's native completion UI
- **AND** support both Windows PowerShell 5.1 and PowerShell Core 7+
#### Scenario: No custom UX patterns
- **WHEN** implementing Zsh completion
- **WHEN** implementing completion for any shell
- **THEN** do NOT attempt to customize completion trigger behavior
- **AND** do NOT override Zsh-specific navigation patterns
- **AND** ensure completions feel native to experienced Zsh users
- **AND** do NOT override shell-specific navigation patterns
- **AND** ensure completions feel native to experienced users of that shell
### Requirement: Command Structure
@@ -43,17 +67,35 @@ The completion system SHALL automatically detect the user's current shell enviro
- **WHEN** no shell is explicitly specified
- **THEN** read the `$SHELL` environment variable
- **AND** extract the shell name from the path (e.g., `/bin/zsh` → `zsh`)
- **AND** validate the shell is `zsh`
- **AND** throw an error if the shell is not `zsh`, with message indicating only Zsh is currently supported
- **AND** validate the shell is one of: `zsh`, `bash`, `fish`, `powershell`
- **AND** throw an error if the shell is not supported
#### Scenario: Non-Zsh shell detection
#### Scenario: Detecting Bash from environment
- **WHEN** shell path indicates bash, fish, powershell, or other non-Zsh shell
- **THEN** throw error: "Shell '<name>' is not supported yet. Currently supported: zsh"
- **WHEN** `$SHELL` contains `bash` in the path
- **THEN** detect shell as `bash`
- **AND** proceed with bash-specific completion logic
#### Scenario: Detecting Fish from environment
- **WHEN** `$SHELL` contains `fish` in the path
- **THEN** detect shell as `fish`
- **AND** proceed with fish-specific completion logic
#### Scenario: Detecting PowerShell from environment
- **WHEN** `$PSModulePath` environment variable is present
- **THEN** detect shell as `powershell`
- **AND** proceed with PowerShell-specific completion logic
#### Scenario: Unsupported shell detection
- **WHEN** shell path indicates an unsupported shell
- **THEN** throw error: "Shell '<name>' is not supported. Supported shells: zsh, bash, fish, powershell"
### Requirement: Completion Generation
The completion command SHALL generate Zsh completion scripts on demand.
The completion command SHALL generate completion scripts for all supported shells on demand.
#### Scenario: Generating Zsh completion
@@ -64,6 +106,33 @@ The completion command SHALL generate Zsh completion scripts on demand.
- **AND** use Zsh's `_arguments` and `_describe` built-in functions
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs
#### Scenario: Generating Bash completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion generate bash`
- **THEN** output a complete Bash completion script to stdout
- **AND** include completions for all commands and subcommands
- **AND** use `complete -F` with custom completion function
- **AND** populate `COMPREPLY` with appropriate suggestions
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs via `openspec __complete`
#### Scenario: Generating Fish completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion generate fish`
- **THEN** output a complete Fish completion script to stdout
- **AND** use `complete -c openspec` with conditions
- **AND** include command-specific completions with `--condition` predicates
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs via `openspec __complete`
- **AND** include descriptions for each completion option
#### Scenario: Generating PowerShell completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion generate powershell`
- **THEN** output a complete PowerShell completion script to stdout
- **AND** use `Register-ArgumentCompleter -CommandName openspec`
- **AND** implement scriptblock that handles command context
- **AND** support dynamic completion for change and spec IDs via `openspec __complete`
- **AND** return `[System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]` objects
### Requirement: Dynamic Completions
The completion system SHALL provide context-aware dynamic completions for project-specific values.
@@ -98,7 +167,7 @@ The completion system SHALL provide context-aware dynamic completions for projec
### Requirement: Installation Automation
The completion command SHALL automatically install completion scripts into shell configuration files.
The completion command SHALL automatically install completion scripts into shell configuration files for all supported shells.
#### Scenario: Installing for Oh My Zsh
@@ -118,12 +187,37 @@ The completion command SHALL automatically install completion scripts into shell
- **AND** add `autoload -Uz compinit && compinit` to `~/.zshrc` if not already present
- **AND** display success message with instruction to run `exec zsh` or restart terminal
#### Scenario: Auto-detecting Zsh for installation
#### Scenario: Installing for Bash with bash-completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install bash`
- **THEN** detect if bash-completion is installed by checking for `/usr/share/bash-completion` or `/etc/bash_completion.d`
- **AND** if bash-completion is available, write to `/etc/bash_completion.d/openspec` (with sudo) or `~/.local/share/bash-completion/completions/openspec`
- **AND** if bash-completion is not available, write to `~/.bash_completion.d/openspec` and source it from `~/.bashrc`
- **AND** add sourcing line to `~/.bashrc` using marker-based updates if needed
- **AND** display success message with instruction to run `exec bash` or restart terminal
#### Scenario: Installing for Fish
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install fish`
- **THEN** create Fish completions directory at `~/.config/fish/completions/` if it doesn't exist
- **AND** write completion script to `~/.config/fish/completions/openspec.fish`
- **AND** Fish automatically loads completions from this directory (no config file modification needed)
- **AND** display success message indicating completions are immediately available
#### Scenario: Installing for PowerShell
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install powershell`
- **THEN** detect PowerShell profile location via `$PROFILE` environment variable or default paths
- **AND** create profile directory if it doesn't exist
- **AND** add completion script import to profile using marker-based updates
- **AND** write completion script to PowerShell modules directory or alongside profile
- **AND** display success message with instruction to restart PowerShell or run `. $PROFILE`
#### Scenario: Auto-detecting shell for installation
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion install` without specifying a shell
- **THEN** detect current shell using shell detection logic
- **AND** install completion if detected shell is Zsh
- **AND** throw error if detected shell is not Zsh
- **AND** install completion for the detected shell (zsh, bash, fish, or powershell)
- **AND** display which shell was detected
#### Scenario: Already installed
@@ -135,23 +229,45 @@ The completion command SHALL automatically install completion scripts into shell
### Requirement: Uninstallation
The completion command SHALL remove installed completion scripts and configuration.
The completion command SHALL remove installed completion scripts and configuration for all supported shells.
#### Scenario: Uninstalling Oh My Zsh completion
#### Scenario: Uninstalling Zsh completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall zsh`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation before proceeding (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user declines, cancel uninstall and display "Uninstall cancelled."
- **AND** if user confirms, remove `~/.oh-my-zsh/custom/completions/_openspec` if Oh My Zsh is detected
- **AND** remove `~/.zsh/completions/_openspec` if standard Zsh setup is detected
- **AND** remove fpath modifications from `~/.zshrc`
- **AND** remove fpath modifications from `~/.zshrc` using marker-based removal
- **AND** display success message
#### Scenario: Auto-detecting Zsh for uninstallation
#### Scenario: Uninstalling Bash completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall bash`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user confirms, remove completion file from bash-completion directory or `~/.bash_completion.d/`
- **AND** remove sourcing lines from `~/.bashrc` using marker-based removal
- **AND** display success message
#### Scenario: Uninstalling Fish completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall fish`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user confirms, remove `~/.config/fish/completions/openspec.fish`
- **AND** display success message (no config file modification needed)
#### Scenario: Uninstalling PowerShell completion
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall powershell`
- **THEN** prompt for confirmation (unless `--yes` flag provided)
- **AND** if user confirms, remove completion import from PowerShell profile using marker-based removal
- **AND** remove completion script file
- **AND** display success message
#### Scenario: Auto-detecting shell for uninstallation
- **WHEN** user executes `openspec completion uninstall` without specifying a shell
- **THEN** detect current shell and uninstall completion if shell is Zsh
- **AND** throw error if detected shell is not Zsh
- **THEN** detect current shell and uninstall completion for that shell
#### Scenario: Not installed
@@ -161,17 +277,34 @@ The completion command SHALL remove installed completion scripts and configurati
### Requirement: Architecture Patterns
The completion implementation SHALL follow clean architecture principles with TypeScript best practices.
The completion implementation SHALL follow clean architecture principles with TypeScript best practices, supporting multiple shells through a plugin-based pattern.
#### Scenario: Shell-specific generators
- **WHEN** implementing completion generators
- **THEN** create `ZshCompletionGenerator` class for Zsh
- **AND** implement a common `CompletionGenerator` interface with methods:
- `generate(): string` - Returns complete shell script
- `getInstallPath(): string` - Returns target installation path
- `getConfigFile(): string` - Returns shell configuration file path
- **AND** design interface to be extensible for future shells (bash, fish, powershell)
- **THEN** create generator classes for each shell: `ZshGenerator`, `BashGenerator`, `FishGenerator`, `PowerShellGenerator`
- **AND** implement a common `CompletionGenerator` interface with method:
- `generate(commands: CommandDefinition[]): string` - Returns complete shell script
- **AND** each generator handles shell-specific syntax, escaping, and patterns
- **AND** all generators consume the same `CommandDefinition[]` from the command registry
#### Scenario: Shell-specific installers
- **WHEN** implementing completion installers
- **THEN** create installer classes for each shell: `ZshInstaller`, `BashInstaller`, `FishInstaller`, `PowerShellInstaller`
- **AND** implement a common `CompletionInstaller` interface with methods:
- `install(script: string): Promise<InstallationResult>` - Installs completion script
- `uninstall(): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }>` - Removes completion
- **AND** each installer handles shell-specific paths, config files, and installation patterns
#### Scenario: Factory pattern for shell selection
- **WHEN** selecting shell-specific implementation
- **THEN** use `CompletionFactory` class with static methods:
- `createGenerator(shell: SupportedShell): CompletionGenerator`
- `createInstaller(shell: SupportedShell): CompletionInstaller`
- **AND** factory uses switch statements with TypeScript exhaustiveness checking
- **AND** adding new shell requires updating `SupportedShell` type and factory cases
#### Scenario: Dynamic completion providers
@@ -190,18 +323,18 @@ The completion implementation SHALL follow clean architecture principles with Ty
- `name: string` - Command name
- `description: string` - Help text
- `flags: FlagDefinition[]` - Available flags
- `acceptsChangeId: boolean` - Whether command takes change ID argument
- `acceptsSpecId: boolean` - Whether command takes spec ID argument
- `acceptsPositional: boolean` - Whether command takes positional arguments
- `positionalType: string` - Type of positional (change-id, spec-id, path, shell)
- `subcommands?: CommandDefinition[]` - Nested subcommands
- **AND** export a `COMMAND_REGISTRY` constant with all command definitions
- **AND** generators consume this registry to ensure consistency
- **AND** all generators consume this registry to ensure consistency across shells
#### Scenario: Type-safe shell detection
- **WHEN** implementing shell detection
- **THEN** define a `SupportedShell` type as literal type: `'zsh'`
- **AND** implement `detectShell()` function that returns 'zsh' or throws error
- **AND** design type to be extensible (e.g., future: `'bash' | 'zsh' | 'fish' | 'powershell'`)
- **THEN** define a `SupportedShell` type as literal type: `'zsh' | 'bash' | 'fish' | 'powershell'`
- **AND** implement `detectShell()` function in `src/utils/shell-detection.ts`
- **AND** return detected shell or throw error with supported shells list
### Requirement: Error Handling
@@ -209,8 +342,8 @@ The completion command SHALL provide clear error messages for common failure sce
#### Scenario: Unsupported shell
- **WHEN** user requests completion for unsupported shell (bash, fish, powershell, etc.)
- **THEN** display error message: "Shell '<name>' is not supported yet. Currently supported: zsh"
- **WHEN** user requests completion for unsupported shell (e.g., ksh, csh, tcsh)
- **THEN** display error message: "Shell '<name>' is not supported yet. Currently supported: zsh, bash, fish, powershell"
- **AND** exit with code 1
#### Scenario: Permission errors during installation
@@ -228,7 +361,7 @@ The completion command SHALL provide clear error messages for common failure sce
#### Scenario: Shell not detected
- **WHEN** `openspec completion install` cannot detect current shell or detects non-Zsh shell
- **WHEN** `openspec completion install` cannot detect current shell
- **THEN** display error: "Could not auto-detect shell. Please specify shell explicitly."
- **AND** display usage hint: "Usage: openspec completion <operation> [shell]"
- **AND** exit with code 1
@@ -263,25 +396,37 @@ The completion command SHALL provide machine-parseable and human-readable output
### Requirement: Testing Support
The completion implementation SHALL be testable with unit and integration tests.
The completion implementation SHALL be testable with unit and integration tests for all supported shells.
#### Scenario: Mock shell environment
- **WHEN** writing tests for shell detection
- **THEN** allow overriding `$SHELL` environment variable
- **THEN** allow overriding `$SHELL` and `$PSModulePath` environment variables
- **AND** use dependency injection for file system operations
- **AND** test detection for all four shells independently
#### Scenario: Generator output verification
- **WHEN** testing completion generators
- **THEN** verify generated scripts contain expected patterns
- **THEN** create test suite for each shell generator (zsh, bash, fish, powershell)
- **AND** verify generated scripts contain expected patterns for that shell
- **AND** test that command registry is properly consumed
- **AND** ensure dynamic completion placeholders are present
- **AND** verify shell-specific syntax and escaping
#### Scenario: Installation simulation
#### Scenario: Installer simulation
- **WHEN** testing installation logic
- **THEN** use temporary test directories instead of actual home directories
- **THEN** create test suite for each shell installer
- **AND** use temporary test directories instead of actual home directories
- **AND** verify file creation without modifying real shell configurations
- **AND** test path resolution logic independently
- **AND** mock file system operations to avoid side effects
#### Scenario: Cross-shell consistency
- **WHEN** testing completion behavior
- **THEN** verify all shells support the same commands and flags
- **AND** verify dynamic completions work consistently across shells
- **AND** ensure error messages are consistent across shells
+9 -2
View File
@@ -172,6 +172,12 @@ The command SHALL use consistent exit codes to indicate different failure modes.
### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** the user selects Antigravity during initialization
- **THEN** create `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.agent/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.agent/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** ensure each file begins with YAML frontmatter that contains only a `description: <stage summary>` field followed by the shared OpenSpec workflow instructions wrapped in managed markers
- **AND** populate the workflow body with the same proposal/apply/archive guidance used for other tools so Antigravity behaves like Windsurf while pointing to the `.agent/workflows/` directory
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
@@ -181,12 +187,13 @@ The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** the user selects CodeBuddy Code during initialization
- **THEN** create `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that include CodeBuddy-compatible YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** use square bracket format for `argument-hint` parameters (e.g., `[change-id]`)
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** the user selects Cline during initialization
- **THEN** create `.clinerules/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** create `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+10 -3
View File
@@ -50,8 +50,14 @@ The update command SHALL always update the core OpenSpec files and display an AS
- **AND** if a root-level stub exists, refresh it so it still directs contributors to `@/openspec/AGENTS.md`
### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones, and ensure the OpenCode archive command accepts change ID arguments.
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Antigravity
- **WHEN** `.agent/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh the OpenSpec-managed portion of each file so the workflow copy matches other tools while preserving the existing single-field `description` frontmatter
- **AND** skip creating any missing workflow files during update, mirroring the behavior for Windsurf and other IDEs
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
@@ -59,11 +65,12 @@ The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured too
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
- **WHEN** `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared CodeBuddy templates that include YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
- **AND** use square bracket format for `argument-hint` parameters (e.g., `[change-id]`)
- **AND** preserve any user customizations outside the OpenSpec managed markers
#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cline
- **WHEN** `.clinerules/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **WHEN** `.clinerules/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+27 -3
View File
@@ -20,12 +20,13 @@ The system SHALL provide a `view` command that displays a dashboard overview of
### Requirement: Summary Section
The dashboard SHALL display a summary section with key project metrics.
The dashboard SHALL display a summary section with key project metrics, including draft change count.
#### Scenario: Complete summary display
- **WHEN** dashboard is rendered with specs and changes
- **THEN** system shows total number of specifications and requirements
- **AND** shows number of draft changes
- **AND** shows number of active changes in progress
- **AND** shows number of completed changes
- **AND** shows overall task progress percentage
@@ -46,11 +47,13 @@ The dashboard SHALL show active changes with visual progress indicators.
### Requirement: Completed Changes Display
The dashboard SHALL list completed changes in a separate section.
The dashboard SHALL list completed changes in a separate section, only showing changes with ALL tasks completed.
> **Fixes bug**: Previously, changes with `total === 0` were incorrectly shown as completed.
#### Scenario: Completed changes listing
- **WHEN** there are completed changes (all tasks done)
- **WHEN** there are changes with `tasks.total > 0` AND `tasks.completed === tasks.total`
- **THEN** system shows them with checkmark indicators in a dedicated section
#### Scenario: Mixed completion states
@@ -58,6 +61,12 @@ The dashboard SHALL list completed changes in a separate section.
- **WHEN** some changes are complete and others active
- **THEN** system separates them into appropriate sections
#### Scenario: Empty changes not completed
- **WHEN** a change has no tasks.md or zero tasks defined
- **THEN** system does NOT show it in "Completed Changes" section
- **AND** shows it in "Draft Changes" section instead
### Requirement: Specifications Display
The dashboard SHALL display specifications sorted by requirement count.
@@ -103,3 +112,18 @@ The view command SHALL handle errors gracefully.
- **WHEN** specs or changes have invalid format
- **THEN** system skips invalid items and continues rendering
### Requirement: Draft Changes Display
The dashboard SHALL display changes without tasks in a separate "Draft" section.
#### Scenario: Draft changes listing
- **WHEN** there are changes with no tasks.md or zero tasks defined
- **THEN** system shows them in a "Draft Changes" section
- **AND** uses a distinct indicator (e.g., `○`) to show draft status
#### Scenario: Draft section ordering
- **WHEN** multiple draft changes exist
- **THEN** system sorts them alphabetically by name
+20
View File
@@ -4,6 +4,26 @@
This spec defines how OpenSpec resolves, reads, and writes user-level global configuration. It governs the `src/core/global-config.ts` module, which provides the foundation for storing user preferences, feature flags, and settings that persist across projects. The spec ensures cross-platform compatibility by following XDG Base Directory Specification with platform-specific fallbacks, and guarantees forward/backward compatibility through schema evolution rules.
## Requirements
### Requirement: Global configuration storage
The system SHALL store global configuration in `~/.config/openspec/config.json`, including telemetry state with `anonymousId` and `noticeSeen` fields.
#### Scenario: Initial config creation
- **WHEN** no global config file exists
- **AND** the first telemetry event is about to be sent
- **THEN** the system creates `~/.config/openspec/config.json` with telemetry configuration
#### Scenario: Telemetry config structure
- **WHEN** reading or writing telemetry configuration
- **THEN** the config contains a `telemetry` object with `anonymousId` (string UUID) and `noticeSeen` (boolean) fields
#### Scenario: Config file format
- **WHEN** storing configuration
- **THEN** the system writes valid JSON that can be read and modified by users
#### Scenario: Existing config preservation
- **WHEN** adding telemetry fields to an existing config file
- **THEN** the system preserves all existing configuration fields
### Requirement: Global Config Directory Path
The system SHALL resolve the global configuration directory path following XDG Base Directory Specification with platform-specific fallbacks.
+122
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
# OPSX Archive Skill Spec
### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill
The system SHALL provide an `/opsx:archive` skill that archives completed changes in the experimental workflow.
#### Scenario: Archive a change with all artifacts complete
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:archive` with a change name
- **AND** all artifacts in the schema are complete
- **AND** all tasks are complete
- **THEN** the agent moves the change to `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`
- **AND** displays success message with archived location
#### Scenario: Change selection prompt
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:archive` without specifying a change
- **THEN** the agent prompts user to select from available changes
- **AND** shows only active changes (excludes archive/)
### Requirement: Artifact Completion Check
The skill SHALL check artifact completion status using the artifact graph before archiving.
#### Scenario: Incomplete artifacts warning
- **WHEN** agent checks artifact status
- **AND** one or more artifacts have status other than `done`
- **THEN** display warning listing incomplete artifacts
- **AND** prompt user for confirmation to continue
- **AND** proceed if user confirms
#### Scenario: All artifacts complete
- **WHEN** agent checks artifact status
- **AND** all artifacts have status `done`
- **THEN** proceed without warning
### Requirement: Task Completion Check
The skill SHALL check task completion status from tasks.md before archiving.
#### Scenario: Incomplete tasks found
- **WHEN** agent reads tasks.md
- **AND** incomplete tasks are found (marked with `- [ ]`)
- **THEN** display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
- **AND** prompt user for confirmation to continue
- **AND** proceed if user confirms
#### Scenario: All tasks complete
- **WHEN** agent reads tasks.md
- **AND** all tasks are complete (marked with `- [x]`)
- **THEN** proceed without task-related warning
#### Scenario: No tasks file
- **WHEN** tasks.md does not exist
- **THEN** proceed without task-related warning
### Requirement: Spec Sync Prompt
The skill SHALL prompt to sync delta specs before archiving if specs exist.
#### Scenario: Delta specs exist
- **WHEN** agent checks for delta specs
- **AND** `specs/` directory exists in the change with spec files
- **THEN** prompt user: "This change has delta specs. Would you like to sync them to main specs before archiving?"
- **AND** if user confirms, execute `/opsx:sync` logic
- **AND** proceed with archive regardless of sync choice
#### Scenario: No delta specs
- **WHEN** agent checks for delta specs
- **AND** no `specs/` directory or no spec files exist
- **THEN** proceed without sync prompt
### Requirement: Archive Process
The skill SHALL move the change to the archive folder with date prefix.
#### Scenario: Successful archive
- **WHEN** archiving a change
- **THEN** create `archive/` directory if it doesn't exist
- **AND** generate target name as `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>` using current date
- **AND** move entire change directory to archive location
- **AND** preserve `.openspec.yaml` file in archived change
#### Scenario: Archive already exists
- **WHEN** target archive directory already exists
- **THEN** fail with error message
- **AND** suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
### Requirement: Skill Output
The skill SHALL provide clear feedback about the archive operation.
#### Scenario: Archive complete with sync
- **WHEN** archive completes after syncing specs
- **THEN** display summary:
- Specs synced (from `/opsx:sync` output)
- Change archived to location
- Schema that was used
#### Scenario: Archive complete without sync
- **WHEN** archive completes without syncing specs
- **THEN** display summary:
- Note that specs were not synced (if applicable)
- Change archived to location
- Schema that was used
#### Scenario: Archive complete with warnings
- **WHEN** archive completes with incomplete artifacts or tasks
- **THEN** include note about what was incomplete
- **AND** suggest reviewing if archive was intentional
+72
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
# specs-sync-skill Specification
## Purpose
Defines the agent skill for syncing delta specs from changes to main specs.
## Requirements
### Requirement: Specs Sync Skill
The system SHALL provide an `/opsx:sync` skill that syncs delta specs from a change to the main specs.
#### Scenario: Sync delta specs to main specs
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:sync` with a change name
- **THEN** the agent reads delta specs from `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/`
- **AND** reads corresponding main specs from `openspec/specs/`
- **AND** reconciles main specs to match what the deltas describe
#### Scenario: Idempotent operation
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:sync` multiple times on the same change
- **THEN** the result is the same as running it once
- **AND** no duplicate requirements are created
#### Scenario: Change selection prompt
- **WHEN** agent executes `/opsx:sync` without specifying a change
- **THEN** the agent prompts user to select from available changes
- **AND** shows changes that have delta specs
### Requirement: Delta Reconciliation Logic
The agent SHALL reconcile main specs with delta specs using the delta operation headers.
#### Scenario: ADDED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## ADDED Requirements` with a requirement
- **AND** the requirement does not exist in main spec
- **THEN** add the requirement to main spec
#### Scenario: ADDED requirement already exists
- **WHEN** delta contains `## ADDED Requirements` with a requirement
- **AND** a requirement with the same name already exists in main spec
- **THEN** update the existing requirement to match the delta version
#### Scenario: MODIFIED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## MODIFIED Requirements` with a requirement
- **AND** the requirement exists in main spec
- **THEN** replace the requirement in main spec with the delta version
#### Scenario: REMOVED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## REMOVED Requirements` with a requirement name
- **AND** the requirement exists in main spec
- **THEN** remove the requirement from main spec
#### Scenario: RENAMED requirements
- **WHEN** delta contains `## RENAMED Requirements` with FROM:/TO: format
- **AND** the FROM requirement exists in main spec
- **THEN** rename the requirement to the TO name
#### Scenario: New capability spec
- **WHEN** delta spec exists for a capability not in main specs
- **THEN** create new main spec file at `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
### Requirement: Skill Output
The skill SHALL provide clear feedback on what was applied.
#### Scenario: Show applied changes
- **WHEN** reconciliation completes successfully
- **THEN** display summary of changes per capability:
- Number of requirements added
- Number of requirements modified
- Number of requirements removed
- Number of requirements renamed
#### Scenario: No changes needed
- **WHEN** main specs already match delta specs
- **THEN** display "Specs already in sync - no changes needed"
+122
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
# telemetry Specification
## Purpose
This spec defines how OpenSpec collects anonymous usage telemetry to help improve the tool. It governs the `src/telemetry/` module, which handles PostHog integration, privacy-preserving event design, user opt-out mechanisms, and first-run notice display. The spec ensures telemetry is minimal, transparent, and respects user privacy.
## Requirements
### Requirement: Command execution tracking
The system SHALL send a `command_executed` event to PostHog when any CLI command executes, including only the command name and OpenSpec version as properties.
#### Scenario: Standard command execution
- **WHEN** a user runs any openspec command
- **THEN** the system sends a `command_executed` event with `command` and `version` properties
#### Scenario: Subcommand execution
- **WHEN** a user runs a nested command like `openspec change apply`
- **THEN** the system sends a `command_executed` event with the full command path (e.g., `change:apply`)
### Requirement: Privacy-preserving event design
The system SHALL NOT include command arguments, file paths, project names, spec content, error messages, or IP addresses in telemetry events.
#### Scenario: Command with arguments
- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec init my-project --force`
- **THEN** the telemetry event contains only `command: "init"` and `version: "<version>"` without arguments
#### Scenario: IP address exclusion
- **WHEN** the system sends a telemetry event
- **THEN** the event explicitly sets `$ip: null` to prevent IP tracking
### Requirement: Environment variable opt-out
The system SHALL disable telemetry when `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` environment variables are set.
#### Scenario: OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY opt-out
- **WHEN** `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0` is set in the environment
- **THEN** the system sends no telemetry events
#### Scenario: DO_NOT_TRACK opt-out
- **WHEN** `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` is set in the environment
- **THEN** the system sends no telemetry events
#### Scenario: Environment variable takes precedence
- **WHEN** the user has previously used the CLI (config exists)
- **AND** the user sets `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0`
- **THEN** telemetry is disabled regardless of config state
### Requirement: CI environment auto-disable
The system SHALL automatically disable telemetry when `CI=true` environment variable is detected.
#### Scenario: CI environment detection
- **WHEN** `CI=true` is set in the environment
- **THEN** the system sends no telemetry events
#### Scenario: CI with explicit enable
- **WHEN** `CI=true` is set
- **AND** `OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=1` is explicitly set
- **THEN** telemetry remains disabled (CI takes precedence for privacy)
### Requirement: First-run telemetry notice
The system SHALL display a one-line telemetry disclosure notice on the first command execution, before any telemetry is sent.
#### Scenario: First command execution
- **WHEN** a user runs their first openspec command
- **AND** telemetry is enabled
- **THEN** the system displays: "Note: OpenSpec collects anonymous usage stats. Opt out: OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0"
#### Scenario: Subsequent command execution
- **WHEN** a user has already seen the notice (noticeSeen: true in config)
- **THEN** the system does not display the notice
#### Scenario: Notice before telemetry
- **WHEN** displaying the first-run notice
- **THEN** the notice appears before any telemetry event is sent
### Requirement: Anonymous user identification
The system SHALL generate a random UUID as an anonymous identifier on first telemetry send, stored in global config.
#### Scenario: First telemetry event
- **WHEN** the first telemetry event is sent
- **AND** no anonymousId exists in config
- **THEN** the system generates a random UUID v4 and stores it in config
#### Scenario: Persistent identity
- **WHEN** a user runs multiple commands across sessions
- **THEN** the same anonymousId is used for all events
#### Scenario: Lazy generation with opt-out
- **WHEN** a user opts out before running any command
- **THEN** no anonymousId is ever generated or stored
### Requirement: Immediate event sending
The system SHALL send telemetry events immediately without batching, using `flushAt: 1` and `flushInterval: 0` configuration.
#### Scenario: Event transmission timing
- **WHEN** a command executes
- **THEN** the telemetry event is sent immediately, not queued for batch transmission
### Requirement: Graceful shutdown
The system SHALL call `posthog.shutdown()` before CLI exit to ensure pending events are flushed.
#### Scenario: Normal exit
- **WHEN** a command completes successfully
- **THEN** the system awaits `shutdown()` before exiting
#### Scenario: Error exit
- **WHEN** a command fails with an error
- **THEN** the system still awaits `shutdown()` before exiting
### Requirement: Silent failure handling
The system SHALL silently ignore telemetry failures without affecting CLI functionality.
#### Scenario: Network failure
- **WHEN** the telemetry request fails due to network error
- **THEN** the CLI command completes normally without error message
#### Scenario: PostHog outage
- **WHEN** PostHog service is unavailable
- **THEN** the CLI command completes normally without error message
#### Scenario: Shutdown failure
- **WHEN** `shutdown()` fails or times out
- **THEN** the CLI exits normally without error message
+2 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@fission-ai/openspec",
"version": "0.17.2",
"version": "0.18.0",
"description": "AI-native system for spec-driven development",
"keywords": [
"openspec",
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
"commander": "^14.0.0",
"fast-glob": "^3.3.3",
"ora": "^8.2.0",
"posthog-node": "^5.20.0",
"yaml": "^2.8.2",
"zod": "^4.0.17"
}
+18
View File
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ importers:
ora:
specifier: ^8.2.0
version: 8.2.0
posthog-node:
specifier: ^5.20.0
version: 5.20.0
yaml:
specifier: ^2.8.2
version: 2.8.2
@@ -484,6 +487,9 @@ packages:
'@polka/url@1.0.0-next.29':
resolution: {integrity: sha512-wwQAWhWSuHaag8c4q/KN/vCoeOJYshAIvMQwD4GpSb3OiZklFfvAgmj0VCBBImRpuF/aFgIRzllXlVX93Jevww==}
'@posthog/core@1.9.1':
resolution: {integrity: sha512-kRb1ch2dhQjsAapZmu6V66551IF2LnCbc1rnrQqnR7ArooVyJN9KOPXre16AJ3ObJz2eTfuP7x25BMyS2Y5Exw==}
'@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi@4.46.2':
resolution: {integrity: sha512-Zj3Hl6sN34xJtMv7Anwb5Gu01yujyE/cLBDB2gnHTAHaWS1Z38L7kuSG+oAh0giZMqG060f/YBStXtMH6FvPMA==}
cpu: [arm]
@@ -1284,6 +1290,10 @@ packages:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-3Ybi1tAuwAP9s0r1UQ2J4n5Y0G05bJkpUIO0/bI9MhwmD70S5aTWbXGBwxHrelT+XM1k6dM0pk+SwNkpTRN7Pg==}
engines: {node: ^10 || ^12 || >=14}
posthog-node@5.20.0:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-LkR5KfrvEQTnUtNKN97VxFB00KcYG1Iz8iKg8r0e/i7f1eQhg1WSZO+Jp1B4bvtHCmdpIE4HwYbvCCzFoCyjVg==}
engines: {node: '>=20'}
prelude-ls@1.2.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-vkcDPrRZo1QZLbn5RLGPpg/WmIQ65qoWWhcGKf/b5eplkkarX0m9z8ppCat4mlOqUsWpyNuYgO3VRyrYHSzX5g==}
engines: {node: '>= 0.8.0'}
@@ -2038,6 +2048,10 @@ snapshots:
'@polka/url@1.0.0-next.29': {}
'@posthog/core@1.9.1':
dependencies:
cross-spawn: 7.0.6
'@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi@4.46.2':
optional: true
@@ -2808,6 +2822,10 @@ snapshots:
picocolors: 1.1.1
source-map-js: 1.2.1
posthog-node@5.20.0:
dependencies:
'@posthog/core': 1.9.1
prelude-ls@1.2.1: {}
prettier@2.8.8: {}
+121 -1
View File
@@ -6,23 +6,143 @@ artifacts:
generates: proposal.md
description: Initial proposal document outlining the change
template: proposal.md
instruction: |
Create the proposal document that establishes WHY this change is needed.
Sections:
- **Why**: 1-2 sentences on the problem or opportunity. What problem does this solve? Why now?
- **What Changes**: Bullet list of changes. Be specific about new capabilities, modifications, or removals. Mark breaking changes with **BREAKING**.
- **Capabilities**: Identify which specs will be created or modified:
- **New Capabilities**: List capabilities being introduced. Each becomes a new `specs/<name>/spec.md`. Use kebab-case names (e.g., `user-auth`, `data-export`).
- **Modified Capabilities**: List existing capabilities whose REQUIREMENTS are changing. Only include if spec-level behavior changes (not just implementation details). Each needs a delta spec file. Check `openspec/specs/` for existing spec names. Leave empty if no requirement changes.
- **Impact**: Affected code, APIs, dependencies, or systems.
IMPORTANT: The Capabilities section is critical. It creates the contract between
proposal and specs phases. Research existing specs before filling this in.
Each capability listed here will need a corresponding spec file.
Keep it concise (1-2 pages). Focus on the "why" not the "how" -
implementation details belong in design.md.
This is the foundation - specs, design, and tasks all build on this.
requires: []
- id: specs
generates: "specs/*.md"
generates: "specs/**/*.md"
description: Detailed specifications for the change
template: spec.md
instruction: |
Create specification files that define WHAT the system should do.
Create one spec file per capability/feature area in specs/<name>/spec.md.
Delta operations (use ## headers):
- **ADDED Requirements**: New capabilities
- **MODIFIED Requirements**: Changed behavior - MUST include full updated content
- **REMOVED Requirements**: Deprecated features - MUST include **Reason** and **Migration**
- **RENAMED Requirements**: Name changes only - use FROM:/TO: format
Format requirements:
- Each requirement: `### Requirement: <name>` followed by description
- Use SHALL/MUST for normative requirements (avoid should/may)
- Each scenario: `#### Scenario: <name>` with WHEN/THEN format
- **CRITICAL**: Scenarios MUST use exactly 4 hashtags (`####`). Using 3 hashtags or bullets will fail silently.
- Every requirement MUST have at least one scenario.
MODIFIED requirements workflow:
1. Locate the existing requirement in openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md
2. Copy the ENTIRE requirement block (from `### Requirement:` through all scenarios)
3. Paste under `## MODIFIED Requirements` and edit to reflect new behavior
4. Ensure header text matches exactly (whitespace-insensitive)
Common pitfall: Using MODIFIED with partial content loses detail at archive time.
If adding new concerns without changing existing behavior, use ADDED instead.
Example:
```
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: User can export data
The system SHALL allow users to export their data in CSV format.
#### Scenario: Successful export
- **WHEN** user clicks "Export" button
- **THEN** system downloads a CSV file with all user data
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: Legacy export
**Reason**: Replaced by new export system
**Migration**: Use new export endpoint at /api/v2/export
```
Specs should be testable - each scenario is a potential test case.
requires:
- proposal
- id: design
generates: design.md
description: Technical design document with implementation details
template: design.md
instruction: |
Create the design document that explains HOW to implement the change.
When to include design.md (create only if any apply):
- Cross-cutting change (multiple services/modules) or new architectural pattern
- New external dependency or significant data model changes
- Security, performance, or migration complexity
- Ambiguity that benefits from technical decisions before coding
Sections:
- **Context**: Background, current state, constraints, stakeholders
- **Goals / Non-Goals**: What this design achieves and explicitly excludes
- **Decisions**: Key technical choices with rationale (why X over Y?). Include alternatives considered for each decision.
- **Risks / Trade-offs**: Known limitations, things that could go wrong. Format: [Risk] → Mitigation
- **Migration Plan**: Steps to deploy, rollback strategy (if applicable)
- **Open Questions**: Outstanding decisions or unknowns to resolve
Focus on architecture and approach, not line-by-line implementation.
Reference the proposal for motivation and specs for requirements.
Good design docs explain the "why" behind technical decisions.
requires:
- proposal
- id: tasks
generates: tasks.md
description: Implementation tasks derived from specs and design
template: tasks.md
instruction: |
Create the task list that breaks down the implementation work.
Guidelines:
- Group related tasks under ## numbered headings
- Each task is a checkbox: - [ ] X.Y Task description
- Tasks should be small enough to complete in one session
- Order tasks by dependency (what must be done first?)
Example:
```
## 1. Setup
- [ ] 1.1 Create new module structure
- [ ] 1.2 Add dependencies to package.json
## 2. Core Implementation
- [ ] 2.1 Implement data export function
- [ ] 2.2 Add CSV formatting utilities
```
Reference specs for what needs to be built, design for how to build it.
Each task should be verifiable - you know when it's done.
requires:
- specs
- design
apply:
requires: [tasks]
tracks: tasks.md
instruction: |
Read context files, work through pending tasks, mark complete as you go.
Pause if you hit blockers or need clarification.
+15 -3
View File
@@ -1,11 +1,23 @@
## Why
<!-- Explain the motivation for this change -->
<!-- Explain the motivation for this change. What problem does this solve? Why now? -->
## What Changes
<!-- Describe what will change -->
<!-- Describe what will change. Be specific about new capabilities, modifications, or removals. -->
## Capabilities
### New Capabilities
<!-- Capabilities being introduced. Replace <name> with kebab-case identifier (e.g., user-auth, data-export, api-rate-limiting). Each creates specs/<name>/spec.md -->
- `<name>`: <brief description of what this capability covers>
### Modified Capabilities
<!-- Existing capabilities whose REQUIREMENTS are changing (not just implementation).
Only list here if spec-level behavior changes. Each needs a delta spec file.
Use existing spec names from openspec/specs/. Leave empty if no requirement changes. -->
- `<existing-name>`: <what requirement is changing>
## Impact
<!-- List affected areas -->
<!-- Affected code, APIs, dependencies, systems -->
+186
View File
@@ -6,22 +6,208 @@ artifacts:
generates: spec.md
description: Feature specification defining requirements
template: spec.md
instruction: |
Create the feature specification that defines WHAT to build.
Sections:
- **Feature**: Name and high-level description of the feature's purpose and user value
- **Requirements**: List of specific requirements. Use SHALL/MUST for normative language.
- **Acceptance Criteria**: Testable criteria in WHEN/THEN format
Format requirements:
- Each requirement should be specific and testable
- Use `#### Scenario: <name>` with WHEN/THEN format for acceptance criteria
- Define edge cases and error scenarios explicitly
- Every requirement MUST have at least one scenario
Example:
```
## Feature: User Authentication
Users can securely log into the application.
## Requirements
### Requirement: Password validation
The system SHALL validate passwords meet minimum security requirements.
#### Scenario: Valid password accepted
- **WHEN** password has 8+ chars, uppercase, lowercase, and number
- **THEN** password is accepted
#### Scenario: Weak password rejected
- **WHEN** password is less than 8 characters
- **THEN** system displays "Password too short" error
```
This spec drives test creation - each scenario becomes a test case.
requires: []
- id: tests
generates: "tests/*.test.ts"
description: Test files written before implementation
template: test.md
instruction: |
Write tests BEFORE implementation (TDD red phase).
File naming:
- Create test files as `tests/<feature>.test.ts`
- One test file per feature/capability
- Use descriptive names matching the spec
Test structure:
- Use Given/When/Then format matching spec scenarios
- Group related tests with `describe()` blocks
- Each scenario from spec becomes at least one `it()` test
Coverage requirements:
- Cover each requirement from the spec
- Include happy path (success cases)
- Include edge cases (boundary conditions)
- Include error scenarios (invalid input, failures)
- Tests should fail initially (no implementation yet)
Example:
```typescript
describe('Password validation', () => {
it('accepts valid password with all requirements', () => {
// GIVEN a password meeting all requirements
const password = 'SecurePass1';
// WHEN validating
const result = validatePassword(password);
// THEN it should be accepted
expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
});
it('rejects password shorter than 8 characters', () => {
// GIVEN a short password
const password = 'Short1';
// WHEN validating
const result = validatePassword(password);
// THEN it should be rejected with message
expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
expect(result.error).toBe('Password too short');
});
});
```
Follow the spec requirements exactly - tests verify the spec.
requires:
- spec
- id: implementation
generates: "src/*.ts"
description: Implementation code to pass the tests
template: implementation.md
instruction: |
Implement the feature to make tests pass (TDD green phase).
TDD workflow:
1. Run tests - confirm they fail (red)
2. Write minimal code to pass ONE test
3. Run tests - confirm that test passes (green)
4. Refactor if needed while keeping tests green
5. Repeat for next failing test
Implementation guidelines:
- Write minimal code to pass each test - no more, no less
- Run tests frequently to verify progress
- Keep functions small and focused
- Use clear, descriptive names
Code organization:
- Create source files in `src/<feature>.ts`
- Export public API clearly
- Keep implementation details private
- Add JSDoc comments for public functions
Example structure:
```typescript
/**
* Validates a password meets security requirements.
* @param password - The password to validate
* @returns Validation result with valid flag and optional error
*/
export function validatePassword(password: string): ValidationResult {
if (password.length < 8) {
return { valid: false, error: 'Password too short' };
}
// ... additional checks
return { valid: true };
}
```
Don't over-engineer - implement only what tests require.
requires:
- tests
- id: docs
generates: "docs/*.md"
description: Documentation for the implemented feature
template: docs.md
instruction: |
Document the implemented feature.
Sections:
- **Overview**: What the feature does and why it exists (1-2 paragraphs)
- **Getting Started**: Quick start guide to use the feature immediately
- **Examples**: Code examples showing common use cases
- **Reference**: Detailed API documentation, configuration options
Guidelines:
- Write for the user, not the developer
- Start with the most common use case
- Include copy-pasteable code examples
- Document all configuration options with defaults
- Note any limitations, edge cases, or gotchas
- Link to related features or specs
Example structure:
```markdown
## Overview
Password validation ensures user passwords meet security requirements
before account creation or password changes.
## Getting Started
Import and use the validation function:
```typescript
import { validatePassword } from './password';
const result = validatePassword('MySecurePass1');
if (!result.valid) {
console.error(result.error);
}
```
## Examples
### Basic validation
...
### Custom error handling
...
## Reference
### validatePassword(password)
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| password | string | The password to validate |
**Returns**: `{ valid: boolean, error?: string }`
```
Reference the spec for requirements, implementation for details.
requires:
- implementation
apply:
requires: [tests]
tracks: null
instruction: |
Run tests to see failures. Implement minimal code to pass each test.
Refactor while keeping tests green.
+47 -4
View File
@@ -14,11 +14,33 @@ import { ValidateCommand } from '../commands/validate.js';
import { ShowCommand } from '../commands/show.js';
import { CompletionCommand } from '../commands/completion.js';
import { registerConfigCommand } from '../commands/config.js';
import { registerArtifactWorkflowCommands } from '../commands/artifact-workflow.js';
import { maybeShowTelemetryNotice, trackCommand, shutdown } from '../telemetry/index.js';
const program = new Command();
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const { version } = require('../../package.json');
/**
* Get the full command path for nested commands.
* For example: 'change show' -> 'change:show'
*/
function getCommandPath(command: Command): string {
const names: string[] = [];
let current: Command | null = command;
while (current) {
const name = current.name();
// Skip the root 'openspec' command
if (name && name !== 'openspec') {
names.unshift(name);
}
current = current.parent;
}
return names.join(':') || 'openspec';
}
program
.name('openspec')
.description('AI-native system for spec-driven development')
@@ -27,12 +49,27 @@ program
// Global options
program.option('--no-color', 'Disable color output');
// Apply global flags before any command runs
program.hook('preAction', (thisCommand) => {
// Apply global flags and telemetry before any command runs
// Note: preAction receives (thisCommand, actionCommand) where:
// - thisCommand: the command where hook was added (root program)
// - actionCommand: the command actually being executed (subcommand)
program.hook('preAction', async (thisCommand, actionCommand) => {
const opts = thisCommand.opts();
if (opts.color === false) {
process.env.NO_COLOR = '1';
}
// Show first-run telemetry notice (if not seen)
await maybeShowTelemetryNotice();
// Track command execution (use actionCommand to get the actual subcommand)
const commandPath = getCommandPath(actionCommand);
await trackCommand(commandPath, version);
});
// Shutdown telemetry after command completes
program.hook('postAction', async () => {
await shutdown();
});
const availableToolIds = AI_TOOLS.filter((tool) => tool.available).map((tool) => tool.value);
@@ -95,11 +132,14 @@ program
.description('List items (changes by default). Use --specs to list specs.')
.option('--specs', 'List specs instead of changes')
.option('--changes', 'List changes explicitly (default)')
.action(async (options?: { specs?: boolean; changes?: boolean }) => {
.option('--sort <order>', 'Sort order: "recent" (default) or "name"', 'recent')
.option('--json', 'Output as JSON (for programmatic use)')
.action(async (options?: { specs?: boolean; changes?: boolean; sort?: string; json?: boolean }) => {
try {
const listCommand = new ListCommand();
const mode: 'changes' | 'specs' = options?.specs ? 'specs' : 'changes';
await listCommand.execute('.', mode);
const sort = options?.sort === 'name' ? 'name' : 'recent';
await listCommand.execute('.', mode, { sort, json: options?.json });
} catch (error) {
console.log(); // Empty line for spacing
ora().fail(`Error: ${(error as Error).message}`);
@@ -316,4 +356,7 @@ program
}
});
// Register artifact workflow commands (experimental)
registerArtifactWorkflowCommands(program);
program.parse();
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
+50 -6
View File
@@ -144,8 +144,27 @@ export class CompletionCommand {
if (result.backupPath) {
console.log(` Backup created: ${result.backupPath}`);
}
if (result.zshrcConfigured) {
console.log(` ~/.zshrc configured automatically`);
// Check if any shell config was updated
const configWasUpdated = result.zshrcConfigured || result.bashrcConfigured || result.profileConfigured;
if (configWasUpdated) {
const configPaths: Record<string, string> = {
zsh: '~/.zshrc',
bash: '~/.bashrc',
fish: '~/.config/fish/config.fish',
powershell: '$PROFILE',
};
const configPath = configPaths[shell] || 'config file';
console.log(` ${configPath} configured automatically`);
}
}
// Display warnings if present
if (result.warnings && result.warnings.length > 0) {
console.log('');
for (const warning of result.warnings) {
console.log(warning);
}
}
@@ -155,9 +174,24 @@ export class CompletionCommand {
for (const instruction of result.instructions) {
console.log(instruction);
}
} else if (result.zshrcConfigured) {
console.log('');
console.log('Restart your shell or run: exec zsh');
} else {
// Check if any shell config was updated (InstallationResult has: zshrcConfigured, bashrcConfigured, profileConfigured)
const configWasUpdated = result.zshrcConfigured || result.bashrcConfigured || result.profileConfigured;
if (configWasUpdated) {
console.log('');
// Shell-specific reload instructions
const reloadCommands: Record<string, string> = {
zsh: 'exec zsh',
bash: 'exec bash',
fish: 'exec fish',
powershell: '. $PROFILE',
};
const reloadCmd = reloadCommands[shell] || `restart your ${shell} shell`;
console.log(`Restart your shell or run: ${reloadCmd}`);
}
}
} else {
console.error(`✗ ${result.message}`);
@@ -179,8 +213,18 @@ export class CompletionCommand {
// Prompt for confirmation unless --yes flag is provided
if (!skipConfirmation) {
const { confirm } = await import('@inquirer/prompts');
// Get shell-specific config file path
const configPaths: Record<string, string> = {
zsh: '~/.zshrc',
bash: '~/.bashrc',
fish: 'Fish configuration', // Fish doesn't modify profile, just removes script file
powershell: '$PROFILE',
};
const configPath = configPaths[shell] || `${shell} configuration`;
const confirmed = await confirm({
message: 'Remove OpenSpec configuration from ~/.zshrc?',
message: `Remove OpenSpec configuration from ${configPath}?`,
default: false,
});
+8 -331
View File
@@ -4,17 +4,11 @@ import { getTaskProgressForChange, formatTaskStatus } from '../utils/task-progre
import { Validator } from './validation/validator.js';
import chalk from 'chalk';
import {
extractRequirementsSection,
parseDeltaSpec,
normalizeRequirementName,
type RequirementBlock,
} from './parsers/requirement-blocks.js';
interface SpecUpdate {
source: string;
target: string;
exists: boolean;
}
findSpecUpdates,
buildUpdatedSpec,
writeUpdatedSpec,
type SpecUpdate,
} from './specs-apply.js';
export class ArchiveCommand {
async execute(
@@ -167,7 +161,7 @@ export class ArchiveCommand {
console.log('Skipping spec updates (--skip-specs flag provided).');
} else {
// Find specs to update
const specUpdates = await this.findSpecUpdates(changeDir, mainSpecsDir);
const specUpdates = await findSpecUpdates(changeDir, mainSpecsDir);
if (specUpdates.length > 0) {
console.log('\nSpecs to update:');
@@ -194,7 +188,7 @@ export class ArchiveCommand {
const prepared: Array<{ update: SpecUpdate; rebuilt: string; counts: { added: number; modified: number; removed: number; renamed: number } }> = [];
try {
for (const update of specUpdates) {
const built = await this.buildUpdatedSpec(update, changeName!);
const built = await buildUpdatedSpec(update, changeName!);
prepared.push({ update, rebuilt: built.rebuilt, counts: built.counts });
}
} catch (err: any) {
@@ -219,7 +213,7 @@ export class ArchiveCommand {
return;
}
}
await this.writeUpdatedSpec(p.update, p.rebuilt, p.counts);
await writeUpdatedSpec(p.update, p.rebuilt, p.counts);
totals.added += p.counts.added;
totals.modified += p.counts.modified;
totals.removed += p.counts.removed;
@@ -301,323 +295,6 @@ export class ArchiveCommand {
}
}
// Deprecated: replaced by shared task-progress utilities
private async checkIncompleteTasks(_tasksPath: string): Promise<number> {
return 0;
}
private async findSpecUpdates(changeDir: string, mainSpecsDir: string): Promise<SpecUpdate[]> {
const updates: SpecUpdate[] = [];
const changeSpecsDir = path.join(changeDir, 'specs');
try {
const entries = await fs.readdir(changeSpecsDir, { withFileTypes: true });
for (const entry of entries) {
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
const specFile = path.join(changeSpecsDir, entry.name, 'spec.md');
const targetFile = path.join(mainSpecsDir, entry.name, 'spec.md');
try {
await fs.access(specFile);
// Check if target exists
let exists = false;
try {
await fs.access(targetFile);
exists = true;
} catch {
exists = false;
}
updates.push({
source: specFile,
target: targetFile,
exists
});
} catch {
// Source spec doesn't exist, skip
}
}
}
} catch {
// No specs directory in change
}
return updates;
}
private async buildUpdatedSpec(update: SpecUpdate, changeName: string): Promise<{ rebuilt: string; counts: { added: number; modified: number; removed: number; renamed: number } }> {
// Read change spec content (delta-format expected)
const changeContent = await fs.readFile(update.source, 'utf-8');
// Parse deltas from the change spec file
const plan = parseDeltaSpec(changeContent);
const specName = path.basename(path.dirname(update.target));
// Pre-validate duplicates within sections
const addedNames = new Set<string>();
for (const add of plan.added) {
const name = normalizeRequirementName(add.name);
if (addedNames.has(name)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - duplicate requirement in ADDED for header "### Requirement: ${add.name}"`
);
}
addedNames.add(name);
}
const modifiedNames = new Set<string>();
for (const mod of plan.modified) {
const name = normalizeRequirementName(mod.name);
if (modifiedNames.has(name)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - duplicate requirement in MODIFIED for header "### Requirement: ${mod.name}"`
);
}
modifiedNames.add(name);
}
const removedNamesSet = new Set<string>();
for (const rem of plan.removed) {
const name = normalizeRequirementName(rem);
if (removedNamesSet.has(name)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - duplicate requirement in REMOVED for header "### Requirement: ${rem}"`
);
}
removedNamesSet.add(name);
}
const renamedFromSet = new Set<string>();
const renamedToSet = new Set<string>();
for (const { from, to } of plan.renamed) {
const fromNorm = normalizeRequirementName(from);
const toNorm = normalizeRequirementName(to);
if (renamedFromSet.has(fromNorm)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - duplicate FROM in RENAMED for header "### Requirement: ${from}"`
);
}
if (renamedToSet.has(toNorm)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - duplicate TO in RENAMED for header "### Requirement: ${to}"`
);
}
renamedFromSet.add(fromNorm);
renamedToSet.add(toNorm);
}
// Pre-validate cross-section conflicts
const conflicts: Array<{ name: string; a: string; b: string }> = [];
for (const n of modifiedNames) {
if (removedNamesSet.has(n)) conflicts.push({ name: n, a: 'MODIFIED', b: 'REMOVED' });
if (addedNames.has(n)) conflicts.push({ name: n, a: 'MODIFIED', b: 'ADDED' });
}
for (const n of addedNames) {
if (removedNamesSet.has(n)) conflicts.push({ name: n, a: 'ADDED', b: 'REMOVED' });
}
// Renamed interplay: MODIFIED must reference the NEW header, not FROM
for (const { from, to } of plan.renamed) {
const fromNorm = normalizeRequirementName(from);
const toNorm = normalizeRequirementName(to);
if (modifiedNames.has(fromNorm)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - when a rename exists, MODIFIED must reference the NEW header "### Requirement: ${to}"`
);
}
// Detect ADDED colliding with a RENAMED TO
if (addedNames.has(toNorm)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - RENAMED TO header collides with ADDED for "### Requirement: ${to}"`
);
}
}
if (conflicts.length > 0) {
const c = conflicts[0];
throw new Error(
`${specName} validation failed - requirement present in multiple sections (${c.a} and ${c.b}) for header "### Requirement: ${c.name}"`
);
}
const hasAnyDelta = (plan.added.length + plan.modified.length + plan.removed.length + plan.renamed.length) > 0;
if (!hasAnyDelta) {
throw new Error(
`Delta parsing found no operations for ${path.basename(path.dirname(update.source))}. ` +
`Provide ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED sections in change spec.`
);
}
// Load or create base target content
let targetContent: string;
let isNewSpec = false;
try {
targetContent = await fs.readFile(update.target, 'utf-8');
} catch {
// Target spec does not exist; MODIFIED and RENAMED are not allowed for new specs
// REMOVED will be ignored with a warning since there's nothing to remove
if (plan.modified.length > 0 || plan.renamed.length > 0) {
throw new Error(
`${specName}: target spec does not exist; only ADDED requirements are allowed for new specs. MODIFIED and RENAMED operations require an existing spec.`
);
}
// Warn about REMOVED requirements being ignored for new specs
if (plan.removed.length > 0) {
console.log(
chalk.yellow(
`⚠️ Warning: ${specName} - ${plan.removed.length} REMOVED requirement(s) ignored for new spec (nothing to remove).`
)
);
}
isNewSpec = true;
targetContent = this.buildSpecSkeleton(specName, changeName);
}
// Extract requirements section and build name->block map
const parts = extractRequirementsSection(targetContent);
const nameToBlock = new Map<string, RequirementBlock>();
for (const block of parts.bodyBlocks) {
nameToBlock.set(normalizeRequirementName(block.name), block);
}
// Apply operations in order: RENAMED → REMOVED → MODIFIED → ADDED
// RENAMED
for (const r of plan.renamed) {
const from = normalizeRequirementName(r.from);
const to = normalizeRequirementName(r.to);
if (!nameToBlock.has(from)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} RENAMED failed for header "### Requirement: ${r.from}" - source not found`
);
}
if (nameToBlock.has(to)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} RENAMED failed for header "### Requirement: ${r.to}" - target already exists`
);
}
const block = nameToBlock.get(from)!;
const newHeader = `### Requirement: ${to}`;
const rawLines = block.raw.split('\n');
rawLines[0] = newHeader;
const renamedBlock: RequirementBlock = {
headerLine: newHeader,
name: to,
raw: rawLines.join('\n'),
};
nameToBlock.delete(from);
nameToBlock.set(to, renamedBlock);
}
// REMOVED
for (const name of plan.removed) {
const key = normalizeRequirementName(name);
if (!nameToBlock.has(key)) {
// For new specs, REMOVED requirements are already warned about and ignored
// For existing specs, missing requirements are an error
if (!isNewSpec) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} REMOVED failed for header "### Requirement: ${name}" - not found`
);
}
// Skip removal for new specs (already warned above)
continue;
}
nameToBlock.delete(key);
}
// MODIFIED
for (const mod of plan.modified) {
const key = normalizeRequirementName(mod.name);
if (!nameToBlock.has(key)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} MODIFIED failed for header "### Requirement: ${mod.name}" - not found`
);
}
// Replace block with provided raw (ensure header line matches key)
const modHeaderMatch = mod.raw.split('\n')[0].match(/^###\s*Requirement:\s*(.+)\s*$/);
if (!modHeaderMatch || normalizeRequirementName(modHeaderMatch[1]) !== key) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} MODIFIED failed for header "### Requirement: ${mod.name}" - header mismatch in content`
);
}
nameToBlock.set(key, mod);
}
// ADDED
for (const add of plan.added) {
const key = normalizeRequirementName(add.name);
if (nameToBlock.has(key)) {
throw new Error(
`${specName} ADDED failed for header "### Requirement: ${add.name}" - already exists`
);
}
nameToBlock.set(key, add);
}
// Duplicates within resulting map are implicitly prevented by key uniqueness.
// Recompose requirements section preserving original ordering where possible
const keptOrder: RequirementBlock[] = [];
const seen = new Set<string>();
for (const block of parts.bodyBlocks) {
const key = normalizeRequirementName(block.name);
const replacement = nameToBlock.get(key);
if (replacement) {
keptOrder.push(replacement);
seen.add(key);
}
}
// Append any newly added that were not in original order
for (const [key, block] of nameToBlock.entries()) {
if (!seen.has(key)) {
keptOrder.push(block);
}
}
const reqBody = [
parts.preamble && parts.preamble.trim() ? parts.preamble.trimEnd() : ''
]
.filter(Boolean)
.concat(keptOrder.map(b => b.raw))
.join('\n\n')
.trimEnd();
const rebuilt = [
parts.before.trimEnd(),
parts.headerLine,
reqBody,
parts.after
]
.filter((s, idx) => !(idx === 0 && s === ''))
.join('\n')
.replace(/\n{3,}/g, '\n\n');
return {
rebuilt,
counts: {
added: plan.added.length,
modified: plan.modified.length,
removed: plan.removed.length,
renamed: plan.renamed.length,
}
};
}
private async writeUpdatedSpec(update: SpecUpdate, rebuilt: string, counts: { added: number; modified: number; removed: number; renamed: number }): Promise<void> {
// Create target directory if needed
const targetDir = path.dirname(update.target);
await fs.mkdir(targetDir, { recursive: true });
await fs.writeFile(update.target, rebuilt);
const specName = path.basename(path.dirname(update.target));
console.log(`Applying changes to openspec/specs/${specName}/spec.md:`);
if (counts.added) console.log(` + ${counts.added} added`);
if (counts.modified) console.log(` ~ ${counts.modified} modified`);
if (counts.removed) console.log(` - ${counts.removed} removed`);
if (counts.renamed) console.log(` → ${counts.renamed} renamed`);
}
private buildSpecSkeleton(specFolderName: string, changeName: string): string {
const titleBase = specFolderName;
return `# ${titleBase} Specification\n\n## Purpose\nTBD - created by archiving change ${changeName}. Update Purpose after archive.\n\n## Requirements\n`;
}
private getArchiveDate(): string {
// Returns date in YYYY-MM-DD format
return new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0];
+3 -1
View File
@@ -21,10 +21,12 @@ export { detectCompleted } from './state.js';
export {
resolveSchema,
listSchemas,
listSchemasWithInfo,
getSchemaDir,
getPackageSchemasDir,
getUserSchemasDir,
SchemaLoadError,
type SchemaInfo,
} from './resolver.js';
// Instruction loading
@@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ export {
TemplateLoadError,
type ChangeContext,
type ArtifactInstructions,
type DependencyStatus,
type DependencyInfo,
type ArtifactStatus,
type ChangeStatus,
} from './instruction-loader.js';
+51 -18
View File
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import * as path from 'node:path';
import { getSchemaDir, resolveSchema } from './resolver.js';
import { ArtifactGraph } from './graph.js';
import { detectCompleted } from './state.js';
import { resolveSchemaForChange } from '../../utils/change-metadata.js';
import type { Artifact, CompletedSet } from './types.js';
/**
@@ -44,26 +45,34 @@ export interface ArtifactInstructions {
artifactId: string;
/** Schema name */
schemaName: string;
/** Full path to change directory */
changeDir: string;
/** Output path pattern (e.g., "proposal.md") */
outputPath: string;
/** Artifact description */
description: string;
/** Template content */
/** Guidance on how to create this artifact (from schema instruction field) */
instruction: string | undefined;
/** Template content (structure to follow) */
template: string;
/** Dependencies with completion status */
dependencies: DependencyStatus[];
/** Dependencies with completion status and paths */
dependencies: DependencyInfo[];
/** Artifacts that become available after completing this one */
unlocks: string[];
}
/**
* Dependency status information.
* Dependency information including path and description.
*/
export interface DependencyStatus {
export interface DependencyInfo {
/** Artifact ID */
id: string;
/** Whether the dependency is completed */
done: boolean;
/** Relative output path of the dependency (e.g., "proposal.md") */
path: string;
/** Description of the dependency artifact */
description: string;
}
/**
@@ -90,6 +99,8 @@ export interface ChangeStatus {
schemaName: string;
/** Whether all artifacts are complete */
isComplete: boolean;
/** Artifact IDs required before apply phase (from schema's apply.requires) */
applyRequires: string[];
/** Status of each artifact */
artifacts: ArtifactStatus[];
}
@@ -134,25 +145,34 @@ export function loadTemplate(schemaName: string, templatePath: string): string {
/**
* Loads change context combining graph and completion state.
*
* Schema resolution order:
* 1. Explicit schemaName parameter (if provided)
* 2. Schema from .openspec.yaml metadata (if exists in change directory)
* 3. Default 'spec-driven'
*
* @param projectRoot - Project root directory
* @param changeName - Change name
* @param schemaName - Optional schema name (defaults to "spec-driven")
* @param schemaName - Optional schema name override. If not provided, auto-detected from metadata.
* @returns Change context with graph, completed set, and metadata
*/
export function loadChangeContext(
projectRoot: string,
changeName: string,
schemaName: string = 'spec-driven'
schemaName?: string
): ChangeContext {
const schema = resolveSchema(schemaName);
const graph = ArtifactGraph.fromSchema(schema);
const changeDir = path.join(projectRoot, 'openspec', 'changes', changeName);
// Resolve schema: explicit > metadata > default
const resolvedSchemaName = resolveSchemaForChange(changeDir, schemaName);
const schema = resolveSchema(resolvedSchemaName);
const graph = ArtifactGraph.fromSchema(schema);
const completed = detectCompleted(graph, changeDir);
return {
graph,
completed,
schemaName,
schemaName: resolvedSchemaName,
changeName,
changeDir,
};
@@ -176,15 +196,17 @@ export function generateInstructions(
}
const template = loadTemplate(context.schemaName, artifact.template);
const dependencies = getDependencyStatus(artifact, context.completed);
const dependencies = getDependencyInfo(artifact, context.graph, context.completed);
const unlocks = getUnlockedArtifacts(context.graph, artifactId);
return {
changeName: context.changeName,
artifactId: artifact.id,
schemaName: context.schemaName,
changeDir: context.changeDir,
outputPath: artifact.generates,
description: artifact.description,
instruction: artifact.instruction,
template,
dependencies,
unlocks,
@@ -192,16 +214,22 @@ export function generateInstructions(
}
/**
* Gets dependency status for an artifact.
* Gets dependency info including paths and descriptions.
*/
function getDependencyStatus(
function getDependencyInfo(
artifact: Artifact,
graph: ArtifactGraph,
completed: CompletedSet
): DependencyStatus[] {
return artifact.requires.map(id => ({
id,
done: completed.has(id),
}));
): DependencyInfo[] {
return artifact.requires.map(id => {
const depArtifact = graph.getArtifact(id);
return {
id,
done: completed.has(id),
path: depArtifact?.generates ?? id,
description: depArtifact?.description ?? '',
};
});
}
/**
@@ -226,6 +254,10 @@ function getUnlockedArtifacts(graph: ArtifactGraph, artifactId: string): string[
* @returns Formatted change status
*/
export function formatChangeStatus(context: ChangeContext): ChangeStatus {
// Load schema to get apply phase configuration
const schema = resolveSchema(context.schemaName);
const applyRequires = schema.apply?.requires ?? schema.artifacts.map(a => a.id);
const artifacts = context.graph.getAllArtifacts();
const ready = new Set(context.graph.getNextArtifacts(context.completed));
const blocked = context.graph.getBlocked(context.completed);
@@ -264,6 +296,7 @@ export function formatChangeStatus(context: ChangeContext): ChangeStatus {
changeName: context.changeName,
schemaName: context.schemaName,
isComplete: context.graph.isComplete(context.completed),
applyRequires,
artifacts: artifactStatuses,
};
}
+68
View File
@@ -156,3 +156,71 @@ export function listSchemas(): string[] {
return Array.from(schemas).sort();
}
/**
* Schema info with metadata (name, description, artifacts).
*/
export interface SchemaInfo {
name: string;
description: string;
artifacts: string[];
source: 'package' | 'user';
}
/**
* Lists all available schemas with their descriptions and artifact lists.
* Useful for agent skills to present schema selection to users.
*/
export function listSchemasWithInfo(): SchemaInfo[] {
const schemas: SchemaInfo[] = [];
const seenNames = new Set<string>();
// Add user override schemas first (they take precedence)
const userDir = getUserSchemasDir();
if (fs.existsSync(userDir)) {
for (const entry of fs.readdirSync(userDir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
const schemaPath = path.join(userDir, entry.name, 'schema.yaml');
if (fs.existsSync(schemaPath)) {
try {
const schema = parseSchema(fs.readFileSync(schemaPath, 'utf-8'));
schemas.push({
name: entry.name,
description: schema.description || '',
artifacts: schema.artifacts.map((a) => a.id),
source: 'user',
});
seenNames.add(entry.name);
} catch {
// Skip invalid schemas
}
}
}
}
}
// Add package built-in schemas (if not overridden)
const packageDir = getPackageSchemasDir();
if (fs.existsSync(packageDir)) {
for (const entry of fs.readdirSync(packageDir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
if (entry.isDirectory() && !seenNames.has(entry.name)) {
const schemaPath = path.join(packageDir, entry.name, 'schema.yaml');
if (fs.existsSync(schemaPath)) {
try {
const schema = parseSchema(fs.readFileSync(schemaPath, 'utf-8'));
schemas.push({
name: entry.name,
description: schema.description || '',
artifacts: schema.artifacts.map((a) => a.id),
source: 'package',
});
} catch {
// Skip invalid schemas
}
}
}
}
}
return schemas.sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name));
}
+32
View File
@@ -6,21 +6,53 @@ export const ArtifactSchema = z.object({
generates: z.string().min(1, { error: 'generates field is required' }),
description: z.string(),
template: z.string().min(1, { error: 'template field is required' }),
instruction: z.string().optional(),
requires: z.array(z.string()).default([]),
});
// Apply phase configuration for schema-aware apply instructions
export const ApplyPhaseSchema = z.object({
// Artifact IDs that must exist before apply is available
requires: z.array(z.string()).min(1, { error: 'At least one required artifact' }),
// Path to file with checkboxes for progress (relative to change dir), or null if no tracking
tracks: z.string().nullable().optional(),
// Custom guidance for the apply phase
instruction: z.string().optional(),
});
// Full schema YAML structure
export const SchemaYamlSchema = z.object({
name: z.string().min(1, { error: 'Schema name is required' }),
version: z.number().int().positive({ error: 'Version must be a positive integer' }),
description: z.string().optional(),
artifacts: z.array(ArtifactSchema).min(1, { error: 'At least one artifact required' }),
// Optional apply phase configuration (for schema-aware apply instructions)
apply: ApplyPhaseSchema.optional(),
});
// Derived TypeScript types
export type Artifact = z.infer<typeof ArtifactSchema>;
export type ApplyPhase = z.infer<typeof ApplyPhaseSchema>;
export type SchemaYaml = z.infer<typeof SchemaYamlSchema>;
// Per-change metadata schema
// Note: schema field is validated at parse time against available schemas
// using a lazy import to avoid circular dependencies
export const ChangeMetadataSchema = z.object({
// Required: which workflow schema this change uses
schema: z.string().min(1, { message: 'schema is required' }),
// Optional: creation timestamp (ISO date string)
created: z
.string()
.regex(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/, {
message: 'created must be YYYY-MM-DD format',
})
.optional(),
});
export type ChangeMetadata = z.infer<typeof ChangeMetadataSchema>;
// Runtime state types (not Zod - internal only)
// Slice 1: Simple completion tracking via filesystem
+7 -1
View File
@@ -284,7 +284,13 @@ export const COMMAND_REGISTRY: CommandDefinition[] = [
description: 'Uninstall completion script for a shell',
acceptsPositional: true,
positionalType: 'shell',
flags: [],
flags: [
{
name: 'yes',
short: 'y',
description: 'Skip confirmation prompts',
},
],
},
],
},
+37 -5
View File
@@ -1,8 +1,31 @@
import { CompletionGenerator } from './types.js';
import { ZshGenerator } from './generators/zsh-generator.js';
import { ZshInstaller, InstallationResult } from './installers/zsh-installer.js';
import { BashGenerator } from './generators/bash-generator.js';
import { FishGenerator } from './generators/fish-generator.js';
import { PowerShellGenerator } from './generators/powershell-generator.js';
import { ZshInstaller } from './installers/zsh-installer.js';
import { BashInstaller } from './installers/bash-installer.js';
import { FishInstaller } from './installers/fish-installer.js';
import { PowerShellInstaller } from './installers/powershell-installer.js';
import { SupportedShell } from '../../utils/shell-detection.js';
/**
* Common installation result interface
*/
export interface InstallationResult {
success: boolean;
installedPath?: string;
backupPath?: string;
message: string;
instructions?: string[];
warnings?: string[];
// Shell-specific optional fields
isOhMyZsh?: boolean;
zshrcConfigured?: boolean;
bashrcConfigured?: boolean;
profileConfigured?: boolean;
}
/**
* Interface for completion installers
*/
@@ -11,15 +34,12 @@ export interface CompletionInstaller {
uninstall(): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }>;
}
// Re-export InstallationResult for convenience
export type { InstallationResult };
/**
* Factory for creating completion generators and installers
* This design makes it easy to add support for additional shells
*/
export class CompletionFactory {
private static readonly SUPPORTED_SHELLS: SupportedShell[] = ['zsh'];
private static readonly SUPPORTED_SHELLS: SupportedShell[] = ['zsh', 'bash', 'fish', 'powershell'];
/**
* Create a completion generator for the specified shell
@@ -32,6 +52,12 @@ export class CompletionFactory {
switch (shell) {
case 'zsh':
return new ZshGenerator();
case 'bash':
return new BashGenerator();
case 'fish':
return new FishGenerator();
case 'powershell':
return new PowerShellGenerator();
default:
throw new Error(`Unsupported shell: ${shell}`);
}
@@ -48,6 +74,12 @@ export class CompletionFactory {
switch (shell) {
case 'zsh':
return new ZshInstaller();
case 'bash':
return new BashInstaller();
case 'fish':
return new FishInstaller();
case 'powershell':
return new PowerShellInstaller();
default:
throw new Error(`Unsupported shell: ${shell}`);
}
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
import { CompletionGenerator, CommandDefinition, FlagDefinition } from '../types.js';
import { BASH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS } from '../templates/bash-templates.js';
/**
* Generates Bash completion scripts for the OpenSpec CLI.
* Follows Bash completion conventions using complete builtin and COMPREPLY array.
*/
export class BashGenerator implements CompletionGenerator {
readonly shell = 'bash' as const;
/**
* Generate a Bash completion script
*
* @param commands - Command definitions to generate completions for
* @returns Bash completion script as a string
*/
generate(commands: CommandDefinition[]): string {
// Build command list for top-level completions
const commandList = commands.map(c => this.escapeCommandName(c.name)).join(' ');
// Build command cases using push() for loop clarity
const caseLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
caseLines.push(` ${cmd.name})`);
caseLines.push(...this.generateCommandCase(cmd, ' '));
caseLines.push(' ;;');
}
const commandCases = caseLines.join('\n');
// Dynamic completion helpers from template
const helpers = BASH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS;
// Assemble final script with template literal
return `# Bash completion script for OpenSpec CLI
# Auto-generated - do not edit manually
_openspec_completion() {
local cur prev words cword
# Use _init_completion if available (from bash-completion package)
# The -n : option prevents colons from being treated as word separators
# (important for spec/change IDs that may contain colons)
# Otherwise, fall back to manual initialization
if declare -F _init_completion >/dev/null 2>&1; then
_init_completion -n : || return
else
# Manual fallback when bash-completion is not installed
COMPREPLY=()
cur="\${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}"
prev="\${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD-1]}"
words=("\${COMP_WORDS[@]}")
cword=$COMP_CWORD
fi
local cmd="\${words[1]}"
local subcmd="\${words[2]}"
# Top-level commands
if [[ $cword -eq 1 ]]; then
local commands="${commandList}"
COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$commands" -- "$cur"))
return 0
fi
# Command-specific completion
case "$cmd" in
${commandCases}
esac
return 0
}
${helpers}
complete -F _openspec_completion openspec
`;
}
/**
* Generate completion case logic for a command
*/
private generateCommandCase(cmd: CommandDefinition, indent: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
// Handle subcommands
if (cmd.subcommands && cmd.subcommands.length > 0) {
// First, check if user is typing a flag for the parent command
if (cmd.flags.length > 0) {
lines.push(`${indent}if [[ "$cur" == -* ]]; then`);
const flags = cmd.flags.map(f => {
const parts: string[] = [];
if (f.short) parts.push(`-${f.short}`);
parts.push(`--${f.name}`);
return parts.join(' ');
}).join(' ');
lines.push(`${indent} local flags="${flags}"`);
lines.push(`${indent} COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$flags" -- "$cur"))`);
lines.push(`${indent} return 0`);
lines.push(`${indent}fi`);
lines.push('');
}
lines.push(`${indent}if [[ $cword -eq 2 ]]; then`);
lines.push(`${indent} local subcommands="` + cmd.subcommands.map(s => this.escapeCommandName(s.name)).join(' ') + '"');
lines.push(`${indent} COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$subcommands" -- "$cur"))`);
lines.push(`${indent} return 0`);
lines.push(`${indent}fi`);
lines.push('');
lines.push(`${indent}case "$subcmd" in`);
for (const subcmd of cmd.subcommands) {
lines.push(`${indent} ${subcmd.name})`);
lines.push(...this.generateArgumentCompletion(subcmd, indent + ' '));
lines.push(`${indent} ;;`);
}
lines.push(`${indent}esac`);
} else {
// No subcommands, just complete arguments
lines.push(...this.generateArgumentCompletion(cmd, indent));
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Generate argument completion (flags and positional arguments)
*/
private generateArgumentCompletion(cmd: CommandDefinition, indent: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
// Check for flag completion
if (cmd.flags.length > 0) {
lines.push(`${indent}if [[ "$cur" == -* ]]; then`);
const flags = cmd.flags.map(f => {
const parts: string[] = [];
if (f.short) parts.push(`-${f.short}`);
parts.push(`--${f.name}`);
return parts.join(' ');
}).join(' ');
lines.push(`${indent} local flags="${flags}"`);
lines.push(`${indent} COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$flags" -- "$cur"))`);
lines.push(`${indent} return 0`);
lines.push(`${indent}fi`);
lines.push('');
}
// Handle positional completions
if (cmd.acceptsPositional) {
lines.push(...this.generatePositionalCompletion(cmd.positionalType, indent));
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Generate positional argument completion based on type
*/
private generatePositionalCompletion(positionalType: string | undefined, indent: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
switch (positionalType) {
case 'change-id':
lines.push(`${indent}_openspec_complete_changes`);
break;
case 'spec-id':
lines.push(`${indent}_openspec_complete_specs`);
break;
case 'change-or-spec-id':
lines.push(`${indent}_openspec_complete_items`);
break;
case 'shell':
lines.push(`${indent}local shells="zsh bash fish powershell"`);
lines.push(`${indent}COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$shells" -- "$cur"))`);
break;
case 'path':
lines.push(`${indent}COMPREPLY=($(compgen -f -- "$cur"))`);
break;
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Escape command/subcommand names for safe use in Bash scripts
*/
private escapeCommandName(name: string): string {
// Escape shell metacharacters to prevent command injection
return name.replace(/["\$`\\]/g, '\\$&');
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
import { CompletionGenerator, CommandDefinition, FlagDefinition } from '../types.js';
import { FISH_STATIC_HELPERS, FISH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS } from '../templates/fish-templates.js';
/**
* Generates Fish completion scripts for the OpenSpec CLI.
* Follows Fish completion conventions using the complete command.
*/
export class FishGenerator implements CompletionGenerator {
readonly shell = 'fish' as const;
/**
* Generate a Fish completion script
*
* @param commands - Command definitions to generate completions for
* @returns Fish completion script as a string
*/
generate(commands: CommandDefinition[]): string {
// Build top-level commands using push() for loop clarity
const topLevelLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
topLevelLines.push(`# ${cmd.name} command`);
topLevelLines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '__fish_openspec_no_subcommand' -a '${cmd.name}' -d '${this.escapeDescription(cmd.description)}'`
);
}
const topLevelCommands = topLevelLines.join('\n');
// Build command-specific completions using push() for loop clarity
const commandCompletionLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
commandCompletionLines.push(...this.generateCommandCompletions(cmd));
commandCompletionLines.push('');
}
const commandCompletions = commandCompletionLines.join('\n');
// Static helper functions from template
const helperFunctions = FISH_STATIC_HELPERS;
// Dynamic completion helpers from template
const dynamicHelpers = FISH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS;
// Assemble final script with template literal
return `# Fish completion script for OpenSpec CLI
# Auto-generated - do not edit manually
${helperFunctions}
${dynamicHelpers}
${topLevelCommands}
${commandCompletions}`;
}
/**
* Generate completions for a specific command
*/
private generateCommandCompletions(cmd: CommandDefinition): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
// If command has subcommands
if (cmd.subcommands && cmd.subcommands.length > 0) {
// Add subcommand completions
for (const subcmd of cmd.subcommands) {
lines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '__fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${cmd.name}; and not __fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${subcmd.name}' -a '${subcmd.name}' -d '${this.escapeDescription(subcmd.description)}'`
);
}
lines.push('');
// Add flags for parent command
for (const flag of cmd.flags) {
lines.push(...this.generateFlagCompletion(flag, `__fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${cmd.name}`));
}
// Add completions for each subcommand
for (const subcmd of cmd.subcommands) {
lines.push(`# ${cmd.name} ${subcmd.name} flags`);
for (const flag of subcmd.flags) {
lines.push(...this.generateFlagCompletion(flag, `__fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${cmd.name}; and __fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${subcmd.name}`));
}
// Add positional completions for subcommand
if (subcmd.acceptsPositional) {
lines.push(...this.generatePositionalCompletion(subcmd.positionalType, `__fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${cmd.name}; and __fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${subcmd.name}`));
}
}
} else {
// Command without subcommands
lines.push(`# ${cmd.name} flags`);
for (const flag of cmd.flags) {
lines.push(...this.generateFlagCompletion(flag, `__fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${cmd.name}`));
}
// Add positional completions
if (cmd.acceptsPositional) {
lines.push(...this.generatePositionalCompletion(cmd.positionalType, `__fish_openspec_using_subcommand ${cmd.name}`));
}
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Generate flag completion
*/
private generateFlagCompletion(flag: FlagDefinition, condition: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
const longFlag = `--${flag.name}`;
const shortFlag = flag.short ? `-${flag.short}` : undefined;
if (flag.takesValue && flag.values) {
// Flag with enum values
for (const value of flag.values) {
if (shortFlag) {
lines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -s ${flag.short} -l ${flag.name} -a '${value}' -d '${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}'`
);
} else {
lines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -l ${flag.name} -a '${value}' -d '${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}'`
);
}
}
} else if (flag.takesValue) {
// Flag that takes a value but no specific values defined
if (shortFlag) {
lines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -s ${flag.short} -l ${flag.name} -r -d '${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}'`
);
} else {
lines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -l ${flag.name} -r -d '${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}'`
);
}
} else {
// Boolean flag
if (shortFlag) {
lines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -s ${flag.short} -l ${flag.name} -d '${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}'`
);
} else {
lines.push(
`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -l ${flag.name} -d '${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}'`
);
}
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Generate positional argument completion
*/
private generatePositionalCompletion(positionalType: string | undefined, condition: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
switch (positionalType) {
case 'change-id':
lines.push(`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -a '(__fish_openspec_changes)' -f`);
break;
case 'spec-id':
lines.push(`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -a '(__fish_openspec_specs)' -f`);
break;
case 'change-or-spec-id':
lines.push(`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -a '(__fish_openspec_items)' -f`);
break;
case 'shell':
lines.push(`complete -c openspec -n '${condition}' -a 'zsh bash fish powershell' -f`);
break;
case 'path':
// Fish automatically completes files, no need to specify
break;
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Escape description text for Fish
*/
private escapeDescription(description: string): string {
return description
.replace(/\\/g, '\\\\') // Backslashes first
.replace(/'/g, "\\'") // Single quotes
.replace(/\$/g, '\\$') // Dollar signs (prevents $())
.replace(/`/g, '\\`'); // Backticks
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
import { CompletionGenerator, CommandDefinition, FlagDefinition } from '../types.js';
import { POWERSHELL_DYNAMIC_HELPERS } from '../templates/powershell-templates.js';
/**
* Generates PowerShell completion scripts for the OpenSpec CLI.
* Uses Register-ArgumentCompleter for command completion.
*/
export class PowerShellGenerator implements CompletionGenerator {
readonly shell = 'powershell' as const;
/**
* Generate a PowerShell completion script
*
* @param commands - Command definitions to generate completions for
* @returns PowerShell completion script as a string
*/
generate(commands: CommandDefinition[]): string {
// Build top-level commands using push() for loop clarity
const commandLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
commandLines.push(` @{Name="${cmd.name}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(cmd.description)}"},`);
}
const topLevelCommands = commandLines.join('\n');
// Build command cases using push() for loop clarity
const commandCaseLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
commandCaseLines.push(` "${cmd.name}" {`);
commandCaseLines.push(...this.generateCommandCase(cmd, ' '));
commandCaseLines.push(' }');
}
const commandCases = commandCaseLines.join('\n');
// Dynamic completion helpers from template
const helpers = POWERSHELL_DYNAMIC_HELPERS;
// Assemble final script with template literal
return `# PowerShell completion script for OpenSpec CLI
# Auto-generated - do not edit manually
${helpers}
$openspecCompleter = {
param($wordToComplete, $commandAst, $cursorPosition)
$tokens = $commandAst.ToString() -split "\\s+"
$commandCount = ($tokens | Measure-Object).Count
# Top-level commands
if ($commandCount -eq 1 -or ($commandCount -eq 2 -and $wordToComplete)) {
$commands = @(
${topLevelCommands}
)
$commands | Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {
[System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_.Name, $_.Name, "ParameterValue", $_.Description)
}
return
}
$command = $tokens[1]
switch ($command) {
${commandCases}
}
}
Register-ArgumentCompleter -CommandName openspec -ScriptBlock $openspecCompleter
`;
}
/**
* Generate completion case for a command
*/
private generateCommandCase(cmd: CommandDefinition, indent: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
if (cmd.subcommands && cmd.subcommands.length > 0) {
// First, check if user is typing a flag for the parent command
if (cmd.flags.length > 0) {
lines.push(`${indent}if ($wordToComplete -like "-*") {`);
lines.push(`${indent} $flags = @(`);
for (const flag of cmd.flags) {
const longFlag = `--${flag.name}`;
const shortFlag = flag.short ? `-${flag.short}` : undefined;
if (shortFlag) {
lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${longFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${shortFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
} else {
lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${longFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
}
}
lines.push(`${indent} )`);
lines.push(`${indent} $flags | Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_.Name, $_.Name, "ParameterName", $_.Description)`);
lines.push(`${indent} }`);
lines.push(`${indent} return`);
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
lines.push('');
}
// Handle subcommands
lines.push(`${indent}if ($commandCount -eq 2 -or ($commandCount -eq 3 -and $wordToComplete)) {`);
lines.push(`${indent} $subcommands = @(`);
for (const subcmd of cmd.subcommands) {
lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${subcmd.name}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(subcmd.description)}"},`);
}
lines.push(`${indent} )`);
lines.push(`${indent} $subcommands | Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_.Name, $_.Name, "ParameterValue", $_.Description)`);
lines.push(`${indent} }`);
lines.push(`${indent} return`);
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
lines.push('');
lines.push(`${indent}$subcommand = if ($commandCount -gt 2) { $tokens[2] } else { "" }`);
lines.push(`${indent}switch ($subcommand) {`);
for (const subcmd of cmd.subcommands) {
lines.push(`${indent} "${subcmd.name}" {`);
lines.push(...this.generateArgumentCompletion(subcmd, indent + ' '));
lines.push(`${indent} }`);
}
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
} else {
// No subcommands
lines.push(...this.generateArgumentCompletion(cmd, indent));
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Generate argument completion (flags and positional)
*/
private generateArgumentCompletion(cmd: CommandDefinition, indent: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
// Flag completion
if (cmd.flags.length > 0) {
lines.push(`${indent}if ($wordToComplete -like "-*") {`);
lines.push(`${indent} $flags = @(`);
for (const flag of cmd.flags) {
const longFlag = `--${flag.name}`;
const shortFlag = flag.short ? `-${flag.short}` : undefined;
if (shortFlag) {
lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${longFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${shortFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
} else {
lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${longFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
}
}
lines.push(`${indent} )`);
lines.push(`${indent} $flags | Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_.Name, $_.Name, "ParameterName", $_.Description)`);
lines.push(`${indent} }`);
lines.push(`${indent} return`);
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
lines.push('');
}
// Positional completion
if (cmd.acceptsPositional) {
lines.push(...this.generatePositionalCompletion(cmd.positionalType, indent));
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Generate positional argument completion
*/
private generatePositionalCompletion(positionalType: string | undefined, indent: string): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
switch (positionalType) {
case 'change-id':
lines.push(`${indent}Get-OpenSpecChanges | Where-Object { $_ -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_, $_, "ParameterValue", "Change: $_")`);
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
break;
case 'spec-id':
lines.push(`${indent}Get-OpenSpecSpecs | Where-Object { $_ -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_, $_, "ParameterValue", "Spec: $_")`);
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
break;
case 'change-or-spec-id':
lines.push(`${indent}$items = @(Get-OpenSpecChanges) + @(Get-OpenSpecSpecs)`);
lines.push(`${indent}$items | Where-Object { $_ -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_, $_, "ParameterValue", $_)`);
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
break;
case 'shell':
lines.push(`${indent}$shells = @("zsh", "bash", "fish", "powershell")`);
lines.push(`${indent}$shells | Where-Object { $_ -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_, $_, "ParameterValue", "Shell: $_")`);
lines.push(`${indent}}`);
break;
case 'path':
// PowerShell handles file path completion automatically
break;
}
return lines;
}
/**
* Escape description text for PowerShell
*/
private escapeDescription(description: string): string {
return description
.replace(/`/g, '``') // Backticks (escape sequences)
.replace(/\$/g, '`$') // Dollar signs (prevents $())
.replace(/"/g, '""'); // Double quotes
}
}
+48 -141
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import { CompletionGenerator, CommandDefinition, FlagDefinition } from '../types.js';
import { ZSH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS } from '../templates/zsh-templates.js';
/**
* Generates Zsh completion scripts for the OpenSpec CLI.
@@ -14,163 +15,69 @@ export class ZshGenerator implements CompletionGenerator {
* @returns Zsh completion script as a string
*/
generate(commands: CommandDefinition[]): string {
const script: string[] = [];
// Header comment
script.push('#compdef openspec');
script.push('');
script.push('# Zsh completion script for OpenSpec CLI');
script.push('# Auto-generated - do not edit manually');
script.push('');
// Main completion function
script.push('_openspec() {');
script.push(' local context state line');
script.push(' typeset -A opt_args');
script.push('');
// Generate main command argument specification
script.push(' local -a commands');
script.push(' commands=(');
// Build command list using push() for loop clarity
const commandLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
const escapedDesc = this.escapeDescription(cmd.description);
script.push(` '${cmd.name}:${escapedDesc}'`);
commandLines.push(` '${cmd.name}:${escapedDesc}'`);
}
script.push(' )');
script.push('');
const commandList = commandLines.join('\n');
// Main _arguments call
script.push(' _arguments -C \\');
script.push(' "1: :->command" \\');
script.push(' "*::arg:->args"');
script.push('');
// Command dispatch logic
script.push(' case $state in');
script.push(' command)');
script.push(' _describe "openspec command" commands');
script.push(' ;;');
script.push(' args)');
script.push(' case $words[1] in');
// Generate completion for each command
// Build command cases using push() for loop clarity
const commandCaseLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
script.push(` ${cmd.name})`);
script.push(` _openspec_${this.sanitizeFunctionName(cmd.name)}`);
script.push(' ;;');
commandCaseLines.push(` ${cmd.name})`);
commandCaseLines.push(` _openspec_${this.sanitizeFunctionName(cmd.name)}`);
commandCaseLines.push(' ;;');
}
const commandCases = commandCaseLines.join('\n');
script.push(' esac');
script.push(' ;;');
script.push(' esac');
script.push('}');
script.push('');
// Generate individual command completion functions
// Build command functions using push() for loop clarity
const commandFunctionLines: string[] = [];
for (const cmd of commands) {
script.push(...this.generateCommandFunction(cmd));
script.push('');
commandFunctionLines.push(...this.generateCommandFunction(cmd));
commandFunctionLines.push('');
}
const commandFunctions = commandFunctionLines.join('\n');
// Add dynamic completion helper functions
script.push(...this.generateDynamicCompletionHelpers());
// Dynamic completion helpers from template
const helpers = ZSH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS;
// Register the completion function
script.push('compdef _openspec openspec');
script.push('');
// Assemble final script with template literal
return `#compdef openspec
return script.join('\n');
}
# Zsh completion script for OpenSpec CLI
# Auto-generated - do not edit manually
/**
* Generate a single completion function
*
* @param functionName - Name of the completion function
* @param varName - Name of the local array variable
* @param varLabel - Label for the completion items
* @param commandLines - Command line(s) to populate the array
* @param comment - Optional comment describing the function
*/
private generateCompletionFunction(
functionName: string,
varName: string,
varLabel: string,
commandLines: string[],
comment?: string
): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
_openspec() {
local context state line
typeset -A opt_args
if (comment) {
lines.push(comment);
}
local -a commands
commands=(
${commandList}
)
lines.push(`${functionName}() {`);
lines.push(` local -a ${varName}`);
_arguments -C \\
"1: :->command" \\
"*::arg:->args"
if (commandLines.length === 1) {
lines.push(` ${commandLines[0]}`);
} else {
lines.push(` ${varName}=(`);
for (let i = 0; i < commandLines.length; i++) {
const suffix = i < commandLines.length - 1 ? ' \\' : '';
lines.push(` ${commandLines[i]}${suffix}`);
}
lines.push(' )');
}
case $state in
command)
_describe "openspec command" commands
;;
args)
case $words[1] in
${commandCases}
esac
;;
esac
}
lines.push(` _describe "${varLabel}" ${varName}`);
lines.push('}');
lines.push('');
return lines;
}
/**
* Generate dynamic completion helper functions for change and spec IDs
*/
private generateDynamicCompletionHelpers(): string[] {
const lines: string[] = [];
lines.push('# Dynamic completion helpers');
lines.push('');
// Helper function for completing change IDs
lines.push('# Use openspec __complete to get available changes');
lines.push('_openspec_complete_changes() {');
lines.push(' local -a changes');
lines.push(' while IFS=$\'\\t\' read -r id desc; do');
lines.push(' changes+=("$id:$desc")');
lines.push(' done < <(openspec __complete changes 2>/dev/null)');
lines.push(' _describe "change" changes');
lines.push('}');
lines.push('');
// Helper function for completing spec IDs
lines.push('# Use openspec __complete to get available specs');
lines.push('_openspec_complete_specs() {');
lines.push(' local -a specs');
lines.push(' while IFS=$\'\\t\' read -r id desc; do');
lines.push(' specs+=("$id:$desc")');
lines.push(' done < <(openspec __complete specs 2>/dev/null)');
lines.push(' _describe "spec" specs');
lines.push('}');
lines.push('');
// Helper function for completing both changes and specs
lines.push('# Get both changes and specs');
lines.push('_openspec_complete_items() {');
lines.push(' local -a items');
lines.push(' while IFS=$\'\\t\' read -r id desc; do');
lines.push(' items+=("$id:$desc")');
lines.push(' done < <(openspec __complete changes 2>/dev/null)');
lines.push(' while IFS=$\'\\t\' read -r id desc; do');
lines.push(' items+=("$id:$desc")');
lines.push(' done < <(openspec __complete specs 2>/dev/null)');
lines.push(' _describe "item" items');
lines.push('}');
lines.push('');
return lines;
${commandFunctions}
${helpers}
compdef _openspec openspec
`;
}
/**
@@ -337,7 +244,7 @@ export class ZshGenerator implements CompletionGenerator {
case 'path':
return "'*:path:_files'";
case 'shell':
return "'*:shell:(zsh)'";
return "'*:shell:(zsh bash fish powershell)'";
default:
return "'*: :_default'";
}
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
import { promises as fs } from 'fs';
import path from 'path';
import os from 'os';
import { FileSystemUtils } from '../../../utils/file-system.js';
import { InstallationResult } from '../factory.js';
/**
* Installer for Bash completion scripts.
* Supports bash-completion package and standalone installations.
*/
export class BashInstaller {
private readonly homeDir: string;
/**
* Markers for .bashrc configuration management
*/
private readonly BASHRC_MARKERS = {
start: '# OPENSPEC:START',
end: '# OPENSPEC:END',
};
constructor(homeDir: string = os.homedir()) {
this.homeDir = homeDir;
}
/**
* Check if bash-completion is installed
*
* @returns true if bash-completion directories exist
*/
async isBashCompletionInstalled(): Promise<boolean> {
const paths = [
'/usr/share/bash-completion', // Linux system-wide
'/usr/local/share/bash-completion', // Homebrew Intel (main)
'/opt/homebrew/etc/bash_completion.d', // Homebrew Apple Silicon
'/usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d', // Homebrew Intel (alt path)
'/etc/bash_completion.d', // Legacy fallback
];
for (const p of paths) {
try {
const stat = await fs.stat(p);
if (stat.isDirectory()) {
return true;
}
} catch {
// Continue checking other paths
}
}
return false;
}
/**
* Get the appropriate installation path for the completion script
*
* @returns Installation path
*/
async getInstallationPath(): Promise<string> {
// Try user-local bash-completion directory first
const localCompletionDir = path.join(this.homeDir, '.local', 'share', 'bash-completion', 'completions');
// For user installation, use local directory
return path.join(localCompletionDir, 'openspec');
}
/**
* Backup an existing completion file if it exists
*
* @param targetPath - Path to the file to backup
* @returns Path to the backup file, or undefined if no backup was needed
*/
async backupExistingFile(targetPath: string): Promise<string | undefined> {
try {
await fs.access(targetPath);
// File exists, create a backup
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-');
const backupPath = `${targetPath}.backup-${timestamp}`;
await fs.copyFile(targetPath, backupPath);
return backupPath;
} catch {
// File doesn't exist, no backup needed
return undefined;
}
}
/**
* Get the path to .bashrc file
*
* @returns Path to .bashrc
*/
private getBashrcPath(): string {
return path.join(this.homeDir, '.bashrc');
}
/**
* Generate .bashrc configuration content
*
* @param completionsDir - Directory containing completion scripts
* @returns Configuration content
*/
private generateBashrcConfig(completionsDir: string): string {
return [
'# OpenSpec shell completions configuration',
`if [ -d "${completionsDir}" ]; then`,
` for f in "${completionsDir}"/*; do`,
' [ -f "$f" ] && . "$f"',
' done',
'fi',
].join('\n');
}
/**
* Configure .bashrc to enable completions
*
* @param completionsDir - Directory containing completion scripts
* @returns true if configured successfully, false otherwise
*/
async configureBashrc(completionsDir: string): Promise<boolean> {
// Check if auto-configuration is disabled
if (process.env.OPENSPEC_NO_AUTO_CONFIG === '1') {
return false;
}
try {
const bashrcPath = this.getBashrcPath();
const config = this.generateBashrcConfig(completionsDir);
// Check write permissions
const canWrite = await FileSystemUtils.canWriteFile(bashrcPath);
if (!canWrite) {
return false;
}
// Use marker-based update
await FileSystemUtils.updateFileWithMarkers(
bashrcPath,
config,
this.BASHRC_MARKERS.start,
this.BASHRC_MARKERS.end
);
return true;
} catch (error: any) {
// Fail gracefully - don't break installation
console.debug(`Unable to configure .bashrc for completions: ${error.message}`);
return false;
}
}
/**
* Remove .bashrc configuration
* Used during uninstallation
*
* @returns true if removed successfully, false otherwise
*/
async removeBashrcConfig(): Promise<boolean> {
try {
const bashrcPath = this.getBashrcPath();
// Check if file exists
try {
await fs.access(bashrcPath);
} catch {
// File doesn't exist, nothing to remove
return true;
}
// Read file content
const content = await fs.readFile(bashrcPath, 'utf-8');
// Check if markers exist
if (!content.includes(this.BASHRC_MARKERS.start) || !content.includes(this.BASHRC_MARKERS.end)) {
// Markers don't exist, nothing to remove
return true;
}
// Remove content between markers (including markers)
const lines = content.split('\n');
const startIndex = lines.findIndex((line) => line.trim() === this.BASHRC_MARKERS.start);
const endIndex = lines.findIndex((line) => line.trim() === this.BASHRC_MARKERS.end);
if (startIndex === -1 || endIndex === -1 || endIndex < startIndex) {
// Invalid marker placement
return false;
}
// Remove lines between markers (inclusive)
lines.splice(startIndex, endIndex - startIndex + 1);
// Remove trailing empty lines
while (lines.length > 0 && lines[lines.length - 1].trim() === '') {
lines.pop();
}
// Write back
await fs.writeFile(bashrcPath, lines.join('\n'), 'utf-8');
return true;
} catch (error: any) {
// Fail gracefully
console.debug(`Unable to remove .bashrc configuration: ${error.message}`);
return false;
}
}
/**
* Install the completion script
*
* @param completionScript - The completion script content to install
* @returns Installation result with status and instructions
*/
async install(completionScript: string): Promise<InstallationResult> {
try {
const targetPath = await this.getInstallationPath();
// Check for bash-completion package
const hasBashCompletion = await this.isBashCompletionInstalled();
// Check if already installed with same content
let isUpdate = false;
try {
const existingContent = await fs.readFile(targetPath, 'utf-8');
if (existingContent === completionScript) {
// Already installed and up to date
return {
success: true,
installedPath: targetPath,
message: 'Completion script is already installed (up to date)',
instructions: [
'The completion script is already installed and up to date.',
'If completions are not working, try: exec bash',
],
};
}
// File exists but content is different - this is an update
isUpdate = true;
} catch (error: any) {
// File doesn't exist or can't be read, proceed with installation
console.debug(`Unable to read existing completion file at ${targetPath}: ${error.message}`);
}
// Ensure the directory exists
const targetDir = path.dirname(targetPath);
await fs.mkdir(targetDir, { recursive: true });
// Backup existing file if updating
const backupPath = isUpdate ? await this.backupExistingFile(targetPath) : undefined;
// Write the completion script
await fs.writeFile(targetPath, completionScript, 'utf-8');
// Auto-configure .bashrc
const bashrcConfigured = await this.configureBashrc(targetDir);
// Generate instructions if .bashrc wasn't auto-configured
const instructions = bashrcConfigured ? undefined : this.generateInstructions(targetPath);
// Collect warnings
const warnings: string[] = [];
if (!hasBashCompletion) {
warnings.push(
'⚠️ Warning: bash-completion package not detected',
'',
'The completion script requires bash-completion to function.',
'Install it with:',
' brew install bash-completion@2',
'',
'Then add to your ~/.bash_profile:',
' [[ -r "/opt/homebrew/etc/profile.d/bash_completion.sh" ]] && . "/opt/homebrew/etc/profile.d/bash_completion.sh"'
);
}
// Determine appropriate message
let message: string;
if (isUpdate) {
message = backupPath
? 'Completion script updated successfully (previous version backed up)'
: 'Completion script updated successfully';
} else {
message = bashrcConfigured
? 'Completion script installed and .bashrc configured successfully'
: 'Completion script installed successfully for Bash';
}
return {
success: true,
installedPath: targetPath,
backupPath,
bashrcConfigured,
message,
instructions,
warnings: warnings.length > 0 ? warnings : undefined,
};
} catch (error) {
return {
success: false,
message: `Failed to install completion script: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
};
}
}
/**
* Generate user instructions for enabling completions
*
* @param installedPath - Path where the script was installed
* @returns Array of instruction strings
*/
private generateInstructions(installedPath: string): string[] {
const completionsDir = path.dirname(installedPath);
return [
'Completion script installed successfully.',
'',
'To enable completions, add the following to your ~/.bashrc file:',
'',
` # Source OpenSpec completions`,
` if [ -d "${completionsDir}" ]; then`,
` for f in "${completionsDir}"/*; do`,
' [ -f "$f" ] && . "$f"',
' done',
' fi',
'',
'Then restart your shell or run: exec bash',
];
}
/**
* Uninstall the completion script
*
* @param options - Optional uninstall options
* @param options.yes - Skip confirmation prompt (handled by command layer)
* @returns Uninstallation result
*/
async uninstall(options?: { yes?: boolean }): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }> {
try {
const targetPath = await this.getInstallationPath();
// Check if installed
try {
await fs.access(targetPath);
} catch {
return {
success: false,
message: 'Completion script is not installed',
};
}
// Remove the completion script
await fs.unlink(targetPath);
// Remove .bashrc configuration
await this.removeBashrcConfig();
return {
success: true,
message: 'Completion script uninstalled successfully',
};
} catch (error) {
return {
success: false,
message: `Failed to uninstall completion script: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
};
}
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
import { promises as fs } from 'fs';
import path from 'path';
import os from 'os';
import { InstallationResult } from '../factory.js';
/**
* Installer for Fish completion scripts.
* Fish automatically loads completions from ~/.config/fish/completions/
*/
export class FishInstaller {
private readonly homeDir: string;
constructor(homeDir: string = os.homedir()) {
this.homeDir = homeDir;
}
/**
* Get the installation path for Fish completions
*
* @returns Installation path
*/
getInstallationPath(): string {
return path.join(this.homeDir, '.config', 'fish', 'completions', 'openspec.fish');
}
/**
* Backup an existing completion file if it exists
*
* @param targetPath - Path to the file to backup
* @returns Path to the backup file, or undefined if no backup was needed
*/
async backupExistingFile(targetPath: string): Promise<string | undefined> {
try {
await fs.access(targetPath);
// File exists, create a backup
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-');
const backupPath = `${targetPath}.backup-${timestamp}`;
await fs.copyFile(targetPath, backupPath);
return backupPath;
} catch {
// File doesn't exist, no backup needed
return undefined;
}
}
/**
* Install the completion script
*
* @param completionScript - The completion script content to install
* @returns Installation result with status and instructions
*/
async install(completionScript: string): Promise<InstallationResult> {
try {
const targetPath = this.getInstallationPath();
// Check if already installed with same content
let isUpdate = false;
try {
const existingContent = await fs.readFile(targetPath, 'utf-8');
if (existingContent === completionScript) {
// Already installed and up to date
return {
success: true,
installedPath: targetPath,
message: 'Completion script is already installed (up to date)',
instructions: [
'The completion script is already installed and up to date.',
'Fish automatically loads completions - they should be available immediately.',
],
};
}
// File exists but content is different - this is an update
isUpdate = true;
} catch (error: any) {
// File doesn't exist or can't be read, proceed with installation
console.debug(`Unable to read existing completion file at ${targetPath}: ${error.message}`);
}
// Ensure the directory exists
const targetDir = path.dirname(targetPath);
await fs.mkdir(targetDir, { recursive: true });
// Backup existing file if updating
const backupPath = isUpdate ? await this.backupExistingFile(targetPath) : undefined;
// Write the completion script
await fs.writeFile(targetPath, completionScript, 'utf-8');
// Determine appropriate message
let message: string;
if (isUpdate) {
message = backupPath
? 'Completion script updated successfully (previous version backed up)'
: 'Completion script updated successfully';
} else {
message = 'Completion script installed successfully for Fish';
}
return {
success: true,
installedPath: targetPath,
backupPath,
message,
instructions: [
'Fish automatically loads completions from ~/.config/fish/completions/',
'Completions are available immediately - no shell restart needed.',
],
};
} catch (error) {
return {
success: false,
message: `Failed to install completion script: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
};
}
}
/**
* Uninstall the completion script
*
* @param options - Optional uninstall options
* @param options.yes - Skip confirmation prompt (handled by command layer)
* @returns Uninstallation result
*/
async uninstall(options?: { yes?: boolean }): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }> {
try {
const targetPath = this.getInstallationPath();
// Check if installed
try {
await fs.access(targetPath);
} catch {
return {
success: false,
message: 'Completion script is not installed',
};
}
// Remove the completion script
await fs.unlink(targetPath);
return {
success: true,
message: 'Completion script uninstalled successfully',
};
} catch (error) {
return {
success: false,
message: `Failed to uninstall completion script: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
};
}
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
import { promises as fs } from 'fs';
import path from 'path';
import os from 'os';
import { FileSystemUtils } from '../../../utils/file-system.js';
import { InstallationResult } from '../factory.js';
/**
* Installer for PowerShell completion scripts.
* Works with both Windows PowerShell 5.1 and PowerShell Core 7+
*/
export class PowerShellInstaller {
private readonly homeDir: string;
/**
* Markers for PowerShell profile configuration management
*/
private readonly PROFILE_MARKERS = {
start: '# OPENSPEC:START',
end: '# OPENSPEC:END',
};
constructor(homeDir: string = os.homedir()) {
this.homeDir = homeDir;
}
/**
* Get PowerShell profile path
* Prefers $PROFILE environment variable, falls back to platform defaults
*
* @returns Profile path
*/
getProfilePath(): string {
// Check $PROFILE environment variable (set when running in PowerShell)
if (process.env.PROFILE) {
return process.env.PROFILE;
}
// Fall back to platform-specific defaults
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
// Windows: Documents/PowerShell/Microsoft.PowerShell_profile.ps1
return path.join(this.homeDir, 'Documents', 'PowerShell', 'Microsoft.PowerShell_profile.ps1');
} else {
// macOS/Linux: .config/powershell/Microsoft.PowerShell_profile.ps1
return path.join(this.homeDir, '.config', 'powershell', 'Microsoft.PowerShell_profile.ps1');
}
}
/**
* Get all PowerShell profile paths to configure.
* On Windows, returns both PowerShell Core and Windows PowerShell 5.1 paths.
* On Unix, returns PowerShell Core path only.
*/
private getAllProfilePaths(): string[] {
// If PROFILE env var is set, use only that path
if (process.env.PROFILE) {
return [process.env.PROFILE];
}
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
return [
// PowerShell Core 6+ (cross-platform)
path.join(this.homeDir, 'Documents', 'PowerShell', 'Microsoft.PowerShell_profile.ps1'),
// Windows PowerShell 5.1 (Windows-only)
path.join(this.homeDir, 'Documents', 'WindowsPowerShell', 'Microsoft.PowerShell_profile.ps1'),
];
} else {
// Unix systems: PowerShell Core only
return [path.join(this.homeDir, '.config', 'powershell', 'Microsoft.PowerShell_profile.ps1')];
}
}
/**
* Get the installation path for the completion script
*
* @returns Installation path
*/
getInstallationPath(): string {
const profilePath = this.getProfilePath();
const profileDir = path.dirname(profilePath);
return path.join(profileDir, 'OpenSpecCompletion.ps1');
}
/**
* Backup an existing completion file if it exists
*
* @param targetPath - Path to the file to backup
* @returns Path to the backup file, or undefined if no backup was needed
*/
async backupExistingFile(targetPath: string): Promise<string | undefined> {
try {
await fs.access(targetPath);
// File exists, create a backup
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-');
const backupPath = `${targetPath}.backup-${timestamp}`;
await fs.copyFile(targetPath, backupPath);
return backupPath;
} catch {
// File doesn't exist, no backup needed
return undefined;
}
}
/**
* Generate PowerShell profile configuration content
*
* @param scriptPath - Path to the completion script
* @returns Configuration content
*/
private generateProfileConfig(scriptPath: string): string {
return [
'# OpenSpec shell completions configuration',
`if (Test-Path "${scriptPath}") {`,
` . "${scriptPath}"`,
'}',
].join('\n');
}
/**
* Configure PowerShell profile to source the completion script
*
* @param scriptPath - Path to the completion script
* @returns true if configured successfully, false otherwise
*/
async configureProfile(scriptPath: string): Promise<boolean> {
const profilePaths = this.getAllProfilePaths();
let anyConfigured = false;
for (const profilePath of profilePaths) {
try {
// Create profile file if it doesn't exist
const profileDir = path.dirname(profilePath);
await fs.mkdir(profileDir, { recursive: true });
let profileContent = '';
try {
profileContent = await fs.readFile(profilePath, 'utf-8');
} catch {
// Profile doesn't exist yet, that's fine
}
// Check if already configured
const scriptLine = `. "${scriptPath}"`;
if (profileContent.includes(scriptLine)) {
continue; // Already configured, skip
}
// Add OpenSpec completion configuration with markers
const openspecBlock = [
'',
'# OPENSPEC:START - OpenSpec completion (managed block, do not edit manually)',
scriptLine,
'# OPENSPEC:END',
'',
].join('\n');
const newContent = profileContent + openspecBlock;
await fs.writeFile(profilePath, newContent, 'utf-8');
anyConfigured = true;
} catch (error) {
// Continue to next profile if this one fails
console.warn(`Warning: Could not configure ${profilePath}: ${error}`);
}
}
return anyConfigured;
}
/**
* Remove PowerShell profile configuration
* Used during uninstallation
*
* @returns true if removed successfully, false otherwise
*/
async removeProfileConfig(): Promise<boolean> {
const profilePaths = this.getAllProfilePaths();
let anyRemoved = false;
for (const profilePath of profilePaths) {
try {
// Read profile content
let profileContent: string;
try {
profileContent = await fs.readFile(profilePath, 'utf-8');
} catch {
continue; // Profile doesn't exist, nothing to remove
}
// Remove OPENSPEC:START -> OPENSPEC:END block
const startMarker = '# OPENSPEC:START';
const endMarker = '# OPENSPEC:END';
const startIndex = profileContent.indexOf(startMarker);
if (startIndex === -1) {
continue; // No OpenSpec block found
}
const endIndex = profileContent.indexOf(endMarker, startIndex);
if (endIndex === -1) {
console.warn(`Warning: Found start marker but no end marker in ${profilePath}`);
continue;
}
// Remove the block (including markers and surrounding newlines)
const beforeBlock = profileContent.substring(0, startIndex);
const afterBlock = profileContent.substring(endIndex + endMarker.length);
// Clean up extra newlines
const newContent = (beforeBlock.trimEnd() + '\n' + afterBlock.trimStart()).trim() + '\n';
await fs.writeFile(profilePath, newContent, 'utf-8');
anyRemoved = true;
} catch (error) {
console.warn(`Warning: Could not clean ${profilePath}: ${error}`);
}
}
return anyRemoved;
}
/**
* Install the completion script
*
* @param completionScript - The completion script content to install
* @returns Installation result with status and instructions
*/
async install(completionScript: string): Promise<InstallationResult> {
try {
const targetPath = this.getInstallationPath();
// Check if already installed with same content
let isUpdate = false;
try {
const existingContent = await fs.readFile(targetPath, 'utf-8');
if (existingContent === completionScript) {
// Already installed and up to date
return {
success: true,
installedPath: targetPath,
message: 'Completion script is already installed (up to date)',
instructions: [
'The completion script is already installed and up to date.',
'If completions are not working, try restarting PowerShell or run: . $PROFILE',
],
};
}
// File exists but content is different - this is an update
isUpdate = true;
} catch (error: any) {
// File doesn't exist or can't be read, proceed with installation
console.debug(`Unable to read existing completion file at ${targetPath}: ${error.message}`);
}
// Ensure the directory exists
const targetDir = path.dirname(targetPath);
await fs.mkdir(targetDir, { recursive: true });
// Backup existing file if updating
const backupPath = isUpdate ? await this.backupExistingFile(targetPath) : undefined;
// Write the completion script
await fs.writeFile(targetPath, completionScript, 'utf-8');
// Auto-configure PowerShell profile
const profileConfigured = await this.configureProfile(targetPath);
// Generate instructions if profile wasn't auto-configured
const instructions = profileConfigured ? undefined : this.generateInstructions(targetPath);
// Determine appropriate message
let message: string;
if (isUpdate) {
message = backupPath
? 'Completion script updated successfully (previous version backed up)'
: 'Completion script updated successfully';
} else {
message = profileConfigured
? 'Completion script installed and PowerShell profile configured successfully'
: 'Completion script installed successfully for PowerShell';
}
return {
success: true,
installedPath: targetPath,
backupPath,
profileConfigured,
message,
instructions,
};
} catch (error) {
return {
success: false,
message: `Failed to install completion script: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
};
}
}
/**
* Generate user instructions for enabling completions
*
* @param installedPath - Path where the script was installed
* @returns Array of instruction strings
*/
private generateInstructions(installedPath: string): string[] {
const profilePath = this.getProfilePath();
return [
'Completion script installed successfully.',
'',
`To enable completions, add the following to your PowerShell profile (${profilePath}):`,
'',
' # Source OpenSpec completions',
` if (Test-Path "${installedPath}") {`,
` . "${installedPath}"`,
' }',
'',
'Then restart PowerShell or run: . $PROFILE',
];
}
/**
* Uninstall the completion script
*
* @param options - Optional uninstall options
* @param options.yes - Skip confirmation prompt (handled by command layer)
* @returns Uninstallation result
*/
async uninstall(options?: { yes?: boolean }): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }> {
try {
const targetPath = this.getInstallationPath();
// Check if installed
try {
await fs.access(targetPath);
} catch {
return {
success: false,
message: 'Completion script is not installed',
};
}
// Remove the completion script
await fs.unlink(targetPath);
// Remove profile configuration
await this.removeProfileConfig();
return {
success: true,
message: 'Completion script uninstalled successfully',
};
} catch (error) {
return {
success: false,
message: `Failed to uninstall completion script: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
};
}
}
}
@@ -2,19 +2,7 @@ import { promises as fs } from 'fs';
import path from 'path';
import os from 'os';
import { FileSystemUtils } from '../../../utils/file-system.js';
/**
* Installation result information
*/
export interface InstallationResult {
success: boolean;
installedPath?: string;
backupPath?: string;
isOhMyZsh: boolean;
zshrcConfigured?: boolean;
message: string;
instructions?: string[];
}
import { InstallationResult } from '../factory.js';
/**
* Installer for Zsh completion scripts.
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
/**
* Static template strings for Bash completion scripts.
* These are Bash-specific helper functions that never change.
*/
export const BASH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS = `# Dynamic completion helpers
_openspec_complete_changes() {
local changes
changes=$(openspec __complete changes 2>/dev/null | cut -f1)
COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$changes" -- "$cur"))
}
_openspec_complete_specs() {
local specs
specs=$(openspec __complete specs 2>/dev/null | cut -f1)
COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$specs" -- "$cur"))
}
_openspec_complete_items() {
local items
items=$(openspec __complete changes 2>/dev/null | cut -f1; openspec __complete specs 2>/dev/null | cut -f1)
COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "$items" -- "$cur"))
}`;
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
/**
* Static template strings for Fish completion scripts.
* These are Fish-specific helper functions that never change.
*/
export const FISH_STATIC_HELPERS = `# Helper function to check if a subcommand is present
function __fish_openspec_using_subcommand
set -l cmd (commandline -opc)
set -e cmd[1]
for i in $argv
if contains -- $i $cmd
return 0
end
end
return 1
end
function __fish_openspec_no_subcommand
set -l cmd (commandline -opc)
test (count $cmd) -eq 1
end`;
export const FISH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS = `# Dynamic completion helpers
function __fish_openspec_changes
openspec __complete changes 2>/dev/null | while read -l id desc
printf '%s\\t%s\\n' "$id" "$desc"
end
end
function __fish_openspec_specs
openspec __complete specs 2>/dev/null | while read -l id desc
printf '%s\\t%s\\n' "$id" "$desc"
end
end
function __fish_openspec_items
__fish_openspec_changes
__fish_openspec_specs
end`;
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
/**
* Static template strings for PowerShell completion scripts.
* These are PowerShell-specific helper functions that never change.
*/
export const POWERSHELL_DYNAMIC_HELPERS = `# Dynamic completion helpers
function Get-OpenSpecChanges {
$output = openspec __complete changes 2>$null
if ($output) {
$output | ForEach-Object {
($_ -split "\\t")[0]
}
}
}
function Get-OpenSpecSpecs {
$output = openspec __complete specs 2>$null
if ($output) {
$output | ForEach-Object {
($_ -split "\\t")[0]
}
}
}
`;
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
/**
* Static template strings for Zsh completion scripts.
* These are Zsh-specific helper functions that never change.
*/
export const ZSH_DYNAMIC_HELPERS = `# Dynamic completion helpers
# Use openspec __complete to get available changes
_openspec_complete_changes() {
local -a changes
while IFS=$'\\t' read -r id desc; do
changes+=("$id:$desc")
done < <(openspec __complete changes 2>/dev/null)
_describe "change" changes
}
# Use openspec __complete to get available specs
_openspec_complete_specs() {
local -a specs
while IFS=$'\\t' read -r id desc; do
specs+=("$id:$desc")
done < <(openspec __complete specs 2>/dev/null)
_describe "spec" specs
}
# Get both changes and specs
_openspec_complete_items() {
local -a items
while IFS=$'\\t' read -r id desc; do
items+=("$id:$desc")
done < <(openspec __complete changes 2>/dev/null)
while IFS=$'\\t' read -r id desc; do
items+=("$id:$desc")
done < <(openspec __complete specs 2>/dev/null)
_describe "item" items
}`;

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More