A dbt model is an ordinary .sql file whose dependencies are written
{{ ref('other_model') }} or {{ source('group','table') }}, never as
literal table names. The SQL grammar cannot read those -- FROM {{ ref(
'x') }} is a parse error to it -- so the dependency structure of an
entire dbt project was invisible to the graph.
extract_dbt.c runs as a sub-extractor inside the normal indexing
pipeline. Per qualifying file it emits one Model definition (named by
the file stem, dbt's own model identity) plus one usage per ref()/
source() call; pass_usages resolves those into model -> relation
lineage edges like any other reference.
Model is a relation label alongside Table and View, which is what makes
the rest work without new plumbing: registry seeding, the central
relation veto, the incremental surface hash, search ranking and the
architecture queries all pick it up from cbm_label_is_relation. Sharing
one label class also means a model's source('raw','customers') resolves
onto a Table declared in a plain DDL migration in the same repository,
so dbt lineage and SQL lineage form one graph rather than two, while
the veto keeps model names out of every non-lineage consumer.
The pass is self-gating: SQL files only, and only those carrying a real
ref()/source() call. The dbt builtins are themselves the evidence, which
is cheaper than a dbt_project.yml lookup and more precise -- templated
SQL that is not dbt (an Airflow {{ ds }} parameter) produces no Model
node and no usages even inside a dbt repository.
{% macro %} definitions are deliberately excluded: the vendored
tree-sitter-jinja2 grammar has no node types for {% %} statements, so
they can only be recovered by a hand-written scanner that cannot see
comments or find {% endmacro %} for a correct span. Filed as follow-up
rather than approximated.
Tests cover the lineage, the last-string-argument semantics of both
builtins, the gate (against a plain-SQL control extraction), plain DDL
staying untouched, and an end-to-end pipeline case asserting model ->
model across files, model -> Table onto plain DDL, and cross-language
isolation. Disabling the pass reddens three of them; removing Model from
the relation set breaks lineage outright.
Implements the lineage half of #575.
Co-authored-by: alexisperinger-ux <alexis.peringer@iss-stoxx.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Vogel <martin.vogel.tech@gmail.com>