A reporter brought a full ProcMon trace to #1856 and still could not say which
check refused their install. That is not their failing: the binary discards the
answer before printing it.
cli_activation_production_context_init() validates the cache, rendezvous and
log directories -- it is the emitter MOST likely to hold a useful detail -- and
it printed CLI_ACTIVATION_REFUSED_MESSAGE bare, through the raw sink rather
than cli_activation_diagnostic(). So the reader got "Check the errors above"
with nothing above. That is the exact dead end #1416 and #1537 already fixed;
the property was repaired on the paths that had tests and left broken on this
sibling, which had none. Route it through the attributing helper: the refusal
now names the transaction refusal note or cbm_daemon_ipc_validation_detail().
The remedy was also wrong for the reported shape. `icacls <dir> /remove:g <sid>`
cannot remove an INHERITED ACE, and the stock C:\ grant for Authenticated Users
reaches every new child directory exactly that way -- so a reporter following
our advice watches the command succeed and the refusal persist. The refusal now
says whether the ACE was inherited, and the advice names
`icacls <dir> /inheritance:r /grant:r "%USERNAME%":(OI)(CI)F` for that case.
No safety check is relaxed. An install directory writable by other accounts is
still refused; it is now refused in terms the reader can act on.
The new contract test guards the CLASS rather than this one call site: any
emitter of a refusal constant that bypasses the attributing helper fails it,
which is what would have caught this. It fails on the previous tree naming
src/cli/cli.c:750, plus the missing inherited-ACE report and the missing
/inheritance:r remedy.
Local: cli 314 passed; activation_transaction daemon_ipc daemon_bootstrap
daemon_version 110 passed, 1 skipped (user namespaces are Linux-only, runs on
the Linux leg); make -f Makefile.cbm lint-ci clean.
Reported by zaferavci1.
Refs #1856
Signed-off-by: Martin Vogel <martin.vogel.tech@gmail.com>
Martin Vogel
734906379f