Files
Rohit Ghumare dda194f840 fix(quiz): correct answer is always in the same position (slot B) (#381)
Every "Test Your Understanding" quiz placed the correct answer in option B.
Across the 2026 questions in 338 quiz files the correct answer sat at index 1
in 61.5% of cases (uniform would be ~25%), and 107 files had every answer at B,
making the quizzes guessable without reading them.

scripts/debias_quizzes.py rewrites each question's option order with a
deterministic, content-seeded permutation and updates the correct index to
follow the moved answer. It is idempotent: options are canonicalised to a sorted
base before permuting, so re-running produces byte-identical output. Questions
whose options reference each other by position ("all of the above", "both A and
B") are left untouched. The correct-answer value, the option set, and every
explanation are preserved exactly; only order and the index change.

Result: A 23.8% / B 26.3% / C 23.5% / D 26.4%.

The script doubles as a CI guard: `--check` exits non-zero if any quiz is not
de-biased, wired into the curriculum workflow so new lessons cannot regress.

Fixes #368
2026-08-01 14:24:15 +01:00

79 lines
3.2 KiB
JSON

{
"lesson": "80-checkpoint-sharded-resume",
"title": "Sharded Checkpoint and Atomic Resume",
"questions": [
{
"stage": "pre",
"question": "Why is gather-then-write the wrong checkpoint pattern at scale?",
"options": [
"All state passes through rank 0; write bandwidth is the slowest single link, not the aggregate, so a TB-scale write takes hours",
"It needs special hardware",
"It uses too much CPU",
"It looks ugly"
],
"correct": 0,
"explanation": "Sharded write scales with cluster size: 64 ranks writing in parallel finish in 1/64 the time of one rank writing the gathered state."
},
{
"stage": "pre",
"question": "What does the manifest record that the shard files cannot?",
"options": [
"world_size, schema version, per-shard sha256, and shard ownership; gives the loader a contract to validate before touching state",
"Hostname",
"Random numbers",
"Filesystem name"
],
"correct": 0,
"explanation": "Without the manifest the loader has to guess which shard belongs to which rank and trust the file count is right."
},
{
"stage": "check",
"question": "Why write to <name>.tmp and rename instead of writing directly?",
"options": [
"Required by torch",
"Faster",
"Saves memory",
"POSIX rename within a filesystem is atomic: a crash mid-write leaves the previous file untouched. Direct writes can leave half-finished checkpoints that poison the next resume"
],
"correct": 3,
"explanation": "Without atomic write a partial save plus an updated manifest pointing at it corrupts state on the next load."
},
{
"stage": "check",
"question": "What does sha256 per shard defend against?",
"options": [
"Slowdown",
"Network attacks",
"Partial or corrupted writes; verifying the hash on load catches truncated shards before they touch model state",
"Memory leak"
],
"correct": 2,
"explanation": "Without sha256 verification a truncated shard loads silently and corrupts the optimiser, surfacing later as NaN loss."
},
{
"stage": "check",
"question": "Why does the load path reject a world_size mismatch loudly?",
"options": [
"Resuming a 4-rank shard layout on 8 ranks silently misassigns shards; loud rejection forces the operator to use the cross-world-size rebalance path",
"Hardware needs it",
"Easier to code",
"Cosmetic"
],
"correct": 0,
"explanation": "The cross-world-size rebalance is a separate operation; silently splicing wrong sized shards corrupts state."
},
{
"stage": "post",
"question": "Why does production rotate checkpoints (keep last K)?",
"options": [
"Compression",
"Aesthetic",
"It does not",
"Without rotation the disk fills mid-run and the next checkpoint fails; rotation deletes the oldest before writing the new one, bounding disk usage"
],
"correct": 3,
"explanation": "Real runs keep 3-5 recent checkpoints; the oldest is dropped before each new save so the disk budget is fixed."
}
]
}