ai-engineering-from-scratch/phases/13-tools-and-protocols/31-mcp-conformance-versioning-and-operations/quiz.json

{
  "lesson": "31-mcp-conformance-versioning-and-operations",
  "title": "MCP Conformance Engineering: Versioning, Evidence, and Operations",
  "questions": [
    {
      "stage": "pre",
      "question": "Why is one successful SDK tools/list call insufficient conformance evidence?",
      "options": [
        "The normalized value may hide wire fields, version behavior, proxy changes, and invalid responses",
        "SDKs cannot call MCP tools",
        "A successful call always selects the legacy era",
        "Conformance applies only to Registry publishers"
      ],
      "correct": 0,
      "explanation": "Conformance must inspect the raw request and response, selected version era, intermediaries, and SDK transformation."
    },
    {
      "stage": "check",
      "question": "A modern probe returns JSON-RPC error -32021. What should a fallback-capable client do?",
      "options": [
        "Immediately send initialize for the legacy era",
        "Treat the peer as offline",
        "Keep the modern era and correct or report the missing capability declaration",
        "Ignore the error and retry without capabilities"
      ],
      "correct": 2,
      "explanation": "A recognized modern error proves modern behavior. It is correction evidence, not permission to downgrade."
    },
    {
      "stage": "check",
      "question": "How should a modern client handle a result with resultType complete and an unfamiliar additive field?",
      "options": [
        "Change resultType to input_required",
        "Reject every result containing an unknown key",
        "Accept the known result type and preserve or deliberately ignore the additive field according to its role",
        "Treat the unfamiliar field as a legacy handshake"
      ],
      "correct": 2,
      "explanation": "Additive fields support forward compatibility. They are different from an unknown lifecycle discriminator."
    },
    {
      "stage": "check",
      "question": "What is the required JSON-RPC response to a notification with no id?",
      "options": [
        "A server/discover result",
        "No JSON-RPC response",
        "A complete result with null content",
        "An error with id null"
      ],
      "correct": 1,
      "explanation": "Notifications are one-way. The final transport serializer must not emit a JSON-RPC success or error."
    },
    {
      "stage": "post",
      "question": "Which evidence best proves that a proxy preserved an origin protocol error?",
      "options": [
        "Redacted ingress, origin, and egress status and body evidence with stable digests",
        "A screenshot of the gateway dashboard",
        "The SDK exception class alone",
        "The proxy process uptime"
      ],
      "correct": 0,
      "explanation": "Three-boundary evidence reveals status collapse, body rewriting, and the exact hop where behavior changed."
    },
    {
      "stage": "post",
      "question": "A candidate fails its negative transcripts and the previous version has no admission or health evidence. What should the release gate do?",
      "options": [
        "Select the newest Registry version",
        "Promote because golden transcripts passed",
        "Roll back to the package tagged latest",
        "Hold the release until an eligible rollback target or a corrected candidate is proven"
      ],
      "correct": 3,
      "explanation": "A rollback without exact admission and health evidence is another unverified release, so the safe action is to hold."
    }
  ]
}