mirror of
https://github.com/rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch.git
synced 2026-10-02 01:54:39 +08:00
* feat(phase-13/22): teach portable agent skill contracts Agent skills need a portable contract before host-specific metadata and runtime policy can be reasoned about. * fix(phase-13/23): make the ecosystem capstone accurate The capstone should model current A2A operations, portable artifact metadata, and deterministic trace timing. * feat(phase-13/24): teach skill discovery and disclosure A useful skill catalog needs explicit scope precedence and bounded progressive disclosure before instructions are loaded. * feat(phase-13/25): teach invocation policy and routing Human, model, application, and skill activation need separate policy decisions before relevance ranking can be trusted. * feat(phase-13/26): teach skill sandbox and trust boundaries Skill instructions are untrusted input, so authority must remain host-owned and every filesystem, network, and command boundary must fail closed. * feat(phase-13/27): add the skill release gate A distributable skill needs adversarial structure, routing, safety, artifact, provenance, installation, and portability evidence before release. * feat(skills): install and render complete skill bundles Progressive-disclosure skills must keep companion references, scripts, assets, and evals intact across discovery, installation, and lesson rendering. * docs(curriculum): index the agent skills mini-course The expanded Phase 13 sequence needs consistent lesson links, durations, translations, and shared terminology across every learner entry point. * feat(certification/11): teach stateless MCP integration Certification learners need the same stateless wire model as the production curriculum. * feat(phase-11/14): modernize MCP protocol contracts The foundational MCP lesson must no longer teach the removed session lifecycle. * fix(phase-13/01): align tool terms with stateless MCP The tool interface introduction should point to the current protocol vocabulary. * feat(phase-13/06): teach stateless MCP fundamentals Learners need the current per-request contract before building clients or servers. * feat(phase-13/07): build a stateless MCP server The server lab should model the protocol that new implementations actually ship. * feat(phase-13/08): build a stateless MCP client The client lab must negotiate every request without relying on session state. * feat(phase-13/09): teach current Streamable HTTP Transport examples need the current POST-only lifecycle and notification behavior. * feat(phase-13/10): teach stateless resources and prompts Resource and prompt discovery must reflect stateless cache and result contracts. * feat(phase-13/11): teach per-request sampling Sampling calls must carry current capabilities and stateless response semantics. * feat(phase-13/12): teach roots and elicitation retries Elicitation retries and roots handling need current capability and MRTR boundaries. * feat(phase-13/13): teach stateless MCP tasks Task storage and subscriptions must survive cross-instance stateless requests. * feat(phase-13/14): update MCP Apps contracts Apps learners need current bridge, subscription, and discovery boundaries. * feat(phase-13/15): update MCP threat boundaries Threat modeling must cover current routing and MRTR state boundaries. * feat(phase-13/16): update MCP OAuth contracts OAuth examples must bind issuers and resources while using current errors. * feat(phase-13/17): update gateway and registry contracts Registry admission must separate publication identity from runtime discovery. * feat(phase-13/18): teach production MCP authentication Production auth should implement real PKCE, CIMD, and resource-bound caching. * docs(phase-13/22): add a runnable skill quickstart Beginners need an exact repository-root path from bundle inspection to host use. * fix(phase-13/23): make the capstone stateless The ecosystem capstone must compose the same current contracts taught upstream. * docs(phase-13/24): clarify host discovery limits Learners should distinguish known context budgets from host fallback behavior. * docs(phase-13/26): clarify sandbox prerequisites The safety lab needs explicit prerequisites and a viable conceptual fallback. * docs(phase-13/27): add real-host release evidence A production claim should require installed-host evidence beyond deterministic fixtures. * docs(phase-16/02): update MCP legacy comparison The interoperability comparison should use the current stateless MCP lifecycle. * feat(phase-19/13): modernize the MCP registry capstone The production capstone must separate Registry publication from stateless runtime discovery. * docs(curriculum): index agent skills and stateless MCP Learners need one coherent route through the skills track and current MCP sequence. * feat(skills): add a focused agent skills learner path A dedicated route removes placement and navigation friction for focused learners. * feat(mcp): add production engineering track * fix(cert-11): harden MCP integration contract * fix(phase-11-14): classify MCP handler failures * fix(mcp-07): validate JSON-RPC request identifiers * fix(mcp-08): reuse strict response decoding * fix(mcp-09): harden HTTP transport boundaries * fix(mcp-11): isolate returned tool descriptors * fix(mcp-12): make continuation state single-use * fix(mcp-14): align lesson response metadata * fix(mcp-15): expire and consume continuation state * fix(mcp-16): bind OAuth enrollment and code exchange * fix(mcp-18): enforce redirect and code lifetimes * fix(mcp-23): validate task identifiers * fix(skills-24): clarify discovery boundaries * fix(skills-25): deny unknown invocation actors * fix(skills-26): validate approval policy shape * fix(mcp-28): terminate unsafe cursor pagination * fix(mcp-29): preserve completed request state * fix(mcp-30): require secure remote endpoints * fix(mcp-31): strengthen conformance checks * fix(agent-skills): align route prerequisites * fix(scripts): harden skill bundle installation * fix(site): validate learning and artifact boundaries * fix(course): address review edge cases * fix(mcp): tighten notification and redirect validation * fix(mcp): secure reproducible lesson state * fix(mcp): use required lesson header comments
79 lines
3.5 KiB
JSON
79 lines
3.5 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"lesson": "12-mcp-roots-and-elicitation",
|
|
"title": "Explicit Scope and Stateless Elicitation",
|
|
"questions": [
|
|
{
|
|
"stage": "pre",
|
|
"question": "What security guarantee did MCP Roots provide?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
"Informational workspace guidance, not authorization or sandboxing",
|
|
"Operating-system isolation for every server process",
|
|
"Proof that the caller owns every file below the root",
|
|
"Automatic prevention of symbolic-link escapes"
|
|
],
|
|
"correct": 0,
|
|
"explanation": "Roots were informational and are deprecated in 2026-07-28. Servers still need authorization, containment, and sandboxing."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"stage": "check",
|
|
"question": "What is the clearest modern replacement when workspace scope changes per tool call?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
"A hidden value stored under a transport session",
|
|
"A roots/list request sent after mutation",
|
|
"The self-reported clientInfo name",
|
|
"An explicit workspace URI argument that the server authorizes"
|
|
],
|
|
"correct": 3,
|
|
"explanation": "An explicit handle is visible and replayable, but the server must still authorize it for the authenticated principal."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"stage": "check",
|
|
"question": "How is form-mode elicitation delivered under MCP 2026-07-28?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
"As an HTTP redirect from server/discover",
|
|
"Through notifications/roots/list_changed",
|
|
"As a reverse request over an Mcp-Session-Id stream",
|
|
"Inside inputRequests on an input_required result"
|
|
],
|
|
"correct": 3,
|
|
"explanation": "MRTR embeds elicitation/create in inputRequests, then the client retries the original operation with inputResponses. Elicitation {} and elicitation.form support form mode; URL-only support returns -32021 with data.requiredCapabilities.elicitation.form."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"stage": "check",
|
|
"question": "Which value must never be collected through form-mode elicitation?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
"A boolean destructive-action confirmation",
|
|
"A note id selected from an enum",
|
|
"An API access token",
|
|
"A non-sensitive display preference"
|
|
],
|
|
"correct": 2,
|
|
"explanation": "Secrets and credentials must not transit the MCP client. Use a carefully bound URL-mode flow for sensitive external interactions."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"stage": "post",
|
|
"question": "A user declines a deletion elicitation. What is the safe result?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
"Delete because the model already selected the note",
|
|
"Treat the missing content as implicit consent",
|
|
"Return a complete non-error refusal outcome and preserve the note",
|
|
"Repeat the same dialog until the user accepts"
|
|
],
|
|
"correct": 2,
|
|
"explanation": "Decline is explicit refusal. It must not be converted into consent, error-loop prompting, or mutation."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"stage": "post",
|
|
"question": "Which design safely binds a destructive confirmation to what the user saw?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
"Base64-encode the chosen note id without a signature",
|
|
"Sign the principal, original argument digest, candidate ids, phase, and expiry, then re-check the live target",
|
|
"Use clientInfo as the authoritative user identity",
|
|
"Trust any note id returned with action accept"
|
|
],
|
|
"correct": 1,
|
|
"explanation": "Integrity-protected state prevents tampering. A shared atomic one-time nonce claim prevents replay, while final live checks address races before mutation."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|